Graph of the history of databasesWhat is the history of data compression tools on personal computers?The history of context switchAre there any articles elucidating the history of the POPCOUNT instruction?Power of university computer in the '70s?History behind the text column restrictionWhat is the history of the PDP-11 MARK instruction?MITS to Dell: the mail order gap?History of Ctrl-S and Ctrl-Q for flow controlHistory of the demise of Matrox from the world of 3D graphics cardsHistory of advanced hardware
What's the meaning of "Sollensaussagen"?
How could sorcerers who are able to produce/manipulate almost all forms of energy communicate over large distances?
How do conventional missiles fly?
How obscure is the use of 令 in 令和?
Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?
Can someone clarify Hamming's notion of important problems in relation to modern academia?
What historical events would have to change in order to make 19th century "steampunk" technology possible?
Machine learning testing data
Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?
files created then deleted at every second in tmp directory
Could the museum Saturn V's be refitted for one more flight?
What are the G forces leaving Earth orbit?
How exploitable/balanced is this homebrew spell: Spell Permanency?
Sums of two squares in arithmetic progressions
Is this draw by repetition?
When handwriting 黄 (huáng; yellow) is it incorrect to have a disconnected 草 (cǎo; grass) radical on top?
Knowledge-based authentication using Domain-driven Design in C#
Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?
Finding the reason behind the value of the integral.
Why was Sir Cadogan fired?
Why is the sentence "Das ist eine Nase" correct?
How can I prove that a state of equilibrium is unstable?
how do we prove that a sum of two periods is still a period?
Were days ever written as ordinal numbers when writing day-month-year?
Graph of the history of databases
What is the history of data compression tools on personal computers?The history of context switchAre there any articles elucidating the history of the POPCOUNT instruction?Power of university computer in the '70s?History behind the text column restrictionWhat is the history of the PDP-11 MARK instruction?MITS to Dell: the mail order gap?History of Ctrl-S and Ctrl-Q for flow controlHistory of the demise of Matrox from the world of 3D graphics cardsHistory of advanced hardware
There are several nice graphs (in the computer science sense: nodes and arcs) of the history of programming languages, such as http://rigaux.org/language-study/diagram.html
I haven't found one of operating systems in general, but there was one for UNIX around somewhere, and this one for Linux distributions was easy to find: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-kernel-history-and-distribution-time-line.html
Database systems have a rich and tangled history, for most of which as far as I can tell documentation exists, but is not as easy to find as for more familiar matters such as home computing.
Does there exist a graph or other form of comprehensive overview of the history of database and ERP systems?
history databases
asked 2 days ago
rwallacerwallace
10.4k451154
add a comment |
There are several nice graphs (in the computer science sense: nodes and arcs) of the history of programming languages, such as http://rigaux.org/language-study/diagram.html
I haven't found one of operating systems in general, but there was one for UNIX around somewhere, and this one for Linux distributions was easy to find: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-kernel-history-and-distribution-time-line.html
Database systems have a rich and tangled history, for most of which as far as I can tell documentation exists, but is not as easy to find as for more familiar matters such as home computing.
Does there exist a graph or other form of comprehensive overview of the history of database and ERP systems?
history databases
asked 2 days ago
rwallacerwallace
10.4k451154
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
yesterday
add a comment |
There are several nice graphs (in the computer science sense: nodes and arcs) of the history of programming languages, such as http://rigaux.org/language-study/diagram.html
I haven't found one of operating systems in general, but there was one for UNIX around somewhere, and this one for Linux distributions was easy to find: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-kernel-history-and-distribution-time-line.html
Database systems have a rich and tangled history, for most of which as far as I can tell documentation exists, but is not as easy to find as for more familiar matters such as home computing.
Does there exist a graph or other form of comprehensive overview of the history of database and ERP systems?
history databases
asked 2 days ago
rwallacerwallace
10.4k451154
There are several nice graphs (in the computer science sense: nodes and arcs) of the history of programming languages, such as http://rigaux.org/language-study/diagram.html
I haven't found one of operating systems in general, but there was one for UNIX around somewhere, and this one for Linux distributions was easy to find: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-kernel-history-and-distribution-time-line.html
Database systems have a rich and tangled history, for most of which as far as I can tell documentation exists, but is not as easy to find as for more familiar matters such as home computing.
Does there exist a graph or other form of comprehensive overview of the history of database and ERP systems?
history databases
history databases
asked 2 days ago
rwallacerwallace
10.4k451154
asked 2 days ago
rwallacerwallace
10.4k451154
asked 2 days ago
rwallacerwallace
10.4k451154
asked 2 days ago
rwallacerwallace
10.4k451154
asked 2 days ago
rwallacerwallace
10.4k451154
10.4k451154
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
yesterday
add a comment |
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
yesterday
3
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
yesterday
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered yesterday
UliUli
34123
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
yesterday
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
yesterday
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
yesterday
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
13 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "648"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9497%2fgraph-of-the-history-of-databases%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered yesterday
UliUli
34123
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
yesterday
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
yesterday
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
yesterday
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
13 hours ago
add a comment |
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered yesterday
UliUli
34123
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
yesterday
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
yesterday
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
yesterday
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
13 hours ago
add a comment |
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered yesterday
UliUli
34123
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered yesterday
UliUli
34123
answered yesterday
UliUli
34123
answered yesterday
UliUli
34123
answered yesterday
UliUli
34123
34123
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
yesterday
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
yesterday
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
yesterday
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
13 hours ago
add a comment |
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
yesterday
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
yesterday
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
yesterday
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
13 hours ago
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
yesterday
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
yesterday
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
yesterday
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
yesterday
1
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
yesterday
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
yesterday
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
13 hours ago
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
13 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9497%2fgraph-of-the-history-of-databases%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
yesterday