Otdfbt

The usage of kelvin in formulas

C++ logging library

What does the pair of vertical lines in empirical entropy formula mean?

Separate SPI data

How can one's career as a reviewer be ended?

Section numbering in binary

Is using 'echo' to display attacker-controlled data on the terminal dangerous?

Why did the World Bank set the global poverty line at $1.90?

Can the removal of a duty-free sales trolley result in a measurable reduction in emissions?

Electricity free spaceship

A map of non-pathological topology?

How do we say "within a kilometer radius spherically"?

empApi with Lightning Web Components?

Solving ‘Null geometry…’ error during distance matrix operation?

Do you need to let the DM know when you are multiclassing?

What would prevent chimeras from reproducing with each other?

Is Lambda Calculus purely syntactic?

Difference between prepositions in "...killed during/in the war"

Analogy between an unknown in an argument, and a contradiction in the principle of explosion

Increase speed altering column on large table to NON NULL

Is the use of umgeben in the passive unusual?

Why was this person allowed to become Grand Maester?

Should I put programming books I wrote a few years ago on my resume?

Fermat's statement about the ancients: How serious was he?

Does running both (XCode & Android Studio) at the same time overload my MacBook Air with only 8 GB of Ram

Does the new Macbook Pro with Retina display have user-upgradeable RAM?Possible to increase the RAM on a MacBook Air?Mac app for testing websites in android emulator quicklyIt wakes up the Mac to Leave an Android device connected via USB and Android Studio runningMacbook Pro battery life with Android Studio 2.2 runningIs it useful to upgrade MacBook Pro to 16GB RAM?Does running some commands on terminal with sudo permission consume more RAM?How smoothly does Xcode 10.1 run on 2017 MacBook Pro base model (8 GB RAM/128 GB SSD)?How to limit RAM in an OSX device?RAM recommendation for hosting 8gb Linux Mint under Virtualbox?

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;

1

This IDE is for the Automation Testing Purpose.

Along with Appium Server, I need to run the Emulator of Xcode's iOS Emulator and the Android Studio's Emulator.

Does this Run smoothly in the 8GB RAM of Macbook Air.

macos xcode memory performance android

share|improve this question

edited May 27 at 12:30

M.J

asked May 25 at 15:35

M.JM.J

93

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  What do you mean by "Can I install"? "Do the installations conflict with each other", "Do I have enough space on my HDD/SSD", "Does running both at the same time lead to conflicts", "Does running both at the same time overload my system", or something different altogether? Please edit the question to add some details (also, what have you tried so far yourself).
  
  – nohillside♦
  May 26 at 8:43
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

This IDE is for the Automation Testing Purpose.

Along with Appium Server, I need to run the Emulator of Xcode's iOS Emulator and the Android Studio's Emulator.

Does this Run smoothly in the 8GB RAM of Macbook Air.

macos xcode memory performance android

share|improve this question

edited May 27 at 12:30

M.J

asked May 25 at 15:35

M.JM.J

93

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  What do you mean by "Can I install"? "Do the installations conflict with each other", "Do I have enough space on my HDD/SSD", "Does running both at the same time lead to conflicts", "Does running both at the same time overload my system", or something different altogether? Please edit the question to add some details (also, what have you tried so far yourself).
  
  – nohillside♦
  May 26 at 8:43
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

This IDE is for the Automation Testing Purpose.

Along with Appium Server, I need to run the Emulator of Xcode's iOS Emulator and the Android Studio's Emulator.

Does this Run smoothly in the 8GB RAM of Macbook Air.

macos xcode memory performance android

share|improve this question

edited May 27 at 12:30

M.J

asked May 25 at 15:35

M.JM.J

93

share|improve this question

edited May 27 at 12:30

M.J

asked May 25 at 15:35

M.JM.J

93

share|improve this question

edited May 27 at 12:30

M.J

asked May 25 at 15:35

M.JM.J

93

asked May 25 at 15:35

M.JM.J

93

asked May 25 at 15:35

M.JM.J

93

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

2

You can install them both because installing only takes up disk space, not RAM. If you try to run them both simultaneously there may be a problem depending on how much RAM each application takes. They both may run simultaneously but they may be slow.

share|improve this answer

answered May 25 at 16:18

jmhjmh

4,5521730

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Bingo. And when it's slow, you can then make a change to how you work or justify the ROI to spend more. I made a much longer post, but I'm all in on "just do it" and learn to profile so you can buy strategically when you can save money by investing in better hardware.
  
  – bmike♦
  May 25 at 16:28
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

Yes you can and should load up your machine and see how it behaves.

The activity monitor will tell you when you run into memory pressure and you can see if swap helps or if you have a workload that would save you time on different hardware.

I’ve still not replaced my 2015 MacBook with 256 NVMe SSD (blazingly fast storage when it was introduced and still in the ballpark on 2019 models for what I need)

I run mongodb, make single page web apps, design and test API and deployment scripts, package Mac software for enterprise distribution, sign apps, notarize apps and generally work / debug / program and develop on this machine. Yes, some newer hardware is faster on benchmarks but in real life, I'm the thing the computer is waiting on always in terms of getting meaningful work done and I know how to measure when I'm waiting for the computer and can then buy a different kit when (and only when) I know I'll save money or time with more horsepower or more RAM.

In fact, developing on this means my solutions run even faster since I know when I make a bad decision and memory isn't free and to make a better database query, better data structure, more elegant code rather than assuming everyone that runs my apps spent $4000 on their portable.

share|improve this answer

answered May 25 at 16:16

bmike♦bmike

164k46298640

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  n.b. - I cheat, too. I have a Mac mini and Mac Pro that run remotely and my goal is to get things to CI as fast as possible, but I can and do run VM (which can be pokey don't run a VM the same time as building / debugging / emulating iOS) but constraints are good when you know why they are there. Just get on with doing your thing and not obsessing prematurely if your tools can do the job. Pay attention, you will know when your tools are inadequate and then you can buy the right tools out of knowledge, not someone saying 8 GB of ram is/isn't enough even if that someone is me.
  
  – bmike♦
  May 25 at 16:25
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

You can install them both because installing only takes up disk space, not RAM. If you try to run them both simultaneously there may be a problem depending on how much RAM each application takes. They both may run simultaneously but they may be slow.

share|improve this answer

answered May 25 at 16:18

jmhjmh

4,5521730

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Bingo. And when it's slow, you can then make a change to how you work or justify the ROI to spend more. I made a much longer post, but I'm all in on "just do it" and learn to profile so you can buy strategically when you can save money by investing in better hardware.
  
  – bmike♦
  May 25 at 16:28
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

You can install them both because installing only takes up disk space, not RAM. If you try to run them both simultaneously there may be a problem depending on how much RAM each application takes. They both may run simultaneously but they may be slow.

share|improve this answer

answered May 25 at 16:18

jmhjmh

4,5521730

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Bingo. And when it's slow, you can then make a change to how you work or justify the ROI to spend more. I made a much longer post, but I'm all in on "just do it" and learn to profile so you can buy strategically when you can save money by investing in better hardware.
  
  – bmike♦
  May 25 at 16:28
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

You can install them both because installing only takes up disk space, not RAM. If you try to run them both simultaneously there may be a problem depending on how much RAM each application takes. They both may run simultaneously but they may be slow.

share|improve this answer

answered May 25 at 16:18

jmhjmh

4,5521730

share|improve this answer

answered May 25 at 16:18

jmhjmh

4,5521730

answered May 25 at 16:18

jmhjmh

4,5521730

answered May 25 at 16:18

jmhjmh

4,5521730

1

Yes you can and should load up your machine and see how it behaves.

The activity monitor will tell you when you run into memory pressure and you can see if swap helps or if you have a workload that would save you time on different hardware.

I’ve still not replaced my 2015 MacBook with 256 NVMe SSD (blazingly fast storage when it was introduced and still in the ballpark on 2019 models for what I need)

I run mongodb, make single page web apps, design and test API and deployment scripts, package Mac software for enterprise distribution, sign apps, notarize apps and generally work / debug / program and develop on this machine. Yes, some newer hardware is faster on benchmarks but in real life, I'm the thing the computer is waiting on always in terms of getting meaningful work done and I know how to measure when I'm waiting for the computer and can then buy a different kit when (and only when) I know I'll save money or time with more horsepower or more RAM.

In fact, developing on this means my solutions run even faster since I know when I make a bad decision and memory isn't free and to make a better database query, better data structure, more elegant code rather than assuming everyone that runs my apps spent $4000 on their portable.

share|improve this answer

answered May 25 at 16:16

bmike♦bmike

164k46298640

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  n.b. - I cheat, too. I have a Mac mini and Mac Pro that run remotely and my goal is to get things to CI as fast as possible, but I can and do run VM (which can be pokey don't run a VM the same time as building / debugging / emulating iOS) but constraints are good when you know why they are there. Just get on with doing your thing and not obsessing prematurely if your tools can do the job. Pay attention, you will know when your tools are inadequate and then you can buy the right tools out of knowledge, not someone saying 8 GB of ram is/isn't enough even if that someone is me.
  
  – bmike♦
  May 25 at 16:25
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

Yes you can and should load up your machine and see how it behaves.

The activity monitor will tell you when you run into memory pressure and you can see if swap helps or if you have a workload that would save you time on different hardware.

I’ve still not replaced my 2015 MacBook with 256 NVMe SSD (blazingly fast storage when it was introduced and still in the ballpark on 2019 models for what I need)

I run mongodb, make single page web apps, design and test API and deployment scripts, package Mac software for enterprise distribution, sign apps, notarize apps and generally work / debug / program and develop on this machine. Yes, some newer hardware is faster on benchmarks but in real life, I'm the thing the computer is waiting on always in terms of getting meaningful work done and I know how to measure when I'm waiting for the computer and can then buy a different kit when (and only when) I know I'll save money or time with more horsepower or more RAM.

In fact, developing on this means my solutions run even faster since I know when I make a bad decision and memory isn't free and to make a better database query, better data structure, more elegant code rather than assuming everyone that runs my apps spent $4000 on their portable.

share|improve this answer

answered May 25 at 16:16

bmike♦bmike

164k46298640

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  n.b. - I cheat, too. I have a Mac mini and Mac Pro that run remotely and my goal is to get things to CI as fast as possible, but I can and do run VM (which can be pokey don't run a VM the same time as building / debugging / emulating iOS) but constraints are good when you know why they are there. Just get on with doing your thing and not obsessing prematurely if your tools can do the job. Pay attention, you will know when your tools are inadequate and then you can buy the right tools out of knowledge, not someone saying 8 GB of ram is/isn't enough even if that someone is me.
  
  – bmike♦
  May 25 at 16:25
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Yes you can and should load up your machine and see how it behaves.

The activity monitor will tell you when you run into memory pressure and you can see if swap helps or if you have a workload that would save you time on different hardware.

I’ve still not replaced my 2015 MacBook with 256 NVMe SSD (blazingly fast storage when it was introduced and still in the ballpark on 2019 models for what I need)

I run mongodb, make single page web apps, design and test API and deployment scripts, package Mac software for enterprise distribution, sign apps, notarize apps and generally work / debug / program and develop on this machine. Yes, some newer hardware is faster on benchmarks but in real life, I'm the thing the computer is waiting on always in terms of getting meaningful work done and I know how to measure when I'm waiting for the computer and can then buy a different kit when (and only when) I know I'll save money or time with more horsepower or more RAM.

In fact, developing on this means my solutions run even faster since I know when I make a bad decision and memory isn't free and to make a better database query, better data structure, more elegant code rather than assuming everyone that runs my apps spent $4000 on their portable.

share|improve this answer

answered May 25 at 16:16

bmike♦bmike

164k46298640

share|improve this answer

answered May 25 at 16:16

bmike♦bmike

164k46298640

answered May 25 at 16:16

bmike♦bmike

164k46298640

answered May 25 at 16:16

bmike♦bmike

164k46298640