Should I mention being denied entry to UK due to a confusion in my Visa and Ticket bookings?Leave and re-enter Schengen Area with multiple entry long stay D visa and NO permitHow can Americans visit Europe with as much flexibility and convenience as possible?Old Type C Schengen expires after type DI am American and have a D visa multi-entry for ItalyRelaxation on validity of UK visa requirement while applying for Schengen Visa to ItalyDenied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?Why didn't the check-in agent recognize my long term visa?

Why was the Ancient One so hesitant to teach Dr. Strange the art of sorcery?

On studying Computer Science vs. Software Engineering to become a proficient coder

How can this pool heater gas line be disconnected?

Is Simic Ascendancy triggered by Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi?

Unit Test - Testing API Methods

Was there a contingency plan in place if Little Boy failed to detonate?

Was this a power play by Daenerys?

Ex-manager wants to stay in touch, I don't want to

Why does the Earth follow an elliptical trajectory rather than a parabolic one?

Why do Thanos's punches not kill Captain America or at least cause some mortal injuries?

Ubuntu won't let me edit or delete .vimrc file

Is a diamond sword feasible?

On what legal basis did the UK remove the 'European Union' from its passport?

51% attack - apparently very easy? refering to CZ's "rollback btc chain" - How to make sure such corruptible scenario can never happen so easily?

Why in a Ethernet LAN, a packet sniffer can obtain all packets sent over the LAN?

What are some possible reasons that a father's name is missing from a birth certificate - England?

Adding slope values to attribute table (QGIS 3)

How to select certain lines (n, n+4, n+8, n+12...) from the file?

Help decide course of action for rotting windows

How are Core iX names like Core i5, i7 related to Haswell, Ivy Bridge?

"Fīliolō me auctum scito, salva Terentia"; what is "me" role in this phrase?

How to slow yourself down (for playing nice with others)

Drawing Quarter-Circle

Is the homebrew weapon attack cantrip 'Arcane Strike' balanced?



Should I mention being denied entry to UK due to a confusion in my Visa and Ticket bookings?


Leave and re-enter Schengen Area with multiple entry long stay D visa and NO permitHow can Americans visit Europe with as much flexibility and convenience as possible?Old Type C Schengen expires after type DI am American and have a D visa multi-entry for ItalyRelaxation on validity of UK visa requirement while applying for Schengen Visa to ItalyDenied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?Why didn't the check-in agent recognize my long term visa?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








27















I am an Indian national. I was travelling for an interview to Cork, Ireland in March this year. After my visa was approved (BC only, not BC BIVS), my employer booked the tickets for me via Istanbul and London.



At Istanbul Airport I was denied boarding for the onward flight to London. The reason given was that I needed a "BC BIVS" visa and not a "BC" to travel through London. After this, I took a direct flight next day to Dublin instead of London and attended my interview.



This was a mistake on the travel agent's side, as he did not see the "BC" on my visa and booked me a flight through London instead of a direct flight to Ireland.



Now, I am applying for a long term employment visa for Ireland. Does this count as a refusal to entry? Should I mention this as being denied entry to a country in the visa application form?



The exact question in my Long Stay visa application is: "Have you ever been refused entry to, deported from, or otherwise required to leave another country?"










share|improve this question
























  • Could you please clarify the context of "Does this count as a refusal to entry"? Who is asking this information? Refusal to entry to what? etc. If Ireland is asking, then they probably do not care about refusal to entry in UK.

    – user803422
    May 2 at 19:11












  • @user803422 If the form only asks about being refused entry to Ireland, there'd be no reason to ask if this incident counts as being refused entry to the UK.

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 23:47











  • @user803422 The exact question in my Long Stay visa application was: "Have you ever been refused entry to, deported from, or otherwise required to leave another country?". As of now, I proceeded to answer No to the above question after the answers here and also confirmed from the HR of my prospective employer. The rationale behind this, what I understood was that I was in transit and not entering the country. So technically I was not denied entry.

    – Yash Deep
    May 3 at 16:40











  • @YashDeep the actual reason is that you weren't even in transit because you weren't allowed onto the plane, so you never got to the UK border, so you weren't refused. Transit or visit doesn't matter: if you'd got to the UK, said "I want to transit, please" and been told by an immigration official "You can't: you don't have the right visa", that would have been a refusal, even though it was just transit.

    – David Richerby
    May 3 at 17:10











  • @DavidRicherby I accept I wasn't actually "in Transit". What I meant to say was that I was supposed to " only transit through" and "not enter" the UK , and I was not allowed to board in Istanbul itself, so I changed my route and went directly to Dublin instead and that is why the refusal does not count, I suppose. What you are saying is also very correct that if I had landed in the UK and then the immigration officials refused to let me in, it would have been a refusal. I hope I am getting that right!

    – Yash Deep
    May 3 at 18:28

















27















I am an Indian national. I was travelling for an interview to Cork, Ireland in March this year. After my visa was approved (BC only, not BC BIVS), my employer booked the tickets for me via Istanbul and London.



At Istanbul Airport I was denied boarding for the onward flight to London. The reason given was that I needed a "BC BIVS" visa and not a "BC" to travel through London. After this, I took a direct flight next day to Dublin instead of London and attended my interview.



This was a mistake on the travel agent's side, as he did not see the "BC" on my visa and booked me a flight through London instead of a direct flight to Ireland.



Now, I am applying for a long term employment visa for Ireland. Does this count as a refusal to entry? Should I mention this as being denied entry to a country in the visa application form?



The exact question in my Long Stay visa application is: "Have you ever been refused entry to, deported from, or otherwise required to leave another country?"










share|improve this question
























  • Could you please clarify the context of "Does this count as a refusal to entry"? Who is asking this information? Refusal to entry to what? etc. If Ireland is asking, then they probably do not care about refusal to entry in UK.

    – user803422
    May 2 at 19:11












  • @user803422 If the form only asks about being refused entry to Ireland, there'd be no reason to ask if this incident counts as being refused entry to the UK.

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 23:47











  • @user803422 The exact question in my Long Stay visa application was: "Have you ever been refused entry to, deported from, or otherwise required to leave another country?". As of now, I proceeded to answer No to the above question after the answers here and also confirmed from the HR of my prospective employer. The rationale behind this, what I understood was that I was in transit and not entering the country. So technically I was not denied entry.

    – Yash Deep
    May 3 at 16:40











  • @YashDeep the actual reason is that you weren't even in transit because you weren't allowed onto the plane, so you never got to the UK border, so you weren't refused. Transit or visit doesn't matter: if you'd got to the UK, said "I want to transit, please" and been told by an immigration official "You can't: you don't have the right visa", that would have been a refusal, even though it was just transit.

    – David Richerby
    May 3 at 17:10











  • @DavidRicherby I accept I wasn't actually "in Transit". What I meant to say was that I was supposed to " only transit through" and "not enter" the UK , and I was not allowed to board in Istanbul itself, so I changed my route and went directly to Dublin instead and that is why the refusal does not count, I suppose. What you are saying is also very correct that if I had landed in the UK and then the immigration officials refused to let me in, it would have been a refusal. I hope I am getting that right!

    – Yash Deep
    May 3 at 18:28













27












27








27


0






I am an Indian national. I was travelling for an interview to Cork, Ireland in March this year. After my visa was approved (BC only, not BC BIVS), my employer booked the tickets for me via Istanbul and London.



At Istanbul Airport I was denied boarding for the onward flight to London. The reason given was that I needed a "BC BIVS" visa and not a "BC" to travel through London. After this, I took a direct flight next day to Dublin instead of London and attended my interview.



This was a mistake on the travel agent's side, as he did not see the "BC" on my visa and booked me a flight through London instead of a direct flight to Ireland.



Now, I am applying for a long term employment visa for Ireland. Does this count as a refusal to entry? Should I mention this as being denied entry to a country in the visa application form?



The exact question in my Long Stay visa application is: "Have you ever been refused entry to, deported from, or otherwise required to leave another country?"










share|improve this question
















I am an Indian national. I was travelling for an interview to Cork, Ireland in March this year. After my visa was approved (BC only, not BC BIVS), my employer booked the tickets for me via Istanbul and London.



At Istanbul Airport I was denied boarding for the onward flight to London. The reason given was that I needed a "BC BIVS" visa and not a "BC" to travel through London. After this, I took a direct flight next day to Dublin instead of London and attended my interview.



This was a mistake on the travel agent's side, as he did not see the "BC" on my visa and booked me a flight through London instead of a direct flight to Ireland.



Now, I am applying for a long term employment visa for Ireland. Does this count as a refusal to entry? Should I mention this as being denied entry to a country in the visa application form?



The exact question in my Long Stay visa application is: "Have you ever been refused entry to, deported from, or otherwise required to leave another country?"







long-stay-visas denied-boarding






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 3 at 17:13









David Richerby

16.2k104993




16.2k104993










asked May 1 at 12:09









Yash DeepYash Deep

13625




13625












  • Could you please clarify the context of "Does this count as a refusal to entry"? Who is asking this information? Refusal to entry to what? etc. If Ireland is asking, then they probably do not care about refusal to entry in UK.

    – user803422
    May 2 at 19:11












  • @user803422 If the form only asks about being refused entry to Ireland, there'd be no reason to ask if this incident counts as being refused entry to the UK.

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 23:47











  • @user803422 The exact question in my Long Stay visa application was: "Have you ever been refused entry to, deported from, or otherwise required to leave another country?". As of now, I proceeded to answer No to the above question after the answers here and also confirmed from the HR of my prospective employer. The rationale behind this, what I understood was that I was in transit and not entering the country. So technically I was not denied entry.

    – Yash Deep
    May 3 at 16:40











  • @YashDeep the actual reason is that you weren't even in transit because you weren't allowed onto the plane, so you never got to the UK border, so you weren't refused. Transit or visit doesn't matter: if you'd got to the UK, said "I want to transit, please" and been told by an immigration official "You can't: you don't have the right visa", that would have been a refusal, even though it was just transit.

    – David Richerby
    May 3 at 17:10











  • @DavidRicherby I accept I wasn't actually "in Transit". What I meant to say was that I was supposed to " only transit through" and "not enter" the UK , and I was not allowed to board in Istanbul itself, so I changed my route and went directly to Dublin instead and that is why the refusal does not count, I suppose. What you are saying is also very correct that if I had landed in the UK and then the immigration officials refused to let me in, it would have been a refusal. I hope I am getting that right!

    – Yash Deep
    May 3 at 18:28

















  • Could you please clarify the context of "Does this count as a refusal to entry"? Who is asking this information? Refusal to entry to what? etc. If Ireland is asking, then they probably do not care about refusal to entry in UK.

    – user803422
    May 2 at 19:11












  • @user803422 If the form only asks about being refused entry to Ireland, there'd be no reason to ask if this incident counts as being refused entry to the UK.

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 23:47











  • @user803422 The exact question in my Long Stay visa application was: "Have you ever been refused entry to, deported from, or otherwise required to leave another country?". As of now, I proceeded to answer No to the above question after the answers here and also confirmed from the HR of my prospective employer. The rationale behind this, what I understood was that I was in transit and not entering the country. So technically I was not denied entry.

    – Yash Deep
    May 3 at 16:40











  • @YashDeep the actual reason is that you weren't even in transit because you weren't allowed onto the plane, so you never got to the UK border, so you weren't refused. Transit or visit doesn't matter: if you'd got to the UK, said "I want to transit, please" and been told by an immigration official "You can't: you don't have the right visa", that would have been a refusal, even though it was just transit.

    – David Richerby
    May 3 at 17:10











  • @DavidRicherby I accept I wasn't actually "in Transit". What I meant to say was that I was supposed to " only transit through" and "not enter" the UK , and I was not allowed to board in Istanbul itself, so I changed my route and went directly to Dublin instead and that is why the refusal does not count, I suppose. What you are saying is also very correct that if I had landed in the UK and then the immigration officials refused to let me in, it would have been a refusal. I hope I am getting that right!

    – Yash Deep
    May 3 at 18:28
















Could you please clarify the context of "Does this count as a refusal to entry"? Who is asking this information? Refusal to entry to what? etc. If Ireland is asking, then they probably do not care about refusal to entry in UK.

– user803422
May 2 at 19:11






Could you please clarify the context of "Does this count as a refusal to entry"? Who is asking this information? Refusal to entry to what? etc. If Ireland is asking, then they probably do not care about refusal to entry in UK.

– user803422
May 2 at 19:11














@user803422 If the form only asks about being refused entry to Ireland, there'd be no reason to ask if this incident counts as being refused entry to the UK.

– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:47





@user803422 If the form only asks about being refused entry to Ireland, there'd be no reason to ask if this incident counts as being refused entry to the UK.

– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:47













@user803422 The exact question in my Long Stay visa application was: "Have you ever been refused entry to, deported from, or otherwise required to leave another country?". As of now, I proceeded to answer No to the above question after the answers here and also confirmed from the HR of my prospective employer. The rationale behind this, what I understood was that I was in transit and not entering the country. So technically I was not denied entry.

– Yash Deep
May 3 at 16:40





@user803422 The exact question in my Long Stay visa application was: "Have you ever been refused entry to, deported from, or otherwise required to leave another country?". As of now, I proceeded to answer No to the above question after the answers here and also confirmed from the HR of my prospective employer. The rationale behind this, what I understood was that I was in transit and not entering the country. So technically I was not denied entry.

– Yash Deep
May 3 at 16:40













@YashDeep the actual reason is that you weren't even in transit because you weren't allowed onto the plane, so you never got to the UK border, so you weren't refused. Transit or visit doesn't matter: if you'd got to the UK, said "I want to transit, please" and been told by an immigration official "You can't: you don't have the right visa", that would have been a refusal, even though it was just transit.

– David Richerby
May 3 at 17:10





@YashDeep the actual reason is that you weren't even in transit because you weren't allowed onto the plane, so you never got to the UK border, so you weren't refused. Transit or visit doesn't matter: if you'd got to the UK, said "I want to transit, please" and been told by an immigration official "You can't: you don't have the right visa", that would have been a refusal, even though it was just transit.

– David Richerby
May 3 at 17:10













@DavidRicherby I accept I wasn't actually "in Transit". What I meant to say was that I was supposed to " only transit through" and "not enter" the UK , and I was not allowed to board in Istanbul itself, so I changed my route and went directly to Dublin instead and that is why the refusal does not count, I suppose. What you are saying is also very correct that if I had landed in the UK and then the immigration officials refused to let me in, it would have been a refusal. I hope I am getting that right!

– Yash Deep
May 3 at 18:28





@DavidRicherby I accept I wasn't actually "in Transit". What I meant to say was that I was supposed to " only transit through" and "not enter" the UK , and I was not allowed to board in Istanbul itself, so I changed my route and went directly to Dublin instead and that is why the refusal does not count, I suppose. What you are saying is also very correct that if I had landed in the UK and then the immigration officials refused to let me in, it would have been a refusal. I hope I am getting that right!

– Yash Deep
May 3 at 18:28










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















100














You were not refused entry to the UK. The airline just refused to take you there, which is lucky because, if they had taken you to the UK, it seems that you would have been refused entry.






share|improve this answer























  • Does the airline inform immigration in these cases? Could the refused boarding be recorded in any way?

    – Fabio Turati
    May 2 at 9:16






  • 1





    @FabioTurati I don't know, but I don't think it affects the answer.

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 10:23











  • I don't know either, but if the incident has been recorded and immigration has been informed, I think it would be better to mention it.

    – Fabio Turati
    May 2 at 10:44






  • 1





    Note that he was never refused entry to Ireland - he was just not allowed to have a stopover in London.

    – Twinkles
    May 2 at 12:00






  • 11





    @Twinkles He wasn't refused entry to any country.

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 12:49


















8














There is no need to mention your tale of woe if the application form specifically asks if you have been refused entry to any country. Refusal of entry has a specific meaning, and should be accompanied by a stamp in the passport. So if you are using the same passport and there is no refusal stamp, then you have nothing to fear.



You were simply not allowed to travel via the UK because you did not have the right type of visa to transit the UK. As is said above, you have not been refused entry to the UK or to Ireland by any immigration authority. You were merely refused permission to board the aircraft because you did not have the right documentation, just as you would be if you had the wrong ticket.



The simple fact is that you have previously been to Ireland for your interview, you did the right thing and left again, complying with your conditions of stay, and now you wish to return there to work and are going through the proper process to do so. That's what work interviews are for!



Full marks for wanting to be fully honest and open. If for some unlikely reason the issue of the earlier incident comes up, you should have nothing to fear. Even the most hard-bitten immigration officials know that travel agents are not always competent, and will see from your record that you had no reason to want to enter the UK illegally.






share|improve this answer


















  • 7





    Re. "So if you are using the same passport and there is no refusal stamp, then you have nothing to fear". It doesn't apply to the OP, but for safety's sake, it might be worth explicitly noting that if someone was refused entry and has had a stamp in their passport, but now has a new passport without a stamp, that does not mean they no longer have to worry about or mention their refusal if asked.

    – TripeHound
    May 3 at 11:43


















2














I would be inclined to mention it. If you choose not to and they find out then you will likely have a black mark.
If you disclose it along with the circumstances (i.e. not your fault, just an error, not attempting to cheat etc), then they will take that into account and probably not even worry about it. In my (limited) experience with these types of authorities, they are generally looking for honesty and openness.



At the end of the day, it is hard to say exactly they will view any particular disclosure (or non-disclosure).



If you choose not to disclose, then you always have the option of saying that there was a mistake and when it was discovered, you voluntarily modified your travel plans so as to avoid any problems with "refusal of entry". So in your case, you are probably safe either way.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    You make good points (so +1 from me), except that being refused boarding isn't "voluntarily modif[ying] your travel plans."

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 8:33







  • 3





    But the OP was never refused entry, they were refused boarding -- these are different things.

    – jpatokal
    May 2 at 9:15






  • 2





    OP was never processed by UK immigration (who are the only ones competent to 'refuse' entry). The airlines just declined to ferry him to UK. Indicating he has been refused entry (when there is no corresponding trail in the immigration system) just muddles the application.

    – RedBaron
    May 3 at 8:08






  • 1





    I like this answer because it's the one I'd go with. If they asked me in this situation, I'd probably say something along the lines of "No, but - haha - there was a mix-up with my travel on the way here. Couldn't travel through London because of my current visa and had to switch planes! Glad to be here eventually. But no, never been refused entry." It's possible to mention something without making a big deal of it. Then you're covered both ways. If they want to know more about your visa woes, they can ask, but I expect they wouldn't care and if they ask it's probably just out of politeness.

    – oliver-clare
    May 3 at 8:08






  • 1





    My comment above assumes a human interaction though, if it's a form-filling exercise, then I'd say don't mention it, it's irrelevant.

    – oliver-clare
    May 3 at 8:09


















1














Don't mention it. PERIOD.



If you give them ANY ammunition, you only get yourself shot. As far as you are concerned, you were not refused entry into the UK or anywhere, it was airline staff that denied you boarding the flight, not any official!



Telling them you were denied entry to the flight is only going to make them look into it more and possibly find something else wrong to deny you on. In which case, you did it to yourself.



The way it stands: you were not denied entry into anywhere! No one can substantiate any different to that. And your knowledge only extends as far as customs officials permit.



My take: IF it EVER comes up, you plead ignorance on the basis you weren't denied entry to anywhere, stating as much and nothing more. I didn't think it bore any relevance since it had nothing to do with (INSERT AGENCY) I was travelling to Ireland, not the UK!!! AND I was only travelling for the purpose of an interview. I was only transiting through the UK, nothing more. That's it!






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "273"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137686%2fshould-i-mention-being-denied-entry-to-uk-due-to-a-confusion-in-my-visa-and-tick%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    100














    You were not refused entry to the UK. The airline just refused to take you there, which is lucky because, if they had taken you to the UK, it seems that you would have been refused entry.






    share|improve this answer























    • Does the airline inform immigration in these cases? Could the refused boarding be recorded in any way?

      – Fabio Turati
      May 2 at 9:16






    • 1





      @FabioTurati I don't know, but I don't think it affects the answer.

      – David Richerby
      May 2 at 10:23











    • I don't know either, but if the incident has been recorded and immigration has been informed, I think it would be better to mention it.

      – Fabio Turati
      May 2 at 10:44






    • 1





      Note that he was never refused entry to Ireland - he was just not allowed to have a stopover in London.

      – Twinkles
      May 2 at 12:00






    • 11





      @Twinkles He wasn't refused entry to any country.

      – David Richerby
      May 2 at 12:49















    100














    You were not refused entry to the UK. The airline just refused to take you there, which is lucky because, if they had taken you to the UK, it seems that you would have been refused entry.






    share|improve this answer























    • Does the airline inform immigration in these cases? Could the refused boarding be recorded in any way?

      – Fabio Turati
      May 2 at 9:16






    • 1





      @FabioTurati I don't know, but I don't think it affects the answer.

      – David Richerby
      May 2 at 10:23











    • I don't know either, but if the incident has been recorded and immigration has been informed, I think it would be better to mention it.

      – Fabio Turati
      May 2 at 10:44






    • 1





      Note that he was never refused entry to Ireland - he was just not allowed to have a stopover in London.

      – Twinkles
      May 2 at 12:00






    • 11





      @Twinkles He wasn't refused entry to any country.

      – David Richerby
      May 2 at 12:49













    100












    100








    100







    You were not refused entry to the UK. The airline just refused to take you there, which is lucky because, if they had taken you to the UK, it seems that you would have been refused entry.






    share|improve this answer













    You were not refused entry to the UK. The airline just refused to take you there, which is lucky because, if they had taken you to the UK, it seems that you would have been refused entry.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered May 1 at 12:21









    David RicherbyDavid Richerby

    16.2k104993




    16.2k104993












    • Does the airline inform immigration in these cases? Could the refused boarding be recorded in any way?

      – Fabio Turati
      May 2 at 9:16






    • 1





      @FabioTurati I don't know, but I don't think it affects the answer.

      – David Richerby
      May 2 at 10:23











    • I don't know either, but if the incident has been recorded and immigration has been informed, I think it would be better to mention it.

      – Fabio Turati
      May 2 at 10:44






    • 1





      Note that he was never refused entry to Ireland - he was just not allowed to have a stopover in London.

      – Twinkles
      May 2 at 12:00






    • 11





      @Twinkles He wasn't refused entry to any country.

      – David Richerby
      May 2 at 12:49

















    • Does the airline inform immigration in these cases? Could the refused boarding be recorded in any way?

      – Fabio Turati
      May 2 at 9:16






    • 1





      @FabioTurati I don't know, but I don't think it affects the answer.

      – David Richerby
      May 2 at 10:23











    • I don't know either, but if the incident has been recorded and immigration has been informed, I think it would be better to mention it.

      – Fabio Turati
      May 2 at 10:44






    • 1





      Note that he was never refused entry to Ireland - he was just not allowed to have a stopover in London.

      – Twinkles
      May 2 at 12:00






    • 11





      @Twinkles He wasn't refused entry to any country.

      – David Richerby
      May 2 at 12:49
















    Does the airline inform immigration in these cases? Could the refused boarding be recorded in any way?

    – Fabio Turati
    May 2 at 9:16





    Does the airline inform immigration in these cases? Could the refused boarding be recorded in any way?

    – Fabio Turati
    May 2 at 9:16




    1




    1





    @FabioTurati I don't know, but I don't think it affects the answer.

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 10:23





    @FabioTurati I don't know, but I don't think it affects the answer.

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 10:23













    I don't know either, but if the incident has been recorded and immigration has been informed, I think it would be better to mention it.

    – Fabio Turati
    May 2 at 10:44





    I don't know either, but if the incident has been recorded and immigration has been informed, I think it would be better to mention it.

    – Fabio Turati
    May 2 at 10:44




    1




    1





    Note that he was never refused entry to Ireland - he was just not allowed to have a stopover in London.

    – Twinkles
    May 2 at 12:00





    Note that he was never refused entry to Ireland - he was just not allowed to have a stopover in London.

    – Twinkles
    May 2 at 12:00




    11




    11





    @Twinkles He wasn't refused entry to any country.

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 12:49





    @Twinkles He wasn't refused entry to any country.

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 12:49













    8














    There is no need to mention your tale of woe if the application form specifically asks if you have been refused entry to any country. Refusal of entry has a specific meaning, and should be accompanied by a stamp in the passport. So if you are using the same passport and there is no refusal stamp, then you have nothing to fear.



    You were simply not allowed to travel via the UK because you did not have the right type of visa to transit the UK. As is said above, you have not been refused entry to the UK or to Ireland by any immigration authority. You were merely refused permission to board the aircraft because you did not have the right documentation, just as you would be if you had the wrong ticket.



    The simple fact is that you have previously been to Ireland for your interview, you did the right thing and left again, complying with your conditions of stay, and now you wish to return there to work and are going through the proper process to do so. That's what work interviews are for!



    Full marks for wanting to be fully honest and open. If for some unlikely reason the issue of the earlier incident comes up, you should have nothing to fear. Even the most hard-bitten immigration officials know that travel agents are not always competent, and will see from your record that you had no reason to want to enter the UK illegally.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 7





      Re. "So if you are using the same passport and there is no refusal stamp, then you have nothing to fear". It doesn't apply to the OP, but for safety's sake, it might be worth explicitly noting that if someone was refused entry and has had a stamp in their passport, but now has a new passport without a stamp, that does not mean they no longer have to worry about or mention their refusal if asked.

      – TripeHound
      May 3 at 11:43















    8














    There is no need to mention your tale of woe if the application form specifically asks if you have been refused entry to any country. Refusal of entry has a specific meaning, and should be accompanied by a stamp in the passport. So if you are using the same passport and there is no refusal stamp, then you have nothing to fear.



    You were simply not allowed to travel via the UK because you did not have the right type of visa to transit the UK. As is said above, you have not been refused entry to the UK or to Ireland by any immigration authority. You were merely refused permission to board the aircraft because you did not have the right documentation, just as you would be if you had the wrong ticket.



    The simple fact is that you have previously been to Ireland for your interview, you did the right thing and left again, complying with your conditions of stay, and now you wish to return there to work and are going through the proper process to do so. That's what work interviews are for!



    Full marks for wanting to be fully honest and open. If for some unlikely reason the issue of the earlier incident comes up, you should have nothing to fear. Even the most hard-bitten immigration officials know that travel agents are not always competent, and will see from your record that you had no reason to want to enter the UK illegally.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 7





      Re. "So if you are using the same passport and there is no refusal stamp, then you have nothing to fear". It doesn't apply to the OP, but for safety's sake, it might be worth explicitly noting that if someone was refused entry and has had a stamp in their passport, but now has a new passport without a stamp, that does not mean they no longer have to worry about or mention their refusal if asked.

      – TripeHound
      May 3 at 11:43













    8












    8








    8







    There is no need to mention your tale of woe if the application form specifically asks if you have been refused entry to any country. Refusal of entry has a specific meaning, and should be accompanied by a stamp in the passport. So if you are using the same passport and there is no refusal stamp, then you have nothing to fear.



    You were simply not allowed to travel via the UK because you did not have the right type of visa to transit the UK. As is said above, you have not been refused entry to the UK or to Ireland by any immigration authority. You were merely refused permission to board the aircraft because you did not have the right documentation, just as you would be if you had the wrong ticket.



    The simple fact is that you have previously been to Ireland for your interview, you did the right thing and left again, complying with your conditions of stay, and now you wish to return there to work and are going through the proper process to do so. That's what work interviews are for!



    Full marks for wanting to be fully honest and open. If for some unlikely reason the issue of the earlier incident comes up, you should have nothing to fear. Even the most hard-bitten immigration officials know that travel agents are not always competent, and will see from your record that you had no reason to want to enter the UK illegally.






    share|improve this answer













    There is no need to mention your tale of woe if the application form specifically asks if you have been refused entry to any country. Refusal of entry has a specific meaning, and should be accompanied by a stamp in the passport. So if you are using the same passport and there is no refusal stamp, then you have nothing to fear.



    You were simply not allowed to travel via the UK because you did not have the right type of visa to transit the UK. As is said above, you have not been refused entry to the UK or to Ireland by any immigration authority. You were merely refused permission to board the aircraft because you did not have the right documentation, just as you would be if you had the wrong ticket.



    The simple fact is that you have previously been to Ireland for your interview, you did the right thing and left again, complying with your conditions of stay, and now you wish to return there to work and are going through the proper process to do so. That's what work interviews are for!



    Full marks for wanting to be fully honest and open. If for some unlikely reason the issue of the earlier incident comes up, you should have nothing to fear. Even the most hard-bitten immigration officials know that travel agents are not always competent, and will see from your record that you had no reason to want to enter the UK illegally.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered May 2 at 20:20









    MichaelMichael

    811




    811







    • 7





      Re. "So if you are using the same passport and there is no refusal stamp, then you have nothing to fear". It doesn't apply to the OP, but for safety's sake, it might be worth explicitly noting that if someone was refused entry and has had a stamp in their passport, but now has a new passport without a stamp, that does not mean they no longer have to worry about or mention their refusal if asked.

      – TripeHound
      May 3 at 11:43












    • 7





      Re. "So if you are using the same passport and there is no refusal stamp, then you have nothing to fear". It doesn't apply to the OP, but for safety's sake, it might be worth explicitly noting that if someone was refused entry and has had a stamp in their passport, but now has a new passport without a stamp, that does not mean they no longer have to worry about or mention their refusal if asked.

      – TripeHound
      May 3 at 11:43







    7




    7





    Re. "So if you are using the same passport and there is no refusal stamp, then you have nothing to fear". It doesn't apply to the OP, but for safety's sake, it might be worth explicitly noting that if someone was refused entry and has had a stamp in their passport, but now has a new passport without a stamp, that does not mean they no longer have to worry about or mention their refusal if asked.

    – TripeHound
    May 3 at 11:43





    Re. "So if you are using the same passport and there is no refusal stamp, then you have nothing to fear". It doesn't apply to the OP, but for safety's sake, it might be worth explicitly noting that if someone was refused entry and has had a stamp in their passport, but now has a new passport without a stamp, that does not mean they no longer have to worry about or mention their refusal if asked.

    – TripeHound
    May 3 at 11:43











    2














    I would be inclined to mention it. If you choose not to and they find out then you will likely have a black mark.
    If you disclose it along with the circumstances (i.e. not your fault, just an error, not attempting to cheat etc), then they will take that into account and probably not even worry about it. In my (limited) experience with these types of authorities, they are generally looking for honesty and openness.



    At the end of the day, it is hard to say exactly they will view any particular disclosure (or non-disclosure).



    If you choose not to disclose, then you always have the option of saying that there was a mistake and when it was discovered, you voluntarily modified your travel plans so as to avoid any problems with "refusal of entry". So in your case, you are probably safe either way.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      You make good points (so +1 from me), except that being refused boarding isn't "voluntarily modif[ying] your travel plans."

      – David Richerby
      May 2 at 8:33







    • 3





      But the OP was never refused entry, they were refused boarding -- these are different things.

      – jpatokal
      May 2 at 9:15






    • 2





      OP was never processed by UK immigration (who are the only ones competent to 'refuse' entry). The airlines just declined to ferry him to UK. Indicating he has been refused entry (when there is no corresponding trail in the immigration system) just muddles the application.

      – RedBaron
      May 3 at 8:08






    • 1





      I like this answer because it's the one I'd go with. If they asked me in this situation, I'd probably say something along the lines of "No, but - haha - there was a mix-up with my travel on the way here. Couldn't travel through London because of my current visa and had to switch planes! Glad to be here eventually. But no, never been refused entry." It's possible to mention something without making a big deal of it. Then you're covered both ways. If they want to know more about your visa woes, they can ask, but I expect they wouldn't care and if they ask it's probably just out of politeness.

      – oliver-clare
      May 3 at 8:08






    • 1





      My comment above assumes a human interaction though, if it's a form-filling exercise, then I'd say don't mention it, it's irrelevant.

      – oliver-clare
      May 3 at 8:09















    2














    I would be inclined to mention it. If you choose not to and they find out then you will likely have a black mark.
    If you disclose it along with the circumstances (i.e. not your fault, just an error, not attempting to cheat etc), then they will take that into account and probably not even worry about it. In my (limited) experience with these types of authorities, they are generally looking for honesty and openness.



    At the end of the day, it is hard to say exactly they will view any particular disclosure (or non-disclosure).



    If you choose not to disclose, then you always have the option of saying that there was a mistake and when it was discovered, you voluntarily modified your travel plans so as to avoid any problems with "refusal of entry". So in your case, you are probably safe either way.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      You make good points (so +1 from me), except that being refused boarding isn't "voluntarily modif[ying] your travel plans."

      – David Richerby
      May 2 at 8:33







    • 3





      But the OP was never refused entry, they were refused boarding -- these are different things.

      – jpatokal
      May 2 at 9:15






    • 2





      OP was never processed by UK immigration (who are the only ones competent to 'refuse' entry). The airlines just declined to ferry him to UK. Indicating he has been refused entry (when there is no corresponding trail in the immigration system) just muddles the application.

      – RedBaron
      May 3 at 8:08






    • 1





      I like this answer because it's the one I'd go with. If they asked me in this situation, I'd probably say something along the lines of "No, but - haha - there was a mix-up with my travel on the way here. Couldn't travel through London because of my current visa and had to switch planes! Glad to be here eventually. But no, never been refused entry." It's possible to mention something without making a big deal of it. Then you're covered both ways. If they want to know more about your visa woes, they can ask, but I expect they wouldn't care and if they ask it's probably just out of politeness.

      – oliver-clare
      May 3 at 8:08






    • 1





      My comment above assumes a human interaction though, if it's a form-filling exercise, then I'd say don't mention it, it's irrelevant.

      – oliver-clare
      May 3 at 8:09













    2












    2








    2







    I would be inclined to mention it. If you choose not to and they find out then you will likely have a black mark.
    If you disclose it along with the circumstances (i.e. not your fault, just an error, not attempting to cheat etc), then they will take that into account and probably not even worry about it. In my (limited) experience with these types of authorities, they are generally looking for honesty and openness.



    At the end of the day, it is hard to say exactly they will view any particular disclosure (or non-disclosure).



    If you choose not to disclose, then you always have the option of saying that there was a mistake and when it was discovered, you voluntarily modified your travel plans so as to avoid any problems with "refusal of entry". So in your case, you are probably safe either way.






    share|improve this answer













    I would be inclined to mention it. If you choose not to and they find out then you will likely have a black mark.
    If you disclose it along with the circumstances (i.e. not your fault, just an error, not attempting to cheat etc), then they will take that into account and probably not even worry about it. In my (limited) experience with these types of authorities, they are generally looking for honesty and openness.



    At the end of the day, it is hard to say exactly they will view any particular disclosure (or non-disclosure).



    If you choose not to disclose, then you always have the option of saying that there was a mistake and when it was discovered, you voluntarily modified your travel plans so as to avoid any problems with "refusal of entry". So in your case, you are probably safe either way.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered May 2 at 6:10









    GMcGMc

    1452




    1452







    • 1





      You make good points (so +1 from me), except that being refused boarding isn't "voluntarily modif[ying] your travel plans."

      – David Richerby
      May 2 at 8:33







    • 3





      But the OP was never refused entry, they were refused boarding -- these are different things.

      – jpatokal
      May 2 at 9:15






    • 2





      OP was never processed by UK immigration (who are the only ones competent to 'refuse' entry). The airlines just declined to ferry him to UK. Indicating he has been refused entry (when there is no corresponding trail in the immigration system) just muddles the application.

      – RedBaron
      May 3 at 8:08






    • 1





      I like this answer because it's the one I'd go with. If they asked me in this situation, I'd probably say something along the lines of "No, but - haha - there was a mix-up with my travel on the way here. Couldn't travel through London because of my current visa and had to switch planes! Glad to be here eventually. But no, never been refused entry." It's possible to mention something without making a big deal of it. Then you're covered both ways. If they want to know more about your visa woes, they can ask, but I expect they wouldn't care and if they ask it's probably just out of politeness.

      – oliver-clare
      May 3 at 8:08






    • 1





      My comment above assumes a human interaction though, if it's a form-filling exercise, then I'd say don't mention it, it's irrelevant.

      – oliver-clare
      May 3 at 8:09












    • 1





      You make good points (so +1 from me), except that being refused boarding isn't "voluntarily modif[ying] your travel plans."

      – David Richerby
      May 2 at 8:33







    • 3





      But the OP was never refused entry, they were refused boarding -- these are different things.

      – jpatokal
      May 2 at 9:15






    • 2





      OP was never processed by UK immigration (who are the only ones competent to 'refuse' entry). The airlines just declined to ferry him to UK. Indicating he has been refused entry (when there is no corresponding trail in the immigration system) just muddles the application.

      – RedBaron
      May 3 at 8:08






    • 1





      I like this answer because it's the one I'd go with. If they asked me in this situation, I'd probably say something along the lines of "No, but - haha - there was a mix-up with my travel on the way here. Couldn't travel through London because of my current visa and had to switch planes! Glad to be here eventually. But no, never been refused entry." It's possible to mention something without making a big deal of it. Then you're covered both ways. If they want to know more about your visa woes, they can ask, but I expect they wouldn't care and if they ask it's probably just out of politeness.

      – oliver-clare
      May 3 at 8:08






    • 1





      My comment above assumes a human interaction though, if it's a form-filling exercise, then I'd say don't mention it, it's irrelevant.

      – oliver-clare
      May 3 at 8:09







    1




    1





    You make good points (so +1 from me), except that being refused boarding isn't "voluntarily modif[ying] your travel plans."

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 8:33






    You make good points (so +1 from me), except that being refused boarding isn't "voluntarily modif[ying] your travel plans."

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 8:33





    3




    3





    But the OP was never refused entry, they were refused boarding -- these are different things.

    – jpatokal
    May 2 at 9:15





    But the OP was never refused entry, they were refused boarding -- these are different things.

    – jpatokal
    May 2 at 9:15




    2




    2





    OP was never processed by UK immigration (who are the only ones competent to 'refuse' entry). The airlines just declined to ferry him to UK. Indicating he has been refused entry (when there is no corresponding trail in the immigration system) just muddles the application.

    – RedBaron
    May 3 at 8:08





    OP was never processed by UK immigration (who are the only ones competent to 'refuse' entry). The airlines just declined to ferry him to UK. Indicating he has been refused entry (when there is no corresponding trail in the immigration system) just muddles the application.

    – RedBaron
    May 3 at 8:08




    1




    1





    I like this answer because it's the one I'd go with. If they asked me in this situation, I'd probably say something along the lines of "No, but - haha - there was a mix-up with my travel on the way here. Couldn't travel through London because of my current visa and had to switch planes! Glad to be here eventually. But no, never been refused entry." It's possible to mention something without making a big deal of it. Then you're covered both ways. If they want to know more about your visa woes, they can ask, but I expect they wouldn't care and if they ask it's probably just out of politeness.

    – oliver-clare
    May 3 at 8:08





    I like this answer because it's the one I'd go with. If they asked me in this situation, I'd probably say something along the lines of "No, but - haha - there was a mix-up with my travel on the way here. Couldn't travel through London because of my current visa and had to switch planes! Glad to be here eventually. But no, never been refused entry." It's possible to mention something without making a big deal of it. Then you're covered both ways. If they want to know more about your visa woes, they can ask, but I expect they wouldn't care and if they ask it's probably just out of politeness.

    – oliver-clare
    May 3 at 8:08




    1




    1





    My comment above assumes a human interaction though, if it's a form-filling exercise, then I'd say don't mention it, it's irrelevant.

    – oliver-clare
    May 3 at 8:09





    My comment above assumes a human interaction though, if it's a form-filling exercise, then I'd say don't mention it, it's irrelevant.

    – oliver-clare
    May 3 at 8:09











    1














    Don't mention it. PERIOD.



    If you give them ANY ammunition, you only get yourself shot. As far as you are concerned, you were not refused entry into the UK or anywhere, it was airline staff that denied you boarding the flight, not any official!



    Telling them you were denied entry to the flight is only going to make them look into it more and possibly find something else wrong to deny you on. In which case, you did it to yourself.



    The way it stands: you were not denied entry into anywhere! No one can substantiate any different to that. And your knowledge only extends as far as customs officials permit.



    My take: IF it EVER comes up, you plead ignorance on the basis you weren't denied entry to anywhere, stating as much and nothing more. I didn't think it bore any relevance since it had nothing to do with (INSERT AGENCY) I was travelling to Ireland, not the UK!!! AND I was only travelling for the purpose of an interview. I was only transiting through the UK, nothing more. That's it!






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      Don't mention it. PERIOD.



      If you give them ANY ammunition, you only get yourself shot. As far as you are concerned, you were not refused entry into the UK or anywhere, it was airline staff that denied you boarding the flight, not any official!



      Telling them you were denied entry to the flight is only going to make them look into it more and possibly find something else wrong to deny you on. In which case, you did it to yourself.



      The way it stands: you were not denied entry into anywhere! No one can substantiate any different to that. And your knowledge only extends as far as customs officials permit.



      My take: IF it EVER comes up, you plead ignorance on the basis you weren't denied entry to anywhere, stating as much and nothing more. I didn't think it bore any relevance since it had nothing to do with (INSERT AGENCY) I was travelling to Ireland, not the UK!!! AND I was only travelling for the purpose of an interview. I was only transiting through the UK, nothing more. That's it!






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        Don't mention it. PERIOD.



        If you give them ANY ammunition, you only get yourself shot. As far as you are concerned, you were not refused entry into the UK or anywhere, it was airline staff that denied you boarding the flight, not any official!



        Telling them you were denied entry to the flight is only going to make them look into it more and possibly find something else wrong to deny you on. In which case, you did it to yourself.



        The way it stands: you were not denied entry into anywhere! No one can substantiate any different to that. And your knowledge only extends as far as customs officials permit.



        My take: IF it EVER comes up, you plead ignorance on the basis you weren't denied entry to anywhere, stating as much and nothing more. I didn't think it bore any relevance since it had nothing to do with (INSERT AGENCY) I was travelling to Ireland, not the UK!!! AND I was only travelling for the purpose of an interview. I was only transiting through the UK, nothing more. That's it!






        share|improve this answer













        Don't mention it. PERIOD.



        If you give them ANY ammunition, you only get yourself shot. As far as you are concerned, you were not refused entry into the UK or anywhere, it was airline staff that denied you boarding the flight, not any official!



        Telling them you were denied entry to the flight is only going to make them look into it more and possibly find something else wrong to deny you on. In which case, you did it to yourself.



        The way it stands: you were not denied entry into anywhere! No one can substantiate any different to that. And your knowledge only extends as far as customs officials permit.



        My take: IF it EVER comes up, you plead ignorance on the basis you weren't denied entry to anywhere, stating as much and nothing more. I didn't think it bore any relevance since it had nothing to do with (INSERT AGENCY) I was travelling to Ireland, not the UK!!! AND I was only travelling for the purpose of an interview. I was only transiting through the UK, nothing more. That's it!







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 3 at 14:36









        MadivadMadivad

        1413




        1413



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137686%2fshould-i-mention-being-denied-entry-to-uk-due-to-a-confusion-in-my-visa-and-tick%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

            Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

            What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company