What property of a BJT transistor makes it an amplifier?How is possible that with same Ibase there is more than one Vce?Zener Noise Generator - NPN BJT Amplifier AnalysisNPN transistor circuit connection, what determines which region it is at?How collector-base junction in BJT worksBipolar transistor as a switchWhy is saturation region called so in BJT characteristics?How does a transistor act as an amplifier considering energy conservation?Question on BJT operation modeBJT Input AC Signal AmplitudeInverse active mode of BJTBJT cut-off currents magnitudes and directions

Can 'sudo apt-get remove [write]' destroy my Ubuntu?

How are one-time password generators like Google Authenticator different from having two passwords?

Is it a bad idea to replace pull-up resistors with hard pull-ups?

Can I use my laptop, which says 240V, in the USA?

How are Core iX names like Core i5, i7 related to Haswell, Ivy Bridge?

How to select certain lines (n, n+4, n+8, n+12...) from the file?

Why does a C.D.F need to be right-continuous?

LocalDate.plus Incorrect Answer

Thesis' "Future Work" section – is it acceptable to omit personal involvement in a mentioned project?

Why in a Ethernet LAN, a packet sniffer can obtain all packets sent over the LAN?

Why can't RGB or bicolour LEDs produce a decent yellow?

Increase height of laser cut design file for enclosure

What does it mean with the ask price is below the last price?

Guns in space with bullets that return?

Is the schwa sound consistent?

Is a vertical stabiliser needed for straight line flight in a glider?

Does Lawful Interception of 4G / the proposed 5G provide a back door for hackers as well?

On what legal basis did the UK remove the 'European Union' from its passport?

How do I compare the result of "1d20+x, with advantage" to "1d20+y, without advantage", assuming x < y?

Was this a power play by Daenerys?

How could we transfer large amounts of energy sourced in space to Earth?

How does Howard Stark know this?

Why does TypeScript pack a Class in an IIFE?

Why do unstable nuclei form?



What property of a BJT transistor makes it an amplifier?


How is possible that with same Ibase there is more than one Vce?Zener Noise Generator - NPN BJT Amplifier AnalysisNPN transistor circuit connection, what determines which region it is at?How collector-base junction in BJT worksBipolar transistor as a switchWhy is saturation region called so in BJT characteristics?How does a transistor act as an amplifier considering energy conservation?Question on BJT operation modeBJT Input AC Signal AmplitudeInverse active mode of BJTBJT cut-off currents magnitudes and directions






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








9












$begingroup$


I know how we can amplify a given signal using BJT transistors by biasing them. But I would like to know what is that crux property which enables BJT transistor to act like an amplifier. Is it the constant nature of reverse saturation current or is it the definite relationship between the base and the collector current or anything else?



I am specifically talking about the BJT.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Have you read the wikipedia article on transistors?
    $endgroup$
    – HandyHowie
    May 1 at 11:12






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you specifically thinking of the BJT as an amplifier or transistors in general (e.g. FETs)?
    $endgroup$
    – edmz
    May 1 at 11:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @edmz i am specifically talking about the BJT
    $endgroup$
    – electrophod
    May 1 at 11:26










  • $begingroup$
    Here you can find a different view electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/355899/…
    $endgroup$
    – G36
    May 1 at 18:05

















9












$begingroup$


I know how we can amplify a given signal using BJT transistors by biasing them. But I would like to know what is that crux property which enables BJT transistor to act like an amplifier. Is it the constant nature of reverse saturation current or is it the definite relationship between the base and the collector current or anything else?



I am specifically talking about the BJT.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Have you read the wikipedia article on transistors?
    $endgroup$
    – HandyHowie
    May 1 at 11:12






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you specifically thinking of the BJT as an amplifier or transistors in general (e.g. FETs)?
    $endgroup$
    – edmz
    May 1 at 11:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @edmz i am specifically talking about the BJT
    $endgroup$
    – electrophod
    May 1 at 11:26










  • $begingroup$
    Here you can find a different view electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/355899/…
    $endgroup$
    – G36
    May 1 at 18:05













9












9








9


1



$begingroup$


I know how we can amplify a given signal using BJT transistors by biasing them. But I would like to know what is that crux property which enables BJT transistor to act like an amplifier. Is it the constant nature of reverse saturation current or is it the definite relationship between the base and the collector current or anything else?



I am specifically talking about the BJT.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I know how we can amplify a given signal using BJT transistors by biasing them. But I would like to know what is that crux property which enables BJT transistor to act like an amplifier. Is it the constant nature of reverse saturation current or is it the definite relationship between the base and the collector current or anything else?



I am specifically talking about the BJT.







transistors amplifier bjt electrical






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 1 at 14:52









Greenonline

1,07521024




1,07521024










asked May 1 at 10:49









electrophodelectrophod

595




595







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Have you read the wikipedia article on transistors?
    $endgroup$
    – HandyHowie
    May 1 at 11:12






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you specifically thinking of the BJT as an amplifier or transistors in general (e.g. FETs)?
    $endgroup$
    – edmz
    May 1 at 11:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @edmz i am specifically talking about the BJT
    $endgroup$
    – electrophod
    May 1 at 11:26










  • $begingroup$
    Here you can find a different view electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/355899/…
    $endgroup$
    – G36
    May 1 at 18:05












  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Have you read the wikipedia article on transistors?
    $endgroup$
    – HandyHowie
    May 1 at 11:12






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you specifically thinking of the BJT as an amplifier or transistors in general (e.g. FETs)?
    $endgroup$
    – edmz
    May 1 at 11:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @edmz i am specifically talking about the BJT
    $endgroup$
    – electrophod
    May 1 at 11:26










  • $begingroup$
    Here you can find a different view electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/355899/…
    $endgroup$
    – G36
    May 1 at 18:05







6




6




$begingroup$
Have you read the wikipedia article on transistors?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
May 1 at 11:12




$begingroup$
Have you read the wikipedia article on transistors?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
May 1 at 11:12




2




2




$begingroup$
Are you specifically thinking of the BJT as an amplifier or transistors in general (e.g. FETs)?
$endgroup$
– edmz
May 1 at 11:23




$begingroup$
Are you specifically thinking of the BJT as an amplifier or transistors in general (e.g. FETs)?
$endgroup$
– edmz
May 1 at 11:23




1




1




$begingroup$
@edmz i am specifically talking about the BJT
$endgroup$
– electrophod
May 1 at 11:26




$begingroup$
@edmz i am specifically talking about the BJT
$endgroup$
– electrophod
May 1 at 11:26












$begingroup$
Here you can find a different view electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/355899/…
$endgroup$
– G36
May 1 at 18:05




$begingroup$
Here you can find a different view electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/355899/…
$endgroup$
– G36
May 1 at 18:05










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















15












$begingroup$

A transistor on its own does not make it an amplifier.



The transistor needs a circuit around it to do the actual (signal) amplification.



Depending on the circuit a transistor can amplify current changes and/or voltage changes and that means power amplification. Power amplification means that you need a smaller power to control or output a larger power.



In my opinion, the most basic property of a transistor which results in (power) amplification is the current relation between base current $I_B$ and collector current $I_C$. Their ratio is often referred to as $beta$:



$$beta = fracI_CI_B $$



This $beta$ is also quite "visible" in the actual transistor as it is linked to the ratio between the doping levels of the emitter and the base. The emitter will have the highest doping level, the base has a lower doping level (it could be $beta$ times lower) and the collector will have the lowest doping level.



So if we increase the doping level of the base region, $beta$ will increase and "amplification" goes up.



Does that mean I will always get a higher amplification if I use a transistor with a higher $beta$?



No, it depends on the circuit you're using.



In some circuits indeed a higher $beta$ will give you more amplification.



For example, a transistor controlling a relay. When $beta$ is increased, we could use a smaller base current.



In others it will not give you more amplification.



For example, a Common Emitter amplifier, assuming we do not change the DC current $I_C$. In a CE amplifier, the voltage gain is $gm*R_load$. To get more gain we would need to increase $gm$ or $R_load$. Both can be done irrespective of $beta$.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    14












    $begingroup$

    The crux property that allows anything to act as an amplifier is that it can control a high power signal, using a low power input.



    In the case of a transistor, it's the fact that a low power base current or gate voltage can change a large collector or drain current.



    There's a whole host of other devices that can be used as amplifiers. One of the earliest audio amplifiers used a diaphram microphone to modulate the tension of one end of a string wound round a rotating drum. The several turns of slipping string could control a large output tension which pulled a loud-speaking diaphram. Also look up fluidic amplifiers, magnetic amplifiers, Travelling Wave Tube Amplifiers (TWTAs).






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Interesting history of amplifiers you've mentioned. Please consider adding to your answer with links to more information, as some may (myself included) want to read more about it..
      $endgroup$
      – Kelly S. French
      May 1 at 14:14










    • $begingroup$
      Interestingly, all the examples are transducers - which means: It is NOT a small quantity that controls a larger quantity OF THE SAME KIND. And - the same must apply also to the bipolar transistor: It is not (and cannot be) the small base current which controls the much larger collector current (how could 2 additional charged carriers in the base region enable the release of 500 additional carriers in the emitter, assuming a beta value of 250 ?). No - the BJT is a voltage-to-current transducer and it is the voltage Vbe that determines the collector current.
      $endgroup$
      – LvW
      May 1 at 15:49







    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @LvW With your assertion that base current doesn't control collector current, I am minded of Douglas Adams' philosophers who argue that black is white, and get killed on the next zebra crossing. I would be more sympathetic if you were to argue that gate current doesn't control drain current. I'd like to see you change base voltage without changing base current, and then argue which one is really controlling the collector current.
      $endgroup$
      – Neil_UK
      May 1 at 18:31










    • $begingroup$
      @Neil_UK, do you really still believe that the BJT is current-controlled? And - it is just a believe, because there is not a single proof for current-control. Can you explain WHY and HOW such a current control could work? In contrary, there are many proofs and indication for voltage control (and many good (!!) textbooks and university papers explain this fact (it is not my "assertion"). The famous Barrie Gilbert says that the unwanted base current would be "best viewed as a defect"! Do you need examples/indications for voltage-control?
      $endgroup$
      – LvW
      May 2 at 9:03











    • $begingroup$
      @LvW I'm with Gilbert that base current is unwanted, but it always tends to be there in BJTs. You can choose a gm (voltage controlled) or beta (current controlled) model for a transistor, both work well within their own range. When it comes to reality, what is really happening, then explanations that this is, or what your POV seems to be isn't controlling it don't make much sense. Physics doesn't deal with reality, even down in QM it's still equations. So I won't tell you it is current, if you don't tell me it isn't, and we'll let people still design with hybrid parameters.
      $endgroup$
      – Neil_UK
      May 2 at 10:44











    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f436364%2fwhat-property-of-a-bjt-transistor-makes-it-an-amplifier%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    15












    $begingroup$

    A transistor on its own does not make it an amplifier.



    The transistor needs a circuit around it to do the actual (signal) amplification.



    Depending on the circuit a transistor can amplify current changes and/or voltage changes and that means power amplification. Power amplification means that you need a smaller power to control or output a larger power.



    In my opinion, the most basic property of a transistor which results in (power) amplification is the current relation between base current $I_B$ and collector current $I_C$. Their ratio is often referred to as $beta$:



    $$beta = fracI_CI_B $$



    This $beta$ is also quite "visible" in the actual transistor as it is linked to the ratio between the doping levels of the emitter and the base. The emitter will have the highest doping level, the base has a lower doping level (it could be $beta$ times lower) and the collector will have the lowest doping level.



    So if we increase the doping level of the base region, $beta$ will increase and "amplification" goes up.



    Does that mean I will always get a higher amplification if I use a transistor with a higher $beta$?



    No, it depends on the circuit you're using.



    In some circuits indeed a higher $beta$ will give you more amplification.



    For example, a transistor controlling a relay. When $beta$ is increased, we could use a smaller base current.



    In others it will not give you more amplification.



    For example, a Common Emitter amplifier, assuming we do not change the DC current $I_C$. In a CE amplifier, the voltage gain is $gm*R_load$. To get more gain we would need to increase $gm$ or $R_load$. Both can be done irrespective of $beta$.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      15












      $begingroup$

      A transistor on its own does not make it an amplifier.



      The transistor needs a circuit around it to do the actual (signal) amplification.



      Depending on the circuit a transistor can amplify current changes and/or voltage changes and that means power amplification. Power amplification means that you need a smaller power to control or output a larger power.



      In my opinion, the most basic property of a transistor which results in (power) amplification is the current relation between base current $I_B$ and collector current $I_C$. Their ratio is often referred to as $beta$:



      $$beta = fracI_CI_B $$



      This $beta$ is also quite "visible" in the actual transistor as it is linked to the ratio between the doping levels of the emitter and the base. The emitter will have the highest doping level, the base has a lower doping level (it could be $beta$ times lower) and the collector will have the lowest doping level.



      So if we increase the doping level of the base region, $beta$ will increase and "amplification" goes up.



      Does that mean I will always get a higher amplification if I use a transistor with a higher $beta$?



      No, it depends on the circuit you're using.



      In some circuits indeed a higher $beta$ will give you more amplification.



      For example, a transistor controlling a relay. When $beta$ is increased, we could use a smaller base current.



      In others it will not give you more amplification.



      For example, a Common Emitter amplifier, assuming we do not change the DC current $I_C$. In a CE amplifier, the voltage gain is $gm*R_load$. To get more gain we would need to increase $gm$ or $R_load$. Both can be done irrespective of $beta$.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        15












        15








        15





        $begingroup$

        A transistor on its own does not make it an amplifier.



        The transistor needs a circuit around it to do the actual (signal) amplification.



        Depending on the circuit a transistor can amplify current changes and/or voltage changes and that means power amplification. Power amplification means that you need a smaller power to control or output a larger power.



        In my opinion, the most basic property of a transistor which results in (power) amplification is the current relation between base current $I_B$ and collector current $I_C$. Their ratio is often referred to as $beta$:



        $$beta = fracI_CI_B $$



        This $beta$ is also quite "visible" in the actual transistor as it is linked to the ratio between the doping levels of the emitter and the base. The emitter will have the highest doping level, the base has a lower doping level (it could be $beta$ times lower) and the collector will have the lowest doping level.



        So if we increase the doping level of the base region, $beta$ will increase and "amplification" goes up.



        Does that mean I will always get a higher amplification if I use a transistor with a higher $beta$?



        No, it depends on the circuit you're using.



        In some circuits indeed a higher $beta$ will give you more amplification.



        For example, a transistor controlling a relay. When $beta$ is increased, we could use a smaller base current.



        In others it will not give you more amplification.



        For example, a Common Emitter amplifier, assuming we do not change the DC current $I_C$. In a CE amplifier, the voltage gain is $gm*R_load$. To get more gain we would need to increase $gm$ or $R_load$. Both can be done irrespective of $beta$.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        A transistor on its own does not make it an amplifier.



        The transistor needs a circuit around it to do the actual (signal) amplification.



        Depending on the circuit a transistor can amplify current changes and/or voltage changes and that means power amplification. Power amplification means that you need a smaller power to control or output a larger power.



        In my opinion, the most basic property of a transistor which results in (power) amplification is the current relation between base current $I_B$ and collector current $I_C$. Their ratio is often referred to as $beta$:



        $$beta = fracI_CI_B $$



        This $beta$ is also quite "visible" in the actual transistor as it is linked to the ratio between the doping levels of the emitter and the base. The emitter will have the highest doping level, the base has a lower doping level (it could be $beta$ times lower) and the collector will have the lowest doping level.



        So if we increase the doping level of the base region, $beta$ will increase and "amplification" goes up.



        Does that mean I will always get a higher amplification if I use a transistor with a higher $beta$?



        No, it depends on the circuit you're using.



        In some circuits indeed a higher $beta$ will give you more amplification.



        For example, a transistor controlling a relay. When $beta$ is increased, we could use a smaller base current.



        In others it will not give you more amplification.



        For example, a Common Emitter amplifier, assuming we do not change the DC current $I_C$. In a CE amplifier, the voltage gain is $gm*R_load$. To get more gain we would need to increase $gm$ or $R_load$. Both can be done irrespective of $beta$.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 1 at 11:16









        BimpelrekkieBimpelrekkie

        53.1k248120




        53.1k248120























            14












            $begingroup$

            The crux property that allows anything to act as an amplifier is that it can control a high power signal, using a low power input.



            In the case of a transistor, it's the fact that a low power base current or gate voltage can change a large collector or drain current.



            There's a whole host of other devices that can be used as amplifiers. One of the earliest audio amplifiers used a diaphram microphone to modulate the tension of one end of a string wound round a rotating drum. The several turns of slipping string could control a large output tension which pulled a loud-speaking diaphram. Also look up fluidic amplifiers, magnetic amplifiers, Travelling Wave Tube Amplifiers (TWTAs).






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 5




              $begingroup$
              Interesting history of amplifiers you've mentioned. Please consider adding to your answer with links to more information, as some may (myself included) want to read more about it..
              $endgroup$
              – Kelly S. French
              May 1 at 14:14










            • $begingroup$
              Interestingly, all the examples are transducers - which means: It is NOT a small quantity that controls a larger quantity OF THE SAME KIND. And - the same must apply also to the bipolar transistor: It is not (and cannot be) the small base current which controls the much larger collector current (how could 2 additional charged carriers in the base region enable the release of 500 additional carriers in the emitter, assuming a beta value of 250 ?). No - the BJT is a voltage-to-current transducer and it is the voltage Vbe that determines the collector current.
              $endgroup$
              – LvW
              May 1 at 15:49







            • 4




              $begingroup$
              @LvW With your assertion that base current doesn't control collector current, I am minded of Douglas Adams' philosophers who argue that black is white, and get killed on the next zebra crossing. I would be more sympathetic if you were to argue that gate current doesn't control drain current. I'd like to see you change base voltage without changing base current, and then argue which one is really controlling the collector current.
              $endgroup$
              – Neil_UK
              May 1 at 18:31










            • $begingroup$
              @Neil_UK, do you really still believe that the BJT is current-controlled? And - it is just a believe, because there is not a single proof for current-control. Can you explain WHY and HOW such a current control could work? In contrary, there are many proofs and indication for voltage control (and many good (!!) textbooks and university papers explain this fact (it is not my "assertion"). The famous Barrie Gilbert says that the unwanted base current would be "best viewed as a defect"! Do you need examples/indications for voltage-control?
              $endgroup$
              – LvW
              May 2 at 9:03











            • $begingroup$
              @LvW I'm with Gilbert that base current is unwanted, but it always tends to be there in BJTs. You can choose a gm (voltage controlled) or beta (current controlled) model for a transistor, both work well within their own range. When it comes to reality, what is really happening, then explanations that this is, or what your POV seems to be isn't controlling it don't make much sense. Physics doesn't deal with reality, even down in QM it's still equations. So I won't tell you it is current, if you don't tell me it isn't, and we'll let people still design with hybrid parameters.
              $endgroup$
              – Neil_UK
              May 2 at 10:44















            14












            $begingroup$

            The crux property that allows anything to act as an amplifier is that it can control a high power signal, using a low power input.



            In the case of a transistor, it's the fact that a low power base current or gate voltage can change a large collector or drain current.



            There's a whole host of other devices that can be used as amplifiers. One of the earliest audio amplifiers used a diaphram microphone to modulate the tension of one end of a string wound round a rotating drum. The several turns of slipping string could control a large output tension which pulled a loud-speaking diaphram. Also look up fluidic amplifiers, magnetic amplifiers, Travelling Wave Tube Amplifiers (TWTAs).






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 5




              $begingroup$
              Interesting history of amplifiers you've mentioned. Please consider adding to your answer with links to more information, as some may (myself included) want to read more about it..
              $endgroup$
              – Kelly S. French
              May 1 at 14:14










            • $begingroup$
              Interestingly, all the examples are transducers - which means: It is NOT a small quantity that controls a larger quantity OF THE SAME KIND. And - the same must apply also to the bipolar transistor: It is not (and cannot be) the small base current which controls the much larger collector current (how could 2 additional charged carriers in the base region enable the release of 500 additional carriers in the emitter, assuming a beta value of 250 ?). No - the BJT is a voltage-to-current transducer and it is the voltage Vbe that determines the collector current.
              $endgroup$
              – LvW
              May 1 at 15:49







            • 4




              $begingroup$
              @LvW With your assertion that base current doesn't control collector current, I am minded of Douglas Adams' philosophers who argue that black is white, and get killed on the next zebra crossing. I would be more sympathetic if you were to argue that gate current doesn't control drain current. I'd like to see you change base voltage without changing base current, and then argue which one is really controlling the collector current.
              $endgroup$
              – Neil_UK
              May 1 at 18:31










            • $begingroup$
              @Neil_UK, do you really still believe that the BJT is current-controlled? And - it is just a believe, because there is not a single proof for current-control. Can you explain WHY and HOW such a current control could work? In contrary, there are many proofs and indication for voltage control (and many good (!!) textbooks and university papers explain this fact (it is not my "assertion"). The famous Barrie Gilbert says that the unwanted base current would be "best viewed as a defect"! Do you need examples/indications for voltage-control?
              $endgroup$
              – LvW
              May 2 at 9:03











            • $begingroup$
              @LvW I'm with Gilbert that base current is unwanted, but it always tends to be there in BJTs. You can choose a gm (voltage controlled) or beta (current controlled) model for a transistor, both work well within their own range. When it comes to reality, what is really happening, then explanations that this is, or what your POV seems to be isn't controlling it don't make much sense. Physics doesn't deal with reality, even down in QM it's still equations. So I won't tell you it is current, if you don't tell me it isn't, and we'll let people still design with hybrid parameters.
              $endgroup$
              – Neil_UK
              May 2 at 10:44













            14












            14








            14





            $begingroup$

            The crux property that allows anything to act as an amplifier is that it can control a high power signal, using a low power input.



            In the case of a transistor, it's the fact that a low power base current or gate voltage can change a large collector or drain current.



            There's a whole host of other devices that can be used as amplifiers. One of the earliest audio amplifiers used a diaphram microphone to modulate the tension of one end of a string wound round a rotating drum. The several turns of slipping string could control a large output tension which pulled a loud-speaking diaphram. Also look up fluidic amplifiers, magnetic amplifiers, Travelling Wave Tube Amplifiers (TWTAs).






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The crux property that allows anything to act as an amplifier is that it can control a high power signal, using a low power input.



            In the case of a transistor, it's the fact that a low power base current or gate voltage can change a large collector or drain current.



            There's a whole host of other devices that can be used as amplifiers. One of the earliest audio amplifiers used a diaphram microphone to modulate the tension of one end of a string wound round a rotating drum. The several turns of slipping string could control a large output tension which pulled a loud-speaking diaphram. Also look up fluidic amplifiers, magnetic amplifiers, Travelling Wave Tube Amplifiers (TWTAs).







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered May 1 at 11:45









            Neil_UKNeil_UK

            80.2k285184




            80.2k285184







            • 5




              $begingroup$
              Interesting history of amplifiers you've mentioned. Please consider adding to your answer with links to more information, as some may (myself included) want to read more about it..
              $endgroup$
              – Kelly S. French
              May 1 at 14:14










            • $begingroup$
              Interestingly, all the examples are transducers - which means: It is NOT a small quantity that controls a larger quantity OF THE SAME KIND. And - the same must apply also to the bipolar transistor: It is not (and cannot be) the small base current which controls the much larger collector current (how could 2 additional charged carriers in the base region enable the release of 500 additional carriers in the emitter, assuming a beta value of 250 ?). No - the BJT is a voltage-to-current transducer and it is the voltage Vbe that determines the collector current.
              $endgroup$
              – LvW
              May 1 at 15:49







            • 4




              $begingroup$
              @LvW With your assertion that base current doesn't control collector current, I am minded of Douglas Adams' philosophers who argue that black is white, and get killed on the next zebra crossing. I would be more sympathetic if you were to argue that gate current doesn't control drain current. I'd like to see you change base voltage without changing base current, and then argue which one is really controlling the collector current.
              $endgroup$
              – Neil_UK
              May 1 at 18:31










            • $begingroup$
              @Neil_UK, do you really still believe that the BJT is current-controlled? And - it is just a believe, because there is not a single proof for current-control. Can you explain WHY and HOW such a current control could work? In contrary, there are many proofs and indication for voltage control (and many good (!!) textbooks and university papers explain this fact (it is not my "assertion"). The famous Barrie Gilbert says that the unwanted base current would be "best viewed as a defect"! Do you need examples/indications for voltage-control?
              $endgroup$
              – LvW
              May 2 at 9:03











            • $begingroup$
              @LvW I'm with Gilbert that base current is unwanted, but it always tends to be there in BJTs. You can choose a gm (voltage controlled) or beta (current controlled) model for a transistor, both work well within their own range. When it comes to reality, what is really happening, then explanations that this is, or what your POV seems to be isn't controlling it don't make much sense. Physics doesn't deal with reality, even down in QM it's still equations. So I won't tell you it is current, if you don't tell me it isn't, and we'll let people still design with hybrid parameters.
              $endgroup$
              – Neil_UK
              May 2 at 10:44












            • 5




              $begingroup$
              Interesting history of amplifiers you've mentioned. Please consider adding to your answer with links to more information, as some may (myself included) want to read more about it..
              $endgroup$
              – Kelly S. French
              May 1 at 14:14










            • $begingroup$
              Interestingly, all the examples are transducers - which means: It is NOT a small quantity that controls a larger quantity OF THE SAME KIND. And - the same must apply also to the bipolar transistor: It is not (and cannot be) the small base current which controls the much larger collector current (how could 2 additional charged carriers in the base region enable the release of 500 additional carriers in the emitter, assuming a beta value of 250 ?). No - the BJT is a voltage-to-current transducer and it is the voltage Vbe that determines the collector current.
              $endgroup$
              – LvW
              May 1 at 15:49







            • 4




              $begingroup$
              @LvW With your assertion that base current doesn't control collector current, I am minded of Douglas Adams' philosophers who argue that black is white, and get killed on the next zebra crossing. I would be more sympathetic if you were to argue that gate current doesn't control drain current. I'd like to see you change base voltage without changing base current, and then argue which one is really controlling the collector current.
              $endgroup$
              – Neil_UK
              May 1 at 18:31










            • $begingroup$
              @Neil_UK, do you really still believe that the BJT is current-controlled? And - it is just a believe, because there is not a single proof for current-control. Can you explain WHY and HOW such a current control could work? In contrary, there are many proofs and indication for voltage control (and many good (!!) textbooks and university papers explain this fact (it is not my "assertion"). The famous Barrie Gilbert says that the unwanted base current would be "best viewed as a defect"! Do you need examples/indications for voltage-control?
              $endgroup$
              – LvW
              May 2 at 9:03











            • $begingroup$
              @LvW I'm with Gilbert that base current is unwanted, but it always tends to be there in BJTs. You can choose a gm (voltage controlled) or beta (current controlled) model for a transistor, both work well within their own range. When it comes to reality, what is really happening, then explanations that this is, or what your POV seems to be isn't controlling it don't make much sense. Physics doesn't deal with reality, even down in QM it's still equations. So I won't tell you it is current, if you don't tell me it isn't, and we'll let people still design with hybrid parameters.
              $endgroup$
              – Neil_UK
              May 2 at 10:44







            5




            5




            $begingroup$
            Interesting history of amplifiers you've mentioned. Please consider adding to your answer with links to more information, as some may (myself included) want to read more about it..
            $endgroup$
            – Kelly S. French
            May 1 at 14:14




            $begingroup$
            Interesting history of amplifiers you've mentioned. Please consider adding to your answer with links to more information, as some may (myself included) want to read more about it..
            $endgroup$
            – Kelly S. French
            May 1 at 14:14












            $begingroup$
            Interestingly, all the examples are transducers - which means: It is NOT a small quantity that controls a larger quantity OF THE SAME KIND. And - the same must apply also to the bipolar transistor: It is not (and cannot be) the small base current which controls the much larger collector current (how could 2 additional charged carriers in the base region enable the release of 500 additional carriers in the emitter, assuming a beta value of 250 ?). No - the BJT is a voltage-to-current transducer and it is the voltage Vbe that determines the collector current.
            $endgroup$
            – LvW
            May 1 at 15:49





            $begingroup$
            Interestingly, all the examples are transducers - which means: It is NOT a small quantity that controls a larger quantity OF THE SAME KIND. And - the same must apply also to the bipolar transistor: It is not (and cannot be) the small base current which controls the much larger collector current (how could 2 additional charged carriers in the base region enable the release of 500 additional carriers in the emitter, assuming a beta value of 250 ?). No - the BJT is a voltage-to-current transducer and it is the voltage Vbe that determines the collector current.
            $endgroup$
            – LvW
            May 1 at 15:49





            4




            4




            $begingroup$
            @LvW With your assertion that base current doesn't control collector current, I am minded of Douglas Adams' philosophers who argue that black is white, and get killed on the next zebra crossing. I would be more sympathetic if you were to argue that gate current doesn't control drain current. I'd like to see you change base voltage without changing base current, and then argue which one is really controlling the collector current.
            $endgroup$
            – Neil_UK
            May 1 at 18:31




            $begingroup$
            @LvW With your assertion that base current doesn't control collector current, I am minded of Douglas Adams' philosophers who argue that black is white, and get killed on the next zebra crossing. I would be more sympathetic if you were to argue that gate current doesn't control drain current. I'd like to see you change base voltage without changing base current, and then argue which one is really controlling the collector current.
            $endgroup$
            – Neil_UK
            May 1 at 18:31












            $begingroup$
            @Neil_UK, do you really still believe that the BJT is current-controlled? And - it is just a believe, because there is not a single proof for current-control. Can you explain WHY and HOW such a current control could work? In contrary, there are many proofs and indication for voltage control (and many good (!!) textbooks and university papers explain this fact (it is not my "assertion"). The famous Barrie Gilbert says that the unwanted base current would be "best viewed as a defect"! Do you need examples/indications for voltage-control?
            $endgroup$
            – LvW
            May 2 at 9:03





            $begingroup$
            @Neil_UK, do you really still believe that the BJT is current-controlled? And - it is just a believe, because there is not a single proof for current-control. Can you explain WHY and HOW such a current control could work? In contrary, there are many proofs and indication for voltage control (and many good (!!) textbooks and university papers explain this fact (it is not my "assertion"). The famous Barrie Gilbert says that the unwanted base current would be "best viewed as a defect"! Do you need examples/indications for voltage-control?
            $endgroup$
            – LvW
            May 2 at 9:03













            $begingroup$
            @LvW I'm with Gilbert that base current is unwanted, but it always tends to be there in BJTs. You can choose a gm (voltage controlled) or beta (current controlled) model for a transistor, both work well within their own range. When it comes to reality, what is really happening, then explanations that this is, or what your POV seems to be isn't controlling it don't make much sense. Physics doesn't deal with reality, even down in QM it's still equations. So I won't tell you it is current, if you don't tell me it isn't, and we'll let people still design with hybrid parameters.
            $endgroup$
            – Neil_UK
            May 2 at 10:44




            $begingroup$
            @LvW I'm with Gilbert that base current is unwanted, but it always tends to be there in BJTs. You can choose a gm (voltage controlled) or beta (current controlled) model for a transistor, both work well within their own range. When it comes to reality, what is really happening, then explanations that this is, or what your POV seems to be isn't controlling it don't make much sense. Physics doesn't deal with reality, even down in QM it's still equations. So I won't tell you it is current, if you don't tell me it isn't, and we'll let people still design with hybrid parameters.
            $endgroup$
            – Neil_UK
            May 2 at 10:44

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f436364%2fwhat-property-of-a-bjt-transistor-makes-it-an-amplifier%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

            Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

            What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company