Statue View: 2, 3, 5, 7Statue View: TetrominoesStatue View: RaindropsThe Ludicrous Loop: over a thousand cells of circular logic!Who killed Boggs? A chandelier’s viewTetromi-nuri-dokuMasyu jigsaw puzzleStatue Park (Loop)Diabolical Deceptions: A 333rd Birthday Tribute to J.S. BachStatue Park: FiveStatue Park: Knight's LinesStatue View: TetrominoesStatue View: Raindrops
What differences exist between adamantine and adamantite in all editions of D&D?
empApi with Lightning Web Components?
How can I use the SpendProofV1 to prove I sent Monero to an exchange?
Grep Match and extract
Why was this person allowed to become Grand Maester?
The origin of the Russian proverb about two hares
What is the energy payback time of solar panels, in hours?
How to write a convincing religious myth?
How to publish items after pipeline is finished?
Are polynomials with the same roots identical?
Math cases align being colored as a table
Why am I getting a strange double quote (“) in Open Office instead of the ordinary one (")?
Write a function that checks if a string starts with or contains something
"due" instead of "to"?
Difference between prepositions in "...killed during/in the war"
Why are MBA programs closing in the United States?
Who won a Game of Bar Dice?
tabular: caption and align problem
Is it possible to have 2 different but equal size real number sets that have the same mean and standard deviation?
2019 gold coins to share
Why do radiation hardened IC packages often have long leads?
Is there a DSLR/mirorless camera with minimal options like a classic, simple SLR?
The usage of kelvin in formulas
Can a human be transformed into a Mind Flayer?
Statue View: 2, 3, 5, 7
Statue View: TetrominoesStatue View: RaindropsThe Ludicrous Loop: over a thousand cells of circular logic!Who killed Boggs? A chandelier’s viewTetromi-nuri-dokuMasyu jigsaw puzzleStatue Park (Loop)Diabolical Deceptions: A 333rd Birthday Tribute to J.S. BachStatue Park: FiveStatue Park: Knight's LinesStatue View: TetrominoesStatue View: Raindrops
$begingroup$
This is another Statue View puzzle. It's easily the hardest of the three I've made, so I recommend trying the other two as practice first.
Rules of Statue View:
- Shade some cells of the grid to form the given set of pieces. Pieces may be rotated or reflected.
- Pieces cannot be adjacent (though they can touch at a corner).
- All unshaded cells must be (orthogonally) connected.
- Any cells with numbers in them must be unshaded. These numbers give the total lengths of the runs of shaded cells starting immediately adjacent to the clue, and extending outwards from the clue.
logical-deduction grid-deduction
asked May 25 at 17:35
Deusovi♦Deusovi
66.2k6228288
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is another Statue View puzzle. It's easily the hardest of the three I've made, so I recommend trying the other two as practice first.
Rules of Statue View:
- Shade some cells of the grid to form the given set of pieces. Pieces may be rotated or reflected.
- Pieces cannot be adjacent (though they can touch at a corner).
- All unshaded cells must be (orthogonally) connected.
- Any cells with numbers in them must be unshaded. These numbers give the total lengths of the runs of shaded cells starting immediately adjacent to the clue, and extending outwards from the clue.
logical-deduction grid-deduction
asked May 25 at 17:35
Deusovi♦Deusovi
66.2k6228288
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
These are amazing, how do you come up with these?
$endgroup$
– greenturtle3141
May 25 at 19:24
1
$begingroup$
@greenturtle3141 Place clues to force an interesting deduction to be made, mark down all possible things you can figure out from there, and repeat until unique! The tough part is finding interesting deductions and figuring out how to force them with clues...
$endgroup$
– Deusovi♦
May 26 at 0:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is another Statue View puzzle. It's easily the hardest of the three I've made, so I recommend trying the other two as practice first.
Rules of Statue View:
- Shade some cells of the grid to form the given set of pieces. Pieces may be rotated or reflected.
- Pieces cannot be adjacent (though they can touch at a corner).
- All unshaded cells must be (orthogonally) connected.
- Any cells with numbers in them must be unshaded. These numbers give the total lengths of the runs of shaded cells starting immediately adjacent to the clue, and extending outwards from the clue.
logical-deduction grid-deduction
asked May 25 at 17:35
Deusovi♦Deusovi
66.2k6228288
$endgroup$
This is another Statue View puzzle. It's easily the hardest of the three I've made, so I recommend trying the other two as practice first.
Rules of Statue View:
- Shade some cells of the grid to form the given set of pieces. Pieces may be rotated or reflected.
- Pieces cannot be adjacent (though they can touch at a corner).
- All unshaded cells must be (orthogonally) connected.
- Any cells with numbers in them must be unshaded. These numbers give the total lengths of the runs of shaded cells starting immediately adjacent to the clue, and extending outwards from the clue.
logical-deduction grid-deduction
logical-deduction grid-deduction
asked May 25 at 17:35
Deusovi♦Deusovi
66.2k6228288
asked May 25 at 17:35
Deusovi♦Deusovi
66.2k6228288
asked May 25 at 17:35
Deusovi♦Deusovi
66.2k6228288
asked May 25 at 17:35
Deusovi♦Deusovi
66.2k6228288
asked May 25 at 17:35
Deusovi♦Deusovi
66.2k6228288
66.2k6228288
3
$begingroup$
These are amazing, how do you come up with these?
$endgroup$
– greenturtle3141
May 25 at 19:24
1
$begingroup$
@greenturtle3141 Place clues to force an interesting deduction to be made, mark down all possible things you can figure out from there, and repeat until unique! The tough part is finding interesting deductions and figuring out how to force them with clues...
$endgroup$
– Deusovi♦
May 26 at 0:52
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
These are amazing, how do you come up with these?
$endgroup$
– greenturtle3141
May 25 at 19:24
1
$begingroup$
@greenturtle3141 Place clues to force an interesting deduction to be made, mark down all possible things you can figure out from there, and repeat until unique! The tough part is finding interesting deductions and figuring out how to force them with clues...
$endgroup$
– Deusovi♦
May 26 at 0:52
3
3
$begingroup$
These are amazing, how do you come up with these?
$endgroup$
– greenturtle3141
May 25 at 19:24
$begingroup$
These are amazing, how do you come up with these?
$endgroup$
– greenturtle3141
May 25 at 19:24
1
1
$begingroup$
@greenturtle3141 Place clues to force an interesting deduction to be made, mark down all possible things you can figure out from there, and repeat until unique! The tough part is finding interesting deductions and figuring out how to force them with clues...
$endgroup$
– Deusovi♦
May 26 at 0:52
$begingroup$
@greenturtle3141 Place clues to force an interesting deduction to be made, mark down all possible things you can figure out from there, and repeat until unique! The tough part is finding interesting deductions and figuring out how to force them with clues...
$endgroup$
– Deusovi♦
May 26 at 0:52
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The solution:
First of all,
Since there are no stretches of 4 or 6 in any of the pieces, the 7 can only be 2+5 or 1+3+3. Also, we can see that no stretch of 3 fits the 3 squares north of the 7 without filling either the 2 or the 3 square.
Also, the only other choices for 3+3 around the 7 are west and south, and there is no way to fit a piece to complete the southward part without touching the westward part.
By contradiction, we can deduce that the 7 square has to be made up of 2+5.
From there,
There are only two pieces with a stretch of 5, so let's try all their positions. A northward three-piece would make it impossible to complete the 3 with any of the remaining pieces.
Same story with a northward seven-piece in either direction.
So the stretch of five needs to be westward. Note that we cannot fit the two-piece into any of the stretches of 2 required, so the stretch of 2 has to be filled in by a seven-piece. That leaves only the three-piece for the stretch of 5.
If we put the three-piece facing south, there is only one way to complete the 7, but this puts a stretch of 5 next to the 3-square.
Thus we conclude that the three-piece must face north. There is exactly one way to complete the 7 now, and we've completed the 2 in the process as well.
Then,
We know the 3 cannot be 2+1, because there is no way to complete the 3 if we use the stretch of two in either direction.
So the 3 has to be a stretch of 3 to the north. We have two pieces that fit that stretch of three. Let's try the two-piece first.
If we touch the five with a stretch of 3, we can't complete it with the remaining pieces which has no stretch of 2.
Putting the two-piece the other way, we would need a stretch of 5 to finish the 5-square.
So we have to use the five-piece for the 3, and there are two ways to do it. Let's try the wrong way first – this would require a stretch of 4 to complete the 5-square.
Only one position we haven't tried:
From there, the remaining piece only fits one way to complete the 5:
answered May 25 at 20:20
jafejafe
30k487307
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
yeah, i think this is correct! i wish i didn't take 20 minutes to figure out how the puzzle worked though (ugh for my noticing skills) +1
$endgroup$
– Alto
May 25 at 21:31
2
$begingroup$
That's correct, nice job! There's some slightly easier logic towards the end, though: once you have the first two pieces placed, you can also notice that the piece touching the 3 clue must also touch the 5 clue (with at least two cells), and then place that shape (apart from maybe the upper left corner, since you don't know yet if it's the two-piece or the five-piece).
$endgroup$
– Deusovi♦
May 26 at 0:41
$begingroup$
How did you create all those images? Is there some specialized software for that, or ist is just paint/gimp/photoshop and a lot of manual work?
$endgroup$
– Guntram Blohm
May 26 at 11:12
$begingroup$
@GuntramBlohm Just the paint bucket tool in Paint :)
$endgroup$
– jafe
May 26 at 11:59
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84364%2fstatue-view-2-3-5-7%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The solution:
First of all,
Since there are no stretches of 4 or 6 in any of the pieces, the 7 can only be 2+5 or 1+3+3. Also, we can see that no stretch of 3 fits the 3 squares north of the 7 without filling either the 2 or the 3 square.
Also, the only other choices for 3+3 around the 7 are west and south, and there is no way to fit a piece to complete the southward part without touching the westward part.
By contradiction, we can deduce that the 7 square has to be made up of 2+5.
From there,
There are only two pieces with a stretch of 5, so let's try all their positions. A northward three-piece would make it impossible to complete the 3 with any of the remaining pieces.
Same story with a northward seven-piece in either direction.
So the stretch of five needs to be westward. Note that we cannot fit the two-piece into any of the stretches of 2 required, so the stretch of 2 has to be filled in by a seven-piece. That leaves only the three-piece for the stretch of 5.
If we put the three-piece facing south, there is only one way to complete the 7, but this puts a stretch of 5 next to the 3-square.
Thus we conclude that the three-piece must face north. There is exactly one way to complete the 7 now, and we've completed the 2 in the process as well.
Then,
We know the 3 cannot be 2+1, because there is no way to complete the 3 if we use the stretch of two in either direction.
So the 3 has to be a stretch of 3 to the north. We have two pieces that fit that stretch of three. Let's try the two-piece first.
If we touch the five with a stretch of 3, we can't complete it with the remaining pieces which has no stretch of 2.
Putting the two-piece the other way, we would need a stretch of 5 to finish the 5-square.
So we have to use the five-piece for the 3, and there are two ways to do it. Let's try the wrong way first – this would require a stretch of 4 to complete the 5-square.
Only one position we haven't tried:
From there, the remaining piece only fits one way to complete the 5:
answered May 25 at 20:20
jafejafe
30k487307
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
yeah, i think this is correct! i wish i didn't take 20 minutes to figure out how the puzzle worked though (ugh for my noticing skills) +1
$endgroup$
– Alto
May 25 at 21:31
2
$begingroup$
That's correct, nice job! There's some slightly easier logic towards the end, though: once you have the first two pieces placed, you can also notice that the piece touching the 3 clue must also touch the 5 clue (with at least two cells), and then place that shape (apart from maybe the upper left corner, since you don't know yet if it's the two-piece or the five-piece).
$endgroup$
– Deusovi♦
May 26 at 0:41
$begingroup$
How did you create all those images? Is there some specialized software for that, or ist is just paint/gimp/photoshop and a lot of manual work?
$endgroup$
– Guntram Blohm
May 26 at 11:12
$begingroup$
@GuntramBlohm Just the paint bucket tool in Paint :)
$endgroup$
– jafe
May 26 at 11:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The solution:
First of all,
Since there are no stretches of 4 or 6 in any of the pieces, the 7 can only be 2+5 or 1+3+3. Also, we can see that no stretch of 3 fits the 3 squares north of the 7 without filling either the 2 or the 3 square.
Also, the only other choices for 3+3 around the 7 are west and south, and there is no way to fit a piece to complete the southward part without touching the westward part.
By contradiction, we can deduce that the 7 square has to be made up of 2+5.
From there,
There are only two pieces with a stretch of 5, so let's try all their positions. A northward three-piece would make it impossible to complete the 3 with any of the remaining pieces.
Same story with a northward seven-piece in either direction.
So the stretch of five needs to be westward. Note that we cannot fit the two-piece into any of the stretches of 2 required, so the stretch of 2 has to be filled in by a seven-piece. That leaves only the three-piece for the stretch of 5.
If we put the three-piece facing south, there is only one way to complete the 7, but this puts a stretch of 5 next to the 3-square.
Thus we conclude that the three-piece must face north. There is exactly one way to complete the 7 now, and we've completed the 2 in the process as well.
Then,
We know the 3 cannot be 2+1, because there is no way to complete the 3 if we use the stretch of two in either direction.
So the 3 has to be a stretch of 3 to the north. We have two pieces that fit that stretch of three. Let's try the two-piece first.
If we touch the five with a stretch of 3, we can't complete it with the remaining pieces which has no stretch of 2.
Putting the two-piece the other way, we would need a stretch of 5 to finish the 5-square.
So we have to use the five-piece for the 3, and there are two ways to do it. Let's try the wrong way first – this would require a stretch of 4 to complete the 5-square.
Only one position we haven't tried:
From there, the remaining piece only fits one way to complete the 5:
answered May 25 at 20:20
jafejafe
30k487307
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
yeah, i think this is correct! i wish i didn't take 20 minutes to figure out how the puzzle worked though (ugh for my noticing skills) +1
$endgroup$
– Alto
May 25 at 21:31
2
$begingroup$
That's correct, nice job! There's some slightly easier logic towards the end, though: once you have the first two pieces placed, you can also notice that the piece touching the 3 clue must also touch the 5 clue (with at least two cells), and then place that shape (apart from maybe the upper left corner, since you don't know yet if it's the two-piece or the five-piece).
$endgroup$
– Deusovi♦
May 26 at 0:41
$begingroup$
How did you create all those images? Is there some specialized software for that, or ist is just paint/gimp/photoshop and a lot of manual work?
$endgroup$
– Guntram Blohm
May 26 at 11:12
$begingroup$
@GuntramBlohm Just the paint bucket tool in Paint :)
$endgroup$
– jafe
May 26 at 11:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The solution:
First of all,
Since there are no stretches of 4 or 6 in any of the pieces, the 7 can only be 2+5 or 1+3+3. Also, we can see that no stretch of 3 fits the 3 squares north of the 7 without filling either the 2 or the 3 square.
Also, the only other choices for 3+3 around the 7 are west and south, and there is no way to fit a piece to complete the southward part without touching the westward part.
By contradiction, we can deduce that the 7 square has to be made up of 2+5.
From there,
There are only two pieces with a stretch of 5, so let's try all their positions. A northward three-piece would make it impossible to complete the 3 with any of the remaining pieces.
Same story with a northward seven-piece in either direction.
So the stretch of five needs to be westward. Note that we cannot fit the two-piece into any of the stretches of 2 required, so the stretch of 2 has to be filled in by a seven-piece. That leaves only the three-piece for the stretch of 5.
If we put the three-piece facing south, there is only one way to complete the 7, but this puts a stretch of 5 next to the 3-square.
Thus we conclude that the three-piece must face north. There is exactly one way to complete the 7 now, and we've completed the 2 in the process as well.
Then,
We know the 3 cannot be 2+1, because there is no way to complete the 3 if we use the stretch of two in either direction.
So the 3 has to be a stretch of 3 to the north. We have two pieces that fit that stretch of three. Let's try the two-piece first.
If we touch the five with a stretch of 3, we can't complete it with the remaining pieces which has no stretch of 2.
Putting the two-piece the other way, we would need a stretch of 5 to finish the 5-square.
So we have to use the five-piece for the 3, and there are two ways to do it. Let's try the wrong way first – this would require a stretch of 4 to complete the 5-square.
Only one position we haven't tried:
From there, the remaining piece only fits one way to complete the 5:
answered May 25 at 20:20
jafejafe
30k487307
$endgroup$
The solution:
First of all,
Since there are no stretches of 4 or 6 in any of the pieces, the 7 can only be 2+5 or 1+3+3. Also, we can see that no stretch of 3 fits the 3 squares north of the 7 without filling either the 2 or the 3 square.
Also, the only other choices for 3+3 around the 7 are west and south, and there is no way to fit a piece to complete the southward part without touching the westward part.
By contradiction, we can deduce that the 7 square has to be made up of 2+5.
From there,
There are only two pieces with a stretch of 5, so let's try all their positions. A northward three-piece would make it impossible to complete the 3 with any of the remaining pieces.
Same story with a northward seven-piece in either direction.
So the stretch of five needs to be westward. Note that we cannot fit the two-piece into any of the stretches of 2 required, so the stretch of 2 has to be filled in by a seven-piece. That leaves only the three-piece for the stretch of 5.
If we put the three-piece facing south, there is only one way to complete the 7, but this puts a stretch of 5 next to the 3-square.
Thus we conclude that the three-piece must face north. There is exactly one way to complete the 7 now, and we've completed the 2 in the process as well.
Then,
We know the 3 cannot be 2+1, because there is no way to complete the 3 if we use the stretch of two in either direction.
So the 3 has to be a stretch of 3 to the north. We have two pieces that fit that stretch of three. Let's try the two-piece first.
If we touch the five with a stretch of 3, we can't complete it with the remaining pieces which has no stretch of 2.
Putting the two-piece the other way, we would need a stretch of 5 to finish the 5-square.
So we have to use the five-piece for the 3, and there are two ways to do it. Let's try the wrong way first – this would require a stretch of 4 to complete the 5-square.
Only one position we haven't tried:
From there, the remaining piece only fits one way to complete the 5:
answered May 25 at 20:20
jafejafe
30k487307
edited May 25 at 22:33
answered May 25 at 20:20
jafejafe
30k487307
answered May 25 at 20:20
jafejafe
30k487307
answered May 25 at 20:20
jafejafe
30k487307
30k487307
1
$begingroup$
yeah, i think this is correct! i wish i didn't take 20 minutes to figure out how the puzzle worked though (ugh for my noticing skills) +1
$endgroup$
– Alto
May 25 at 21:31
2
$begingroup$
That's correct, nice job! There's some slightly easier logic towards the end, though: once you have the first two pieces placed, you can also notice that the piece touching the 3 clue must also touch the 5 clue (with at least two cells), and then place that shape (apart from maybe the upper left corner, since you don't know yet if it's the two-piece or the five-piece).
$endgroup$
– Deusovi♦
May 26 at 0:41
$begingroup$
How did you create all those images? Is there some specialized software for that, or ist is just paint/gimp/photoshop and a lot of manual work?
$endgroup$
– Guntram Blohm
May 26 at 11:12
$begingroup$
@GuntramBlohm Just the paint bucket tool in Paint :)
$endgroup$
– jafe
May 26 at 11:59
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
yeah, i think this is correct! i wish i didn't take 20 minutes to figure out how the puzzle worked though (ugh for my noticing skills) +1
$endgroup$
– Alto
May 25 at 21:31
2
$begingroup$
That's correct, nice job! There's some slightly easier logic towards the end, though: once you have the first two pieces placed, you can also notice that the piece touching the 3 clue must also touch the 5 clue (with at least two cells), and then place that shape (apart from maybe the upper left corner, since you don't know yet if it's the two-piece or the five-piece).
$endgroup$
– Deusovi♦
May 26 at 0:41
$begingroup$
How did you create all those images? Is there some specialized software for that, or ist is just paint/gimp/photoshop and a lot of manual work?
$endgroup$
– Guntram Blohm
May 26 at 11:12
$begingroup$
@GuntramBlohm Just the paint bucket tool in Paint :)
$endgroup$
– jafe
May 26 at 11:59
1
1
$begingroup$
yeah, i think this is correct! i wish i didn't take 20 minutes to figure out how the puzzle worked though (ugh for my noticing skills) +1
$endgroup$
– Alto
May 25 at 21:31
$begingroup$
yeah, i think this is correct! i wish i didn't take 20 minutes to figure out how the puzzle worked though (ugh for my noticing skills) +1
$endgroup$
– Alto
May 25 at 21:31
2
2
$begingroup$
That's correct, nice job! There's some slightly easier logic towards the end, though: once you have the first two pieces placed, you can also notice that the piece touching the 3 clue must also touch the 5 clue (with at least two cells), and then place that shape (apart from maybe the upper left corner, since you don't know yet if it's the two-piece or the five-piece).
$endgroup$
– Deusovi♦
May 26 at 0:41
$begingroup$
That's correct, nice job! There's some slightly easier logic towards the end, though: once you have the first two pieces placed, you can also notice that the piece touching the 3 clue must also touch the 5 clue (with at least two cells), and then place that shape (apart from maybe the upper left corner, since you don't know yet if it's the two-piece or the five-piece).
$endgroup$
– Deusovi♦
May 26 at 0:41
$begingroup$
How did you create all those images? Is there some specialized software for that, or ist is just paint/gimp/photoshop and a lot of manual work?
$endgroup$
– Guntram Blohm
May 26 at 11:12
$begingroup$
How did you create all those images? Is there some specialized software for that, or ist is just paint/gimp/photoshop and a lot of manual work?
$endgroup$
– Guntram Blohm
May 26 at 11:12
$begingroup$
@GuntramBlohm Just the paint bucket tool in Paint :)
$endgroup$
– jafe
May 26 at 11:59
$begingroup$
@GuntramBlohm Just the paint bucket tool in Paint :)
$endgroup$
– jafe
May 26 at 11:59
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84364%2fstatue-view-2-3-5-7%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
These are amazing, how do you come up with these?
$endgroup$
– greenturtle3141
May 25 at 19:24
1
$begingroup$
@greenturtle3141 Place clues to force an interesting deduction to be made, mark down all possible things you can figure out from there, and repeat until unique! The tough part is finding interesting deductions and figuring out how to force them with clues...
$endgroup$
– Deusovi♦
May 26 at 0:52