How to play vs. 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 d6?Old Indian defense variation: 1. d4 d6 2. c4 Nf6 3. Nc3 Nc6 : how should White respond?Best way to play against Glek system?How can black exploit this lead in development?In sicilian defence, why would white always exchange the c5 pawn. What harm would it do otherwise?Why is it said that beginning with 1. Nf3 2. c4 avoids the Benoni but beginning with 1. d4 2. c4 does not?Why not 1.Nf3 d5 2.c4 Nf6 against the Reti opening?What happened to the Giuoco Pianissimo?How to play vs 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 Nxd4?1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 Nf6 4.Bg5?Why is the Advance Variation considered strong vs the Caro-Kann but not vs the Scandinavian?
Comma Code - Ch. 4 Automate the Boring Stuff
Applicants clearly not having the skills they advertise
Who operates delivery flights for commercial airlines?
What happened to all the nuclear material being smuggled after the fall of the USSR?
Can you please explain this joke: "I'm going bananas is what I tell my bananas before I leave the house"?
Past participle agreement with the subject in the case of pronominal verbs
Can a magnetic field of an object be stronger than its gravity?
Is the decompression of compressed and encrypted data without decryption also theoretically impossible?
If Boris Johnson were prosecuted and convicted of lying about Brexit, can that be used to cancel Brexit?
Responsibility for visa checking
Explain Ant-Man's "not it" scene from Avengers: Endgame
Did thousands of women die every year due to illegal abortions before Roe v. Wade?
Do I include animal companions when calculating difficulty of an encounter?
What happens if you do emergency landing on a US base in middle of the ocean?
Why were the Night's Watch required to be celibate?
Is it legal in the UK for politicians to lie to the public for political gain?
Side by side histograms
Movie where a boy is transported into the future by an alien spaceship
What is the right way to float a home lab?
Did Darth Vader wear the same suit for 20+ years?
Is it a problem that pull requests are approved without any comments
Will TSA allow me to carry a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device?
Avoiding cliches when writing gods
My ESTA has been refused
How to play vs. 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 d6?
Old Indian defense variation: 1. d4 d6 2. c4 Nf6 3. Nc3 Nc6 : how should White respond?Best way to play against Glek system?How can black exploit this lead in development?In sicilian defence, why would white always exchange the c5 pawn. What harm would it do otherwise?Why is it said that beginning with 1. Nf3 2. c4 avoids the Benoni but beginning with 1. d4 2. c4 does not?Why not 1.Nf3 d5 2.c4 Nf6 against the Reti opening?What happened to the Giuoco Pianissimo?How to play vs 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 Nxd4?1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 Nf6 4.Bg5?Why is the Advance Variation considered strong vs the Caro-Kann but not vs the Scandinavian?
As title above, how to play vs. 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 d6? I see that this move (3...d6) is generally considered inferior in books, or not even mentioned in books about 3.Bc4, but I cannot see a clear way to obtain advantage.
opening 1.e4 italian-game open-games
add a comment |
As title above, how to play vs. 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 d6? I see that this move (3...d6) is generally considered inferior in books, or not even mentioned in books about 3.Bc4, but I cannot see a clear way to obtain advantage.
opening 1.e4 italian-game open-games
add a comment |
As title above, how to play vs. 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 d6? I see that this move (3...d6) is generally considered inferior in books, or not even mentioned in books about 3.Bc4, but I cannot see a clear way to obtain advantage.
opening 1.e4 italian-game open-games
As title above, how to play vs. 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 d6? I see that this move (3...d6) is generally considered inferior in books, or not even mentioned in books about 3.Bc4, but I cannot see a clear way to obtain advantage.
opening 1.e4 italian-game open-games
opening 1.e4 italian-game open-games
asked May 18 at 13:54
A. N. OtherA. N. Other
2,102823
2,102823
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The game will get the characteristics of the Philidor Defense rather than the Italian Game. Wikipedia calls it the Semi-Italian Opening.
I. A. Horowitz called the defence "solid", also writing: "It does not seem quite sufficient for equality."
The Wikipedia article notes several possible continuations for White, with 4. d4 probably the best bet for advantage.
add a comment |
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 d6:
365chess.com database shows:
MOVE | games | year | White + Draw + Black
-------+-------+------+--------+--------+-------
4. d4 | 491 | 2018 | 50.3 % | 24.4 % | 25.3 %
4. c3 | 359 | 2018 | 53.5 % | 20.6 % | 25.9 %
4. d3 | 357 | 2018 | 45.4 % | 22.7 % | 31.9 %
4. h3 | 323 | 2016 | 42.7 % | 25.7 % | 31.6 %
4. Nc3 | 289 | 2018 | 50.9 % | 16.3 % | 32.9 %
4. O-O | 249 | 2019 | 50.6 % | 22.1 % | 27.3 %
White will get a space advantage and freer development after d4 (whether delayed or played immediately). Or White can play the pawn to d3 and the fact that his Bishop is outside the pawn chain (and Blacks Bf8 is inside) gives White an easier position.
There is no knock-out blow for White as Black is accepting a slightly passive but solid position.
add a comment |
There is no way to "crush" that move. You just play! Develop your pieces, get space in the center and obtain a small advantage. Your opponent won't be losing a piece or something like that.
I assume 3...d6 may have some ideas related to a pin on g4 (for instance, 4.d4 Bg4) A c3 pawn advance can be sueful to prevent some ...Nd4. I think you'll be fine after 4.0-0 Bg4 5.c3, but also 4.Nc3 Bg4 5.h3 or many other sequences
In short, I don't know what the best answer is. I doubt anyone in the world actually does. Analyze your games and find what works best for yourself
Then, why only beginners play it?
– A. N. Other
May 25 at 7:35
"Only" beginners play it, because it is not ambitious and White has many different ways of staying "slightly better". In other words, no kind of trouble is created by Black. If there was a way to completely smash it, not even beginners would play it. Also, experienced players who like that type of schemes may prefer 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6
– David
May 26 at 22:14
I am not saying that there must be a way to "completely smash it", but of at least obtaining a reasonable advantage out of the opening. If instead the move is unambitious, but perfectly playable, as you seem to suggest (and you may be perfectly right, of course), I was wondering why it is not more popular among strong players, at least to avoid the main theoretical lines. I hope you get my point. Move is playable, yet it is extremely unpopular.
– A. N. Other
May 27 at 15:15
I think players who want to play that type of position will prefer .e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6. Also, it's not really avoiding any theory, since the position that will be reached will be very similar to other well known openings and may even lead to transpositions (with the advantage for White of having more flexibility)
– David
May 27 at 15:31
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "435"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24517%2fhow-to-play-vs-1-e4-e5-2-nf3-nc6-3-bc4-d6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The game will get the characteristics of the Philidor Defense rather than the Italian Game. Wikipedia calls it the Semi-Italian Opening.
I. A. Horowitz called the defence "solid", also writing: "It does not seem quite sufficient for equality."
The Wikipedia article notes several possible continuations for White, with 4. d4 probably the best bet for advantage.
add a comment |
The game will get the characteristics of the Philidor Defense rather than the Italian Game. Wikipedia calls it the Semi-Italian Opening.
I. A. Horowitz called the defence "solid", also writing: "It does not seem quite sufficient for equality."
The Wikipedia article notes several possible continuations for White, with 4. d4 probably the best bet for advantage.
add a comment |
The game will get the characteristics of the Philidor Defense rather than the Italian Game. Wikipedia calls it the Semi-Italian Opening.
I. A. Horowitz called the defence "solid", also writing: "It does not seem quite sufficient for equality."
The Wikipedia article notes several possible continuations for White, with 4. d4 probably the best bet for advantage.
The game will get the characteristics of the Philidor Defense rather than the Italian Game. Wikipedia calls it the Semi-Italian Opening.
I. A. Horowitz called the defence "solid", also writing: "It does not seem quite sufficient for equality."
The Wikipedia article notes several possible continuations for White, with 4. d4 probably the best bet for advantage.
answered May 18 at 15:44
GlorfindelGlorfindel
14.1k43970
14.1k43970
add a comment |
add a comment |
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 d6:
365chess.com database shows:
MOVE | games | year | White + Draw + Black
-------+-------+------+--------+--------+-------
4. d4 | 491 | 2018 | 50.3 % | 24.4 % | 25.3 %
4. c3 | 359 | 2018 | 53.5 % | 20.6 % | 25.9 %
4. d3 | 357 | 2018 | 45.4 % | 22.7 % | 31.9 %
4. h3 | 323 | 2016 | 42.7 % | 25.7 % | 31.6 %
4. Nc3 | 289 | 2018 | 50.9 % | 16.3 % | 32.9 %
4. O-O | 249 | 2019 | 50.6 % | 22.1 % | 27.3 %
White will get a space advantage and freer development after d4 (whether delayed or played immediately). Or White can play the pawn to d3 and the fact that his Bishop is outside the pawn chain (and Blacks Bf8 is inside) gives White an easier position.
There is no knock-out blow for White as Black is accepting a slightly passive but solid position.
add a comment |
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 d6:
365chess.com database shows:
MOVE | games | year | White + Draw + Black
-------+-------+------+--------+--------+-------
4. d4 | 491 | 2018 | 50.3 % | 24.4 % | 25.3 %
4. c3 | 359 | 2018 | 53.5 % | 20.6 % | 25.9 %
4. d3 | 357 | 2018 | 45.4 % | 22.7 % | 31.9 %
4. h3 | 323 | 2016 | 42.7 % | 25.7 % | 31.6 %
4. Nc3 | 289 | 2018 | 50.9 % | 16.3 % | 32.9 %
4. O-O | 249 | 2019 | 50.6 % | 22.1 % | 27.3 %
White will get a space advantage and freer development after d4 (whether delayed or played immediately). Or White can play the pawn to d3 and the fact that his Bishop is outside the pawn chain (and Blacks Bf8 is inside) gives White an easier position.
There is no knock-out blow for White as Black is accepting a slightly passive but solid position.
add a comment |
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 d6:
365chess.com database shows:
MOVE | games | year | White + Draw + Black
-------+-------+------+--------+--------+-------
4. d4 | 491 | 2018 | 50.3 % | 24.4 % | 25.3 %
4. c3 | 359 | 2018 | 53.5 % | 20.6 % | 25.9 %
4. d3 | 357 | 2018 | 45.4 % | 22.7 % | 31.9 %
4. h3 | 323 | 2016 | 42.7 % | 25.7 % | 31.6 %
4. Nc3 | 289 | 2018 | 50.9 % | 16.3 % | 32.9 %
4. O-O | 249 | 2019 | 50.6 % | 22.1 % | 27.3 %
White will get a space advantage and freer development after d4 (whether delayed or played immediately). Or White can play the pawn to d3 and the fact that his Bishop is outside the pawn chain (and Blacks Bf8 is inside) gives White an easier position.
There is no knock-out blow for White as Black is accepting a slightly passive but solid position.
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 d6:
365chess.com database shows:
MOVE | games | year | White + Draw + Black
-------+-------+------+--------+--------+-------
4. d4 | 491 | 2018 | 50.3 % | 24.4 % | 25.3 %
4. c3 | 359 | 2018 | 53.5 % | 20.6 % | 25.9 %
4. d3 | 357 | 2018 | 45.4 % | 22.7 % | 31.9 %
4. h3 | 323 | 2016 | 42.7 % | 25.7 % | 31.6 %
4. Nc3 | 289 | 2018 | 50.9 % | 16.3 % | 32.9 %
4. O-O | 249 | 2019 | 50.6 % | 22.1 % | 27.3 %
White will get a space advantage and freer development after d4 (whether delayed or played immediately). Or White can play the pawn to d3 and the fact that his Bishop is outside the pawn chain (and Blacks Bf8 is inside) gives White an easier position.
There is no knock-out blow for White as Black is accepting a slightly passive but solid position.
edited May 23 at 22:12
Brandon_J
1,25522
1,25522
answered May 23 at 21:50
YwapomYwapom
3,317321
3,317321
add a comment |
add a comment |
There is no way to "crush" that move. You just play! Develop your pieces, get space in the center and obtain a small advantage. Your opponent won't be losing a piece or something like that.
I assume 3...d6 may have some ideas related to a pin on g4 (for instance, 4.d4 Bg4) A c3 pawn advance can be sueful to prevent some ...Nd4. I think you'll be fine after 4.0-0 Bg4 5.c3, but also 4.Nc3 Bg4 5.h3 or many other sequences
In short, I don't know what the best answer is. I doubt anyone in the world actually does. Analyze your games and find what works best for yourself
Then, why only beginners play it?
– A. N. Other
May 25 at 7:35
"Only" beginners play it, because it is not ambitious and White has many different ways of staying "slightly better". In other words, no kind of trouble is created by Black. If there was a way to completely smash it, not even beginners would play it. Also, experienced players who like that type of schemes may prefer 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6
– David
May 26 at 22:14
I am not saying that there must be a way to "completely smash it", but of at least obtaining a reasonable advantage out of the opening. If instead the move is unambitious, but perfectly playable, as you seem to suggest (and you may be perfectly right, of course), I was wondering why it is not more popular among strong players, at least to avoid the main theoretical lines. I hope you get my point. Move is playable, yet it is extremely unpopular.
– A. N. Other
May 27 at 15:15
I think players who want to play that type of position will prefer .e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6. Also, it's not really avoiding any theory, since the position that will be reached will be very similar to other well known openings and may even lead to transpositions (with the advantage for White of having more flexibility)
– David
May 27 at 15:31
add a comment |
There is no way to "crush" that move. You just play! Develop your pieces, get space in the center and obtain a small advantage. Your opponent won't be losing a piece or something like that.
I assume 3...d6 may have some ideas related to a pin on g4 (for instance, 4.d4 Bg4) A c3 pawn advance can be sueful to prevent some ...Nd4. I think you'll be fine after 4.0-0 Bg4 5.c3, but also 4.Nc3 Bg4 5.h3 or many other sequences
In short, I don't know what the best answer is. I doubt anyone in the world actually does. Analyze your games and find what works best for yourself
Then, why only beginners play it?
– A. N. Other
May 25 at 7:35
"Only" beginners play it, because it is not ambitious and White has many different ways of staying "slightly better". In other words, no kind of trouble is created by Black. If there was a way to completely smash it, not even beginners would play it. Also, experienced players who like that type of schemes may prefer 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6
– David
May 26 at 22:14
I am not saying that there must be a way to "completely smash it", but of at least obtaining a reasonable advantage out of the opening. If instead the move is unambitious, but perfectly playable, as you seem to suggest (and you may be perfectly right, of course), I was wondering why it is not more popular among strong players, at least to avoid the main theoretical lines. I hope you get my point. Move is playable, yet it is extremely unpopular.
– A. N. Other
May 27 at 15:15
I think players who want to play that type of position will prefer .e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6. Also, it's not really avoiding any theory, since the position that will be reached will be very similar to other well known openings and may even lead to transpositions (with the advantage for White of having more flexibility)
– David
May 27 at 15:31
add a comment |
There is no way to "crush" that move. You just play! Develop your pieces, get space in the center and obtain a small advantage. Your opponent won't be losing a piece or something like that.
I assume 3...d6 may have some ideas related to a pin on g4 (for instance, 4.d4 Bg4) A c3 pawn advance can be sueful to prevent some ...Nd4. I think you'll be fine after 4.0-0 Bg4 5.c3, but also 4.Nc3 Bg4 5.h3 or many other sequences
In short, I don't know what the best answer is. I doubt anyone in the world actually does. Analyze your games and find what works best for yourself
There is no way to "crush" that move. You just play! Develop your pieces, get space in the center and obtain a small advantage. Your opponent won't be losing a piece or something like that.
I assume 3...d6 may have some ideas related to a pin on g4 (for instance, 4.d4 Bg4) A c3 pawn advance can be sueful to prevent some ...Nd4. I think you'll be fine after 4.0-0 Bg4 5.c3, but also 4.Nc3 Bg4 5.h3 or many other sequences
In short, I don't know what the best answer is. I doubt anyone in the world actually does. Analyze your games and find what works best for yourself
answered May 24 at 21:59
DavidDavid
9246
9246
Then, why only beginners play it?
– A. N. Other
May 25 at 7:35
"Only" beginners play it, because it is not ambitious and White has many different ways of staying "slightly better". In other words, no kind of trouble is created by Black. If there was a way to completely smash it, not even beginners would play it. Also, experienced players who like that type of schemes may prefer 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6
– David
May 26 at 22:14
I am not saying that there must be a way to "completely smash it", but of at least obtaining a reasonable advantage out of the opening. If instead the move is unambitious, but perfectly playable, as you seem to suggest (and you may be perfectly right, of course), I was wondering why it is not more popular among strong players, at least to avoid the main theoretical lines. I hope you get my point. Move is playable, yet it is extremely unpopular.
– A. N. Other
May 27 at 15:15
I think players who want to play that type of position will prefer .e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6. Also, it's not really avoiding any theory, since the position that will be reached will be very similar to other well known openings and may even lead to transpositions (with the advantage for White of having more flexibility)
– David
May 27 at 15:31
add a comment |
Then, why only beginners play it?
– A. N. Other
May 25 at 7:35
"Only" beginners play it, because it is not ambitious and White has many different ways of staying "slightly better". In other words, no kind of trouble is created by Black. If there was a way to completely smash it, not even beginners would play it. Also, experienced players who like that type of schemes may prefer 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6
– David
May 26 at 22:14
I am not saying that there must be a way to "completely smash it", but of at least obtaining a reasonable advantage out of the opening. If instead the move is unambitious, but perfectly playable, as you seem to suggest (and you may be perfectly right, of course), I was wondering why it is not more popular among strong players, at least to avoid the main theoretical lines. I hope you get my point. Move is playable, yet it is extremely unpopular.
– A. N. Other
May 27 at 15:15
I think players who want to play that type of position will prefer .e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6. Also, it's not really avoiding any theory, since the position that will be reached will be very similar to other well known openings and may even lead to transpositions (with the advantage for White of having more flexibility)
– David
May 27 at 15:31
Then, why only beginners play it?
– A. N. Other
May 25 at 7:35
Then, why only beginners play it?
– A. N. Other
May 25 at 7:35
"Only" beginners play it, because it is not ambitious and White has many different ways of staying "slightly better". In other words, no kind of trouble is created by Black. If there was a way to completely smash it, not even beginners would play it. Also, experienced players who like that type of schemes may prefer 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6
– David
May 26 at 22:14
"Only" beginners play it, because it is not ambitious and White has many different ways of staying "slightly better". In other words, no kind of trouble is created by Black. If there was a way to completely smash it, not even beginners would play it. Also, experienced players who like that type of schemes may prefer 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6
– David
May 26 at 22:14
I am not saying that there must be a way to "completely smash it", but of at least obtaining a reasonable advantage out of the opening. If instead the move is unambitious, but perfectly playable, as you seem to suggest (and you may be perfectly right, of course), I was wondering why it is not more popular among strong players, at least to avoid the main theoretical lines. I hope you get my point. Move is playable, yet it is extremely unpopular.
– A. N. Other
May 27 at 15:15
I am not saying that there must be a way to "completely smash it", but of at least obtaining a reasonable advantage out of the opening. If instead the move is unambitious, but perfectly playable, as you seem to suggest (and you may be perfectly right, of course), I was wondering why it is not more popular among strong players, at least to avoid the main theoretical lines. I hope you get my point. Move is playable, yet it is extremely unpopular.
– A. N. Other
May 27 at 15:15
I think players who want to play that type of position will prefer .e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6. Also, it's not really avoiding any theory, since the position that will be reached will be very similar to other well known openings and may even lead to transpositions (with the advantage for White of having more flexibility)
– David
May 27 at 15:31
I think players who want to play that type of position will prefer .e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6. Also, it's not really avoiding any theory, since the position that will be reached will be very similar to other well known openings and may even lead to transpositions (with the advantage for White of having more flexibility)
– David
May 27 at 15:31
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24517%2fhow-to-play-vs-1-e4-e5-2-nf3-nc6-3-bc4-d6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown