Is there an idiom that supports the idea that “inflation is bad”?Searching for the idiom to express thisIdiom request for describing a situation in which people pay attention to their minor problems rather than the fundamental related ones?A proverb meaning, “he wanted to do a good thing for others, but he ended up being blamed/hurt”Is there an idiomatic expression for “look at things from the other person's perspective”?“I'll carve into your ribs and leave you crying for a kiss” (Tessa Violet - Haze) - literal or metaphoric?I wanted to know whether there are some similar English idioms for this Persian Idiom or not?(look at the definition)An expression meaning doing long and hard mental work resulting in extreme mental fatigueExceptions to the fixed word order in some idiomatic pairsAn idiom or phrase that means “as an act of solidarity”?Is there an idiom related to the idea of a “bad omen”?

How to pronounce "r" after a "g"?

Was there a contingency plan in place if Little Boy failed to detonate?

What is the best way for a skeleton to impersonate human without using magic?

Can I do brevets (long distance rides) on my hybrid bike? If yes, how to start?

International Code of Ethics for order of co-authors in research papers

Control variables and other independent variables

Why does the Earth follow an elliptical trajectory rather than a parabolic one?

Why use steam instead of just hot air?

Does Lawful Interception of 4G / the proposed 5G provide a back door for hackers as well?

How are Core iX names like Core i5, i7 related to Haswell, Ivy Bridge?

51% attack - apparently very easy? refering to CZ's "rollback btc chain" - How to make sure such corruptible scenario can never happen so easily?

What did Rocket give Hawkeye in "Avengers: Endgame"?

Why was the Ancient One so hesitant to teach Dr. Strange the art of sorcery?

Is there any evidence to support the claim that the United States was "suckered into WW1" by Zionists, made by Benjamin Freedman in his 1961 speech?

Would an 8% reduction in drag outweigh the weight addition from this custom CFD-tested winglet?

What can cause a never-frozen indoor copper drain pipe to crack?

find not returning expected files

On studying Computer Science vs. Software Engineering to become a proficient coder

Best species to breed to intelligence

Renting a house to a graduate student in my department

Was there ever any real use for a 6800-based Apple I?

Is there enough time to Planar Bind a creature conjured by a 1-hour-duration spell?

Why in a Ethernet LAN, a packet sniffer can obtain all packets sent over the LAN?

Was the Highlands Ranch shooting the 115th mass shooting in the US in 2019



Is there an idiom that supports the idea that “inflation is bad”?


Searching for the idiom to express thisIdiom request for describing a situation in which people pay attention to their minor problems rather than the fundamental related ones?A proverb meaning, “he wanted to do a good thing for others, but he ended up being blamed/hurt”Is there an idiomatic expression for “look at things from the other person's perspective”?“I'll carve into your ribs and leave you crying for a kiss” (Tessa Violet - Haze) - literal or metaphoric?I wanted to know whether there are some similar English idioms for this Persian Idiom or not?(look at the definition)An expression meaning doing long and hard mental work resulting in extreme mental fatigueExceptions to the fixed word order in some idiomatic pairsAn idiom or phrase that means “as an act of solidarity”?Is there an idiom related to the idea of a “bad omen”?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








7















I am thinking there could be an idiom that states that you can't just print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy? Can you think of an idiom like that? I am looking for an idiom I can use to begin my essay on inflation.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    It may help to find a country/context where there was hyperinflation, and look for idioms that developed there. I'm not aware of hyperinflation of a national currency ever being an issue in any english speaking country...though there are probably some examples of local/private currencies losing their value.

    – adam.r
    May 1 at 19:52






  • 2





    @adam.r -- The U.S. has had hyperinflation twice: During the American Revolution, and in the Confederate States of America. The Revolution's experience gave rise to the phrase, "Not worth a Continental." Also, Zimbabwe used to be a British colony; I don't know if it still considered to be an English-speaking country.

    – Jasper
    May 1 at 21:36












  • @Jasper. Thanks. The "stagflation" era may also be a good source.

    – adam.r
    May 2 at 2:07

















7















I am thinking there could be an idiom that states that you can't just print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy? Can you think of an idiom like that? I am looking for an idiom I can use to begin my essay on inflation.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    It may help to find a country/context where there was hyperinflation, and look for idioms that developed there. I'm not aware of hyperinflation of a national currency ever being an issue in any english speaking country...though there are probably some examples of local/private currencies losing their value.

    – adam.r
    May 1 at 19:52






  • 2





    @adam.r -- The U.S. has had hyperinflation twice: During the American Revolution, and in the Confederate States of America. The Revolution's experience gave rise to the phrase, "Not worth a Continental." Also, Zimbabwe used to be a British colony; I don't know if it still considered to be an English-speaking country.

    – Jasper
    May 1 at 21:36












  • @Jasper. Thanks. The "stagflation" era may also be a good source.

    – adam.r
    May 2 at 2:07













7












7








7


1






I am thinking there could be an idiom that states that you can't just print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy? Can you think of an idiom like that? I am looking for an idiom I can use to begin my essay on inflation.










share|improve this question
















I am thinking there could be an idiom that states that you can't just print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy? Can you think of an idiom like that? I am looking for an idiom I can use to begin my essay on inflation.







idiom-request






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 3 at 12:43









Davo

3,3871929




3,3871929










asked May 1 at 12:52









tefisjbtefisjb

502315




502315







  • 1





    It may help to find a country/context where there was hyperinflation, and look for idioms that developed there. I'm not aware of hyperinflation of a national currency ever being an issue in any english speaking country...though there are probably some examples of local/private currencies losing their value.

    – adam.r
    May 1 at 19:52






  • 2





    @adam.r -- The U.S. has had hyperinflation twice: During the American Revolution, and in the Confederate States of America. The Revolution's experience gave rise to the phrase, "Not worth a Continental." Also, Zimbabwe used to be a British colony; I don't know if it still considered to be an English-speaking country.

    – Jasper
    May 1 at 21:36












  • @Jasper. Thanks. The "stagflation" era may also be a good source.

    – adam.r
    May 2 at 2:07












  • 1





    It may help to find a country/context where there was hyperinflation, and look for idioms that developed there. I'm not aware of hyperinflation of a national currency ever being an issue in any english speaking country...though there are probably some examples of local/private currencies losing their value.

    – adam.r
    May 1 at 19:52






  • 2





    @adam.r -- The U.S. has had hyperinflation twice: During the American Revolution, and in the Confederate States of America. The Revolution's experience gave rise to the phrase, "Not worth a Continental." Also, Zimbabwe used to be a British colony; I don't know if it still considered to be an English-speaking country.

    – Jasper
    May 1 at 21:36












  • @Jasper. Thanks. The "stagflation" era may also be a good source.

    – adam.r
    May 2 at 2:07







1




1





It may help to find a country/context where there was hyperinflation, and look for idioms that developed there. I'm not aware of hyperinflation of a national currency ever being an issue in any english speaking country...though there are probably some examples of local/private currencies losing their value.

– adam.r
May 1 at 19:52





It may help to find a country/context where there was hyperinflation, and look for idioms that developed there. I'm not aware of hyperinflation of a national currency ever being an issue in any english speaking country...though there are probably some examples of local/private currencies losing their value.

– adam.r
May 1 at 19:52




2




2





@adam.r -- The U.S. has had hyperinflation twice: During the American Revolution, and in the Confederate States of America. The Revolution's experience gave rise to the phrase, "Not worth a Continental." Also, Zimbabwe used to be a British colony; I don't know if it still considered to be an English-speaking country.

– Jasper
May 1 at 21:36






@adam.r -- The U.S. has had hyperinflation twice: During the American Revolution, and in the Confederate States of America. The Revolution's experience gave rise to the phrase, "Not worth a Continental." Also, Zimbabwe used to be a British colony; I don't know if it still considered to be an English-speaking country.

– Jasper
May 1 at 21:36














@Jasper. Thanks. The "stagflation" era may also be a good source.

– adam.r
May 2 at 2:07





@Jasper. Thanks. The "stagflation" era may also be a good source.

– adam.r
May 2 at 2:07










9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes


















19














There's a saying (in American English, anyway) that is related but not quite exactly what you're looking for.




Money doesn't grow on trees.




That is, money has to come from something. It has to be earned. This same idea could be applied to inflation, still meaning that its value has to come from something, but the source could be gold reserves or GDP or something rather than labor hours.



If money did grow on trees, everyone would have lots of money, and therefore a unit of that money would be worth a lot less. The decrease in value is the general concept of inflation, although the "growing on trees" bit more directly relates to inflation caused by over-printing of currency and not other forms of value loss.






share|improve this answer




















  • 4





    @Lambie I made it clear that the original saying doesn't directly relate to inflation, and also wrote a large section explaining how it might be able to be applied to inflation. Can you clarify your comment?

    – CrescentSickle
    May 1 at 14:33






  • 3





    @Lamble Yes... but the saying isn't literal, nor meant to be taken literally. It's an idiom. It's not about where one finds it either, it's a statement that money itself isn't free, which is a concept that has parallels to inflation.

    – CrescentSickle
    May 1 at 14:44






  • 1





    This is identical in British English.

    – Chris Melville
    May 1 at 19:44






  • 1





    @ChrisMelville, and in Spanish.

    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    May 2 at 8:33






  • 4





    Do other people then point out that cotton is technically a shrub? And that some money is made of polymers? (-:

    – JdeBP
    May 2 at 11:38


















13














I'm going to challenge your premise a bit: the consensus among economists is that a small amount of inflation is actually important for a healthy economy, and it's only high inflation that's a problem.



Therefore, I'm going to propose the dose makes the poison. It's a phrase that originated in toxicology dating back to Paracelsus, but is often used in a more general sense to refer to the idea that many things are only dangerous in sufficiently high amounts.






share|improve this answer























  • Even a small amount of inflation is undesirable, but a small amount of deflation would be much worse. Since fluctuations are inevitable, aiming for a little inflation is pragmatic.

    – TKK
    May 2 at 20:08






  • 3





    @TKK That's not what many/most economists think. For example, the US has a target inflation that is above 0%. If it falls below that, the fed will attempt to increase the money supply. A small amount of inflation pushes investment.

    – JimmyJames
    May 2 at 21:36











  • A small amount of inflation means you devalue debt, and give an option for rebalancing 'earnings' - it's much easier to 'deflate' someone's wages, than it is to cut their pay.

    – Sobrique
    May 3 at 11:15


















6














An idiom that's related to inflation is saying something's "not worth the paper it's written/printed on." This usually refers to contracts where one or more parties don't intend to honor the agreement, making the contract itself worthless. It can also refer to currency, meaning the monetary value represented by a banknote is less than the value of the paper itself, like in Weimar Germany when people used low-denomination bills as paper for crafts and wallpaper.



This idiom doesn't quite fit the sense you're looking for in your essay, but it could be used in a sentence to that effect, e.g. "If a government keeps printing money to fix its economy, all it will get is money that's worth less than the paper it's printed on."



The Free Dictionary has an entry for this idiom, which says:




not worth the paper it's written on

Useless; unimportant; insignificant.

Meaningless or without authority; of no value




  • Oh, that memo is not worth the paper it's written on.

  • Due to the recent hyperinflation, the nation's currency is now not worth the
    paper it's written on.


  • Don't take a check from that guy. It's not worth the paper it's written on.






share|improve this answer
































    5














    "A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore" -- attributed to Yogi Berra. Technically, this is backwards -- we'd be concerned if a dime wasn't worth a nickel. "Not worth a dime" is often used to mean "of negligible value".



    A web search turns up a couple of song titles:
    "A dollar ain't worth a dime"
    and
    "A dollar ain't a dollar anymore"
    http://www.folkarchive.de/dollar.html
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-tvOb5nUiA






    share|improve this answer


















    • 2





      @Jasper A war nickel was only 35% silver, giving it a current melt value of about $0.82. A silver dime was 90% silver, with a current melt value of $1.05.

      – TKK
      May 2 at 20:11


















    3














    I don't know if there is an idiom that can "explain" what you are trying to, because the problem seems to me that people don't understand how inflation works, so they won't be able to relate it to anything. What you need is an analogy to help them understand it.



    Here's something I have come up with, bearing in mind I am not an economist:




    Imagine that you are the owner of a rare breed of animal. There are only a handful of this kind of animal in the entire world. How much do you think that animal would be worth? A lot, because it is so rare.



    Now imagine what would happen if somebody set up a breeding operation with two of the other remaining members of this animal species. Within a few years they manage to breed hundreds, which then in turn breed with each other and create thousands more. The more animals that breed, the more offspring they have, and the faster the population of these animals grows.



    How much is your animal worth now? Not much, because it isn't rare anymore.



    The country in which you live has a net worth that is not valued by the amount of paper money changing hands within it, but the value of its assets minus its liabilities. Every coin, every banknote represents a percentage of that net worth. Printing more money only devalues the money in your hand, because now each coin and note represents a smaller percentage of the net worth.



    Inflation is like the increasing population of your "rare" animal. If you don't want it to stop being valuable, it has to be controlled. Once it gets a little bit out of control, it spirals out of control further, and faster.




    I've thought of another, shorter one:




    Imagine your country's net worth is a cake. Every banknote represents a slice of that cake.



    The only way to get more slices of cake is to cut those slices smaller. Sure there are more slices to go around, but everybody is getting less cake.



    The only way for everyone to get more cake is to make the cake bigger. And if you want more people to get the same amount of cake, the cake has to grow proportionately to the increased amount of slicing.



    Printing more bank notes does not make the economy grow any more than slicing up the cake more makes the cake bigger. The only way to do that is for the country's net worth to grow - through trade, building assets, and reduction of the national debt.







    share|improve this answer

























    • Actually, the amount of national debt does not change the overall value of the economy, because the nation's debt is some debtor's asset. (National debt does change the money flow inside the economy, and may cause beneficial or detrimental incentives, but that aspect is off-topic.)

      – toolforger
      May 2 at 6:26


















    3














    Here's a great saying that might help.



    You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.



    Cheers/



    The silk purse is fixing the economy.



    The sow's ear is the problem, here, inflation.



    Specific quotes:



    1) "Inflation is like sin; every government denounces it and every government practices it”
    Frederick Leith-Ross



    2) “Inflation is when you pay fifteen dollars for the ten-dollar haircut you used to get for five dollars when you had hair.”
    Sam Ewing



    There are others but these are two that I liked.



    specific inflation quotes






    share|improve this answer




















    • 7





      It is a lovely expression, but I've always understood it to mean "you can't make a beautiful thing out of ugly materials"

      – jonathanjo
      May 1 at 14:31






    • 1





      Yes, fixing the economy is a beautiful thing,and you can't fix it by printing money.

      – Lambie
      May 1 at 14:33






    • 5





      @I didn't mean you can't apply it to the economy, only that it's quite a general expression.

      – jonathanjo
      May 1 at 14:35


















    2














    Robbing Peter To Pay Paul



    "You can't just rob Peter to pay Paul print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy."




    rob Peter to pay Paul

    To incur a debt in order to pay off another debt.

    – American Heritage, TFD







    share|improve this answer























    • The idiom robbing Peter to pay Paul may be related, but I'm upvoting for "print money out of thin air."

      – J.R.
      May 2 at 22:17












    • OP's words. At first I had it struck out. Then I thought mine better as an idiomatic title. Still, both are interchangeable.

      – Mazura
      May 2 at 23:41


















    0














    People used to say in the USA: "Solid as a dollar". This implies the dollar should be solid, which of course strongly implies that inflation is bad. As someone else said: "Imagine if a yard [or meter] were always shrinking, all the time. It would be very hard to measure things!"






    share|improve this answer






























      0














      People understand that one form of money printing, namely counterfeiting, is harmful and destructive, and in hard-money circles at least, one will see the notion expressed concisely as




      Inflation is legalized counterfeiting.




      In other words, the state or the state’s central bank creating money out of thin air is no less pernicious than when petty crooks do it.



      Similar is the statement




      The Fed has the monopoly on Monopoly money.




      The Fed refers to the Federal Reserve, the U.S. (and arguably global) central bank. Monopoly is a board game in which players buy and sell properties, starting out with colorful but clearly worthless bills that have value within the game only.



      When a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke stated in a 2002 speech




      … a money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman's famous 'helicopter drop' of money.




      so lampooning someone, as Bernanke was in parts of the American press, as Helicopter Ben is an insulting putdown of a ridiculous idea.



      Helicopter Ben




      More broadly about any bald assertion by a politician in plain contradiction to fact, someone might allude to the Hans Christian Andersen tale along the lines of




      The Emperor is wearing no clothes!




      or with biting irony as in




      The Emperor’s new clothes are magnificently stylish!




      An elected official, political appointee, or judge in flowing black robes running her mouth, spouting off, or talking out of his rear end (of which the last is both informal and slightly crude) does not make it true in any sense, and the connection to the Emperor’s new clothes states that people who play along are fools or sycophants.



      One might make the connection to inflation with




      The Emperor’s new printing press is a truly magical device! Why, who would have ever believed that all our problems could be solved by merely printing more money?







      share|improve this answer

























      • It's a lovely phrase, but not specifically about inflation. You can use it about anything where someone is stating a clear falsehood and it not being rejected by most people.

        – jonathanjo
        May 2 at 23:26









      protected by Community May 2 at 2:04



      Thank you for your interest in this question.
      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














      9 Answers
      9






      active

      oldest

      votes








      9 Answers
      9






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      19














      There's a saying (in American English, anyway) that is related but not quite exactly what you're looking for.




      Money doesn't grow on trees.




      That is, money has to come from something. It has to be earned. This same idea could be applied to inflation, still meaning that its value has to come from something, but the source could be gold reserves or GDP or something rather than labor hours.



      If money did grow on trees, everyone would have lots of money, and therefore a unit of that money would be worth a lot less. The decrease in value is the general concept of inflation, although the "growing on trees" bit more directly relates to inflation caused by over-printing of currency and not other forms of value loss.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 4





        @Lambie I made it clear that the original saying doesn't directly relate to inflation, and also wrote a large section explaining how it might be able to be applied to inflation. Can you clarify your comment?

        – CrescentSickle
        May 1 at 14:33






      • 3





        @Lamble Yes... but the saying isn't literal, nor meant to be taken literally. It's an idiom. It's not about where one finds it either, it's a statement that money itself isn't free, which is a concept that has parallels to inflation.

        – CrescentSickle
        May 1 at 14:44






      • 1





        This is identical in British English.

        – Chris Melville
        May 1 at 19:44






      • 1





        @ChrisMelville, and in Spanish.

        – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
        May 2 at 8:33






      • 4





        Do other people then point out that cotton is technically a shrub? And that some money is made of polymers? (-:

        – JdeBP
        May 2 at 11:38















      19














      There's a saying (in American English, anyway) that is related but not quite exactly what you're looking for.




      Money doesn't grow on trees.




      That is, money has to come from something. It has to be earned. This same idea could be applied to inflation, still meaning that its value has to come from something, but the source could be gold reserves or GDP or something rather than labor hours.



      If money did grow on trees, everyone would have lots of money, and therefore a unit of that money would be worth a lot less. The decrease in value is the general concept of inflation, although the "growing on trees" bit more directly relates to inflation caused by over-printing of currency and not other forms of value loss.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 4





        @Lambie I made it clear that the original saying doesn't directly relate to inflation, and also wrote a large section explaining how it might be able to be applied to inflation. Can you clarify your comment?

        – CrescentSickle
        May 1 at 14:33






      • 3





        @Lamble Yes... but the saying isn't literal, nor meant to be taken literally. It's an idiom. It's not about where one finds it either, it's a statement that money itself isn't free, which is a concept that has parallels to inflation.

        – CrescentSickle
        May 1 at 14:44






      • 1





        This is identical in British English.

        – Chris Melville
        May 1 at 19:44






      • 1





        @ChrisMelville, and in Spanish.

        – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
        May 2 at 8:33






      • 4





        Do other people then point out that cotton is technically a shrub? And that some money is made of polymers? (-:

        – JdeBP
        May 2 at 11:38













      19












      19








      19







      There's a saying (in American English, anyway) that is related but not quite exactly what you're looking for.




      Money doesn't grow on trees.




      That is, money has to come from something. It has to be earned. This same idea could be applied to inflation, still meaning that its value has to come from something, but the source could be gold reserves or GDP or something rather than labor hours.



      If money did grow on trees, everyone would have lots of money, and therefore a unit of that money would be worth a lot less. The decrease in value is the general concept of inflation, although the "growing on trees" bit more directly relates to inflation caused by over-printing of currency and not other forms of value loss.






      share|improve this answer















      There's a saying (in American English, anyway) that is related but not quite exactly what you're looking for.




      Money doesn't grow on trees.




      That is, money has to come from something. It has to be earned. This same idea could be applied to inflation, still meaning that its value has to come from something, but the source could be gold reserves or GDP or something rather than labor hours.



      If money did grow on trees, everyone would have lots of money, and therefore a unit of that money would be worth a lot less. The decrease in value is the general concept of inflation, although the "growing on trees" bit more directly relates to inflation caused by over-printing of currency and not other forms of value loss.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited May 1 at 15:04

























      answered May 1 at 14:10









      CrescentSickleCrescentSickle

      1,70417




      1,70417







      • 4





        @Lambie I made it clear that the original saying doesn't directly relate to inflation, and also wrote a large section explaining how it might be able to be applied to inflation. Can you clarify your comment?

        – CrescentSickle
        May 1 at 14:33






      • 3





        @Lamble Yes... but the saying isn't literal, nor meant to be taken literally. It's an idiom. It's not about where one finds it either, it's a statement that money itself isn't free, which is a concept that has parallels to inflation.

        – CrescentSickle
        May 1 at 14:44






      • 1





        This is identical in British English.

        – Chris Melville
        May 1 at 19:44






      • 1





        @ChrisMelville, and in Spanish.

        – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
        May 2 at 8:33






      • 4





        Do other people then point out that cotton is technically a shrub? And that some money is made of polymers? (-:

        – JdeBP
        May 2 at 11:38












      • 4





        @Lambie I made it clear that the original saying doesn't directly relate to inflation, and also wrote a large section explaining how it might be able to be applied to inflation. Can you clarify your comment?

        – CrescentSickle
        May 1 at 14:33






      • 3





        @Lamble Yes... but the saying isn't literal, nor meant to be taken literally. It's an idiom. It's not about where one finds it either, it's a statement that money itself isn't free, which is a concept that has parallels to inflation.

        – CrescentSickle
        May 1 at 14:44






      • 1





        This is identical in British English.

        – Chris Melville
        May 1 at 19:44






      • 1





        @ChrisMelville, and in Spanish.

        – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
        May 2 at 8:33






      • 4





        Do other people then point out that cotton is technically a shrub? And that some money is made of polymers? (-:

        – JdeBP
        May 2 at 11:38







      4




      4





      @Lambie I made it clear that the original saying doesn't directly relate to inflation, and also wrote a large section explaining how it might be able to be applied to inflation. Can you clarify your comment?

      – CrescentSickle
      May 1 at 14:33





      @Lambie I made it clear that the original saying doesn't directly relate to inflation, and also wrote a large section explaining how it might be able to be applied to inflation. Can you clarify your comment?

      – CrescentSickle
      May 1 at 14:33




      3




      3





      @Lamble Yes... but the saying isn't literal, nor meant to be taken literally. It's an idiom. It's not about where one finds it either, it's a statement that money itself isn't free, which is a concept that has parallels to inflation.

      – CrescentSickle
      May 1 at 14:44





      @Lamble Yes... but the saying isn't literal, nor meant to be taken literally. It's an idiom. It's not about where one finds it either, it's a statement that money itself isn't free, which is a concept that has parallels to inflation.

      – CrescentSickle
      May 1 at 14:44




      1




      1





      This is identical in British English.

      – Chris Melville
      May 1 at 19:44





      This is identical in British English.

      – Chris Melville
      May 1 at 19:44




      1




      1





      @ChrisMelville, and in Spanish.

      – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
      May 2 at 8:33





      @ChrisMelville, and in Spanish.

      – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
      May 2 at 8:33




      4




      4





      Do other people then point out that cotton is technically a shrub? And that some money is made of polymers? (-:

      – JdeBP
      May 2 at 11:38





      Do other people then point out that cotton is technically a shrub? And that some money is made of polymers? (-:

      – JdeBP
      May 2 at 11:38













      13














      I'm going to challenge your premise a bit: the consensus among economists is that a small amount of inflation is actually important for a healthy economy, and it's only high inflation that's a problem.



      Therefore, I'm going to propose the dose makes the poison. It's a phrase that originated in toxicology dating back to Paracelsus, but is often used in a more general sense to refer to the idea that many things are only dangerous in sufficiently high amounts.






      share|improve this answer























      • Even a small amount of inflation is undesirable, but a small amount of deflation would be much worse. Since fluctuations are inevitable, aiming for a little inflation is pragmatic.

        – TKK
        May 2 at 20:08






      • 3





        @TKK That's not what many/most economists think. For example, the US has a target inflation that is above 0%. If it falls below that, the fed will attempt to increase the money supply. A small amount of inflation pushes investment.

        – JimmyJames
        May 2 at 21:36











      • A small amount of inflation means you devalue debt, and give an option for rebalancing 'earnings' - it's much easier to 'deflate' someone's wages, than it is to cut their pay.

        – Sobrique
        May 3 at 11:15















      13














      I'm going to challenge your premise a bit: the consensus among economists is that a small amount of inflation is actually important for a healthy economy, and it's only high inflation that's a problem.



      Therefore, I'm going to propose the dose makes the poison. It's a phrase that originated in toxicology dating back to Paracelsus, but is often used in a more general sense to refer to the idea that many things are only dangerous in sufficiently high amounts.






      share|improve this answer























      • Even a small amount of inflation is undesirable, but a small amount of deflation would be much worse. Since fluctuations are inevitable, aiming for a little inflation is pragmatic.

        – TKK
        May 2 at 20:08






      • 3





        @TKK That's not what many/most economists think. For example, the US has a target inflation that is above 0%. If it falls below that, the fed will attempt to increase the money supply. A small amount of inflation pushes investment.

        – JimmyJames
        May 2 at 21:36











      • A small amount of inflation means you devalue debt, and give an option for rebalancing 'earnings' - it's much easier to 'deflate' someone's wages, than it is to cut their pay.

        – Sobrique
        May 3 at 11:15













      13












      13








      13







      I'm going to challenge your premise a bit: the consensus among economists is that a small amount of inflation is actually important for a healthy economy, and it's only high inflation that's a problem.



      Therefore, I'm going to propose the dose makes the poison. It's a phrase that originated in toxicology dating back to Paracelsus, but is often used in a more general sense to refer to the idea that many things are only dangerous in sufficiently high amounts.






      share|improve this answer













      I'm going to challenge your premise a bit: the consensus among economists is that a small amount of inflation is actually important for a healthy economy, and it's only high inflation that's a problem.



      Therefore, I'm going to propose the dose makes the poison. It's a phrase that originated in toxicology dating back to Paracelsus, but is often used in a more general sense to refer to the idea that many things are only dangerous in sufficiently high amounts.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered May 1 at 17:38









      John MontgomeryJohn Montgomery

      2315




      2315












      • Even a small amount of inflation is undesirable, but a small amount of deflation would be much worse. Since fluctuations are inevitable, aiming for a little inflation is pragmatic.

        – TKK
        May 2 at 20:08






      • 3





        @TKK That's not what many/most economists think. For example, the US has a target inflation that is above 0%. If it falls below that, the fed will attempt to increase the money supply. A small amount of inflation pushes investment.

        – JimmyJames
        May 2 at 21:36











      • A small amount of inflation means you devalue debt, and give an option for rebalancing 'earnings' - it's much easier to 'deflate' someone's wages, than it is to cut their pay.

        – Sobrique
        May 3 at 11:15

















      • Even a small amount of inflation is undesirable, but a small amount of deflation would be much worse. Since fluctuations are inevitable, aiming for a little inflation is pragmatic.

        – TKK
        May 2 at 20:08






      • 3





        @TKK That's not what many/most economists think. For example, the US has a target inflation that is above 0%. If it falls below that, the fed will attempt to increase the money supply. A small amount of inflation pushes investment.

        – JimmyJames
        May 2 at 21:36











      • A small amount of inflation means you devalue debt, and give an option for rebalancing 'earnings' - it's much easier to 'deflate' someone's wages, than it is to cut their pay.

        – Sobrique
        May 3 at 11:15
















      Even a small amount of inflation is undesirable, but a small amount of deflation would be much worse. Since fluctuations are inevitable, aiming for a little inflation is pragmatic.

      – TKK
      May 2 at 20:08





      Even a small amount of inflation is undesirable, but a small amount of deflation would be much worse. Since fluctuations are inevitable, aiming for a little inflation is pragmatic.

      – TKK
      May 2 at 20:08




      3




      3





      @TKK That's not what many/most economists think. For example, the US has a target inflation that is above 0%. If it falls below that, the fed will attempt to increase the money supply. A small amount of inflation pushes investment.

      – JimmyJames
      May 2 at 21:36





      @TKK That's not what many/most economists think. For example, the US has a target inflation that is above 0%. If it falls below that, the fed will attempt to increase the money supply. A small amount of inflation pushes investment.

      – JimmyJames
      May 2 at 21:36













      A small amount of inflation means you devalue debt, and give an option for rebalancing 'earnings' - it's much easier to 'deflate' someone's wages, than it is to cut their pay.

      – Sobrique
      May 3 at 11:15





      A small amount of inflation means you devalue debt, and give an option for rebalancing 'earnings' - it's much easier to 'deflate' someone's wages, than it is to cut their pay.

      – Sobrique
      May 3 at 11:15











      6














      An idiom that's related to inflation is saying something's "not worth the paper it's written/printed on." This usually refers to contracts where one or more parties don't intend to honor the agreement, making the contract itself worthless. It can also refer to currency, meaning the monetary value represented by a banknote is less than the value of the paper itself, like in Weimar Germany when people used low-denomination bills as paper for crafts and wallpaper.



      This idiom doesn't quite fit the sense you're looking for in your essay, but it could be used in a sentence to that effect, e.g. "If a government keeps printing money to fix its economy, all it will get is money that's worth less than the paper it's printed on."



      The Free Dictionary has an entry for this idiom, which says:




      not worth the paper it's written on

      Useless; unimportant; insignificant.

      Meaningless or without authority; of no value




      • Oh, that memo is not worth the paper it's written on.

      • Due to the recent hyperinflation, the nation's currency is now not worth the
        paper it's written on.


      • Don't take a check from that guy. It's not worth the paper it's written on.






      share|improve this answer





























        6














        An idiom that's related to inflation is saying something's "not worth the paper it's written/printed on." This usually refers to contracts where one or more parties don't intend to honor the agreement, making the contract itself worthless. It can also refer to currency, meaning the monetary value represented by a banknote is less than the value of the paper itself, like in Weimar Germany when people used low-denomination bills as paper for crafts and wallpaper.



        This idiom doesn't quite fit the sense you're looking for in your essay, but it could be used in a sentence to that effect, e.g. "If a government keeps printing money to fix its economy, all it will get is money that's worth less than the paper it's printed on."



        The Free Dictionary has an entry for this idiom, which says:




        not worth the paper it's written on

        Useless; unimportant; insignificant.

        Meaningless or without authority; of no value




        • Oh, that memo is not worth the paper it's written on.

        • Due to the recent hyperinflation, the nation's currency is now not worth the
          paper it's written on.


        • Don't take a check from that guy. It's not worth the paper it's written on.






        share|improve this answer



























          6












          6








          6







          An idiom that's related to inflation is saying something's "not worth the paper it's written/printed on." This usually refers to contracts where one or more parties don't intend to honor the agreement, making the contract itself worthless. It can also refer to currency, meaning the monetary value represented by a banknote is less than the value of the paper itself, like in Weimar Germany when people used low-denomination bills as paper for crafts and wallpaper.



          This idiom doesn't quite fit the sense you're looking for in your essay, but it could be used in a sentence to that effect, e.g. "If a government keeps printing money to fix its economy, all it will get is money that's worth less than the paper it's printed on."



          The Free Dictionary has an entry for this idiom, which says:




          not worth the paper it's written on

          Useless; unimportant; insignificant.

          Meaningless or without authority; of no value




          • Oh, that memo is not worth the paper it's written on.

          • Due to the recent hyperinflation, the nation's currency is now not worth the
            paper it's written on.


          • Don't take a check from that guy. It's not worth the paper it's written on.






          share|improve this answer















          An idiom that's related to inflation is saying something's "not worth the paper it's written/printed on." This usually refers to contracts where one or more parties don't intend to honor the agreement, making the contract itself worthless. It can also refer to currency, meaning the monetary value represented by a banknote is less than the value of the paper itself, like in Weimar Germany when people used low-denomination bills as paper for crafts and wallpaper.



          This idiom doesn't quite fit the sense you're looking for in your essay, but it could be used in a sentence to that effect, e.g. "If a government keeps printing money to fix its economy, all it will get is money that's worth less than the paper it's printed on."



          The Free Dictionary has an entry for this idiom, which says:




          not worth the paper it's written on

          Useless; unimportant; insignificant.

          Meaningless or without authority; of no value




          • Oh, that memo is not worth the paper it's written on.

          • Due to the recent hyperinflation, the nation's currency is now not worth the
            paper it's written on.


          • Don't take a check from that guy. It's not worth the paper it's written on.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 2 at 22:15









          J.R.

          101k8129250




          101k8129250










          answered May 1 at 21:19









          ShmeekuShmeeku

          1911




          1911





















              5














              "A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore" -- attributed to Yogi Berra. Technically, this is backwards -- we'd be concerned if a dime wasn't worth a nickel. "Not worth a dime" is often used to mean "of negligible value".



              A web search turns up a couple of song titles:
              "A dollar ain't worth a dime"
              and
              "A dollar ain't a dollar anymore"
              http://www.folkarchive.de/dollar.html
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-tvOb5nUiA






              share|improve this answer


















              • 2





                @Jasper A war nickel was only 35% silver, giving it a current melt value of about $0.82. A silver dime was 90% silver, with a current melt value of $1.05.

                – TKK
                May 2 at 20:11















              5














              "A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore" -- attributed to Yogi Berra. Technically, this is backwards -- we'd be concerned if a dime wasn't worth a nickel. "Not worth a dime" is often used to mean "of negligible value".



              A web search turns up a couple of song titles:
              "A dollar ain't worth a dime"
              and
              "A dollar ain't a dollar anymore"
              http://www.folkarchive.de/dollar.html
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-tvOb5nUiA






              share|improve this answer


















              • 2





                @Jasper A war nickel was only 35% silver, giving it a current melt value of about $0.82. A silver dime was 90% silver, with a current melt value of $1.05.

                – TKK
                May 2 at 20:11













              5












              5








              5







              "A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore" -- attributed to Yogi Berra. Technically, this is backwards -- we'd be concerned if a dime wasn't worth a nickel. "Not worth a dime" is often used to mean "of negligible value".



              A web search turns up a couple of song titles:
              "A dollar ain't worth a dime"
              and
              "A dollar ain't a dollar anymore"
              http://www.folkarchive.de/dollar.html
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-tvOb5nUiA






              share|improve this answer













              "A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore" -- attributed to Yogi Berra. Technically, this is backwards -- we'd be concerned if a dime wasn't worth a nickel. "Not worth a dime" is often used to mean "of negligible value".



              A web search turns up a couple of song titles:
              "A dollar ain't worth a dime"
              and
              "A dollar ain't a dollar anymore"
              http://www.folkarchive.de/dollar.html
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-tvOb5nUiA







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered May 2 at 2:04









              adam.radam.r

              1513




              1513







              • 2





                @Jasper A war nickel was only 35% silver, giving it a current melt value of about $0.82. A silver dime was 90% silver, with a current melt value of $1.05.

                – TKK
                May 2 at 20:11












              • 2





                @Jasper A war nickel was only 35% silver, giving it a current melt value of about $0.82. A silver dime was 90% silver, with a current melt value of $1.05.

                – TKK
                May 2 at 20:11







              2




              2





              @Jasper A war nickel was only 35% silver, giving it a current melt value of about $0.82. A silver dime was 90% silver, with a current melt value of $1.05.

              – TKK
              May 2 at 20:11





              @Jasper A war nickel was only 35% silver, giving it a current melt value of about $0.82. A silver dime was 90% silver, with a current melt value of $1.05.

              – TKK
              May 2 at 20:11











              3














              I don't know if there is an idiom that can "explain" what you are trying to, because the problem seems to me that people don't understand how inflation works, so they won't be able to relate it to anything. What you need is an analogy to help them understand it.



              Here's something I have come up with, bearing in mind I am not an economist:




              Imagine that you are the owner of a rare breed of animal. There are only a handful of this kind of animal in the entire world. How much do you think that animal would be worth? A lot, because it is so rare.



              Now imagine what would happen if somebody set up a breeding operation with two of the other remaining members of this animal species. Within a few years they manage to breed hundreds, which then in turn breed with each other and create thousands more. The more animals that breed, the more offspring they have, and the faster the population of these animals grows.



              How much is your animal worth now? Not much, because it isn't rare anymore.



              The country in which you live has a net worth that is not valued by the amount of paper money changing hands within it, but the value of its assets minus its liabilities. Every coin, every banknote represents a percentage of that net worth. Printing more money only devalues the money in your hand, because now each coin and note represents a smaller percentage of the net worth.



              Inflation is like the increasing population of your "rare" animal. If you don't want it to stop being valuable, it has to be controlled. Once it gets a little bit out of control, it spirals out of control further, and faster.




              I've thought of another, shorter one:




              Imagine your country's net worth is a cake. Every banknote represents a slice of that cake.



              The only way to get more slices of cake is to cut those slices smaller. Sure there are more slices to go around, but everybody is getting less cake.



              The only way for everyone to get more cake is to make the cake bigger. And if you want more people to get the same amount of cake, the cake has to grow proportionately to the increased amount of slicing.



              Printing more bank notes does not make the economy grow any more than slicing up the cake more makes the cake bigger. The only way to do that is for the country's net worth to grow - through trade, building assets, and reduction of the national debt.







              share|improve this answer

























              • Actually, the amount of national debt does not change the overall value of the economy, because the nation's debt is some debtor's asset. (National debt does change the money flow inside the economy, and may cause beneficial or detrimental incentives, but that aspect is off-topic.)

                – toolforger
                May 2 at 6:26















              3














              I don't know if there is an idiom that can "explain" what you are trying to, because the problem seems to me that people don't understand how inflation works, so they won't be able to relate it to anything. What you need is an analogy to help them understand it.



              Here's something I have come up with, bearing in mind I am not an economist:




              Imagine that you are the owner of a rare breed of animal. There are only a handful of this kind of animal in the entire world. How much do you think that animal would be worth? A lot, because it is so rare.



              Now imagine what would happen if somebody set up a breeding operation with two of the other remaining members of this animal species. Within a few years they manage to breed hundreds, which then in turn breed with each other and create thousands more. The more animals that breed, the more offspring they have, and the faster the population of these animals grows.



              How much is your animal worth now? Not much, because it isn't rare anymore.



              The country in which you live has a net worth that is not valued by the amount of paper money changing hands within it, but the value of its assets minus its liabilities. Every coin, every banknote represents a percentage of that net worth. Printing more money only devalues the money in your hand, because now each coin and note represents a smaller percentage of the net worth.



              Inflation is like the increasing population of your "rare" animal. If you don't want it to stop being valuable, it has to be controlled. Once it gets a little bit out of control, it spirals out of control further, and faster.




              I've thought of another, shorter one:




              Imagine your country's net worth is a cake. Every banknote represents a slice of that cake.



              The only way to get more slices of cake is to cut those slices smaller. Sure there are more slices to go around, but everybody is getting less cake.



              The only way for everyone to get more cake is to make the cake bigger. And if you want more people to get the same amount of cake, the cake has to grow proportionately to the increased amount of slicing.



              Printing more bank notes does not make the economy grow any more than slicing up the cake more makes the cake bigger. The only way to do that is for the country's net worth to grow - through trade, building assets, and reduction of the national debt.







              share|improve this answer

























              • Actually, the amount of national debt does not change the overall value of the economy, because the nation's debt is some debtor's asset. (National debt does change the money flow inside the economy, and may cause beneficial or detrimental incentives, but that aspect is off-topic.)

                – toolforger
                May 2 at 6:26













              3












              3








              3







              I don't know if there is an idiom that can "explain" what you are trying to, because the problem seems to me that people don't understand how inflation works, so they won't be able to relate it to anything. What you need is an analogy to help them understand it.



              Here's something I have come up with, bearing in mind I am not an economist:




              Imagine that you are the owner of a rare breed of animal. There are only a handful of this kind of animal in the entire world. How much do you think that animal would be worth? A lot, because it is so rare.



              Now imagine what would happen if somebody set up a breeding operation with two of the other remaining members of this animal species. Within a few years they manage to breed hundreds, which then in turn breed with each other and create thousands more. The more animals that breed, the more offspring they have, and the faster the population of these animals grows.



              How much is your animal worth now? Not much, because it isn't rare anymore.



              The country in which you live has a net worth that is not valued by the amount of paper money changing hands within it, but the value of its assets minus its liabilities. Every coin, every banknote represents a percentage of that net worth. Printing more money only devalues the money in your hand, because now each coin and note represents a smaller percentage of the net worth.



              Inflation is like the increasing population of your "rare" animal. If you don't want it to stop being valuable, it has to be controlled. Once it gets a little bit out of control, it spirals out of control further, and faster.




              I've thought of another, shorter one:




              Imagine your country's net worth is a cake. Every banknote represents a slice of that cake.



              The only way to get more slices of cake is to cut those slices smaller. Sure there are more slices to go around, but everybody is getting less cake.



              The only way for everyone to get more cake is to make the cake bigger. And if you want more people to get the same amount of cake, the cake has to grow proportionately to the increased amount of slicing.



              Printing more bank notes does not make the economy grow any more than slicing up the cake more makes the cake bigger. The only way to do that is for the country's net worth to grow - through trade, building assets, and reduction of the national debt.







              share|improve this answer















              I don't know if there is an idiom that can "explain" what you are trying to, because the problem seems to me that people don't understand how inflation works, so they won't be able to relate it to anything. What you need is an analogy to help them understand it.



              Here's something I have come up with, bearing in mind I am not an economist:




              Imagine that you are the owner of a rare breed of animal. There are only a handful of this kind of animal in the entire world. How much do you think that animal would be worth? A lot, because it is so rare.



              Now imagine what would happen if somebody set up a breeding operation with two of the other remaining members of this animal species. Within a few years they manage to breed hundreds, which then in turn breed with each other and create thousands more. The more animals that breed, the more offspring they have, and the faster the population of these animals grows.



              How much is your animal worth now? Not much, because it isn't rare anymore.



              The country in which you live has a net worth that is not valued by the amount of paper money changing hands within it, but the value of its assets minus its liabilities. Every coin, every banknote represents a percentage of that net worth. Printing more money only devalues the money in your hand, because now each coin and note represents a smaller percentage of the net worth.



              Inflation is like the increasing population of your "rare" animal. If you don't want it to stop being valuable, it has to be controlled. Once it gets a little bit out of control, it spirals out of control further, and faster.




              I've thought of another, shorter one:




              Imagine your country's net worth is a cake. Every banknote represents a slice of that cake.



              The only way to get more slices of cake is to cut those slices smaller. Sure there are more slices to go around, but everybody is getting less cake.



              The only way for everyone to get more cake is to make the cake bigger. And if you want more people to get the same amount of cake, the cake has to grow proportionately to the increased amount of slicing.



              Printing more bank notes does not make the economy grow any more than slicing up the cake more makes the cake bigger. The only way to do that is for the country's net worth to grow - through trade, building assets, and reduction of the national debt.








              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited May 1 at 14:31

























              answered May 1 at 14:23









              AstralbeeAstralbee

              16.4k1757




              16.4k1757












              • Actually, the amount of national debt does not change the overall value of the economy, because the nation's debt is some debtor's asset. (National debt does change the money flow inside the economy, and may cause beneficial or detrimental incentives, but that aspect is off-topic.)

                – toolforger
                May 2 at 6:26

















              • Actually, the amount of national debt does not change the overall value of the economy, because the nation's debt is some debtor's asset. (National debt does change the money flow inside the economy, and may cause beneficial or detrimental incentives, but that aspect is off-topic.)

                – toolforger
                May 2 at 6:26
















              Actually, the amount of national debt does not change the overall value of the economy, because the nation's debt is some debtor's asset. (National debt does change the money flow inside the economy, and may cause beneficial or detrimental incentives, but that aspect is off-topic.)

              – toolforger
              May 2 at 6:26





              Actually, the amount of national debt does not change the overall value of the economy, because the nation's debt is some debtor's asset. (National debt does change the money flow inside the economy, and may cause beneficial or detrimental incentives, but that aspect is off-topic.)

              – toolforger
              May 2 at 6:26











              3














              Here's a great saying that might help.



              You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.



              Cheers/



              The silk purse is fixing the economy.



              The sow's ear is the problem, here, inflation.



              Specific quotes:



              1) "Inflation is like sin; every government denounces it and every government practices it”
              Frederick Leith-Ross



              2) “Inflation is when you pay fifteen dollars for the ten-dollar haircut you used to get for five dollars when you had hair.”
              Sam Ewing



              There are others but these are two that I liked.



              specific inflation quotes






              share|improve this answer




















              • 7





                It is a lovely expression, but I've always understood it to mean "you can't make a beautiful thing out of ugly materials"

                – jonathanjo
                May 1 at 14:31






              • 1





                Yes, fixing the economy is a beautiful thing,and you can't fix it by printing money.

                – Lambie
                May 1 at 14:33






              • 5





                @I didn't mean you can't apply it to the economy, only that it's quite a general expression.

                – jonathanjo
                May 1 at 14:35















              3














              Here's a great saying that might help.



              You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.



              Cheers/



              The silk purse is fixing the economy.



              The sow's ear is the problem, here, inflation.



              Specific quotes:



              1) "Inflation is like sin; every government denounces it and every government practices it”
              Frederick Leith-Ross



              2) “Inflation is when you pay fifteen dollars for the ten-dollar haircut you used to get for five dollars when you had hair.”
              Sam Ewing



              There are others but these are two that I liked.



              specific inflation quotes






              share|improve this answer




















              • 7





                It is a lovely expression, but I've always understood it to mean "you can't make a beautiful thing out of ugly materials"

                – jonathanjo
                May 1 at 14:31






              • 1





                Yes, fixing the economy is a beautiful thing,and you can't fix it by printing money.

                – Lambie
                May 1 at 14:33






              • 5





                @I didn't mean you can't apply it to the economy, only that it's quite a general expression.

                – jonathanjo
                May 1 at 14:35













              3












              3








              3







              Here's a great saying that might help.



              You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.



              Cheers/



              The silk purse is fixing the economy.



              The sow's ear is the problem, here, inflation.



              Specific quotes:



              1) "Inflation is like sin; every government denounces it and every government practices it”
              Frederick Leith-Ross



              2) “Inflation is when you pay fifteen dollars for the ten-dollar haircut you used to get for five dollars when you had hair.”
              Sam Ewing



              There are others but these are two that I liked.



              specific inflation quotes






              share|improve this answer















              Here's a great saying that might help.



              You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.



              Cheers/



              The silk purse is fixing the economy.



              The sow's ear is the problem, here, inflation.



              Specific quotes:



              1) "Inflation is like sin; every government denounces it and every government practices it”
              Frederick Leith-Ross



              2) “Inflation is when you pay fifteen dollars for the ten-dollar haircut you used to get for five dollars when you had hair.”
              Sam Ewing



              There are others but these are two that I liked.



              specific inflation quotes







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited May 1 at 14:32

























              answered May 1 at 13:00









              LambieLambie

              18.3k1641




              18.3k1641







              • 7





                It is a lovely expression, but I've always understood it to mean "you can't make a beautiful thing out of ugly materials"

                – jonathanjo
                May 1 at 14:31






              • 1





                Yes, fixing the economy is a beautiful thing,and you can't fix it by printing money.

                – Lambie
                May 1 at 14:33






              • 5





                @I didn't mean you can't apply it to the economy, only that it's quite a general expression.

                – jonathanjo
                May 1 at 14:35












              • 7





                It is a lovely expression, but I've always understood it to mean "you can't make a beautiful thing out of ugly materials"

                – jonathanjo
                May 1 at 14:31






              • 1





                Yes, fixing the economy is a beautiful thing,and you can't fix it by printing money.

                – Lambie
                May 1 at 14:33






              • 5





                @I didn't mean you can't apply it to the economy, only that it's quite a general expression.

                – jonathanjo
                May 1 at 14:35







              7




              7





              It is a lovely expression, but I've always understood it to mean "you can't make a beautiful thing out of ugly materials"

              – jonathanjo
              May 1 at 14:31





              It is a lovely expression, but I've always understood it to mean "you can't make a beautiful thing out of ugly materials"

              – jonathanjo
              May 1 at 14:31




              1




              1





              Yes, fixing the economy is a beautiful thing,and you can't fix it by printing money.

              – Lambie
              May 1 at 14:33





              Yes, fixing the economy is a beautiful thing,and you can't fix it by printing money.

              – Lambie
              May 1 at 14:33




              5




              5





              @I didn't mean you can't apply it to the economy, only that it's quite a general expression.

              – jonathanjo
              May 1 at 14:35





              @I didn't mean you can't apply it to the economy, only that it's quite a general expression.

              – jonathanjo
              May 1 at 14:35











              2














              Robbing Peter To Pay Paul



              "You can't just rob Peter to pay Paul print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy."




              rob Peter to pay Paul

              To incur a debt in order to pay off another debt.

              – American Heritage, TFD







              share|improve this answer























              • The idiom robbing Peter to pay Paul may be related, but I'm upvoting for "print money out of thin air."

                – J.R.
                May 2 at 22:17












              • OP's words. At first I had it struck out. Then I thought mine better as an idiomatic title. Still, both are interchangeable.

                – Mazura
                May 2 at 23:41















              2














              Robbing Peter To Pay Paul



              "You can't just rob Peter to pay Paul print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy."




              rob Peter to pay Paul

              To incur a debt in order to pay off another debt.

              – American Heritage, TFD







              share|improve this answer























              • The idiom robbing Peter to pay Paul may be related, but I'm upvoting for "print money out of thin air."

                – J.R.
                May 2 at 22:17












              • OP's words. At first I had it struck out. Then I thought mine better as an idiomatic title. Still, both are interchangeable.

                – Mazura
                May 2 at 23:41













              2












              2








              2







              Robbing Peter To Pay Paul



              "You can't just rob Peter to pay Paul print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy."




              rob Peter to pay Paul

              To incur a debt in order to pay off another debt.

              – American Heritage, TFD







              share|improve this answer













              Robbing Peter To Pay Paul



              "You can't just rob Peter to pay Paul print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy."




              rob Peter to pay Paul

              To incur a debt in order to pay off another debt.

              – American Heritage, TFD








              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered May 2 at 5:20









              MazuraMazura

              24417




              24417












              • The idiom robbing Peter to pay Paul may be related, but I'm upvoting for "print money out of thin air."

                – J.R.
                May 2 at 22:17












              • OP's words. At first I had it struck out. Then I thought mine better as an idiomatic title. Still, both are interchangeable.

                – Mazura
                May 2 at 23:41

















              • The idiom robbing Peter to pay Paul may be related, but I'm upvoting for "print money out of thin air."

                – J.R.
                May 2 at 22:17












              • OP's words. At first I had it struck out. Then I thought mine better as an idiomatic title. Still, both are interchangeable.

                – Mazura
                May 2 at 23:41
















              The idiom robbing Peter to pay Paul may be related, but I'm upvoting for "print money out of thin air."

              – J.R.
              May 2 at 22:17






              The idiom robbing Peter to pay Paul may be related, but I'm upvoting for "print money out of thin air."

              – J.R.
              May 2 at 22:17














              OP's words. At first I had it struck out. Then I thought mine better as an idiomatic title. Still, both are interchangeable.

              – Mazura
              May 2 at 23:41





              OP's words. At first I had it struck out. Then I thought mine better as an idiomatic title. Still, both are interchangeable.

              – Mazura
              May 2 at 23:41











              0














              People used to say in the USA: "Solid as a dollar". This implies the dollar should be solid, which of course strongly implies that inflation is bad. As someone else said: "Imagine if a yard [or meter] were always shrinking, all the time. It would be very hard to measure things!"






              share|improve this answer



























                0














                People used to say in the USA: "Solid as a dollar". This implies the dollar should be solid, which of course strongly implies that inflation is bad. As someone else said: "Imagine if a yard [or meter] were always shrinking, all the time. It would be very hard to measure things!"






                share|improve this answer

























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  People used to say in the USA: "Solid as a dollar". This implies the dollar should be solid, which of course strongly implies that inflation is bad. As someone else said: "Imagine if a yard [or meter] were always shrinking, all the time. It would be very hard to measure things!"






                  share|improve this answer













                  People used to say in the USA: "Solid as a dollar". This implies the dollar should be solid, which of course strongly implies that inflation is bad. As someone else said: "Imagine if a yard [or meter] were always shrinking, all the time. It would be very hard to measure things!"







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered May 1 at 15:52









                  JosephDoggieJosephDoggie

                  1012




                  1012





















                      0














                      People understand that one form of money printing, namely counterfeiting, is harmful and destructive, and in hard-money circles at least, one will see the notion expressed concisely as




                      Inflation is legalized counterfeiting.




                      In other words, the state or the state’s central bank creating money out of thin air is no less pernicious than when petty crooks do it.



                      Similar is the statement




                      The Fed has the monopoly on Monopoly money.




                      The Fed refers to the Federal Reserve, the U.S. (and arguably global) central bank. Monopoly is a board game in which players buy and sell properties, starting out with colorful but clearly worthless bills that have value within the game only.



                      When a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke stated in a 2002 speech




                      … a money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman's famous 'helicopter drop' of money.




                      so lampooning someone, as Bernanke was in parts of the American press, as Helicopter Ben is an insulting putdown of a ridiculous idea.



                      Helicopter Ben




                      More broadly about any bald assertion by a politician in plain contradiction to fact, someone might allude to the Hans Christian Andersen tale along the lines of




                      The Emperor is wearing no clothes!




                      or with biting irony as in




                      The Emperor’s new clothes are magnificently stylish!




                      An elected official, political appointee, or judge in flowing black robes running her mouth, spouting off, or talking out of his rear end (of which the last is both informal and slightly crude) does not make it true in any sense, and the connection to the Emperor’s new clothes states that people who play along are fools or sycophants.



                      One might make the connection to inflation with




                      The Emperor’s new printing press is a truly magical device! Why, who would have ever believed that all our problems could be solved by merely printing more money?







                      share|improve this answer

























                      • It's a lovely phrase, but not specifically about inflation. You can use it about anything where someone is stating a clear falsehood and it not being rejected by most people.

                        – jonathanjo
                        May 2 at 23:26















                      0














                      People understand that one form of money printing, namely counterfeiting, is harmful and destructive, and in hard-money circles at least, one will see the notion expressed concisely as




                      Inflation is legalized counterfeiting.




                      In other words, the state or the state’s central bank creating money out of thin air is no less pernicious than when petty crooks do it.



                      Similar is the statement




                      The Fed has the monopoly on Monopoly money.




                      The Fed refers to the Federal Reserve, the U.S. (and arguably global) central bank. Monopoly is a board game in which players buy and sell properties, starting out with colorful but clearly worthless bills that have value within the game only.



                      When a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke stated in a 2002 speech




                      … a money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman's famous 'helicopter drop' of money.




                      so lampooning someone, as Bernanke was in parts of the American press, as Helicopter Ben is an insulting putdown of a ridiculous idea.



                      Helicopter Ben




                      More broadly about any bald assertion by a politician in plain contradiction to fact, someone might allude to the Hans Christian Andersen tale along the lines of




                      The Emperor is wearing no clothes!




                      or with biting irony as in




                      The Emperor’s new clothes are magnificently stylish!




                      An elected official, political appointee, or judge in flowing black robes running her mouth, spouting off, or talking out of his rear end (of which the last is both informal and slightly crude) does not make it true in any sense, and the connection to the Emperor’s new clothes states that people who play along are fools or sycophants.



                      One might make the connection to inflation with




                      The Emperor’s new printing press is a truly magical device! Why, who would have ever believed that all our problems could be solved by merely printing more money?







                      share|improve this answer

























                      • It's a lovely phrase, but not specifically about inflation. You can use it about anything where someone is stating a clear falsehood and it not being rejected by most people.

                        – jonathanjo
                        May 2 at 23:26













                      0












                      0








                      0







                      People understand that one form of money printing, namely counterfeiting, is harmful and destructive, and in hard-money circles at least, one will see the notion expressed concisely as




                      Inflation is legalized counterfeiting.




                      In other words, the state or the state’s central bank creating money out of thin air is no less pernicious than when petty crooks do it.



                      Similar is the statement




                      The Fed has the monopoly on Monopoly money.




                      The Fed refers to the Federal Reserve, the U.S. (and arguably global) central bank. Monopoly is a board game in which players buy and sell properties, starting out with colorful but clearly worthless bills that have value within the game only.



                      When a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke stated in a 2002 speech




                      … a money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman's famous 'helicopter drop' of money.




                      so lampooning someone, as Bernanke was in parts of the American press, as Helicopter Ben is an insulting putdown of a ridiculous idea.



                      Helicopter Ben




                      More broadly about any bald assertion by a politician in plain contradiction to fact, someone might allude to the Hans Christian Andersen tale along the lines of




                      The Emperor is wearing no clothes!




                      or with biting irony as in




                      The Emperor’s new clothes are magnificently stylish!




                      An elected official, political appointee, or judge in flowing black robes running her mouth, spouting off, or talking out of his rear end (of which the last is both informal and slightly crude) does not make it true in any sense, and the connection to the Emperor’s new clothes states that people who play along are fools or sycophants.



                      One might make the connection to inflation with




                      The Emperor’s new printing press is a truly magical device! Why, who would have ever believed that all our problems could be solved by merely printing more money?







                      share|improve this answer















                      People understand that one form of money printing, namely counterfeiting, is harmful and destructive, and in hard-money circles at least, one will see the notion expressed concisely as




                      Inflation is legalized counterfeiting.




                      In other words, the state or the state’s central bank creating money out of thin air is no less pernicious than when petty crooks do it.



                      Similar is the statement




                      The Fed has the monopoly on Monopoly money.




                      The Fed refers to the Federal Reserve, the U.S. (and arguably global) central bank. Monopoly is a board game in which players buy and sell properties, starting out with colorful but clearly worthless bills that have value within the game only.



                      When a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke stated in a 2002 speech




                      … a money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman's famous 'helicopter drop' of money.




                      so lampooning someone, as Bernanke was in parts of the American press, as Helicopter Ben is an insulting putdown of a ridiculous idea.



                      Helicopter Ben




                      More broadly about any bald assertion by a politician in plain contradiction to fact, someone might allude to the Hans Christian Andersen tale along the lines of




                      The Emperor is wearing no clothes!




                      or with biting irony as in




                      The Emperor’s new clothes are magnificently stylish!




                      An elected official, political appointee, or judge in flowing black robes running her mouth, spouting off, or talking out of his rear end (of which the last is both informal and slightly crude) does not make it true in any sense, and the connection to the Emperor’s new clothes states that people who play along are fools or sycophants.



                      One might make the connection to inflation with




                      The Emperor’s new printing press is a truly magical device! Why, who would have ever believed that all our problems could be solved by merely printing more money?








                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited May 2 at 23:54

























                      answered May 2 at 23:14









                      Greg BaconGreg Bacon

                      55028




                      55028












                      • It's a lovely phrase, but not specifically about inflation. You can use it about anything where someone is stating a clear falsehood and it not being rejected by most people.

                        – jonathanjo
                        May 2 at 23:26

















                      • It's a lovely phrase, but not specifically about inflation. You can use it about anything where someone is stating a clear falsehood and it not being rejected by most people.

                        – jonathanjo
                        May 2 at 23:26
















                      It's a lovely phrase, but not specifically about inflation. You can use it about anything where someone is stating a clear falsehood and it not being rejected by most people.

                      – jonathanjo
                      May 2 at 23:26





                      It's a lovely phrase, but not specifically about inflation. You can use it about anything where someone is stating a clear falsehood and it not being rejected by most people.

                      – jonathanjo
                      May 2 at 23:26





                      protected by Community May 2 at 2:04



                      Thank you for your interest in this question.
                      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

                      Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

                      What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company