Could a dragon use its wings to swim?Dragon evolving from humanoid: Ice dragonWingless Dragons?Dragon taxonomyCan a dragon be electrocuted?Could this Very Specific Dragon Fly?Can a dragon who can heat parts of its body at will use that to fly?Alternate uses for dragon wings?Anti-Dragon armor, shields and melee weaponsHow would winged humans fight dragons?Is this humanoid dragon realistic the way I’ve imagined it?

Is it possible to map the firing of neurons in the human brain so as to stimulate artificial memories in someone else?

How could sorcerers who are able to produce/manipulate almost all forms of energy communicate over large distances?

Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?

Do creatures with a speed 0ft., fly 30ft. (hover) ever touch the ground?

Notepad++ delete until colon for every line with replace all

Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?

Finitely generated matrix groups whose eigenvalues are all algebraic

Is it "common practice in Fourier transform spectroscopy to multiply the measured interferogram by an apodizing function"? If so, why?

Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?

how do we prove that a sum of two periods is still a period?

Machine learning testing data

Knowledge-based authentication using Domain-driven Design in C#

Convert seconds to minutes

Unlock My Phone! February 2018

How exploitable/balanced is this homebrew spell: Spell Permanency?

How do I exit BASH while loop using modulus operator?

What is the most common color to indicate the input-field is disabled?

Why is the sentence "Das ist eine Nase" correct?

Obtaining database information and values in extended properties

Pact of Blade Warlock with Dancing Blade

Did 'Cinema Songs' exist during Hiranyakshipu's time?

How does a dynamic QR code work?



Could a dragon use its wings to swim?


Dragon evolving from humanoid: Ice dragonWingless Dragons?Dragon taxonomyCan a dragon be electrocuted?Could this Very Specific Dragon Fly?Can a dragon who can heat parts of its body at will use that to fly?Alternate uses for dragon wings?Anti-Dragon armor, shields and melee weaponsHow would winged humans fight dragons?Is this humanoid dragon realistic the way I’ve imagined it?













15












$begingroup$


I have three types of dragons; dragons that primarily fly, dragons that primarily run, and dragons that primarily swim, with all three types being able to do the other two things for a limited amount of time.
What kind of wings would a water dragon have to have to be able to fly as well as swim? I had envisioned them using their wings as flippers, but I don't know if that would work for flying too.










share|improve this question







New contributor




NadiraSpzirglas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don't know much about the physics or biology of this kind of thing, but it seems to me the needed motion for swimming vs flying is different? You push "down" against the air when flying, as opposed to pushing "back" against the water when swimming? So, anyone please correct me if I'm wrong but I feel like the range of motion is different for these two things and your dragons would need pretty versatile joints? I'm also now pretty interested in this question, looking forward to seeing what the science-literate folks on here say. P.S. Welcome to Stack Exchange
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    You are not a big fan of How to Train Your Dragon, are you?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter A. Schneider
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Considering dragons shouldn't even be able to fly I don't see why swimming would be a problem. The Guards! Guards! book from Terry Pratchett goes into great detail about how and why dragons are completely unrealistic and can't exist (while of course having a fully functional dragon in that story anyway). Unless you're talking of pretty small dragons ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @Mark the discworld swamp dragons also suggest an alternative way that an aquatic species might be able to fly, by imitating a submarine-launched missile...
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Since you don't have a swim speed requirement, my first thought went to sea-flap-flap dragon. Also, for "limited time" do flying fish count as meeting that? X3
    $endgroup$
    – Tezra
    yesterday















15












$begingroup$


I have three types of dragons; dragons that primarily fly, dragons that primarily run, and dragons that primarily swim, with all three types being able to do the other two things for a limited amount of time.
What kind of wings would a water dragon have to have to be able to fly as well as swim? I had envisioned them using their wings as flippers, but I don't know if that would work for flying too.










share|improve this question







New contributor




NadiraSpzirglas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don't know much about the physics or biology of this kind of thing, but it seems to me the needed motion for swimming vs flying is different? You push "down" against the air when flying, as opposed to pushing "back" against the water when swimming? So, anyone please correct me if I'm wrong but I feel like the range of motion is different for these two things and your dragons would need pretty versatile joints? I'm also now pretty interested in this question, looking forward to seeing what the science-literate folks on here say. P.S. Welcome to Stack Exchange
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    You are not a big fan of How to Train Your Dragon, are you?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter A. Schneider
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Considering dragons shouldn't even be able to fly I don't see why swimming would be a problem. The Guards! Guards! book from Terry Pratchett goes into great detail about how and why dragons are completely unrealistic and can't exist (while of course having a fully functional dragon in that story anyway). Unless you're talking of pretty small dragons ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @Mark the discworld swamp dragons also suggest an alternative way that an aquatic species might be able to fly, by imitating a submarine-launched missile...
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Since you don't have a swim speed requirement, my first thought went to sea-flap-flap dragon. Also, for "limited time" do flying fish count as meeting that? X3
    $endgroup$
    – Tezra
    yesterday













15












15








15


4



$begingroup$


I have three types of dragons; dragons that primarily fly, dragons that primarily run, and dragons that primarily swim, with all three types being able to do the other two things for a limited amount of time.
What kind of wings would a water dragon have to have to be able to fly as well as swim? I had envisioned them using their wings as flippers, but I don't know if that would work for flying too.










share|improve this question







New contributor




NadiraSpzirglas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I have three types of dragons; dragons that primarily fly, dragons that primarily run, and dragons that primarily swim, with all three types being able to do the other two things for a limited amount of time.
What kind of wings would a water dragon have to have to be able to fly as well as swim? I had envisioned them using their wings as flippers, but I don't know if that would work for flying too.







biology mythical-creatures dragons






share|improve this question







New contributor




NadiraSpzirglas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




NadiraSpzirglas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




NadiraSpzirglas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









NadiraSpzirglasNadiraSpzirglas

7615




7615




New contributor




NadiraSpzirglas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





NadiraSpzirglas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






NadiraSpzirglas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don't know much about the physics or biology of this kind of thing, but it seems to me the needed motion for swimming vs flying is different? You push "down" against the air when flying, as opposed to pushing "back" against the water when swimming? So, anyone please correct me if I'm wrong but I feel like the range of motion is different for these two things and your dragons would need pretty versatile joints? I'm also now pretty interested in this question, looking forward to seeing what the science-literate folks on here say. P.S. Welcome to Stack Exchange
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    You are not a big fan of How to Train Your Dragon, are you?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter A. Schneider
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Considering dragons shouldn't even be able to fly I don't see why swimming would be a problem. The Guards! Guards! book from Terry Pratchett goes into great detail about how and why dragons are completely unrealistic and can't exist (while of course having a fully functional dragon in that story anyway). Unless you're talking of pretty small dragons ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @Mark the discworld swamp dragons also suggest an alternative way that an aquatic species might be able to fly, by imitating a submarine-launched missile...
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Since you don't have a swim speed requirement, my first thought went to sea-flap-flap dragon. Also, for "limited time" do flying fish count as meeting that? X3
    $endgroup$
    – Tezra
    yesterday












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don't know much about the physics or biology of this kind of thing, but it seems to me the needed motion for swimming vs flying is different? You push "down" against the air when flying, as opposed to pushing "back" against the water when swimming? So, anyone please correct me if I'm wrong but I feel like the range of motion is different for these two things and your dragons would need pretty versatile joints? I'm also now pretty interested in this question, looking forward to seeing what the science-literate folks on here say. P.S. Welcome to Stack Exchange
    $endgroup$
    – MarielS
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    You are not a big fan of How to Train Your Dragon, are you?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter A. Schneider
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Considering dragons shouldn't even be able to fly I don't see why swimming would be a problem. The Guards! Guards! book from Terry Pratchett goes into great detail about how and why dragons are completely unrealistic and can't exist (while of course having a fully functional dragon in that story anyway). Unless you're talking of pretty small dragons ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @Mark the discworld swamp dragons also suggest an alternative way that an aquatic species might be able to fly, by imitating a submarine-launched missile...
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Since you don't have a swim speed requirement, my first thought went to sea-flap-flap dragon. Also, for "limited time" do flying fish count as meeting that? X3
    $endgroup$
    – Tezra
    yesterday







3




3




$begingroup$
I don't know much about the physics or biology of this kind of thing, but it seems to me the needed motion for swimming vs flying is different? You push "down" against the air when flying, as opposed to pushing "back" against the water when swimming? So, anyone please correct me if I'm wrong but I feel like the range of motion is different for these two things and your dragons would need pretty versatile joints? I'm also now pretty interested in this question, looking forward to seeing what the science-literate folks on here say. P.S. Welcome to Stack Exchange
$endgroup$
– MarielS
2 days ago





$begingroup$
I don't know much about the physics or biology of this kind of thing, but it seems to me the needed motion for swimming vs flying is different? You push "down" against the air when flying, as opposed to pushing "back" against the water when swimming? So, anyone please correct me if I'm wrong but I feel like the range of motion is different for these two things and your dragons would need pretty versatile joints? I'm also now pretty interested in this question, looking forward to seeing what the science-literate folks on here say. P.S. Welcome to Stack Exchange
$endgroup$
– MarielS
2 days ago













$begingroup$
You are not a big fan of How to Train Your Dragon, are you?
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
yesterday




$begingroup$
You are not a big fan of How to Train Your Dragon, are you?
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
yesterday




3




3




$begingroup$
Considering dragons shouldn't even be able to fly I don't see why swimming would be a problem. The Guards! Guards! book from Terry Pratchett goes into great detail about how and why dragons are completely unrealistic and can't exist (while of course having a fully functional dragon in that story anyway). Unless you're talking of pretty small dragons ;)
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday




$begingroup$
Considering dragons shouldn't even be able to fly I don't see why swimming would be a problem. The Guards! Guards! book from Terry Pratchett goes into great detail about how and why dragons are completely unrealistic and can't exist (while of course having a fully functional dragon in that story anyway). Unless you're talking of pretty small dragons ;)
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday












$begingroup$
@Mark the discworld swamp dragons also suggest an alternative way that an aquatic species might be able to fly, by imitating a submarine-launched missile...
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
yesterday




$begingroup$
@Mark the discworld swamp dragons also suggest an alternative way that an aquatic species might be able to fly, by imitating a submarine-launched missile...
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
yesterday












$begingroup$
Since you don't have a swim speed requirement, my first thought went to sea-flap-flap dragon. Also, for "limited time" do flying fish count as meeting that? X3
$endgroup$
– Tezra
yesterday




$begingroup$
Since you don't have a swim speed requirement, my first thought went to sea-flap-flap dragon. Also, for "limited time" do flying fish count as meeting that? X3
$endgroup$
– Tezra
yesterday










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















31












$begingroup$

Totally yes.



If these ducks can do it, your dragons can do it. The video is great - these ducks are flying down to the ocean floor.



duck flying thru water
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7wY4Cnuk-s



It occurs to me that it would be good for something like a dragon to be able to use only part of its wing at first. I worry the forces put over the entirety of the wing to move that much water could tear the wing. As the dragon got up to speed it could use more and more wing.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    The ducks are only using a fraction of their wingspan to swim as the forces and movement are different from flying. The dragons should be fine keeping their wings tucked in the same way.
    $endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    yesterday






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Ducks are perfect "Jack of all trades - master of none" when it comes to locomotion. They can fly, walk, swim and dive, but are not particularlily good at either. But they evolved that way. I am not sure if it can just be transferred to dragons.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp
    yesterday







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Phillipp - I like the idea of dragon "jack of all trades". They are big but not the biggest. They are fierce but there are fierce things out there that can take one. They are smart but not the smartest. They cooperate with each other, but usually out of necessity. They can fly, run, swim and dive, and even dig, but not the greatest at any of those things. Maybe the thing they are best at is copying: if a dragon sees another creature doing something, it thinks "I bet I can do that" and it is usually right, to some degree.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    yesterday






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @Philipp It's fantasy, so why couldn't it be transferred to dragons? Dragons are already impossible in real life, regardless of whether they can swim.
    $endgroup$
    – only_pro
    yesterday



















14












$begingroup$

There are certainly real-life birds that can fly in air and primarily hunt underwater by swimming with their wings... puffins. There are other birds that swim underwater primarily by kicking with their feet, such as diving ducks and cormorants, and there are birds that use a mixture of the two strategies, like gannets (which can also do awesome 100kph power dives from 60m up). There's plenty of footage on youtube of all these birds doing what you're interested in, so at this scale what you want is clearly possible (though dragons with huge webbed feet might not be quite so intrinsically bad-ass as ones with talons. ymmv).



I strongly suspect that there will be scaling issues... for the same reason that large flying dragons are awkward things to make plausible (see countless questions on this site passim ad nauseam) making very large flippers remain light and strong and fast enough for flight and remain tough and powerful enough for swimming is likely to be very difficult. If you've already handwaved dragons into your scenario, perhaps this is less of an issue for you. For the record, northern gannets have a 180cm wingspan, so if your dragons are about this sort of size, you'll be just fine.



Now, there are tradeoffs to be made. Penguins clearly outswim all of the above, but they can't fly and so can't really live anywhere with land predators. Puffins can outswim gannets, but both are outflown by piratical birds such as skuas which will attack the them and steal their catch (see kleptoparasitism in birds). Remember that sort of thing if you're making an ecosystem with various dragon species in it. Personally, I feel that flight is often overrated. See also: the astonishing success of your own species, flight-envy notwithstanding, the wide spread of penguins which don't have much use for flying and especially ants which were able to fly once but mostly gave it up and have become extraordinarily successful. When it comes to sea dragons, I can understand that not everyone is excited by the idea of giant marine iguanas that might breathe fire or create pistol-shrimp style shockwaves underwater, though :-(






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    +1 for mentioning gannets - which are impressive as hell up close when you're rowing a dinghy and they smack into the water right next to you...
    $endgroup$
    – GerardFalla
    yesterday


















7












$begingroup$

Absolutely, but there are some interesting physiological tradeoffs.



Many birds also swim underwater, and there are broadly two techniques for doing so.



Swimming with feet



The first is to use your feet for paddling. Birds such as grebes, loons and cormorants do this, and it can be very effective. It's beneficial as it allows their wings to be well adapted to flight while still being capably of swimming underwater. It also allows for a lot of manoeuvrability.



The first tradeoff is that it's not quite as efficient as using wings so you rarely find it as a sole strategy among sea birds. It's more common among freshwater birds.



The second tradeoff is that to make it more efficient for diving, you tend to need legs that are further and further back on your body. This makes it more and more awkward to walk on land (which is necessary at least for laying eggs). You can see this quite starkly in the extinct Hesperornis which was a sea-going bird that swam with its legs and was probably very ungainly on land.



HesperornisHesperornis



Swimming by generating lift with wings



The second option is to swim using exactly the same mechanics as flight. Flapping wings produce lift and thrust in exactly the same way whether they're operating in air or water. This can be very efficient, and is how the majority of sea-going diving birds swim. However, there are some key differences.



As air isn't very dense, to fly you want a wing that has quite a lot of surface area compared to the weight/area you're trying to move. Strength-wise, you can get away with this as the wing loadings aren't very high.



Water, however, is much denser. For a given power-stroke, you will generate much more lift and thrust, and your wings will be under much higher strain. So, what you want for swimming is short, stubby but strongly built wings.



What you get in diving birds is very often a compromise. Either they will have wings that are pretty well adapted for flying and their swimming ability suffers (shearwaters for instance), or they are very good at swimming but are not very efficient flyers (Puffins). Some pics to illustrate:



Shearwater



Puffin



Puffins actually have some of the highest flight costs of any birds. Go far enough this way any you'll lose the ability to fly at all and become extremely efficient swimmers, like penguins.



Some further considerations



One of the other key issues with flight vs swimming is weight. In order to fly efficiently, you want to be as light as possible. In order to swim efficiently, you want to be as close to the density of water as possible. This is a big hurdle for any animal that wants to do both.



Birds specifically have lungs that don't really inflate or deflate like ours do, so they are trying to dive with inflated air sacs inside them. Seabirds have some of the densest bones in the bird family, which helps counteract this buoyancy. Some also swallow stones for ballast.



Feathers are also designed to trap air pockets inside them to increase their surface area for a given weight which is not what you want for diving. Diving birds with waterproof feathers often preen them before diving in order to drive out any trapped air, and some like cormorants don't have waterproof feathers which allows them to get waterlogged while diving and decrease their buoyancy (at the cost of having to dry them out in the sun before they can fly again).



tl;dr All of this adds up to a set of tradeoffs where if you want to be a better swimmer, you will have to make sacrifices in efficiency for flying and/or walking.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$

    Water is about 3 orders of magnitude denser than air.



    This means that, for a given profile and velocity, lift forces and drag will be as much as higher in water than in air.



    If you need to have lift in air you need a large surface, which would be too large in water. See penguins: their small wings work like a charm in water, but are totally useless to fly.



    Unless your dragon has a foldable membrane that can be deployed only in air, there is no way that water optimized find/wings can provide lift in air.



    This also answer your question: the water dragons can deploy an additional membrane to get lift when they venture in the air, an they keep the membrane unused when in water, to reduce drag.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Every dragon (and bird) already has a way to retract their "membrane", because they tuck their wing in on an upwards flap and extend it on a downwards flap when they are flying. The difference in surface area (and thus force exerted) is how they are able to gain altitude. The exact same principle applies underwater. This is used by humans (e.g. breaststroke: wide when pulling your arms back, narrow when pushing your ars forward) and birds who swim underwater (as per the other answers).
      $endgroup$
      – Flater
      yesterday











    • $begingroup$
      Wings, arms and legs: folded; uses its elongated body with a protractable membrane vertically on its tail for swimming. Basically an eel with six appendages. Six of which only cause drag underwater, and four while in flight. And 2~4 required only for walking on land.
      $endgroup$
      – Mazura
      23 hours ago


















    4












    $begingroup$

    If fish can have fins that allow for flight, so can your dragon.



    I believe I can flyyyy...



    Just don't expect to be able to ride one in flight, or to see it going on for more than a couple hundred meters at a time.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      There are of course other options for primarily aquatic animals who'd like to fly... water jets! blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/02/20/…
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Since your answer is built on "flying fish can do it", it is relevant to consider that flying fish glide, they don't fly. They are limited by whatever force they can muster when they jump out of the water, and then they just coast until they land.
      $endgroup$
      – Flater
      yesterday







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Flater I guess it also depends on the OP's definition of "flying" for the water dragons. If OP just needs short bursts of movement through air without fancy maneuvers or sustained flight, jump-and-glide could very well serve the purpose
      $endgroup$
      – Delioth
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @Delioth: Keep mind of the square cube law though. Surface area of the wing is a square, but a dragon's mass is a cube. When you scale the flying fish, you will reach a point where the wings won't properly glide anymore even though they may have the same relative size to the dragon's body as is the case for the flying fish.
      $endgroup$
      – Flater
      yesterday







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      What about steam powered jets, assuming these are fire-breathing dragons? Ingest water, add fire, expel as steam for initial propulsion
      $endgroup$
      – Mick O'Hea
      yesterday











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    NadiraSpzirglas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142896%2fcould-a-dragon-use-its-wings-to-swim%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    31












    $begingroup$

    Totally yes.



    If these ducks can do it, your dragons can do it. The video is great - these ducks are flying down to the ocean floor.



    duck flying thru water
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7wY4Cnuk-s



    It occurs to me that it would be good for something like a dragon to be able to use only part of its wing at first. I worry the forces put over the entirety of the wing to move that much water could tear the wing. As the dragon got up to speed it could use more and more wing.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 7




      $begingroup$
      The ducks are only using a fraction of their wingspan to swim as the forces and movement are different from flying. The dragons should be fine keeping their wings tucked in the same way.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      yesterday






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Ducks are perfect "Jack of all trades - master of none" when it comes to locomotion. They can fly, walk, swim and dive, but are not particularlily good at either. But they evolved that way. I am not sure if it can just be transferred to dragons.
      $endgroup$
      – Philipp
      yesterday







    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Phillipp - I like the idea of dragon "jack of all trades". They are big but not the biggest. They are fierce but there are fierce things out there that can take one. They are smart but not the smartest. They cooperate with each other, but usually out of necessity. They can fly, run, swim and dive, and even dig, but not the greatest at any of those things. Maybe the thing they are best at is copying: if a dragon sees another creature doing something, it thinks "I bet I can do that" and it is usually right, to some degree.
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      yesterday






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Philipp It's fantasy, so why couldn't it be transferred to dragons? Dragons are already impossible in real life, regardless of whether they can swim.
      $endgroup$
      – only_pro
      yesterday
















    31












    $begingroup$

    Totally yes.



    If these ducks can do it, your dragons can do it. The video is great - these ducks are flying down to the ocean floor.



    duck flying thru water
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7wY4Cnuk-s



    It occurs to me that it would be good for something like a dragon to be able to use only part of its wing at first. I worry the forces put over the entirety of the wing to move that much water could tear the wing. As the dragon got up to speed it could use more and more wing.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 7




      $begingroup$
      The ducks are only using a fraction of their wingspan to swim as the forces and movement are different from flying. The dragons should be fine keeping their wings tucked in the same way.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      yesterday






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Ducks are perfect "Jack of all trades - master of none" when it comes to locomotion. They can fly, walk, swim and dive, but are not particularlily good at either. But they evolved that way. I am not sure if it can just be transferred to dragons.
      $endgroup$
      – Philipp
      yesterday







    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Phillipp - I like the idea of dragon "jack of all trades". They are big but not the biggest. They are fierce but there are fierce things out there that can take one. They are smart but not the smartest. They cooperate with each other, but usually out of necessity. They can fly, run, swim and dive, and even dig, but not the greatest at any of those things. Maybe the thing they are best at is copying: if a dragon sees another creature doing something, it thinks "I bet I can do that" and it is usually right, to some degree.
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      yesterday






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Philipp It's fantasy, so why couldn't it be transferred to dragons? Dragons are already impossible in real life, regardless of whether they can swim.
      $endgroup$
      – only_pro
      yesterday














    31












    31








    31





    $begingroup$

    Totally yes.



    If these ducks can do it, your dragons can do it. The video is great - these ducks are flying down to the ocean floor.



    duck flying thru water
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7wY4Cnuk-s



    It occurs to me that it would be good for something like a dragon to be able to use only part of its wing at first. I worry the forces put over the entirety of the wing to move that much water could tear the wing. As the dragon got up to speed it could use more and more wing.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Totally yes.



    If these ducks can do it, your dragons can do it. The video is great - these ducks are flying down to the ocean floor.



    duck flying thru water
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7wY4Cnuk-s



    It occurs to me that it would be good for something like a dragon to be able to use only part of its wing at first. I worry the forces put over the entirety of the wing to move that much water could tear the wing. As the dragon got up to speed it could use more and more wing.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 days ago









    WillkWillk

    116k27219486




    116k27219486







    • 7




      $begingroup$
      The ducks are only using a fraction of their wingspan to swim as the forces and movement are different from flying. The dragons should be fine keeping their wings tucked in the same way.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      yesterday






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Ducks are perfect "Jack of all trades - master of none" when it comes to locomotion. They can fly, walk, swim and dive, but are not particularlily good at either. But they evolved that way. I am not sure if it can just be transferred to dragons.
      $endgroup$
      – Philipp
      yesterday







    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Phillipp - I like the idea of dragon "jack of all trades". They are big but not the biggest. They are fierce but there are fierce things out there that can take one. They are smart but not the smartest. They cooperate with each other, but usually out of necessity. They can fly, run, swim and dive, and even dig, but not the greatest at any of those things. Maybe the thing they are best at is copying: if a dragon sees another creature doing something, it thinks "I bet I can do that" and it is usually right, to some degree.
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      yesterday






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Philipp It's fantasy, so why couldn't it be transferred to dragons? Dragons are already impossible in real life, regardless of whether they can swim.
      $endgroup$
      – only_pro
      yesterday













    • 7




      $begingroup$
      The ducks are only using a fraction of their wingspan to swim as the forces and movement are different from flying. The dragons should be fine keeping their wings tucked in the same way.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      yesterday






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Ducks are perfect "Jack of all trades - master of none" when it comes to locomotion. They can fly, walk, swim and dive, but are not particularlily good at either. But they evolved that way. I am not sure if it can just be transferred to dragons.
      $endgroup$
      – Philipp
      yesterday







    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Phillipp - I like the idea of dragon "jack of all trades". They are big but not the biggest. They are fierce but there are fierce things out there that can take one. They are smart but not the smartest. They cooperate with each other, but usually out of necessity. They can fly, run, swim and dive, and even dig, but not the greatest at any of those things. Maybe the thing they are best at is copying: if a dragon sees another creature doing something, it thinks "I bet I can do that" and it is usually right, to some degree.
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      yesterday






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Philipp It's fantasy, so why couldn't it be transferred to dragons? Dragons are already impossible in real life, regardless of whether they can swim.
      $endgroup$
      – only_pro
      yesterday








    7




    7




    $begingroup$
    The ducks are only using a fraction of their wingspan to swim as the forces and movement are different from flying. The dragons should be fine keeping their wings tucked in the same way.
    $endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    The ducks are only using a fraction of their wingspan to swim as the forces and movement are different from flying. The dragons should be fine keeping their wings tucked in the same way.
    $endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    yesterday




    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    Ducks are perfect "Jack of all trades - master of none" when it comes to locomotion. They can fly, walk, swim and dive, but are not particularlily good at either. But they evolved that way. I am not sure if it can just be transferred to dragons.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp
    yesterday





    $begingroup$
    Ducks are perfect "Jack of all trades - master of none" when it comes to locomotion. They can fly, walk, swim and dive, but are not particularlily good at either. But they evolved that way. I am not sure if it can just be transferred to dragons.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp
    yesterday





    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    @Phillipp - I like the idea of dragon "jack of all trades". They are big but not the biggest. They are fierce but there are fierce things out there that can take one. They are smart but not the smartest. They cooperate with each other, but usually out of necessity. They can fly, run, swim and dive, and even dig, but not the greatest at any of those things. Maybe the thing they are best at is copying: if a dragon sees another creature doing something, it thinks "I bet I can do that" and it is usually right, to some degree.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    @Phillipp - I like the idea of dragon "jack of all trades". They are big but not the biggest. They are fierce but there are fierce things out there that can take one. They are smart but not the smartest. They cooperate with each other, but usually out of necessity. They can fly, run, swim and dive, and even dig, but not the greatest at any of those things. Maybe the thing they are best at is copying: if a dragon sees another creature doing something, it thinks "I bet I can do that" and it is usually right, to some degree.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    yesterday




    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    @Philipp It's fantasy, so why couldn't it be transferred to dragons? Dragons are already impossible in real life, regardless of whether they can swim.
    $endgroup$
    – only_pro
    yesterday





    $begingroup$
    @Philipp It's fantasy, so why couldn't it be transferred to dragons? Dragons are already impossible in real life, regardless of whether they can swim.
    $endgroup$
    – only_pro
    yesterday












    14












    $begingroup$

    There are certainly real-life birds that can fly in air and primarily hunt underwater by swimming with their wings... puffins. There are other birds that swim underwater primarily by kicking with their feet, such as diving ducks and cormorants, and there are birds that use a mixture of the two strategies, like gannets (which can also do awesome 100kph power dives from 60m up). There's plenty of footage on youtube of all these birds doing what you're interested in, so at this scale what you want is clearly possible (though dragons with huge webbed feet might not be quite so intrinsically bad-ass as ones with talons. ymmv).



    I strongly suspect that there will be scaling issues... for the same reason that large flying dragons are awkward things to make plausible (see countless questions on this site passim ad nauseam) making very large flippers remain light and strong and fast enough for flight and remain tough and powerful enough for swimming is likely to be very difficult. If you've already handwaved dragons into your scenario, perhaps this is less of an issue for you. For the record, northern gannets have a 180cm wingspan, so if your dragons are about this sort of size, you'll be just fine.



    Now, there are tradeoffs to be made. Penguins clearly outswim all of the above, but they can't fly and so can't really live anywhere with land predators. Puffins can outswim gannets, but both are outflown by piratical birds such as skuas which will attack the them and steal their catch (see kleptoparasitism in birds). Remember that sort of thing if you're making an ecosystem with various dragon species in it. Personally, I feel that flight is often overrated. See also: the astonishing success of your own species, flight-envy notwithstanding, the wide spread of penguins which don't have much use for flying and especially ants which were able to fly once but mostly gave it up and have become extraordinarily successful. When it comes to sea dragons, I can understand that not everyone is excited by the idea of giant marine iguanas that might breathe fire or create pistol-shrimp style shockwaves underwater, though :-(






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      +1 for mentioning gannets - which are impressive as hell up close when you're rowing a dinghy and they smack into the water right next to you...
      $endgroup$
      – GerardFalla
      yesterday















    14












    $begingroup$

    There are certainly real-life birds that can fly in air and primarily hunt underwater by swimming with their wings... puffins. There are other birds that swim underwater primarily by kicking with their feet, such as diving ducks and cormorants, and there are birds that use a mixture of the two strategies, like gannets (which can also do awesome 100kph power dives from 60m up). There's plenty of footage on youtube of all these birds doing what you're interested in, so at this scale what you want is clearly possible (though dragons with huge webbed feet might not be quite so intrinsically bad-ass as ones with talons. ymmv).



    I strongly suspect that there will be scaling issues... for the same reason that large flying dragons are awkward things to make plausible (see countless questions on this site passim ad nauseam) making very large flippers remain light and strong and fast enough for flight and remain tough and powerful enough for swimming is likely to be very difficult. If you've already handwaved dragons into your scenario, perhaps this is less of an issue for you. For the record, northern gannets have a 180cm wingspan, so if your dragons are about this sort of size, you'll be just fine.



    Now, there are tradeoffs to be made. Penguins clearly outswim all of the above, but they can't fly and so can't really live anywhere with land predators. Puffins can outswim gannets, but both are outflown by piratical birds such as skuas which will attack the them and steal their catch (see kleptoparasitism in birds). Remember that sort of thing if you're making an ecosystem with various dragon species in it. Personally, I feel that flight is often overrated. See also: the astonishing success of your own species, flight-envy notwithstanding, the wide spread of penguins which don't have much use for flying and especially ants which were able to fly once but mostly gave it up and have become extraordinarily successful. When it comes to sea dragons, I can understand that not everyone is excited by the idea of giant marine iguanas that might breathe fire or create pistol-shrimp style shockwaves underwater, though :-(






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      +1 for mentioning gannets - which are impressive as hell up close when you're rowing a dinghy and they smack into the water right next to you...
      $endgroup$
      – GerardFalla
      yesterday













    14












    14








    14





    $begingroup$

    There are certainly real-life birds that can fly in air and primarily hunt underwater by swimming with their wings... puffins. There are other birds that swim underwater primarily by kicking with their feet, such as diving ducks and cormorants, and there are birds that use a mixture of the two strategies, like gannets (which can also do awesome 100kph power dives from 60m up). There's plenty of footage on youtube of all these birds doing what you're interested in, so at this scale what you want is clearly possible (though dragons with huge webbed feet might not be quite so intrinsically bad-ass as ones with talons. ymmv).



    I strongly suspect that there will be scaling issues... for the same reason that large flying dragons are awkward things to make plausible (see countless questions on this site passim ad nauseam) making very large flippers remain light and strong and fast enough for flight and remain tough and powerful enough for swimming is likely to be very difficult. If you've already handwaved dragons into your scenario, perhaps this is less of an issue for you. For the record, northern gannets have a 180cm wingspan, so if your dragons are about this sort of size, you'll be just fine.



    Now, there are tradeoffs to be made. Penguins clearly outswim all of the above, but they can't fly and so can't really live anywhere with land predators. Puffins can outswim gannets, but both are outflown by piratical birds such as skuas which will attack the them and steal their catch (see kleptoparasitism in birds). Remember that sort of thing if you're making an ecosystem with various dragon species in it. Personally, I feel that flight is often overrated. See also: the astonishing success of your own species, flight-envy notwithstanding, the wide spread of penguins which don't have much use for flying and especially ants which were able to fly once but mostly gave it up and have become extraordinarily successful. When it comes to sea dragons, I can understand that not everyone is excited by the idea of giant marine iguanas that might breathe fire or create pistol-shrimp style shockwaves underwater, though :-(






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    There are certainly real-life birds that can fly in air and primarily hunt underwater by swimming with their wings... puffins. There are other birds that swim underwater primarily by kicking with their feet, such as diving ducks and cormorants, and there are birds that use a mixture of the two strategies, like gannets (which can also do awesome 100kph power dives from 60m up). There's plenty of footage on youtube of all these birds doing what you're interested in, so at this scale what you want is clearly possible (though dragons with huge webbed feet might not be quite so intrinsically bad-ass as ones with talons. ymmv).



    I strongly suspect that there will be scaling issues... for the same reason that large flying dragons are awkward things to make plausible (see countless questions on this site passim ad nauseam) making very large flippers remain light and strong and fast enough for flight and remain tough and powerful enough for swimming is likely to be very difficult. If you've already handwaved dragons into your scenario, perhaps this is less of an issue for you. For the record, northern gannets have a 180cm wingspan, so if your dragons are about this sort of size, you'll be just fine.



    Now, there are tradeoffs to be made. Penguins clearly outswim all of the above, but they can't fly and so can't really live anywhere with land predators. Puffins can outswim gannets, but both are outflown by piratical birds such as skuas which will attack the them and steal their catch (see kleptoparasitism in birds). Remember that sort of thing if you're making an ecosystem with various dragon species in it. Personally, I feel that flight is often overrated. See also: the astonishing success of your own species, flight-envy notwithstanding, the wide spread of penguins which don't have much use for flying and especially ants which were able to fly once but mostly gave it up and have become extraordinarily successful. When it comes to sea dragons, I can understand that not everyone is excited by the idea of giant marine iguanas that might breathe fire or create pistol-shrimp style shockwaves underwater, though :-(







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered 2 days ago









    Starfish PrimeStarfish Prime

    4538




    4538







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      +1 for mentioning gannets - which are impressive as hell up close when you're rowing a dinghy and they smack into the water right next to you...
      $endgroup$
      – GerardFalla
      yesterday












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      +1 for mentioning gannets - which are impressive as hell up close when you're rowing a dinghy and they smack into the water right next to you...
      $endgroup$
      – GerardFalla
      yesterday







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    +1 for mentioning gannets - which are impressive as hell up close when you're rowing a dinghy and they smack into the water right next to you...
    $endgroup$
    – GerardFalla
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    +1 for mentioning gannets - which are impressive as hell up close when you're rowing a dinghy and they smack into the water right next to you...
    $endgroup$
    – GerardFalla
    yesterday











    7












    $begingroup$

    Absolutely, but there are some interesting physiological tradeoffs.



    Many birds also swim underwater, and there are broadly two techniques for doing so.



    Swimming with feet



    The first is to use your feet for paddling. Birds such as grebes, loons and cormorants do this, and it can be very effective. It's beneficial as it allows their wings to be well adapted to flight while still being capably of swimming underwater. It also allows for a lot of manoeuvrability.



    The first tradeoff is that it's not quite as efficient as using wings so you rarely find it as a sole strategy among sea birds. It's more common among freshwater birds.



    The second tradeoff is that to make it more efficient for diving, you tend to need legs that are further and further back on your body. This makes it more and more awkward to walk on land (which is necessary at least for laying eggs). You can see this quite starkly in the extinct Hesperornis which was a sea-going bird that swam with its legs and was probably very ungainly on land.



    HesperornisHesperornis



    Swimming by generating lift with wings



    The second option is to swim using exactly the same mechanics as flight. Flapping wings produce lift and thrust in exactly the same way whether they're operating in air or water. This can be very efficient, and is how the majority of sea-going diving birds swim. However, there are some key differences.



    As air isn't very dense, to fly you want a wing that has quite a lot of surface area compared to the weight/area you're trying to move. Strength-wise, you can get away with this as the wing loadings aren't very high.



    Water, however, is much denser. For a given power-stroke, you will generate much more lift and thrust, and your wings will be under much higher strain. So, what you want for swimming is short, stubby but strongly built wings.



    What you get in diving birds is very often a compromise. Either they will have wings that are pretty well adapted for flying and their swimming ability suffers (shearwaters for instance), or they are very good at swimming but are not very efficient flyers (Puffins). Some pics to illustrate:



    Shearwater



    Puffin



    Puffins actually have some of the highest flight costs of any birds. Go far enough this way any you'll lose the ability to fly at all and become extremely efficient swimmers, like penguins.



    Some further considerations



    One of the other key issues with flight vs swimming is weight. In order to fly efficiently, you want to be as light as possible. In order to swim efficiently, you want to be as close to the density of water as possible. This is a big hurdle for any animal that wants to do both.



    Birds specifically have lungs that don't really inflate or deflate like ours do, so they are trying to dive with inflated air sacs inside them. Seabirds have some of the densest bones in the bird family, which helps counteract this buoyancy. Some also swallow stones for ballast.



    Feathers are also designed to trap air pockets inside them to increase their surface area for a given weight which is not what you want for diving. Diving birds with waterproof feathers often preen them before diving in order to drive out any trapped air, and some like cormorants don't have waterproof feathers which allows them to get waterlogged while diving and decrease their buoyancy (at the cost of having to dry them out in the sun before they can fly again).



    tl;dr All of this adds up to a set of tradeoffs where if you want to be a better swimmer, you will have to make sacrifices in efficiency for flying and/or walking.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      7












      $begingroup$

      Absolutely, but there are some interesting physiological tradeoffs.



      Many birds also swim underwater, and there are broadly two techniques for doing so.



      Swimming with feet



      The first is to use your feet for paddling. Birds such as grebes, loons and cormorants do this, and it can be very effective. It's beneficial as it allows their wings to be well adapted to flight while still being capably of swimming underwater. It also allows for a lot of manoeuvrability.



      The first tradeoff is that it's not quite as efficient as using wings so you rarely find it as a sole strategy among sea birds. It's more common among freshwater birds.



      The second tradeoff is that to make it more efficient for diving, you tend to need legs that are further and further back on your body. This makes it more and more awkward to walk on land (which is necessary at least for laying eggs). You can see this quite starkly in the extinct Hesperornis which was a sea-going bird that swam with its legs and was probably very ungainly on land.



      HesperornisHesperornis



      Swimming by generating lift with wings



      The second option is to swim using exactly the same mechanics as flight. Flapping wings produce lift and thrust in exactly the same way whether they're operating in air or water. This can be very efficient, and is how the majority of sea-going diving birds swim. However, there are some key differences.



      As air isn't very dense, to fly you want a wing that has quite a lot of surface area compared to the weight/area you're trying to move. Strength-wise, you can get away with this as the wing loadings aren't very high.



      Water, however, is much denser. For a given power-stroke, you will generate much more lift and thrust, and your wings will be under much higher strain. So, what you want for swimming is short, stubby but strongly built wings.



      What you get in diving birds is very often a compromise. Either they will have wings that are pretty well adapted for flying and their swimming ability suffers (shearwaters for instance), or they are very good at swimming but are not very efficient flyers (Puffins). Some pics to illustrate:



      Shearwater



      Puffin



      Puffins actually have some of the highest flight costs of any birds. Go far enough this way any you'll lose the ability to fly at all and become extremely efficient swimmers, like penguins.



      Some further considerations



      One of the other key issues with flight vs swimming is weight. In order to fly efficiently, you want to be as light as possible. In order to swim efficiently, you want to be as close to the density of water as possible. This is a big hurdle for any animal that wants to do both.



      Birds specifically have lungs that don't really inflate or deflate like ours do, so they are trying to dive with inflated air sacs inside them. Seabirds have some of the densest bones in the bird family, which helps counteract this buoyancy. Some also swallow stones for ballast.



      Feathers are also designed to trap air pockets inside them to increase their surface area for a given weight which is not what you want for diving. Diving birds with waterproof feathers often preen them before diving in order to drive out any trapped air, and some like cormorants don't have waterproof feathers which allows them to get waterlogged while diving and decrease their buoyancy (at the cost of having to dry them out in the sun before they can fly again).



      tl;dr All of this adds up to a set of tradeoffs where if you want to be a better swimmer, you will have to make sacrifices in efficiency for flying and/or walking.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        7












        7








        7





        $begingroup$

        Absolutely, but there are some interesting physiological tradeoffs.



        Many birds also swim underwater, and there are broadly two techniques for doing so.



        Swimming with feet



        The first is to use your feet for paddling. Birds such as grebes, loons and cormorants do this, and it can be very effective. It's beneficial as it allows their wings to be well adapted to flight while still being capably of swimming underwater. It also allows for a lot of manoeuvrability.



        The first tradeoff is that it's not quite as efficient as using wings so you rarely find it as a sole strategy among sea birds. It's more common among freshwater birds.



        The second tradeoff is that to make it more efficient for diving, you tend to need legs that are further and further back on your body. This makes it more and more awkward to walk on land (which is necessary at least for laying eggs). You can see this quite starkly in the extinct Hesperornis which was a sea-going bird that swam with its legs and was probably very ungainly on land.



        HesperornisHesperornis



        Swimming by generating lift with wings



        The second option is to swim using exactly the same mechanics as flight. Flapping wings produce lift and thrust in exactly the same way whether they're operating in air or water. This can be very efficient, and is how the majority of sea-going diving birds swim. However, there are some key differences.



        As air isn't very dense, to fly you want a wing that has quite a lot of surface area compared to the weight/area you're trying to move. Strength-wise, you can get away with this as the wing loadings aren't very high.



        Water, however, is much denser. For a given power-stroke, you will generate much more lift and thrust, and your wings will be under much higher strain. So, what you want for swimming is short, stubby but strongly built wings.



        What you get in diving birds is very often a compromise. Either they will have wings that are pretty well adapted for flying and their swimming ability suffers (shearwaters for instance), or they are very good at swimming but are not very efficient flyers (Puffins). Some pics to illustrate:



        Shearwater



        Puffin



        Puffins actually have some of the highest flight costs of any birds. Go far enough this way any you'll lose the ability to fly at all and become extremely efficient swimmers, like penguins.



        Some further considerations



        One of the other key issues with flight vs swimming is weight. In order to fly efficiently, you want to be as light as possible. In order to swim efficiently, you want to be as close to the density of water as possible. This is a big hurdle for any animal that wants to do both.



        Birds specifically have lungs that don't really inflate or deflate like ours do, so they are trying to dive with inflated air sacs inside them. Seabirds have some of the densest bones in the bird family, which helps counteract this buoyancy. Some also swallow stones for ballast.



        Feathers are also designed to trap air pockets inside them to increase their surface area for a given weight which is not what you want for diving. Diving birds with waterproof feathers often preen them before diving in order to drive out any trapped air, and some like cormorants don't have waterproof feathers which allows them to get waterlogged while diving and decrease their buoyancy (at the cost of having to dry them out in the sun before they can fly again).



        tl;dr All of this adds up to a set of tradeoffs where if you want to be a better swimmer, you will have to make sacrifices in efficiency for flying and/or walking.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Absolutely, but there are some interesting physiological tradeoffs.



        Many birds also swim underwater, and there are broadly two techniques for doing so.



        Swimming with feet



        The first is to use your feet for paddling. Birds such as grebes, loons and cormorants do this, and it can be very effective. It's beneficial as it allows their wings to be well adapted to flight while still being capably of swimming underwater. It also allows for a lot of manoeuvrability.



        The first tradeoff is that it's not quite as efficient as using wings so you rarely find it as a sole strategy among sea birds. It's more common among freshwater birds.



        The second tradeoff is that to make it more efficient for diving, you tend to need legs that are further and further back on your body. This makes it more and more awkward to walk on land (which is necessary at least for laying eggs). You can see this quite starkly in the extinct Hesperornis which was a sea-going bird that swam with its legs and was probably very ungainly on land.



        HesperornisHesperornis



        Swimming by generating lift with wings



        The second option is to swim using exactly the same mechanics as flight. Flapping wings produce lift and thrust in exactly the same way whether they're operating in air or water. This can be very efficient, and is how the majority of sea-going diving birds swim. However, there are some key differences.



        As air isn't very dense, to fly you want a wing that has quite a lot of surface area compared to the weight/area you're trying to move. Strength-wise, you can get away with this as the wing loadings aren't very high.



        Water, however, is much denser. For a given power-stroke, you will generate much more lift and thrust, and your wings will be under much higher strain. So, what you want for swimming is short, stubby but strongly built wings.



        What you get in diving birds is very often a compromise. Either they will have wings that are pretty well adapted for flying and their swimming ability suffers (shearwaters for instance), or they are very good at swimming but are not very efficient flyers (Puffins). Some pics to illustrate:



        Shearwater



        Puffin



        Puffins actually have some of the highest flight costs of any birds. Go far enough this way any you'll lose the ability to fly at all and become extremely efficient swimmers, like penguins.



        Some further considerations



        One of the other key issues with flight vs swimming is weight. In order to fly efficiently, you want to be as light as possible. In order to swim efficiently, you want to be as close to the density of water as possible. This is a big hurdle for any animal that wants to do both.



        Birds specifically have lungs that don't really inflate or deflate like ours do, so they are trying to dive with inflated air sacs inside them. Seabirds have some of the densest bones in the bird family, which helps counteract this buoyancy. Some also swallow stones for ballast.



        Feathers are also designed to trap air pockets inside them to increase their surface area for a given weight which is not what you want for diving. Diving birds with waterproof feathers often preen them before diving in order to drive out any trapped air, and some like cormorants don't have waterproof feathers which allows them to get waterlogged while diving and decrease their buoyancy (at the cost of having to dry them out in the sun before they can fly again).



        tl;dr All of this adds up to a set of tradeoffs where if you want to be a better swimmer, you will have to make sacrifices in efficiency for flying and/or walking.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        YnneadwraithYnneadwraith

        5,31611528




        5,31611528





















            4












            $begingroup$

            Water is about 3 orders of magnitude denser than air.



            This means that, for a given profile and velocity, lift forces and drag will be as much as higher in water than in air.



            If you need to have lift in air you need a large surface, which would be too large in water. See penguins: their small wings work like a charm in water, but are totally useless to fly.



            Unless your dragon has a foldable membrane that can be deployed only in air, there is no way that water optimized find/wings can provide lift in air.



            This also answer your question: the water dragons can deploy an additional membrane to get lift when they venture in the air, an they keep the membrane unused when in water, to reduce drag.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Every dragon (and bird) already has a way to retract their "membrane", because they tuck their wing in on an upwards flap and extend it on a downwards flap when they are flying. The difference in surface area (and thus force exerted) is how they are able to gain altitude. The exact same principle applies underwater. This is used by humans (e.g. breaststroke: wide when pulling your arms back, narrow when pushing your ars forward) and birds who swim underwater (as per the other answers).
              $endgroup$
              – Flater
              yesterday











            • $begingroup$
              Wings, arms and legs: folded; uses its elongated body with a protractable membrane vertically on its tail for swimming. Basically an eel with six appendages. Six of which only cause drag underwater, and four while in flight. And 2~4 required only for walking on land.
              $endgroup$
              – Mazura
              23 hours ago















            4












            $begingroup$

            Water is about 3 orders of magnitude denser than air.



            This means that, for a given profile and velocity, lift forces and drag will be as much as higher in water than in air.



            If you need to have lift in air you need a large surface, which would be too large in water. See penguins: their small wings work like a charm in water, but are totally useless to fly.



            Unless your dragon has a foldable membrane that can be deployed only in air, there is no way that water optimized find/wings can provide lift in air.



            This also answer your question: the water dragons can deploy an additional membrane to get lift when they venture in the air, an they keep the membrane unused when in water, to reduce drag.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Every dragon (and bird) already has a way to retract their "membrane", because they tuck their wing in on an upwards flap and extend it on a downwards flap when they are flying. The difference in surface area (and thus force exerted) is how they are able to gain altitude. The exact same principle applies underwater. This is used by humans (e.g. breaststroke: wide when pulling your arms back, narrow when pushing your ars forward) and birds who swim underwater (as per the other answers).
              $endgroup$
              – Flater
              yesterday











            • $begingroup$
              Wings, arms and legs: folded; uses its elongated body with a protractable membrane vertically on its tail for swimming. Basically an eel with six appendages. Six of which only cause drag underwater, and four while in flight. And 2~4 required only for walking on land.
              $endgroup$
              – Mazura
              23 hours ago













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Water is about 3 orders of magnitude denser than air.



            This means that, for a given profile and velocity, lift forces and drag will be as much as higher in water than in air.



            If you need to have lift in air you need a large surface, which would be too large in water. See penguins: their small wings work like a charm in water, but are totally useless to fly.



            Unless your dragon has a foldable membrane that can be deployed only in air, there is no way that water optimized find/wings can provide lift in air.



            This also answer your question: the water dragons can deploy an additional membrane to get lift when they venture in the air, an they keep the membrane unused when in water, to reduce drag.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Water is about 3 orders of magnitude denser than air.



            This means that, for a given profile and velocity, lift forces and drag will be as much as higher in water than in air.



            If you need to have lift in air you need a large surface, which would be too large in water. See penguins: their small wings work like a charm in water, but are totally useless to fly.



            Unless your dragon has a foldable membrane that can be deployed only in air, there is no way that water optimized find/wings can provide lift in air.



            This also answer your question: the water dragons can deploy an additional membrane to get lift when they venture in the air, an they keep the membrane unused when in water, to reduce drag.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            L.DutchL.Dutch

            89.8k29208436




            89.8k29208436







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Every dragon (and bird) already has a way to retract their "membrane", because they tuck their wing in on an upwards flap and extend it on a downwards flap when they are flying. The difference in surface area (and thus force exerted) is how they are able to gain altitude. The exact same principle applies underwater. This is used by humans (e.g. breaststroke: wide when pulling your arms back, narrow when pushing your ars forward) and birds who swim underwater (as per the other answers).
              $endgroup$
              – Flater
              yesterday











            • $begingroup$
              Wings, arms and legs: folded; uses its elongated body with a protractable membrane vertically on its tail for swimming. Basically an eel with six appendages. Six of which only cause drag underwater, and four while in flight. And 2~4 required only for walking on land.
              $endgroup$
              – Mazura
              23 hours ago












            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Every dragon (and bird) already has a way to retract their "membrane", because they tuck their wing in on an upwards flap and extend it on a downwards flap when they are flying. The difference in surface area (and thus force exerted) is how they are able to gain altitude. The exact same principle applies underwater. This is used by humans (e.g. breaststroke: wide when pulling your arms back, narrow when pushing your ars forward) and birds who swim underwater (as per the other answers).
              $endgroup$
              – Flater
              yesterday











            • $begingroup$
              Wings, arms and legs: folded; uses its elongated body with a protractable membrane vertically on its tail for swimming. Basically an eel with six appendages. Six of which only cause drag underwater, and four while in flight. And 2~4 required only for walking on land.
              $endgroup$
              – Mazura
              23 hours ago







            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            Every dragon (and bird) already has a way to retract their "membrane", because they tuck their wing in on an upwards flap and extend it on a downwards flap when they are flying. The difference in surface area (and thus force exerted) is how they are able to gain altitude. The exact same principle applies underwater. This is used by humans (e.g. breaststroke: wide when pulling your arms back, narrow when pushing your ars forward) and birds who swim underwater (as per the other answers).
            $endgroup$
            – Flater
            yesterday





            $begingroup$
            Every dragon (and bird) already has a way to retract their "membrane", because they tuck their wing in on an upwards flap and extend it on a downwards flap when they are flying. The difference in surface area (and thus force exerted) is how they are able to gain altitude. The exact same principle applies underwater. This is used by humans (e.g. breaststroke: wide when pulling your arms back, narrow when pushing your ars forward) and birds who swim underwater (as per the other answers).
            $endgroup$
            – Flater
            yesterday













            $begingroup$
            Wings, arms and legs: folded; uses its elongated body with a protractable membrane vertically on its tail for swimming. Basically an eel with six appendages. Six of which only cause drag underwater, and four while in flight. And 2~4 required only for walking on land.
            $endgroup$
            – Mazura
            23 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Wings, arms and legs: folded; uses its elongated body with a protractable membrane vertically on its tail for swimming. Basically an eel with six appendages. Six of which only cause drag underwater, and four while in flight. And 2~4 required only for walking on land.
            $endgroup$
            – Mazura
            23 hours ago











            4












            $begingroup$

            If fish can have fins that allow for flight, so can your dragon.



            I believe I can flyyyy...



            Just don't expect to be able to ride one in flight, or to see it going on for more than a couple hundred meters at a time.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              There are of course other options for primarily aquatic animals who'd like to fly... water jets! blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/02/20/…
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              Since your answer is built on "flying fish can do it", it is relevant to consider that flying fish glide, they don't fly. They are limited by whatever force they can muster when they jump out of the water, and then they just coast until they land.
              $endgroup$
              – Flater
              yesterday







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Flater I guess it also depends on the OP's definition of "flying" for the water dragons. If OP just needs short bursts of movement through air without fancy maneuvers or sustained flight, jump-and-glide could very well serve the purpose
              $endgroup$
              – Delioth
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              @Delioth: Keep mind of the square cube law though. Surface area of the wing is a square, but a dragon's mass is a cube. When you scale the flying fish, you will reach a point where the wings won't properly glide anymore even though they may have the same relative size to the dragon's body as is the case for the flying fish.
              $endgroup$
              – Flater
              yesterday







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              What about steam powered jets, assuming these are fire-breathing dragons? Ingest water, add fire, expel as steam for initial propulsion
              $endgroup$
              – Mick O'Hea
              yesterday















            4












            $begingroup$

            If fish can have fins that allow for flight, so can your dragon.



            I believe I can flyyyy...



            Just don't expect to be able to ride one in flight, or to see it going on for more than a couple hundred meters at a time.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              There are of course other options for primarily aquatic animals who'd like to fly... water jets! blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/02/20/…
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              Since your answer is built on "flying fish can do it", it is relevant to consider that flying fish glide, they don't fly. They are limited by whatever force they can muster when they jump out of the water, and then they just coast until they land.
              $endgroup$
              – Flater
              yesterday







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Flater I guess it also depends on the OP's definition of "flying" for the water dragons. If OP just needs short bursts of movement through air without fancy maneuvers or sustained flight, jump-and-glide could very well serve the purpose
              $endgroup$
              – Delioth
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              @Delioth: Keep mind of the square cube law though. Surface area of the wing is a square, but a dragon's mass is a cube. When you scale the flying fish, you will reach a point where the wings won't properly glide anymore even though they may have the same relative size to the dragon's body as is the case for the flying fish.
              $endgroup$
              – Flater
              yesterday







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              What about steam powered jets, assuming these are fire-breathing dragons? Ingest water, add fire, expel as steam for initial propulsion
              $endgroup$
              – Mick O'Hea
              yesterday













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            If fish can have fins that allow for flight, so can your dragon.



            I believe I can flyyyy...



            Just don't expect to be able to ride one in flight, or to see it going on for more than a couple hundred meters at a time.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            If fish can have fins that allow for flight, so can your dragon.



            I believe I can flyyyy...



            Just don't expect to be able to ride one in flight, or to see it going on for more than a couple hundred meters at a time.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            RenanRenan

            52k15119258




            52k15119258











            • $begingroup$
              There are of course other options for primarily aquatic animals who'd like to fly... water jets! blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/02/20/…
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              Since your answer is built on "flying fish can do it", it is relevant to consider that flying fish glide, they don't fly. They are limited by whatever force they can muster when they jump out of the water, and then they just coast until they land.
              $endgroup$
              – Flater
              yesterday







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Flater I guess it also depends on the OP's definition of "flying" for the water dragons. If OP just needs short bursts of movement through air without fancy maneuvers or sustained flight, jump-and-glide could very well serve the purpose
              $endgroup$
              – Delioth
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              @Delioth: Keep mind of the square cube law though. Surface area of the wing is a square, but a dragon's mass is a cube. When you scale the flying fish, you will reach a point where the wings won't properly glide anymore even though they may have the same relative size to the dragon's body as is the case for the flying fish.
              $endgroup$
              – Flater
              yesterday







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              What about steam powered jets, assuming these are fire-breathing dragons? Ingest water, add fire, expel as steam for initial propulsion
              $endgroup$
              – Mick O'Hea
              yesterday
















            • $begingroup$
              There are of course other options for primarily aquatic animals who'd like to fly... water jets! blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/02/20/…
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              Since your answer is built on "flying fish can do it", it is relevant to consider that flying fish glide, they don't fly. They are limited by whatever force they can muster when they jump out of the water, and then they just coast until they land.
              $endgroup$
              – Flater
              yesterday







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Flater I guess it also depends on the OP's definition of "flying" for the water dragons. If OP just needs short bursts of movement through air without fancy maneuvers or sustained flight, jump-and-glide could very well serve the purpose
              $endgroup$
              – Delioth
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              @Delioth: Keep mind of the square cube law though. Surface area of the wing is a square, but a dragon's mass is a cube. When you scale the flying fish, you will reach a point where the wings won't properly glide anymore even though they may have the same relative size to the dragon's body as is the case for the flying fish.
              $endgroup$
              – Flater
              yesterday







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              What about steam powered jets, assuming these are fire-breathing dragons? Ingest water, add fire, expel as steam for initial propulsion
              $endgroup$
              – Mick O'Hea
              yesterday















            $begingroup$
            There are of course other options for primarily aquatic animals who'd like to fly... water jets! blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/02/20/…
            $endgroup$
            – Starfish Prime
            yesterday




            $begingroup$
            There are of course other options for primarily aquatic animals who'd like to fly... water jets! blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/02/20/…
            $endgroup$
            – Starfish Prime
            yesterday












            $begingroup$
            Since your answer is built on "flying fish can do it", it is relevant to consider that flying fish glide, they don't fly. They are limited by whatever force they can muster when they jump out of the water, and then they just coast until they land.
            $endgroup$
            – Flater
            yesterday





            $begingroup$
            Since your answer is built on "flying fish can do it", it is relevant to consider that flying fish glide, they don't fly. They are limited by whatever force they can muster when they jump out of the water, and then they just coast until they land.
            $endgroup$
            – Flater
            yesterday





            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @Flater I guess it also depends on the OP's definition of "flying" for the water dragons. If OP just needs short bursts of movement through air without fancy maneuvers or sustained flight, jump-and-glide could very well serve the purpose
            $endgroup$
            – Delioth
            yesterday




            $begingroup$
            @Flater I guess it also depends on the OP's definition of "flying" for the water dragons. If OP just needs short bursts of movement through air without fancy maneuvers or sustained flight, jump-and-glide could very well serve the purpose
            $endgroup$
            – Delioth
            yesterday












            $begingroup$
            @Delioth: Keep mind of the square cube law though. Surface area of the wing is a square, but a dragon's mass is a cube. When you scale the flying fish, you will reach a point where the wings won't properly glide anymore even though they may have the same relative size to the dragon's body as is the case for the flying fish.
            $endgroup$
            – Flater
            yesterday





            $begingroup$
            @Delioth: Keep mind of the square cube law though. Surface area of the wing is a square, but a dragon's mass is a cube. When you scale the flying fish, you will reach a point where the wings won't properly glide anymore even though they may have the same relative size to the dragon's body as is the case for the flying fish.
            $endgroup$
            – Flater
            yesterday





            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            What about steam powered jets, assuming these are fire-breathing dragons? Ingest water, add fire, expel as steam for initial propulsion
            $endgroup$
            – Mick O'Hea
            yesterday




            $begingroup$
            What about steam powered jets, assuming these are fire-breathing dragons? Ingest water, add fire, expel as steam for initial propulsion
            $endgroup$
            – Mick O'Hea
            yesterday










            NadiraSpzirglas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            NadiraSpzirglas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            NadiraSpzirglas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            NadiraSpzirglas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142896%2fcould-a-dragon-use-its-wings-to-swim%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to write a 12-bar blues melodyI-IV-V blues progressionHow to play the bridges in a standard blues progressionHow does Gdim7 fit in C# minor?question on a certain chord progressionMusicology of Melody12 bar blues, spread rhythm: alternative to 6th chord to avoid finger stretchChord progressions/ Root key/ MelodiesHow to put chords (POP-EDM) under a given lead vocal melody (starting from a good knowledge in music theory)Are there “rules” for improvising with the minor pentatonic scale over 12-bar shuffle?Confusion about blues scale and chords

            What if the end-user didn't have the required library?What is setup.py?What is a clean, pythonic way to have multiple constructors in Python?What does Ruby have that Python doesn't, and vice versa?What is the reason for having '//' in Python?How do I create a namespace package in Python?How to package shared objects that python modules depend on?setuptools vs. distutils: why is distutils still a thing?Navigation in Windows 10 vs code not going to virtualenv library when the same library is installed at user levelPython create package for local usePackaging a project that uses multiple python versionsWhy is permission denied on pip install except for when “--user” is included at end of command?

            Why did Thanos need his ship to help him in the battle scene?Which actor plays Thanos in the Avengers mid-credits scene?Are there economic implications portrayed in comics where the buildings and cities are ruined almost daily?Old X-Men comic where team travels to alien world with a ring-like sun that needs recharging?Why does Ego need help sleeping?Is there an objective answer to who “the strongest Avenger” is?How did Banner get unstuck?Why did Thanos get hit?How did Thanos (or anyone) know the Infinity Stones would give him this power?Did Thanos leave Eitri alive for his after-sales service?In Avengers 1, why does Thanos need Loki?