Is there an idiom that supports the idea that “inflation is bad”?Searching for the idiom to express thisIdiom request for describing a situation in which people pay attention to their minor problems rather than the fundamental related ones?A proverb meaning, “he wanted to do a good thing for others, but he ended up being blamed/hurt”Is there an idiomatic expression for “look at things from the other person's perspective”?“I'll carve into your ribs and leave you crying for a kiss” (Tessa Violet - Haze) - literal or metaphoric?I wanted to know whether there are some similar English idioms for this Persian Idiom or not?(look at the definition)An expression meaning doing long and hard mental work resulting in extreme mental fatigueExceptions to the fixed word order in some idiomatic pairsAn idiom or phrase that means “as an act of solidarity”?Is there an idiom related to the idea of a “bad omen”?
How to pronounce "r" after a "g"?
Was there a contingency plan in place if Little Boy failed to detonate?
What is the best way for a skeleton to impersonate human without using magic?
Can I do brevets (long distance rides) on my hybrid bike? If yes, how to start?
International Code of Ethics for order of co-authors in research papers
Control variables and other independent variables
Why does the Earth follow an elliptical trajectory rather than a parabolic one?
Why use steam instead of just hot air?
Does Lawful Interception of 4G / the proposed 5G provide a back door for hackers as well?
How are Core iX names like Core i5, i7 related to Haswell, Ivy Bridge?
51% attack - apparently very easy? refering to CZ's "rollback btc chain" - How to make sure such corruptible scenario can never happen so easily?
What did Rocket give Hawkeye in "Avengers: Endgame"?
Why was the Ancient One so hesitant to teach Dr. Strange the art of sorcery?
Is there any evidence to support the claim that the United States was "suckered into WW1" by Zionists, made by Benjamin Freedman in his 1961 speech?
Would an 8% reduction in drag outweigh the weight addition from this custom CFD-tested winglet?
What can cause a never-frozen indoor copper drain pipe to crack?
find not returning expected files
On studying Computer Science vs. Software Engineering to become a proficient coder
Best species to breed to intelligence
Renting a house to a graduate student in my department
Was there ever any real use for a 6800-based Apple I?
Is there enough time to Planar Bind a creature conjured by a 1-hour-duration spell?
Why in a Ethernet LAN, a packet sniffer can obtain all packets sent over the LAN?
Was the Highlands Ranch shooting the 115th mass shooting in the US in 2019
Is there an idiom that supports the idea that “inflation is bad”?
Searching for the idiom to express thisIdiom request for describing a situation in which people pay attention to their minor problems rather than the fundamental related ones?A proverb meaning, “he wanted to do a good thing for others, but he ended up being blamed/hurt”Is there an idiomatic expression for “look at things from the other person's perspective”?“I'll carve into your ribs and leave you crying for a kiss” (Tessa Violet - Haze) - literal or metaphoric?I wanted to know whether there are some similar English idioms for this Persian Idiom or not?(look at the definition)An expression meaning doing long and hard mental work resulting in extreme mental fatigueExceptions to the fixed word order in some idiomatic pairsAn idiom or phrase that means “as an act of solidarity”?Is there an idiom related to the idea of a “bad omen”?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I am thinking there could be an idiom that states that you can't just print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy? Can you think of an idiom like that? I am looking for an idiom I can use to begin my essay on inflation.
idiom-request
add a comment |
I am thinking there could be an idiom that states that you can't just print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy? Can you think of an idiom like that? I am looking for an idiom I can use to begin my essay on inflation.
idiom-request
1
It may help to find a country/context where there was hyperinflation, and look for idioms that developed there. I'm not aware of hyperinflation of a national currency ever being an issue in any english speaking country...though there are probably some examples of local/private currencies losing their value.
– adam.r
May 1 at 19:52
2
@adam.r -- The U.S. has had hyperinflation twice: During the American Revolution, and in the Confederate States of America. The Revolution's experience gave rise to the phrase, "Not worth a Continental." Also, Zimbabwe used to be a British colony; I don't know if it still considered to be an English-speaking country.
– Jasper
May 1 at 21:36
@Jasper. Thanks. The "stagflation" era may also be a good source.
– adam.r
May 2 at 2:07
add a comment |
I am thinking there could be an idiom that states that you can't just print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy? Can you think of an idiom like that? I am looking for an idiom I can use to begin my essay on inflation.
idiom-request
I am thinking there could be an idiom that states that you can't just print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy? Can you think of an idiom like that? I am looking for an idiom I can use to begin my essay on inflation.
idiom-request
idiom-request
edited May 3 at 12:43
Davo
3,3871929
3,3871929
asked May 1 at 12:52
tefisjbtefisjb
502315
502315
1
It may help to find a country/context where there was hyperinflation, and look for idioms that developed there. I'm not aware of hyperinflation of a national currency ever being an issue in any english speaking country...though there are probably some examples of local/private currencies losing their value.
– adam.r
May 1 at 19:52
2
@adam.r -- The U.S. has had hyperinflation twice: During the American Revolution, and in the Confederate States of America. The Revolution's experience gave rise to the phrase, "Not worth a Continental." Also, Zimbabwe used to be a British colony; I don't know if it still considered to be an English-speaking country.
– Jasper
May 1 at 21:36
@Jasper. Thanks. The "stagflation" era may also be a good source.
– adam.r
May 2 at 2:07
add a comment |
1
It may help to find a country/context where there was hyperinflation, and look for idioms that developed there. I'm not aware of hyperinflation of a national currency ever being an issue in any english speaking country...though there are probably some examples of local/private currencies losing their value.
– adam.r
May 1 at 19:52
2
@adam.r -- The U.S. has had hyperinflation twice: During the American Revolution, and in the Confederate States of America. The Revolution's experience gave rise to the phrase, "Not worth a Continental." Also, Zimbabwe used to be a British colony; I don't know if it still considered to be an English-speaking country.
– Jasper
May 1 at 21:36
@Jasper. Thanks. The "stagflation" era may also be a good source.
– adam.r
May 2 at 2:07
1
1
It may help to find a country/context where there was hyperinflation, and look for idioms that developed there. I'm not aware of hyperinflation of a national currency ever being an issue in any english speaking country...though there are probably some examples of local/private currencies losing their value.
– adam.r
May 1 at 19:52
It may help to find a country/context where there was hyperinflation, and look for idioms that developed there. I'm not aware of hyperinflation of a national currency ever being an issue in any english speaking country...though there are probably some examples of local/private currencies losing their value.
– adam.r
May 1 at 19:52
2
2
@adam.r -- The U.S. has had hyperinflation twice: During the American Revolution, and in the Confederate States of America. The Revolution's experience gave rise to the phrase, "Not worth a Continental." Also, Zimbabwe used to be a British colony; I don't know if it still considered to be an English-speaking country.
– Jasper
May 1 at 21:36
@adam.r -- The U.S. has had hyperinflation twice: During the American Revolution, and in the Confederate States of America. The Revolution's experience gave rise to the phrase, "Not worth a Continental." Also, Zimbabwe used to be a British colony; I don't know if it still considered to be an English-speaking country.
– Jasper
May 1 at 21:36
@Jasper. Thanks. The "stagflation" era may also be a good source.
– adam.r
May 2 at 2:07
@Jasper. Thanks. The "stagflation" era may also be a good source.
– adam.r
May 2 at 2:07
add a comment |
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
There's a saying (in American English, anyway) that is related but not quite exactly what you're looking for.
Money doesn't grow on trees.
That is, money has to come from something. It has to be earned. This same idea could be applied to inflation, still meaning that its value has to come from something, but the source could be gold reserves or GDP or something rather than labor hours.
If money did grow on trees, everyone would have lots of money, and therefore a unit of that money would be worth a lot less. The decrease in value is the general concept of inflation, although the "growing on trees" bit more directly relates to inflation caused by over-printing of currency and not other forms of value loss.
4
@Lambie I made it clear that the original saying doesn't directly relate to inflation, and also wrote a large section explaining how it might be able to be applied to inflation. Can you clarify your comment?
– CrescentSickle
May 1 at 14:33
3
@Lamble Yes... but the saying isn't literal, nor meant to be taken literally. It's an idiom. It's not about where one finds it either, it's a statement that money itself isn't free, which is a concept that has parallels to inflation.
– CrescentSickle
May 1 at 14:44
1
This is identical in British English.
– Chris Melville
May 1 at 19:44
1
@ChrisMelville, and in Spanish.
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
May 2 at 8:33
4
Do other people then point out that cotton is technically a shrub? And that some money is made of polymers? (-:
– JdeBP
May 2 at 11:38
|
show 5 more comments
I'm going to challenge your premise a bit: the consensus among economists is that a small amount of inflation is actually important for a healthy economy, and it's only high inflation that's a problem.
Therefore, I'm going to propose the dose makes the poison. It's a phrase that originated in toxicology dating back to Paracelsus, but is often used in a more general sense to refer to the idea that many things are only dangerous in sufficiently high amounts.
Even a small amount of inflation is undesirable, but a small amount of deflation would be much worse. Since fluctuations are inevitable, aiming for a little inflation is pragmatic.
– TKK
May 2 at 20:08
3
@TKK That's not what many/most economists think. For example, the US has a target inflation that is above 0%. If it falls below that, the fed will attempt to increase the money supply. A small amount of inflation pushes investment.
– JimmyJames
May 2 at 21:36
A small amount of inflation means you devalue debt, and give an option for rebalancing 'earnings' - it's much easier to 'deflate' someone's wages, than it is to cut their pay.
– Sobrique
May 3 at 11:15
add a comment |
An idiom that's related to inflation is saying something's "not worth the paper it's written/printed on." This usually refers to contracts where one or more parties don't intend to honor the agreement, making the contract itself worthless. It can also refer to currency, meaning the monetary value represented by a banknote is less than the value of the paper itself, like in Weimar Germany when people used low-denomination bills as paper for crafts and wallpaper.
This idiom doesn't quite fit the sense you're looking for in your essay, but it could be used in a sentence to that effect, e.g. "If a government keeps printing money to fix its economy, all it will get is money that's worth less than the paper it's printed on."
The Free Dictionary has an entry for this idiom, which says:
not worth the paper it's written on
Useless; unimportant; insignificant.
Meaningless or without authority; of no value
Oh, that memo is not worth the paper it's written on.
- Due to the recent hyperinflation, the nation's currency is now not worth the
paper it's written on.
Don't take a check from that guy. It's not worth the paper it's written on.
add a comment |
"A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore" -- attributed to Yogi Berra. Technically, this is backwards -- we'd be concerned if a dime wasn't worth a nickel. "Not worth a dime" is often used to mean "of negligible value".
A web search turns up a couple of song titles:
"A dollar ain't worth a dime"
and
"A dollar ain't a dollar anymore"
http://www.folkarchive.de/dollar.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-tvOb5nUiA
2
@Jasper A war nickel was only 35% silver, giving it a current melt value of about $0.82. A silver dime was 90% silver, with a current melt value of $1.05.
– TKK
May 2 at 20:11
add a comment |
I don't know if there is an idiom that can "explain" what you are trying to, because the problem seems to me that people don't understand how inflation works, so they won't be able to relate it to anything. What you need is an analogy to help them understand it.
Here's something I have come up with, bearing in mind I am not an economist:
Imagine that you are the owner of a rare breed of animal. There are only a handful of this kind of animal in the entire world. How much do you think that animal would be worth? A lot, because it is so rare.
Now imagine what would happen if somebody set up a breeding operation with two of the other remaining members of this animal species. Within a few years they manage to breed hundreds, which then in turn breed with each other and create thousands more. The more animals that breed, the more offspring they have, and the faster the population of these animals grows.
How much is your animal worth now? Not much, because it isn't rare anymore.
The country in which you live has a net worth that is not valued by the amount of paper money changing hands within it, but the value of its assets minus its liabilities. Every coin, every banknote represents a percentage of that net worth. Printing more money only devalues the money in your hand, because now each coin and note represents a smaller percentage of the net worth.
Inflation is like the increasing population of your "rare" animal. If you don't want it to stop being valuable, it has to be controlled. Once it gets a little bit out of control, it spirals out of control further, and faster.
I've thought of another, shorter one:
Imagine your country's net worth is a cake. Every banknote represents a slice of that cake.
The only way to get more slices of cake is to cut those slices smaller. Sure there are more slices to go around, but everybody is getting less cake.
The only way for everyone to get more cake is to make the cake bigger. And if you want more people to get the same amount of cake, the cake has to grow proportionately to the increased amount of slicing.
Printing more bank notes does not make the economy grow any more than slicing up the cake more makes the cake bigger. The only way to do that is for the country's net worth to grow - through trade, building assets, and reduction of the national debt.
Actually, the amount of national debt does not change the overall value of the economy, because the nation's debt is some debtor's asset. (National debt does change the money flow inside the economy, and may cause beneficial or detrimental incentives, but that aspect is off-topic.)
– toolforger
May 2 at 6:26
add a comment |
Here's a great saying that might help.
You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
Cheers/
The silk purse is fixing the economy.
The sow's ear is the problem, here, inflation.
Specific quotes:
1) "Inflation is like sin; every government denounces it and every government practices it”
Frederick Leith-Ross
2) “Inflation is when you pay fifteen dollars for the ten-dollar haircut you used to get for five dollars when you had hair.”
Sam Ewing
There are others but these are two that I liked.
specific inflation quotes
7
It is a lovely expression, but I've always understood it to mean "you can't make a beautiful thing out of ugly materials"
– jonathanjo
May 1 at 14:31
1
Yes, fixing the economy is a beautiful thing,and you can't fix it by printing money.
– Lambie
May 1 at 14:33
5
@I didn't mean you can't apply it to the economy, only that it's quite a general expression.
– jonathanjo
May 1 at 14:35
add a comment |
Robbing Peter To Pay Paul
"You can't just rob Peter to pay Paul print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy."
rob Peter to pay Paul
To incur a debt in order to pay off another debt.
– American Heritage, TFD
The idiom robbing Peter to pay Paul may be related, but I'm upvoting for "print money out of thin air."
– J.R.♦
May 2 at 22:17
OP's words. At first I had it struck out. Then I thought mine better as an idiomatic title. Still, both are interchangeable.
– Mazura
May 2 at 23:41
add a comment |
People used to say in the USA: "Solid as a dollar". This implies the dollar should be solid, which of course strongly implies that inflation is bad. As someone else said: "Imagine if a yard [or meter] were always shrinking, all the time. It would be very hard to measure things!"
add a comment |
People understand that one form of money printing, namely counterfeiting, is harmful and destructive, and in hard-money circles at least, one will see the notion expressed concisely as
Inflation is legalized counterfeiting.
In other words, the state or the state’s central bank creating money out of thin air is no less pernicious than when petty crooks do it.
Similar is the statement
The Fed has the monopoly on Monopoly money.
The Fed refers to the Federal Reserve, the U.S. (and arguably global) central bank. Monopoly is a board game in which players buy and sell properties, starting out with colorful but clearly worthless bills that have value within the game only.
When a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke stated in a 2002 speech
… a money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman's famous 'helicopter drop' of money.
so lampooning someone, as Bernanke was in parts of the American press, as Helicopter Ben is an insulting putdown of a ridiculous idea.
More broadly about any bald assertion by a politician in plain contradiction to fact, someone might allude to the Hans Christian Andersen tale along the lines of
The Emperor is wearing no clothes!
or with biting irony as in
The Emperor’s new clothes are magnificently stylish!
An elected official, political appointee, or judge in flowing black robes running her mouth, spouting off, or talking out of his rear end (of which the last is both informal and slightly crude) does not make it true in any sense, and the connection to the Emperor’s new clothes states that people who play along are fools or sycophants.
One might make the connection to inflation with
The Emperor’s new printing press is a truly magical device! Why, who would have ever believed that all our problems could be solved by merely printing more money?
It's a lovely phrase, but not specifically about inflation. You can use it about anything where someone is stating a clear falsehood and it not being rejected by most people.
– jonathanjo
May 2 at 23:26
add a comment |
protected by Community♦ May 2 at 2:04
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There's a saying (in American English, anyway) that is related but not quite exactly what you're looking for.
Money doesn't grow on trees.
That is, money has to come from something. It has to be earned. This same idea could be applied to inflation, still meaning that its value has to come from something, but the source could be gold reserves or GDP or something rather than labor hours.
If money did grow on trees, everyone would have lots of money, and therefore a unit of that money would be worth a lot less. The decrease in value is the general concept of inflation, although the "growing on trees" bit more directly relates to inflation caused by over-printing of currency and not other forms of value loss.
4
@Lambie I made it clear that the original saying doesn't directly relate to inflation, and also wrote a large section explaining how it might be able to be applied to inflation. Can you clarify your comment?
– CrescentSickle
May 1 at 14:33
3
@Lamble Yes... but the saying isn't literal, nor meant to be taken literally. It's an idiom. It's not about where one finds it either, it's a statement that money itself isn't free, which is a concept that has parallels to inflation.
– CrescentSickle
May 1 at 14:44
1
This is identical in British English.
– Chris Melville
May 1 at 19:44
1
@ChrisMelville, and in Spanish.
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
May 2 at 8:33
4
Do other people then point out that cotton is technically a shrub? And that some money is made of polymers? (-:
– JdeBP
May 2 at 11:38
|
show 5 more comments
There's a saying (in American English, anyway) that is related but not quite exactly what you're looking for.
Money doesn't grow on trees.
That is, money has to come from something. It has to be earned. This same idea could be applied to inflation, still meaning that its value has to come from something, but the source could be gold reserves or GDP or something rather than labor hours.
If money did grow on trees, everyone would have lots of money, and therefore a unit of that money would be worth a lot less. The decrease in value is the general concept of inflation, although the "growing on trees" bit more directly relates to inflation caused by over-printing of currency and not other forms of value loss.
4
@Lambie I made it clear that the original saying doesn't directly relate to inflation, and also wrote a large section explaining how it might be able to be applied to inflation. Can you clarify your comment?
– CrescentSickle
May 1 at 14:33
3
@Lamble Yes... but the saying isn't literal, nor meant to be taken literally. It's an idiom. It's not about where one finds it either, it's a statement that money itself isn't free, which is a concept that has parallels to inflation.
– CrescentSickle
May 1 at 14:44
1
This is identical in British English.
– Chris Melville
May 1 at 19:44
1
@ChrisMelville, and in Spanish.
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
May 2 at 8:33
4
Do other people then point out that cotton is technically a shrub? And that some money is made of polymers? (-:
– JdeBP
May 2 at 11:38
|
show 5 more comments
There's a saying (in American English, anyway) that is related but not quite exactly what you're looking for.
Money doesn't grow on trees.
That is, money has to come from something. It has to be earned. This same idea could be applied to inflation, still meaning that its value has to come from something, but the source could be gold reserves or GDP or something rather than labor hours.
If money did grow on trees, everyone would have lots of money, and therefore a unit of that money would be worth a lot less. The decrease in value is the general concept of inflation, although the "growing on trees" bit more directly relates to inflation caused by over-printing of currency and not other forms of value loss.
There's a saying (in American English, anyway) that is related but not quite exactly what you're looking for.
Money doesn't grow on trees.
That is, money has to come from something. It has to be earned. This same idea could be applied to inflation, still meaning that its value has to come from something, but the source could be gold reserves or GDP or something rather than labor hours.
If money did grow on trees, everyone would have lots of money, and therefore a unit of that money would be worth a lot less. The decrease in value is the general concept of inflation, although the "growing on trees" bit more directly relates to inflation caused by over-printing of currency and not other forms of value loss.
edited May 1 at 15:04
answered May 1 at 14:10
CrescentSickleCrescentSickle
1,70417
1,70417
4
@Lambie I made it clear that the original saying doesn't directly relate to inflation, and also wrote a large section explaining how it might be able to be applied to inflation. Can you clarify your comment?
– CrescentSickle
May 1 at 14:33
3
@Lamble Yes... but the saying isn't literal, nor meant to be taken literally. It's an idiom. It's not about where one finds it either, it's a statement that money itself isn't free, which is a concept that has parallels to inflation.
– CrescentSickle
May 1 at 14:44
1
This is identical in British English.
– Chris Melville
May 1 at 19:44
1
@ChrisMelville, and in Spanish.
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
May 2 at 8:33
4
Do other people then point out that cotton is technically a shrub? And that some money is made of polymers? (-:
– JdeBP
May 2 at 11:38
|
show 5 more comments
4
@Lambie I made it clear that the original saying doesn't directly relate to inflation, and also wrote a large section explaining how it might be able to be applied to inflation. Can you clarify your comment?
– CrescentSickle
May 1 at 14:33
3
@Lamble Yes... but the saying isn't literal, nor meant to be taken literally. It's an idiom. It's not about where one finds it either, it's a statement that money itself isn't free, which is a concept that has parallels to inflation.
– CrescentSickle
May 1 at 14:44
1
This is identical in British English.
– Chris Melville
May 1 at 19:44
1
@ChrisMelville, and in Spanish.
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
May 2 at 8:33
4
Do other people then point out that cotton is technically a shrub? And that some money is made of polymers? (-:
– JdeBP
May 2 at 11:38
4
4
@Lambie I made it clear that the original saying doesn't directly relate to inflation, and also wrote a large section explaining how it might be able to be applied to inflation. Can you clarify your comment?
– CrescentSickle
May 1 at 14:33
@Lambie I made it clear that the original saying doesn't directly relate to inflation, and also wrote a large section explaining how it might be able to be applied to inflation. Can you clarify your comment?
– CrescentSickle
May 1 at 14:33
3
3
@Lamble Yes... but the saying isn't literal, nor meant to be taken literally. It's an idiom. It's not about where one finds it either, it's a statement that money itself isn't free, which is a concept that has parallels to inflation.
– CrescentSickle
May 1 at 14:44
@Lamble Yes... but the saying isn't literal, nor meant to be taken literally. It's an idiom. It's not about where one finds it either, it's a statement that money itself isn't free, which is a concept that has parallels to inflation.
– CrescentSickle
May 1 at 14:44
1
1
This is identical in British English.
– Chris Melville
May 1 at 19:44
This is identical in British English.
– Chris Melville
May 1 at 19:44
1
1
@ChrisMelville, and in Spanish.
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
May 2 at 8:33
@ChrisMelville, and in Spanish.
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
May 2 at 8:33
4
4
Do other people then point out that cotton is technically a shrub? And that some money is made of polymers? (-:
– JdeBP
May 2 at 11:38
Do other people then point out that cotton is technically a shrub? And that some money is made of polymers? (-:
– JdeBP
May 2 at 11:38
|
show 5 more comments
I'm going to challenge your premise a bit: the consensus among economists is that a small amount of inflation is actually important for a healthy economy, and it's only high inflation that's a problem.
Therefore, I'm going to propose the dose makes the poison. It's a phrase that originated in toxicology dating back to Paracelsus, but is often used in a more general sense to refer to the idea that many things are only dangerous in sufficiently high amounts.
Even a small amount of inflation is undesirable, but a small amount of deflation would be much worse. Since fluctuations are inevitable, aiming for a little inflation is pragmatic.
– TKK
May 2 at 20:08
3
@TKK That's not what many/most economists think. For example, the US has a target inflation that is above 0%. If it falls below that, the fed will attempt to increase the money supply. A small amount of inflation pushes investment.
– JimmyJames
May 2 at 21:36
A small amount of inflation means you devalue debt, and give an option for rebalancing 'earnings' - it's much easier to 'deflate' someone's wages, than it is to cut their pay.
– Sobrique
May 3 at 11:15
add a comment |
I'm going to challenge your premise a bit: the consensus among economists is that a small amount of inflation is actually important for a healthy economy, and it's only high inflation that's a problem.
Therefore, I'm going to propose the dose makes the poison. It's a phrase that originated in toxicology dating back to Paracelsus, but is often used in a more general sense to refer to the idea that many things are only dangerous in sufficiently high amounts.
Even a small amount of inflation is undesirable, but a small amount of deflation would be much worse. Since fluctuations are inevitable, aiming for a little inflation is pragmatic.
– TKK
May 2 at 20:08
3
@TKK That's not what many/most economists think. For example, the US has a target inflation that is above 0%. If it falls below that, the fed will attempt to increase the money supply. A small amount of inflation pushes investment.
– JimmyJames
May 2 at 21:36
A small amount of inflation means you devalue debt, and give an option for rebalancing 'earnings' - it's much easier to 'deflate' someone's wages, than it is to cut their pay.
– Sobrique
May 3 at 11:15
add a comment |
I'm going to challenge your premise a bit: the consensus among economists is that a small amount of inflation is actually important for a healthy economy, and it's only high inflation that's a problem.
Therefore, I'm going to propose the dose makes the poison. It's a phrase that originated in toxicology dating back to Paracelsus, but is often used in a more general sense to refer to the idea that many things are only dangerous in sufficiently high amounts.
I'm going to challenge your premise a bit: the consensus among economists is that a small amount of inflation is actually important for a healthy economy, and it's only high inflation that's a problem.
Therefore, I'm going to propose the dose makes the poison. It's a phrase that originated in toxicology dating back to Paracelsus, but is often used in a more general sense to refer to the idea that many things are only dangerous in sufficiently high amounts.
answered May 1 at 17:38
John MontgomeryJohn Montgomery
2315
2315
Even a small amount of inflation is undesirable, but a small amount of deflation would be much worse. Since fluctuations are inevitable, aiming for a little inflation is pragmatic.
– TKK
May 2 at 20:08
3
@TKK That's not what many/most economists think. For example, the US has a target inflation that is above 0%. If it falls below that, the fed will attempt to increase the money supply. A small amount of inflation pushes investment.
– JimmyJames
May 2 at 21:36
A small amount of inflation means you devalue debt, and give an option for rebalancing 'earnings' - it's much easier to 'deflate' someone's wages, than it is to cut their pay.
– Sobrique
May 3 at 11:15
add a comment |
Even a small amount of inflation is undesirable, but a small amount of deflation would be much worse. Since fluctuations are inevitable, aiming for a little inflation is pragmatic.
– TKK
May 2 at 20:08
3
@TKK That's not what many/most economists think. For example, the US has a target inflation that is above 0%. If it falls below that, the fed will attempt to increase the money supply. A small amount of inflation pushes investment.
– JimmyJames
May 2 at 21:36
A small amount of inflation means you devalue debt, and give an option for rebalancing 'earnings' - it's much easier to 'deflate' someone's wages, than it is to cut their pay.
– Sobrique
May 3 at 11:15
Even a small amount of inflation is undesirable, but a small amount of deflation would be much worse. Since fluctuations are inevitable, aiming for a little inflation is pragmatic.
– TKK
May 2 at 20:08
Even a small amount of inflation is undesirable, but a small amount of deflation would be much worse. Since fluctuations are inevitable, aiming for a little inflation is pragmatic.
– TKK
May 2 at 20:08
3
3
@TKK That's not what many/most economists think. For example, the US has a target inflation that is above 0%. If it falls below that, the fed will attempt to increase the money supply. A small amount of inflation pushes investment.
– JimmyJames
May 2 at 21:36
@TKK That's not what many/most economists think. For example, the US has a target inflation that is above 0%. If it falls below that, the fed will attempt to increase the money supply. A small amount of inflation pushes investment.
– JimmyJames
May 2 at 21:36
A small amount of inflation means you devalue debt, and give an option for rebalancing 'earnings' - it's much easier to 'deflate' someone's wages, than it is to cut their pay.
– Sobrique
May 3 at 11:15
A small amount of inflation means you devalue debt, and give an option for rebalancing 'earnings' - it's much easier to 'deflate' someone's wages, than it is to cut their pay.
– Sobrique
May 3 at 11:15
add a comment |
An idiom that's related to inflation is saying something's "not worth the paper it's written/printed on." This usually refers to contracts where one or more parties don't intend to honor the agreement, making the contract itself worthless. It can also refer to currency, meaning the monetary value represented by a banknote is less than the value of the paper itself, like in Weimar Germany when people used low-denomination bills as paper for crafts and wallpaper.
This idiom doesn't quite fit the sense you're looking for in your essay, but it could be used in a sentence to that effect, e.g. "If a government keeps printing money to fix its economy, all it will get is money that's worth less than the paper it's printed on."
The Free Dictionary has an entry for this idiom, which says:
not worth the paper it's written on
Useless; unimportant; insignificant.
Meaningless or without authority; of no value
Oh, that memo is not worth the paper it's written on.
- Due to the recent hyperinflation, the nation's currency is now not worth the
paper it's written on.
Don't take a check from that guy. It's not worth the paper it's written on.
add a comment |
An idiom that's related to inflation is saying something's "not worth the paper it's written/printed on." This usually refers to contracts where one or more parties don't intend to honor the agreement, making the contract itself worthless. It can also refer to currency, meaning the monetary value represented by a banknote is less than the value of the paper itself, like in Weimar Germany when people used low-denomination bills as paper for crafts and wallpaper.
This idiom doesn't quite fit the sense you're looking for in your essay, but it could be used in a sentence to that effect, e.g. "If a government keeps printing money to fix its economy, all it will get is money that's worth less than the paper it's printed on."
The Free Dictionary has an entry for this idiom, which says:
not worth the paper it's written on
Useless; unimportant; insignificant.
Meaningless or without authority; of no value
Oh, that memo is not worth the paper it's written on.
- Due to the recent hyperinflation, the nation's currency is now not worth the
paper it's written on.
Don't take a check from that guy. It's not worth the paper it's written on.
add a comment |
An idiom that's related to inflation is saying something's "not worth the paper it's written/printed on." This usually refers to contracts where one or more parties don't intend to honor the agreement, making the contract itself worthless. It can also refer to currency, meaning the monetary value represented by a banknote is less than the value of the paper itself, like in Weimar Germany when people used low-denomination bills as paper for crafts and wallpaper.
This idiom doesn't quite fit the sense you're looking for in your essay, but it could be used in a sentence to that effect, e.g. "If a government keeps printing money to fix its economy, all it will get is money that's worth less than the paper it's printed on."
The Free Dictionary has an entry for this idiom, which says:
not worth the paper it's written on
Useless; unimportant; insignificant.
Meaningless or without authority; of no value
Oh, that memo is not worth the paper it's written on.
- Due to the recent hyperinflation, the nation's currency is now not worth the
paper it's written on.
Don't take a check from that guy. It's not worth the paper it's written on.
An idiom that's related to inflation is saying something's "not worth the paper it's written/printed on." This usually refers to contracts where one or more parties don't intend to honor the agreement, making the contract itself worthless. It can also refer to currency, meaning the monetary value represented by a banknote is less than the value of the paper itself, like in Weimar Germany when people used low-denomination bills as paper for crafts and wallpaper.
This idiom doesn't quite fit the sense you're looking for in your essay, but it could be used in a sentence to that effect, e.g. "If a government keeps printing money to fix its economy, all it will get is money that's worth less than the paper it's printed on."
The Free Dictionary has an entry for this idiom, which says:
not worth the paper it's written on
Useless; unimportant; insignificant.
Meaningless or without authority; of no value
Oh, that memo is not worth the paper it's written on.
- Due to the recent hyperinflation, the nation's currency is now not worth the
paper it's written on.
Don't take a check from that guy. It's not worth the paper it's written on.
edited May 2 at 22:15
J.R.♦
101k8129250
101k8129250
answered May 1 at 21:19
ShmeekuShmeeku
1911
1911
add a comment |
add a comment |
"A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore" -- attributed to Yogi Berra. Technically, this is backwards -- we'd be concerned if a dime wasn't worth a nickel. "Not worth a dime" is often used to mean "of negligible value".
A web search turns up a couple of song titles:
"A dollar ain't worth a dime"
and
"A dollar ain't a dollar anymore"
http://www.folkarchive.de/dollar.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-tvOb5nUiA
2
@Jasper A war nickel was only 35% silver, giving it a current melt value of about $0.82. A silver dime was 90% silver, with a current melt value of $1.05.
– TKK
May 2 at 20:11
add a comment |
"A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore" -- attributed to Yogi Berra. Technically, this is backwards -- we'd be concerned if a dime wasn't worth a nickel. "Not worth a dime" is often used to mean "of negligible value".
A web search turns up a couple of song titles:
"A dollar ain't worth a dime"
and
"A dollar ain't a dollar anymore"
http://www.folkarchive.de/dollar.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-tvOb5nUiA
2
@Jasper A war nickel was only 35% silver, giving it a current melt value of about $0.82. A silver dime was 90% silver, with a current melt value of $1.05.
– TKK
May 2 at 20:11
add a comment |
"A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore" -- attributed to Yogi Berra. Technically, this is backwards -- we'd be concerned if a dime wasn't worth a nickel. "Not worth a dime" is often used to mean "of negligible value".
A web search turns up a couple of song titles:
"A dollar ain't worth a dime"
and
"A dollar ain't a dollar anymore"
http://www.folkarchive.de/dollar.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-tvOb5nUiA
"A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore" -- attributed to Yogi Berra. Technically, this is backwards -- we'd be concerned if a dime wasn't worth a nickel. "Not worth a dime" is often used to mean "of negligible value".
A web search turns up a couple of song titles:
"A dollar ain't worth a dime"
and
"A dollar ain't a dollar anymore"
http://www.folkarchive.de/dollar.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-tvOb5nUiA
answered May 2 at 2:04
adam.radam.r
1513
1513
2
@Jasper A war nickel was only 35% silver, giving it a current melt value of about $0.82. A silver dime was 90% silver, with a current melt value of $1.05.
– TKK
May 2 at 20:11
add a comment |
2
@Jasper A war nickel was only 35% silver, giving it a current melt value of about $0.82. A silver dime was 90% silver, with a current melt value of $1.05.
– TKK
May 2 at 20:11
2
2
@Jasper A war nickel was only 35% silver, giving it a current melt value of about $0.82. A silver dime was 90% silver, with a current melt value of $1.05.
– TKK
May 2 at 20:11
@Jasper A war nickel was only 35% silver, giving it a current melt value of about $0.82. A silver dime was 90% silver, with a current melt value of $1.05.
– TKK
May 2 at 20:11
add a comment |
I don't know if there is an idiom that can "explain" what you are trying to, because the problem seems to me that people don't understand how inflation works, so they won't be able to relate it to anything. What you need is an analogy to help them understand it.
Here's something I have come up with, bearing in mind I am not an economist:
Imagine that you are the owner of a rare breed of animal. There are only a handful of this kind of animal in the entire world. How much do you think that animal would be worth? A lot, because it is so rare.
Now imagine what would happen if somebody set up a breeding operation with two of the other remaining members of this animal species. Within a few years they manage to breed hundreds, which then in turn breed with each other and create thousands more. The more animals that breed, the more offspring they have, and the faster the population of these animals grows.
How much is your animal worth now? Not much, because it isn't rare anymore.
The country in which you live has a net worth that is not valued by the amount of paper money changing hands within it, but the value of its assets minus its liabilities. Every coin, every banknote represents a percentage of that net worth. Printing more money only devalues the money in your hand, because now each coin and note represents a smaller percentage of the net worth.
Inflation is like the increasing population of your "rare" animal. If you don't want it to stop being valuable, it has to be controlled. Once it gets a little bit out of control, it spirals out of control further, and faster.
I've thought of another, shorter one:
Imagine your country's net worth is a cake. Every banknote represents a slice of that cake.
The only way to get more slices of cake is to cut those slices smaller. Sure there are more slices to go around, but everybody is getting less cake.
The only way for everyone to get more cake is to make the cake bigger. And if you want more people to get the same amount of cake, the cake has to grow proportionately to the increased amount of slicing.
Printing more bank notes does not make the economy grow any more than slicing up the cake more makes the cake bigger. The only way to do that is for the country's net worth to grow - through trade, building assets, and reduction of the national debt.
Actually, the amount of national debt does not change the overall value of the economy, because the nation's debt is some debtor's asset. (National debt does change the money flow inside the economy, and may cause beneficial or detrimental incentives, but that aspect is off-topic.)
– toolforger
May 2 at 6:26
add a comment |
I don't know if there is an idiom that can "explain" what you are trying to, because the problem seems to me that people don't understand how inflation works, so they won't be able to relate it to anything. What you need is an analogy to help them understand it.
Here's something I have come up with, bearing in mind I am not an economist:
Imagine that you are the owner of a rare breed of animal. There are only a handful of this kind of animal in the entire world. How much do you think that animal would be worth? A lot, because it is so rare.
Now imagine what would happen if somebody set up a breeding operation with two of the other remaining members of this animal species. Within a few years they manage to breed hundreds, which then in turn breed with each other and create thousands more. The more animals that breed, the more offspring they have, and the faster the population of these animals grows.
How much is your animal worth now? Not much, because it isn't rare anymore.
The country in which you live has a net worth that is not valued by the amount of paper money changing hands within it, but the value of its assets minus its liabilities. Every coin, every banknote represents a percentage of that net worth. Printing more money only devalues the money in your hand, because now each coin and note represents a smaller percentage of the net worth.
Inflation is like the increasing population of your "rare" animal. If you don't want it to stop being valuable, it has to be controlled. Once it gets a little bit out of control, it spirals out of control further, and faster.
I've thought of another, shorter one:
Imagine your country's net worth is a cake. Every banknote represents a slice of that cake.
The only way to get more slices of cake is to cut those slices smaller. Sure there are more slices to go around, but everybody is getting less cake.
The only way for everyone to get more cake is to make the cake bigger. And if you want more people to get the same amount of cake, the cake has to grow proportionately to the increased amount of slicing.
Printing more bank notes does not make the economy grow any more than slicing up the cake more makes the cake bigger. The only way to do that is for the country's net worth to grow - through trade, building assets, and reduction of the national debt.
Actually, the amount of national debt does not change the overall value of the economy, because the nation's debt is some debtor's asset. (National debt does change the money flow inside the economy, and may cause beneficial or detrimental incentives, but that aspect is off-topic.)
– toolforger
May 2 at 6:26
add a comment |
I don't know if there is an idiom that can "explain" what you are trying to, because the problem seems to me that people don't understand how inflation works, so they won't be able to relate it to anything. What you need is an analogy to help them understand it.
Here's something I have come up with, bearing in mind I am not an economist:
Imagine that you are the owner of a rare breed of animal. There are only a handful of this kind of animal in the entire world. How much do you think that animal would be worth? A lot, because it is so rare.
Now imagine what would happen if somebody set up a breeding operation with two of the other remaining members of this animal species. Within a few years they manage to breed hundreds, which then in turn breed with each other and create thousands more. The more animals that breed, the more offspring they have, and the faster the population of these animals grows.
How much is your animal worth now? Not much, because it isn't rare anymore.
The country in which you live has a net worth that is not valued by the amount of paper money changing hands within it, but the value of its assets minus its liabilities. Every coin, every banknote represents a percentage of that net worth. Printing more money only devalues the money in your hand, because now each coin and note represents a smaller percentage of the net worth.
Inflation is like the increasing population of your "rare" animal. If you don't want it to stop being valuable, it has to be controlled. Once it gets a little bit out of control, it spirals out of control further, and faster.
I've thought of another, shorter one:
Imagine your country's net worth is a cake. Every banknote represents a slice of that cake.
The only way to get more slices of cake is to cut those slices smaller. Sure there are more slices to go around, but everybody is getting less cake.
The only way for everyone to get more cake is to make the cake bigger. And if you want more people to get the same amount of cake, the cake has to grow proportionately to the increased amount of slicing.
Printing more bank notes does not make the economy grow any more than slicing up the cake more makes the cake bigger. The only way to do that is for the country's net worth to grow - through trade, building assets, and reduction of the national debt.
I don't know if there is an idiom that can "explain" what you are trying to, because the problem seems to me that people don't understand how inflation works, so they won't be able to relate it to anything. What you need is an analogy to help them understand it.
Here's something I have come up with, bearing in mind I am not an economist:
Imagine that you are the owner of a rare breed of animal. There are only a handful of this kind of animal in the entire world. How much do you think that animal would be worth? A lot, because it is so rare.
Now imagine what would happen if somebody set up a breeding operation with two of the other remaining members of this animal species. Within a few years they manage to breed hundreds, which then in turn breed with each other and create thousands more. The more animals that breed, the more offspring they have, and the faster the population of these animals grows.
How much is your animal worth now? Not much, because it isn't rare anymore.
The country in which you live has a net worth that is not valued by the amount of paper money changing hands within it, but the value of its assets minus its liabilities. Every coin, every banknote represents a percentage of that net worth. Printing more money only devalues the money in your hand, because now each coin and note represents a smaller percentage of the net worth.
Inflation is like the increasing population of your "rare" animal. If you don't want it to stop being valuable, it has to be controlled. Once it gets a little bit out of control, it spirals out of control further, and faster.
I've thought of another, shorter one:
Imagine your country's net worth is a cake. Every banknote represents a slice of that cake.
The only way to get more slices of cake is to cut those slices smaller. Sure there are more slices to go around, but everybody is getting less cake.
The only way for everyone to get more cake is to make the cake bigger. And if you want more people to get the same amount of cake, the cake has to grow proportionately to the increased amount of slicing.
Printing more bank notes does not make the economy grow any more than slicing up the cake more makes the cake bigger. The only way to do that is for the country's net worth to grow - through trade, building assets, and reduction of the national debt.
edited May 1 at 14:31
answered May 1 at 14:23
AstralbeeAstralbee
16.4k1757
16.4k1757
Actually, the amount of national debt does not change the overall value of the economy, because the nation's debt is some debtor's asset. (National debt does change the money flow inside the economy, and may cause beneficial or detrimental incentives, but that aspect is off-topic.)
– toolforger
May 2 at 6:26
add a comment |
Actually, the amount of national debt does not change the overall value of the economy, because the nation's debt is some debtor's asset. (National debt does change the money flow inside the economy, and may cause beneficial or detrimental incentives, but that aspect is off-topic.)
– toolforger
May 2 at 6:26
Actually, the amount of national debt does not change the overall value of the economy, because the nation's debt is some debtor's asset. (National debt does change the money flow inside the economy, and may cause beneficial or detrimental incentives, but that aspect is off-topic.)
– toolforger
May 2 at 6:26
Actually, the amount of national debt does not change the overall value of the economy, because the nation's debt is some debtor's asset. (National debt does change the money flow inside the economy, and may cause beneficial or detrimental incentives, but that aspect is off-topic.)
– toolforger
May 2 at 6:26
add a comment |
Here's a great saying that might help.
You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
Cheers/
The silk purse is fixing the economy.
The sow's ear is the problem, here, inflation.
Specific quotes:
1) "Inflation is like sin; every government denounces it and every government practices it”
Frederick Leith-Ross
2) “Inflation is when you pay fifteen dollars for the ten-dollar haircut you used to get for five dollars when you had hair.”
Sam Ewing
There are others but these are two that I liked.
specific inflation quotes
7
It is a lovely expression, but I've always understood it to mean "you can't make a beautiful thing out of ugly materials"
– jonathanjo
May 1 at 14:31
1
Yes, fixing the economy is a beautiful thing,and you can't fix it by printing money.
– Lambie
May 1 at 14:33
5
@I didn't mean you can't apply it to the economy, only that it's quite a general expression.
– jonathanjo
May 1 at 14:35
add a comment |
Here's a great saying that might help.
You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
Cheers/
The silk purse is fixing the economy.
The sow's ear is the problem, here, inflation.
Specific quotes:
1) "Inflation is like sin; every government denounces it and every government practices it”
Frederick Leith-Ross
2) “Inflation is when you pay fifteen dollars for the ten-dollar haircut you used to get for five dollars when you had hair.”
Sam Ewing
There are others but these are two that I liked.
specific inflation quotes
7
It is a lovely expression, but I've always understood it to mean "you can't make a beautiful thing out of ugly materials"
– jonathanjo
May 1 at 14:31
1
Yes, fixing the economy is a beautiful thing,and you can't fix it by printing money.
– Lambie
May 1 at 14:33
5
@I didn't mean you can't apply it to the economy, only that it's quite a general expression.
– jonathanjo
May 1 at 14:35
add a comment |
Here's a great saying that might help.
You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
Cheers/
The silk purse is fixing the economy.
The sow's ear is the problem, here, inflation.
Specific quotes:
1) "Inflation is like sin; every government denounces it and every government practices it”
Frederick Leith-Ross
2) “Inflation is when you pay fifteen dollars for the ten-dollar haircut you used to get for five dollars when you had hair.”
Sam Ewing
There are others but these are two that I liked.
specific inflation quotes
Here's a great saying that might help.
You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
Cheers/
The silk purse is fixing the economy.
The sow's ear is the problem, here, inflation.
Specific quotes:
1) "Inflation is like sin; every government denounces it and every government practices it”
Frederick Leith-Ross
2) “Inflation is when you pay fifteen dollars for the ten-dollar haircut you used to get for five dollars when you had hair.”
Sam Ewing
There are others but these are two that I liked.
specific inflation quotes
edited May 1 at 14:32
answered May 1 at 13:00
LambieLambie
18.3k1641
18.3k1641
7
It is a lovely expression, but I've always understood it to mean "you can't make a beautiful thing out of ugly materials"
– jonathanjo
May 1 at 14:31
1
Yes, fixing the economy is a beautiful thing,and you can't fix it by printing money.
– Lambie
May 1 at 14:33
5
@I didn't mean you can't apply it to the economy, only that it's quite a general expression.
– jonathanjo
May 1 at 14:35
add a comment |
7
It is a lovely expression, but I've always understood it to mean "you can't make a beautiful thing out of ugly materials"
– jonathanjo
May 1 at 14:31
1
Yes, fixing the economy is a beautiful thing,and you can't fix it by printing money.
– Lambie
May 1 at 14:33
5
@I didn't mean you can't apply it to the economy, only that it's quite a general expression.
– jonathanjo
May 1 at 14:35
7
7
It is a lovely expression, but I've always understood it to mean "you can't make a beautiful thing out of ugly materials"
– jonathanjo
May 1 at 14:31
It is a lovely expression, but I've always understood it to mean "you can't make a beautiful thing out of ugly materials"
– jonathanjo
May 1 at 14:31
1
1
Yes, fixing the economy is a beautiful thing,and you can't fix it by printing money.
– Lambie
May 1 at 14:33
Yes, fixing the economy is a beautiful thing,and you can't fix it by printing money.
– Lambie
May 1 at 14:33
5
5
@I didn't mean you can't apply it to the economy, only that it's quite a general expression.
– jonathanjo
May 1 at 14:35
@I didn't mean you can't apply it to the economy, only that it's quite a general expression.
– jonathanjo
May 1 at 14:35
add a comment |
Robbing Peter To Pay Paul
"You can't just rob Peter to pay Paul print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy."
rob Peter to pay Paul
To incur a debt in order to pay off another debt.
– American Heritage, TFD
The idiom robbing Peter to pay Paul may be related, but I'm upvoting for "print money out of thin air."
– J.R.♦
May 2 at 22:17
OP's words. At first I had it struck out. Then I thought mine better as an idiomatic title. Still, both are interchangeable.
– Mazura
May 2 at 23:41
add a comment |
Robbing Peter To Pay Paul
"You can't just rob Peter to pay Paul print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy."
rob Peter to pay Paul
To incur a debt in order to pay off another debt.
– American Heritage, TFD
The idiom robbing Peter to pay Paul may be related, but I'm upvoting for "print money out of thin air."
– J.R.♦
May 2 at 22:17
OP's words. At first I had it struck out. Then I thought mine better as an idiomatic title. Still, both are interchangeable.
– Mazura
May 2 at 23:41
add a comment |
Robbing Peter To Pay Paul
"You can't just rob Peter to pay Paul print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy."
rob Peter to pay Paul
To incur a debt in order to pay off another debt.
– American Heritage, TFD
Robbing Peter To Pay Paul
"You can't just rob Peter to pay Paul print money out of thin air and expect it to magically fix the economy."
rob Peter to pay Paul
To incur a debt in order to pay off another debt.
– American Heritage, TFD
answered May 2 at 5:20
MazuraMazura
24417
24417
The idiom robbing Peter to pay Paul may be related, but I'm upvoting for "print money out of thin air."
– J.R.♦
May 2 at 22:17
OP's words. At first I had it struck out. Then I thought mine better as an idiomatic title. Still, both are interchangeable.
– Mazura
May 2 at 23:41
add a comment |
The idiom robbing Peter to pay Paul may be related, but I'm upvoting for "print money out of thin air."
– J.R.♦
May 2 at 22:17
OP's words. At first I had it struck out. Then I thought mine better as an idiomatic title. Still, both are interchangeable.
– Mazura
May 2 at 23:41
The idiom robbing Peter to pay Paul may be related, but I'm upvoting for "print money out of thin air."
– J.R.♦
May 2 at 22:17
The idiom robbing Peter to pay Paul may be related, but I'm upvoting for "print money out of thin air."
– J.R.♦
May 2 at 22:17
OP's words. At first I had it struck out. Then I thought mine better as an idiomatic title. Still, both are interchangeable.
– Mazura
May 2 at 23:41
OP's words. At first I had it struck out. Then I thought mine better as an idiomatic title. Still, both are interchangeable.
– Mazura
May 2 at 23:41
add a comment |
People used to say in the USA: "Solid as a dollar". This implies the dollar should be solid, which of course strongly implies that inflation is bad. As someone else said: "Imagine if a yard [or meter] were always shrinking, all the time. It would be very hard to measure things!"
add a comment |
People used to say in the USA: "Solid as a dollar". This implies the dollar should be solid, which of course strongly implies that inflation is bad. As someone else said: "Imagine if a yard [or meter] were always shrinking, all the time. It would be very hard to measure things!"
add a comment |
People used to say in the USA: "Solid as a dollar". This implies the dollar should be solid, which of course strongly implies that inflation is bad. As someone else said: "Imagine if a yard [or meter] were always shrinking, all the time. It would be very hard to measure things!"
People used to say in the USA: "Solid as a dollar". This implies the dollar should be solid, which of course strongly implies that inflation is bad. As someone else said: "Imagine if a yard [or meter] were always shrinking, all the time. It would be very hard to measure things!"
answered May 1 at 15:52
JosephDoggieJosephDoggie
1012
1012
add a comment |
add a comment |
People understand that one form of money printing, namely counterfeiting, is harmful and destructive, and in hard-money circles at least, one will see the notion expressed concisely as
Inflation is legalized counterfeiting.
In other words, the state or the state’s central bank creating money out of thin air is no less pernicious than when petty crooks do it.
Similar is the statement
The Fed has the monopoly on Monopoly money.
The Fed refers to the Federal Reserve, the U.S. (and arguably global) central bank. Monopoly is a board game in which players buy and sell properties, starting out with colorful but clearly worthless bills that have value within the game only.
When a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke stated in a 2002 speech
… a money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman's famous 'helicopter drop' of money.
so lampooning someone, as Bernanke was in parts of the American press, as Helicopter Ben is an insulting putdown of a ridiculous idea.
More broadly about any bald assertion by a politician in plain contradiction to fact, someone might allude to the Hans Christian Andersen tale along the lines of
The Emperor is wearing no clothes!
or with biting irony as in
The Emperor’s new clothes are magnificently stylish!
An elected official, political appointee, or judge in flowing black robes running her mouth, spouting off, or talking out of his rear end (of which the last is both informal and slightly crude) does not make it true in any sense, and the connection to the Emperor’s new clothes states that people who play along are fools or sycophants.
One might make the connection to inflation with
The Emperor’s new printing press is a truly magical device! Why, who would have ever believed that all our problems could be solved by merely printing more money?
It's a lovely phrase, but not specifically about inflation. You can use it about anything where someone is stating a clear falsehood and it not being rejected by most people.
– jonathanjo
May 2 at 23:26
add a comment |
People understand that one form of money printing, namely counterfeiting, is harmful and destructive, and in hard-money circles at least, one will see the notion expressed concisely as
Inflation is legalized counterfeiting.
In other words, the state or the state’s central bank creating money out of thin air is no less pernicious than when petty crooks do it.
Similar is the statement
The Fed has the monopoly on Monopoly money.
The Fed refers to the Federal Reserve, the U.S. (and arguably global) central bank. Monopoly is a board game in which players buy and sell properties, starting out with colorful but clearly worthless bills that have value within the game only.
When a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke stated in a 2002 speech
… a money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman's famous 'helicopter drop' of money.
so lampooning someone, as Bernanke was in parts of the American press, as Helicopter Ben is an insulting putdown of a ridiculous idea.
More broadly about any bald assertion by a politician in plain contradiction to fact, someone might allude to the Hans Christian Andersen tale along the lines of
The Emperor is wearing no clothes!
or with biting irony as in
The Emperor’s new clothes are magnificently stylish!
An elected official, political appointee, or judge in flowing black robes running her mouth, spouting off, or talking out of his rear end (of which the last is both informal and slightly crude) does not make it true in any sense, and the connection to the Emperor’s new clothes states that people who play along are fools or sycophants.
One might make the connection to inflation with
The Emperor’s new printing press is a truly magical device! Why, who would have ever believed that all our problems could be solved by merely printing more money?
It's a lovely phrase, but not specifically about inflation. You can use it about anything where someone is stating a clear falsehood and it not being rejected by most people.
– jonathanjo
May 2 at 23:26
add a comment |
People understand that one form of money printing, namely counterfeiting, is harmful and destructive, and in hard-money circles at least, one will see the notion expressed concisely as
Inflation is legalized counterfeiting.
In other words, the state or the state’s central bank creating money out of thin air is no less pernicious than when petty crooks do it.
Similar is the statement
The Fed has the monopoly on Monopoly money.
The Fed refers to the Federal Reserve, the U.S. (and arguably global) central bank. Monopoly is a board game in which players buy and sell properties, starting out with colorful but clearly worthless bills that have value within the game only.
When a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke stated in a 2002 speech
… a money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman's famous 'helicopter drop' of money.
so lampooning someone, as Bernanke was in parts of the American press, as Helicopter Ben is an insulting putdown of a ridiculous idea.
More broadly about any bald assertion by a politician in plain contradiction to fact, someone might allude to the Hans Christian Andersen tale along the lines of
The Emperor is wearing no clothes!
or with biting irony as in
The Emperor’s new clothes are magnificently stylish!
An elected official, political appointee, or judge in flowing black robes running her mouth, spouting off, or talking out of his rear end (of which the last is both informal and slightly crude) does not make it true in any sense, and the connection to the Emperor’s new clothes states that people who play along are fools or sycophants.
One might make the connection to inflation with
The Emperor’s new printing press is a truly magical device! Why, who would have ever believed that all our problems could be solved by merely printing more money?
People understand that one form of money printing, namely counterfeiting, is harmful and destructive, and in hard-money circles at least, one will see the notion expressed concisely as
Inflation is legalized counterfeiting.
In other words, the state or the state’s central bank creating money out of thin air is no less pernicious than when petty crooks do it.
Similar is the statement
The Fed has the monopoly on Monopoly money.
The Fed refers to the Federal Reserve, the U.S. (and arguably global) central bank. Monopoly is a board game in which players buy and sell properties, starting out with colorful but clearly worthless bills that have value within the game only.
When a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke stated in a 2002 speech
… a money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman's famous 'helicopter drop' of money.
so lampooning someone, as Bernanke was in parts of the American press, as Helicopter Ben is an insulting putdown of a ridiculous idea.
More broadly about any bald assertion by a politician in plain contradiction to fact, someone might allude to the Hans Christian Andersen tale along the lines of
The Emperor is wearing no clothes!
or with biting irony as in
The Emperor’s new clothes are magnificently stylish!
An elected official, political appointee, or judge in flowing black robes running her mouth, spouting off, or talking out of his rear end (of which the last is both informal and slightly crude) does not make it true in any sense, and the connection to the Emperor’s new clothes states that people who play along are fools or sycophants.
One might make the connection to inflation with
The Emperor’s new printing press is a truly magical device! Why, who would have ever believed that all our problems could be solved by merely printing more money?
edited May 2 at 23:54
answered May 2 at 23:14
Greg BaconGreg Bacon
55028
55028
It's a lovely phrase, but not specifically about inflation. You can use it about anything where someone is stating a clear falsehood and it not being rejected by most people.
– jonathanjo
May 2 at 23:26
add a comment |
It's a lovely phrase, but not specifically about inflation. You can use it about anything where someone is stating a clear falsehood and it not being rejected by most people.
– jonathanjo
May 2 at 23:26
It's a lovely phrase, but not specifically about inflation. You can use it about anything where someone is stating a clear falsehood and it not being rejected by most people.
– jonathanjo
May 2 at 23:26
It's a lovely phrase, but not specifically about inflation. You can use it about anything where someone is stating a clear falsehood and it not being rejected by most people.
– jonathanjo
May 2 at 23:26
add a comment |
protected by Community♦ May 2 at 2:04
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
1
It may help to find a country/context where there was hyperinflation, and look for idioms that developed there. I'm not aware of hyperinflation of a national currency ever being an issue in any english speaking country...though there are probably some examples of local/private currencies losing their value.
– adam.r
May 1 at 19:52
2
@adam.r -- The U.S. has had hyperinflation twice: During the American Revolution, and in the Confederate States of America. The Revolution's experience gave rise to the phrase, "Not worth a Continental." Also, Zimbabwe used to be a British colony; I don't know if it still considered to be an English-speaking country.
– Jasper
May 1 at 21:36
@Jasper. Thanks. The "stagflation" era may also be a good source.
– adam.r
May 2 at 2:07