Transferring data speed of Fast EthernetLimit Internal LAN Traffic and Internet Traffic - Managed Switch?Calculating total time and end to end delay for datagram packet switchingCisco 2900 Default Fast Ethernet Port SpeedTCP - ack and retransmissions - Is this scenario possible?Network bandwidth management and prioritySpeed benefits when switching from 1Gb copper LAN to Fiber OpticCan TCP session be closed by the server depending on the packet content?What is the relationship between throughput and latency
find not returning expected files
How do I tell my supervisor that he is choosing poor replacements for me while I am on maternity leave?
"Fīliolō me auctum scito, salva Terentia"; what is "me" role in this phrase?
What does i386 mean on macOS Mojave?
"Right on the tip of my tongue" meaning?
Understanding basic photoresistor circuit
Why was this sacrifice sufficient?
Why in a Ethernet LAN, a packet sniffer can obtain all packets sent over the LAN?
Should these notes be played as a chord or one after another?
The lexical root of the perfect tense forms differs from the lexical root of the infinitive form
Cropping a message using array splits
Why use steam instead of just hot air?
International Code of Ethics for order of co-authors in research papers
Ex-manager wants to stay in touch, I don't want to
How could we transfer large amounts of energy sourced in space to Earth?
Does the 500 feet falling cap apply per fall, or per turn?
How to make a Lich look like a human without magic in 5e?
How does Howard Stark know this?
Why was the Ancient One so hesitant to teach Dr. Strange the art of sorcery?
As programers say: Strive to be lazy
How to select certain lines (n, n+4, n+8, n+12...) from the file?
How did Thanos not realise this had happened at the end of Endgame?
The lexical root of the past tense forms differs from the lexical root of the infinitive form
How are one-time password generators like Google Authenticator different from having two passwords?
Transferring data speed of Fast Ethernet
Limit Internal LAN Traffic and Internet Traffic - Managed Switch?Calculating total time and end to end delay for datagram packet switchingCisco 2900 Default Fast Ethernet Port SpeedTCP - ack and retransmissions - Is this scenario possible?Network bandwidth management and prioritySpeed benefits when switching from 1Gb copper LAN to Fiber OpticCan TCP session be closed by the server depending on the packet content?What is the relationship between throughput and latency
I am wondering that between 2 hosts in LAN, when i send one file which weights 1Mb versus 1 file weights 0.3Mb from the first host to the second host using TCP/IP protocol, would the latter come first?
IMO, data will be truncated to many small ones, and therefore, 0.3Mb will be divided in a number of packets less than the case of 1Mb => it takes smaller time to be sent to the other host.
tcp lan bandwidth speed
asked May 1 at 8:11
KenNGKenNG
112
add a comment |
I am wondering that between 2 hosts in LAN, when i send one file which weights 1Mb versus 1 file weights 0.3Mb from the first host to the second host using TCP/IP protocol, would the latter come first?
IMO, data will be truncated to many small ones, and therefore, 0.3Mb will be divided in a number of packets less than the case of 1Mb => it takes smaller time to be sent to the other host.
tcp lan bandwidth speed
asked May 1 at 8:11
KenNGKenNG
112
add a comment |
I am wondering that between 2 hosts in LAN, when i send one file which weights 1Mb versus 1 file weights 0.3Mb from the first host to the second host using TCP/IP protocol, would the latter come first?
IMO, data will be truncated to many small ones, and therefore, 0.3Mb will be divided in a number of packets less than the case of 1Mb => it takes smaller time to be sent to the other host.
tcp lan bandwidth speed
asked May 1 at 8:11
KenNGKenNG
112
I am wondering that between 2 hosts in LAN, when i send one file which weights 1Mb versus 1 file weights 0.3Mb from the first host to the second host using TCP/IP protocol, would the latter come first?
IMO, data will be truncated to many small ones, and therefore, 0.3Mb will be divided in a number of packets less than the case of 1Mb => it takes smaller time to be sent to the other host.
tcp lan bandwidth speed
tcp lan bandwidth speed
asked May 1 at 8:11
KenNGKenNG
112
asked May 1 at 8:11
KenNGKenNG
112
edited May 1 at 8:34
KenNG
asked May 1 at 8:11
KenNGKenNG
112
asked May 1 at 8:11
KenNGKenNG
112
asked May 1 at 8:11
KenNGKenNG
112
112
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You'd be correct. However I'd say that what you're referring to as a packet should be considered a file. This is because the data of the file will be truncated (as you put it) into smaller bites of data called packets. The maximum size of packets are measure in tens of bytes as opposed to megabytes.
But yes, all things being equal the smaller file will finish transferring first for the reasons you stated.
answered May 1 at 8:31
SouthPoleElfSouthPoleElf
412
you're right! i mean a file, not a packet. thanks for your answer.
– KenNG
May 1 at 8:35
add a comment |
I am wondering that between 2 hosts in LAN, when i send one file which weights 1Mb versus 1 file weights 0.3Mb from the first host to the second host using TCP/IP protocol, would the latter come first?
Maybe. As with many things, the devil is in the details. For this discussion, let's presume all thing remain equal between the transfers (i.e. no congestion on the network, no packet loss, etc).
Yes it should, if the two transfers are completed in parallel. In other words, if both are sent independently at the same time.
No, if the transfers are completed in series. An applications may queue multiple transfer requests, and only start the second after the first has completed.
Or there may be a limit to the number of transfers that an application would run in parallel. Many web browsers and/or servers will enforce such a limitation, for example perhaps allowing the transfer of three files concurrently, and queuing additional files until one of the first three complete.
answered May 3 at 3:35
YLearn♦YLearn
22.8k550108
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "496"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f58837%2ftransferring-data-speed-of-fast-ethernet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You'd be correct. However I'd say that what you're referring to as a packet should be considered a file. This is because the data of the file will be truncated (as you put it) into smaller bites of data called packets. The maximum size of packets are measure in tens of bytes as opposed to megabytes.
But yes, all things being equal the smaller file will finish transferring first for the reasons you stated.
answered May 1 at 8:31
SouthPoleElfSouthPoleElf
412
you're right! i mean a file, not a packet. thanks for your answer.
– KenNG
May 1 at 8:35
add a comment |
You'd be correct. However I'd say that what you're referring to as a packet should be considered a file. This is because the data of the file will be truncated (as you put it) into smaller bites of data called packets. The maximum size of packets are measure in tens of bytes as opposed to megabytes.
But yes, all things being equal the smaller file will finish transferring first for the reasons you stated.
answered May 1 at 8:31
SouthPoleElfSouthPoleElf
412
you're right! i mean a file, not a packet. thanks for your answer.
– KenNG
May 1 at 8:35
add a comment |
You'd be correct. However I'd say that what you're referring to as a packet should be considered a file. This is because the data of the file will be truncated (as you put it) into smaller bites of data called packets. The maximum size of packets are measure in tens of bytes as opposed to megabytes.
But yes, all things being equal the smaller file will finish transferring first for the reasons you stated.
answered May 1 at 8:31
SouthPoleElfSouthPoleElf
412
You'd be correct. However I'd say that what you're referring to as a packet should be considered a file. This is because the data of the file will be truncated (as you put it) into smaller bites of data called packets. The maximum size of packets are measure in tens of bytes as opposed to megabytes.
But yes, all things being equal the smaller file will finish transferring first for the reasons you stated.
answered May 1 at 8:31
SouthPoleElfSouthPoleElf
412
answered May 1 at 8:31
SouthPoleElfSouthPoleElf
412
answered May 1 at 8:31
SouthPoleElfSouthPoleElf
412
answered May 1 at 8:31
SouthPoleElfSouthPoleElf
412
412
you're right! i mean a file, not a packet. thanks for your answer.
– KenNG
May 1 at 8:35
add a comment |
you're right! i mean a file, not a packet. thanks for your answer.
– KenNG
May 1 at 8:35
you're right! i mean a file, not a packet. thanks for your answer.
– KenNG
May 1 at 8:35
you're right! i mean a file, not a packet. thanks for your answer.
– KenNG
May 1 at 8:35
add a comment |
I am wondering that between 2 hosts in LAN, when i send one file which weights 1Mb versus 1 file weights 0.3Mb from the first host to the second host using TCP/IP protocol, would the latter come first?
Maybe. As with many things, the devil is in the details. For this discussion, let's presume all thing remain equal between the transfers (i.e. no congestion on the network, no packet loss, etc).
Yes it should, if the two transfers are completed in parallel. In other words, if both are sent independently at the same time.
No, if the transfers are completed in series. An applications may queue multiple transfer requests, and only start the second after the first has completed.
Or there may be a limit to the number of transfers that an application would run in parallel. Many web browsers and/or servers will enforce such a limitation, for example perhaps allowing the transfer of three files concurrently, and queuing additional files until one of the first three complete.
answered May 3 at 3:35
YLearn♦YLearn
22.8k550108
add a comment |
I am wondering that between 2 hosts in LAN, when i send one file which weights 1Mb versus 1 file weights 0.3Mb from the first host to the second host using TCP/IP protocol, would the latter come first?
Maybe. As with many things, the devil is in the details. For this discussion, let's presume all thing remain equal between the transfers (i.e. no congestion on the network, no packet loss, etc).
Yes it should, if the two transfers are completed in parallel. In other words, if both are sent independently at the same time.
No, if the transfers are completed in series. An applications may queue multiple transfer requests, and only start the second after the first has completed.
Or there may be a limit to the number of transfers that an application would run in parallel. Many web browsers and/or servers will enforce such a limitation, for example perhaps allowing the transfer of three files concurrently, and queuing additional files until one of the first three complete.
answered May 3 at 3:35
YLearn♦YLearn
22.8k550108
add a comment |
I am wondering that between 2 hosts in LAN, when i send one file which weights 1Mb versus 1 file weights 0.3Mb from the first host to the second host using TCP/IP protocol, would the latter come first?
Maybe. As with many things, the devil is in the details. For this discussion, let's presume all thing remain equal between the transfers (i.e. no congestion on the network, no packet loss, etc).
Yes it should, if the two transfers are completed in parallel. In other words, if both are sent independently at the same time.
No, if the transfers are completed in series. An applications may queue multiple transfer requests, and only start the second after the first has completed.
Or there may be a limit to the number of transfers that an application would run in parallel. Many web browsers and/or servers will enforce such a limitation, for example perhaps allowing the transfer of three files concurrently, and queuing additional files until one of the first three complete.
answered May 3 at 3:35
YLearn♦YLearn
22.8k550108
I am wondering that between 2 hosts in LAN, when i send one file which weights 1Mb versus 1 file weights 0.3Mb from the first host to the second host using TCP/IP protocol, would the latter come first?
Maybe. As with many things, the devil is in the details. For this discussion, let's presume all thing remain equal between the transfers (i.e. no congestion on the network, no packet loss, etc).
Yes it should, if the two transfers are completed in parallel. In other words, if both are sent independently at the same time.
No, if the transfers are completed in series. An applications may queue multiple transfer requests, and only start the second after the first has completed.
Or there may be a limit to the number of transfers that an application would run in parallel. Many web browsers and/or servers will enforce such a limitation, for example perhaps allowing the transfer of three files concurrently, and queuing additional files until one of the first three complete.
answered May 3 at 3:35
YLearn♦YLearn
22.8k550108
answered May 3 at 3:35
YLearn♦YLearn
22.8k550108
answered May 3 at 3:35
YLearn♦YLearn
22.8k550108
answered May 3 at 3:35
YLearn♦YLearn
22.8k550108
22.8k550108
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Network Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f58837%2ftransferring-data-speed-of-fast-ethernet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
