What is Adam, if he isn't literally the first human?Why is the curse of original sin not specific to humans?Orthodoxy's “ancestral sin” versus Calvinism's “total depravity”Where in the Bible does it say we have a sin nature?What is the historical cause between the discrepancy of evangelical approaches to original sin and Jewish ones?Do Mormons believe that Jesus was not begotten by Holy Spirit but by Adam?How is the Vulgate rendering of Romans 5:12 explained (Roman Catholic perspective)?How do Theistic Evolutionists who are Christians reconcile these Scriptures with the adoption of evolutionary theory?How do proponents of Original Sin support a strictly literal interpretation of GenesisFrom a Dogmatic Catholic perspective, what is the eternal destination of an unbaptized embryo?Does God cause the punishment or is that the effect of his absence?

What is the logic behind charging tax _in the form of money_ for owning property when the property does not produce money?

Is it okay to have a sequel start immediately after the end of the first book?

C++ logging library

If there's something that implicates the president why is there then a national security issue? (John Dowd)

If I leave the US through an airport, do I have to return through the same airport?

Possible runaway argument using circuitikz

How do we say "within a kilometer radius spherically"?

How do i export activities related to an account with a specific recordtype?

Does putting salt first make it easier for attacker to bruteforce the hash?

Can the removal of a duty-free sales trolley result in a measurable reduction in emissions?

The origin of the Russian proverb about two hares

How to safely destroy (a large quantity of) valid checks?

Who voices the small round football sized demon In Good Omens

Does the Nuka-Cola bottler actually generate nuka cola?

How long is it safe to leave marker on a Chessex battle map?

Why did the World Bank set the global poverty line at $1.90?

Java Servlet & JSP simple login

How to make the letter "K" that denote Krylov space

Sql Server delete syntax

Grep Match and extract

Did Apple bundle a specific monitor with the Apple II+ for schools?

Non-aqueous eyes?

What is the color of artificial intelligence?

Increase speed altering column on large table to NON NULL



What is Adam, if he isn't literally the first human?


Why is the curse of original sin not specific to humans?Orthodoxy's “ancestral sin” versus Calvinism's “total depravity”Where in the Bible does it say we have a sin nature?What is the historical cause between the discrepancy of evangelical approaches to original sin and Jewish ones?Do Mormons believe that Jesus was not begotten by Holy Spirit but by Adam?How is the Vulgate rendering of Romans 5:12 explained (Roman Catholic perspective)?How do Theistic Evolutionists who are Christians reconcile these Scriptures with the adoption of evolutionary theory?How do proponents of Original Sin support a strictly literal interpretation of GenesisFrom a Dogmatic Catholic perspective, what is the eternal destination of an unbaptized embryo?Does God cause the punishment or is that the effect of his absence?













2















For the sake of argument, let's say our most recent common ancestor lived in Africa 10,000s of years ago, humans originally evolved from apes and migrated out of Africa, and the entire creation narrative (including the existence of Adam and our descent from him) is allegorical.



Then what is Paul referring to in Romans 5?




12 Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned— 13 for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law. 14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.




"Adam" is the source of sin and death -- but where do sin and death actually come from, if not literally from our common ancestor?










share|improve this question






















  • Welcome to Christianity Stack. We're somewhat different to other sites, and I would encourage you to take our tour: christianity.stackexchange.com/tour

    – Lesley
    May 25 at 16:34















2















For the sake of argument, let's say our most recent common ancestor lived in Africa 10,000s of years ago, humans originally evolved from apes and migrated out of Africa, and the entire creation narrative (including the existence of Adam and our descent from him) is allegorical.



Then what is Paul referring to in Romans 5?




12 Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned— 13 for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law. 14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.




"Adam" is the source of sin and death -- but where do sin and death actually come from, if not literally from our common ancestor?










share|improve this question






















  • Welcome to Christianity Stack. We're somewhat different to other sites, and I would encourage you to take our tour: christianity.stackexchange.com/tour

    – Lesley
    May 25 at 16:34













2












2








2








For the sake of argument, let's say our most recent common ancestor lived in Africa 10,000s of years ago, humans originally evolved from apes and migrated out of Africa, and the entire creation narrative (including the existence of Adam and our descent from him) is allegorical.



Then what is Paul referring to in Romans 5?




12 Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned— 13 for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law. 14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.




"Adam" is the source of sin and death -- but where do sin and death actually come from, if not literally from our common ancestor?










share|improve this question














For the sake of argument, let's say our most recent common ancestor lived in Africa 10,000s of years ago, humans originally evolved from apes and migrated out of Africa, and the entire creation narrative (including the existence of Adam and our descent from him) is allegorical.



Then what is Paul referring to in Romans 5?




12 Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned— 13 for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law. 14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.




"Adam" is the source of sin and death -- but where do sin and death actually come from, if not literally from our common ancestor?







original-sin adam theistic-evolution






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 25 at 5:53









JordanJordan

1142




1142












  • Welcome to Christianity Stack. We're somewhat different to other sites, and I would encourage you to take our tour: christianity.stackexchange.com/tour

    – Lesley
    May 25 at 16:34

















  • Welcome to Christianity Stack. We're somewhat different to other sites, and I would encourage you to take our tour: christianity.stackexchange.com/tour

    – Lesley
    May 25 at 16:34
















Welcome to Christianity Stack. We're somewhat different to other sites, and I would encourage you to take our tour: christianity.stackexchange.com/tour

– Lesley
May 25 at 16:34





Welcome to Christianity Stack. We're somewhat different to other sites, and I would encourage you to take our tour: christianity.stackexchange.com/tour

– Lesley
May 25 at 16:34










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














If Adam was not literally created by God, and if the Genesis account of creation is allegorical, then everything written in the Bible about sin, death and the need for Christ Jesus to come to earth to die for our sins is a lie.



The Genesis account of creation says that birds were created with sea creatures on day five while land animals were not created until day six. This is in direct opposition to the Darwinian view that birds evolved from land animals. The literalist account says birds preceded land animals. The theistic evolutionist view says exactly the opposite.



Theistic evolution denies that Adam and Eve were created by God in His image, and that because of Adam and Eve's disobedience, sin entered into the world and death through sin.



If Adam and Eve did not exist and they were not our "common ancestor" then there would be no need for Christianity and there would be no solution to sin and death would reign supreme. There would be no hope for sinful humanity.






share|improve this answer























  • Lesley, consider that Genesis 1 is only one of numerous creation-related texts in scripture -- and some of those other texts call its APPARENT chronology into question. In Job 38:4-7 for example, God states that while He was creating the very earth itself (Gen. 1:1), "the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy." Yet if you go to Gen. 1:14-16, it SEEMS to say the stars did not exist until Day 4. Now God may use poetic language but He wouldn't flat-out lie by telling Job that stars existed when they didn't. So Gen. 1:14-16 has to be re-interpreted accordingly.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 25 at 18:42







  • 2





    Lesley - I agree with your comments above. The record of Gen 1 is inconsistent with both evolution and theistic evolution. However, this is not the place (within comments) to resolve such questions.

    – Mac's Musings
    May 25 at 21:15






  • 1





    Agreed. The genealogy in Luke states seventy generations from Jesus of Nazareth back to Adam, every single named individual being identifiable in recorded, historical documentation.

    – Nigel J
    May 26 at 7:13












  • Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp, Origen, Augustine, Ambrose, most of the Patristics did not hold to a solely literal interpretation of Scripture. The idea that if the events depicted did not literally happen as history then scripture is a lie, is itself an invention of 1850s theology. I'm not saying it's wrong, but we need to realize that there are other paradigms, that go back to the very foundation of the Church. Ignoring them blinds us to the rich tradition of the Church Fathers, who provide a way to deal with Historical Criticism, which a literal method cannot overcome.

    – Rob
    May 27 at 3:58



















1














First a couple of disclaimers: (1) Personally I'm skeptical of motives & specifics of "theistic evolution" as it's called, and (2) though I'm a great admirer of C. S. Lewis I don't agree with or endorse 100% of everything he said or wrote.



That said -- and considering that this site is not about "truth" per se but rather the views of different Christian denominations and traditions -- I offer this quote from C. S. Lewis' book "The Problem of Pain."



In it, he describes his own hypothetical interpretation of creation, which apparently sought to harmonize the evolutionary beliefs as they stood in his time (mid-20th century) with Christian doctrine.



In doing so, he offered an answer (valid or not) to the question you're asking here.




For long centuries, God perfected the animal form which was to become
the vehicle of humanity and the image of Himself. he gave it hands
whose thumb could be applied to each of the fingers, and jaws and
teeth and throat capable of articulation, and a brain sufficiently
complex to execute all of the material motions whereby rational
thought is incarnated. The creature may have existed in this state for
ages before it became man: it may even have been clever enough to make
things which a modern archaeologist would accept as proof of its
humanity. But it was only an animal because all its physical and
psychical processes were directed to purely material and natural ends.
Then, in the fullness of time, God caused to descend upon this
organism, both on its psychology and physiology, a new kind of
consciousness which could say “I” and “me,” which could look upon
itself as an object, which knew God, which could make judgments of
truth, beauty and goodness, and which was so far above time that it
could perceive time flowing past…. We do not know how many of these
creatures God made, nor how long they continued in the Paradisal
state. But sooner or later they fell. Someone or something whispered
that they could become as gods…. They wanted some corner in this
universe of which they could say to God, “This is our business, not
yours.” But there is no such corner.







share|improve this answer























  • Interesting, then who was Adam according to him?

    – Beestocks
    May 25 at 20:21











  • Keeping in mind that Lewis described this interpretation only as a possibility (and not something he genuinely believed in) -- Adam would have been the chosen pre-human creature that God transformed into the first true Man.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 25 at 23:49


















1














I hope I understand your question correctly, in that you find confusion in the part about Adam introducing sin into the World; and the part about death reigning over all people until Moses introduced the LAW.
First of all we need understand Adam's disobedience. Adam's sin of disobedience was Intentional.




Genesis 3:6 KJV  And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.



Gen 3:17 KJV  And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;




God did not tell Adam that he hearkened to Satan as had Eve; but instead had Harkened to Eve. Therefore, Adam was not deceived by Satan and was fully aware that he was disobeying God's word. That fact will be of importance when we get to the part about being like Jesus. So now let's take a long look at the part about sin not being levied until the law. Until the arrival of Jesus, God had only given his rules to only two men Adam and Moses. Without rules one cannot be charged with disobeying. So when Paul says that death reigned from Adam to Moseseven unto those who had not sinned as Adam had; All of those people who had not intentionally disobeyed God also suffered death; though they were sinless, as there was no prohibition other than not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.



That all changed after God gave Moses the ten Commandments. Now God had decreed eleven rules to follow. Therefore, when one of those rules was broken the person was now committing the same sin as Adam that of intentionally disobeying God. Those who had not intentionally sinned had not lived faultless lives, indeed many had committed acts such as Cain killing Abel, but until the ten Commandments were given there was no rule about killing.



If I have misinterpreted your question please let me know. As far as your last paragraph it is the belief in Salvation that is the basis of Christianity, and the hope of eternal life. Otherwise After death there is nothing, and The soul does not exist, we simply die and are gone.






share|improve this answer























  • Could you clarify the statement, "...death reigned from Adam to Moses even unto those who had not sinned as Adam had; All of those people who had not intentionally disobeyed God also suffered death; though they were sinless..." I'm having trouble understanding how this could be accurate in light of Gen. 4:7 when God warns Cain that "sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it." It seems clear that murder was a sin, Cain had been warned of this, and was punished later in Gen. 4 when he committed it.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 26 at 0:01











  • Be glad to: If there is no Law you cannot break the law. God made no laws after telling Adam not to eat from the tree; until he gave Moses the ten commandments. If God had only decreed that eating from the tree, was prohibited then anyone who had not eaten from the tree had not disobeyed him as had Adam; that is to say that they had not done anything knowing that it was wrong, or intentionally disobeyed God's command. After giving the ten Commandments, God gave many other don'ts as in the other books by Moses. Those were strictly for Israelites.

    – BYE
    May 26 at 17:42











  • @JDN-GBG Sin is disobedience of God. God warned Cain that his nature was to do as he wished, just as we today have that same sin nature. We are constantly confronted by our own desires rather than do as God would have us do. God has warned us all that that is sinful; yet how many people do not give 10% to God. How many people talk about others wrong doings (gossip). You must also remember that Cain then had the knowledge of good and evil, and was punished for choosing evil. That is also true of those who died before Moses gave the ten commandments.

    – BYE
    May 26 at 18:04











  • OK, so then Cain was not sinless -- correct?

    – JDM-GBG
    May 28 at 23:10











  • @JDM-GBG Killing Abel was actually a sin, but it was not imputed to him. David Guzik explains it: Until the law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law: We know that at the root of it all we are made sinners because of Adam and not because we break the law ourselves. We know this because sin and death were in the world before the Law was ever given.

    – BYE
    May 29 at 12:56












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "304"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchristianity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f71111%2fwhat-is-adam-if-he-isnt-literally-the-first-human%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














If Adam was not literally created by God, and if the Genesis account of creation is allegorical, then everything written in the Bible about sin, death and the need for Christ Jesus to come to earth to die for our sins is a lie.



The Genesis account of creation says that birds were created with sea creatures on day five while land animals were not created until day six. This is in direct opposition to the Darwinian view that birds evolved from land animals. The literalist account says birds preceded land animals. The theistic evolutionist view says exactly the opposite.



Theistic evolution denies that Adam and Eve were created by God in His image, and that because of Adam and Eve's disobedience, sin entered into the world and death through sin.



If Adam and Eve did not exist and they were not our "common ancestor" then there would be no need for Christianity and there would be no solution to sin and death would reign supreme. There would be no hope for sinful humanity.






share|improve this answer























  • Lesley, consider that Genesis 1 is only one of numerous creation-related texts in scripture -- and some of those other texts call its APPARENT chronology into question. In Job 38:4-7 for example, God states that while He was creating the very earth itself (Gen. 1:1), "the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy." Yet if you go to Gen. 1:14-16, it SEEMS to say the stars did not exist until Day 4. Now God may use poetic language but He wouldn't flat-out lie by telling Job that stars existed when they didn't. So Gen. 1:14-16 has to be re-interpreted accordingly.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 25 at 18:42







  • 2





    Lesley - I agree with your comments above. The record of Gen 1 is inconsistent with both evolution and theistic evolution. However, this is not the place (within comments) to resolve such questions.

    – Mac's Musings
    May 25 at 21:15






  • 1





    Agreed. The genealogy in Luke states seventy generations from Jesus of Nazareth back to Adam, every single named individual being identifiable in recorded, historical documentation.

    – Nigel J
    May 26 at 7:13












  • Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp, Origen, Augustine, Ambrose, most of the Patristics did not hold to a solely literal interpretation of Scripture. The idea that if the events depicted did not literally happen as history then scripture is a lie, is itself an invention of 1850s theology. I'm not saying it's wrong, but we need to realize that there are other paradigms, that go back to the very foundation of the Church. Ignoring them blinds us to the rich tradition of the Church Fathers, who provide a way to deal with Historical Criticism, which a literal method cannot overcome.

    – Rob
    May 27 at 3:58
















4














If Adam was not literally created by God, and if the Genesis account of creation is allegorical, then everything written in the Bible about sin, death and the need for Christ Jesus to come to earth to die for our sins is a lie.



The Genesis account of creation says that birds were created with sea creatures on day five while land animals were not created until day six. This is in direct opposition to the Darwinian view that birds evolved from land animals. The literalist account says birds preceded land animals. The theistic evolutionist view says exactly the opposite.



Theistic evolution denies that Adam and Eve were created by God in His image, and that because of Adam and Eve's disobedience, sin entered into the world and death through sin.



If Adam and Eve did not exist and they were not our "common ancestor" then there would be no need for Christianity and there would be no solution to sin and death would reign supreme. There would be no hope for sinful humanity.






share|improve this answer























  • Lesley, consider that Genesis 1 is only one of numerous creation-related texts in scripture -- and some of those other texts call its APPARENT chronology into question. In Job 38:4-7 for example, God states that while He was creating the very earth itself (Gen. 1:1), "the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy." Yet if you go to Gen. 1:14-16, it SEEMS to say the stars did not exist until Day 4. Now God may use poetic language but He wouldn't flat-out lie by telling Job that stars existed when they didn't. So Gen. 1:14-16 has to be re-interpreted accordingly.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 25 at 18:42







  • 2





    Lesley - I agree with your comments above. The record of Gen 1 is inconsistent with both evolution and theistic evolution. However, this is not the place (within comments) to resolve such questions.

    – Mac's Musings
    May 25 at 21:15






  • 1





    Agreed. The genealogy in Luke states seventy generations from Jesus of Nazareth back to Adam, every single named individual being identifiable in recorded, historical documentation.

    – Nigel J
    May 26 at 7:13












  • Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp, Origen, Augustine, Ambrose, most of the Patristics did not hold to a solely literal interpretation of Scripture. The idea that if the events depicted did not literally happen as history then scripture is a lie, is itself an invention of 1850s theology. I'm not saying it's wrong, but we need to realize that there are other paradigms, that go back to the very foundation of the Church. Ignoring them blinds us to the rich tradition of the Church Fathers, who provide a way to deal with Historical Criticism, which a literal method cannot overcome.

    – Rob
    May 27 at 3:58














4












4








4







If Adam was not literally created by God, and if the Genesis account of creation is allegorical, then everything written in the Bible about sin, death and the need for Christ Jesus to come to earth to die for our sins is a lie.



The Genesis account of creation says that birds were created with sea creatures on day five while land animals were not created until day six. This is in direct opposition to the Darwinian view that birds evolved from land animals. The literalist account says birds preceded land animals. The theistic evolutionist view says exactly the opposite.



Theistic evolution denies that Adam and Eve were created by God in His image, and that because of Adam and Eve's disobedience, sin entered into the world and death through sin.



If Adam and Eve did not exist and they were not our "common ancestor" then there would be no need for Christianity and there would be no solution to sin and death would reign supreme. There would be no hope for sinful humanity.






share|improve this answer













If Adam was not literally created by God, and if the Genesis account of creation is allegorical, then everything written in the Bible about sin, death and the need for Christ Jesus to come to earth to die for our sins is a lie.



The Genesis account of creation says that birds were created with sea creatures on day five while land animals were not created until day six. This is in direct opposition to the Darwinian view that birds evolved from land animals. The literalist account says birds preceded land animals. The theistic evolutionist view says exactly the opposite.



Theistic evolution denies that Adam and Eve were created by God in His image, and that because of Adam and Eve's disobedience, sin entered into the world and death through sin.



If Adam and Eve did not exist and they were not our "common ancestor" then there would be no need for Christianity and there would be no solution to sin and death would reign supreme. There would be no hope for sinful humanity.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 25 at 16:11









LesleyLesley

7,3521838




7,3521838












  • Lesley, consider that Genesis 1 is only one of numerous creation-related texts in scripture -- and some of those other texts call its APPARENT chronology into question. In Job 38:4-7 for example, God states that while He was creating the very earth itself (Gen. 1:1), "the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy." Yet if you go to Gen. 1:14-16, it SEEMS to say the stars did not exist until Day 4. Now God may use poetic language but He wouldn't flat-out lie by telling Job that stars existed when they didn't. So Gen. 1:14-16 has to be re-interpreted accordingly.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 25 at 18:42







  • 2





    Lesley - I agree with your comments above. The record of Gen 1 is inconsistent with both evolution and theistic evolution. However, this is not the place (within comments) to resolve such questions.

    – Mac's Musings
    May 25 at 21:15






  • 1





    Agreed. The genealogy in Luke states seventy generations from Jesus of Nazareth back to Adam, every single named individual being identifiable in recorded, historical documentation.

    – Nigel J
    May 26 at 7:13












  • Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp, Origen, Augustine, Ambrose, most of the Patristics did not hold to a solely literal interpretation of Scripture. The idea that if the events depicted did not literally happen as history then scripture is a lie, is itself an invention of 1850s theology. I'm not saying it's wrong, but we need to realize that there are other paradigms, that go back to the very foundation of the Church. Ignoring them blinds us to the rich tradition of the Church Fathers, who provide a way to deal with Historical Criticism, which a literal method cannot overcome.

    – Rob
    May 27 at 3:58


















  • Lesley, consider that Genesis 1 is only one of numerous creation-related texts in scripture -- and some of those other texts call its APPARENT chronology into question. In Job 38:4-7 for example, God states that while He was creating the very earth itself (Gen. 1:1), "the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy." Yet if you go to Gen. 1:14-16, it SEEMS to say the stars did not exist until Day 4. Now God may use poetic language but He wouldn't flat-out lie by telling Job that stars existed when they didn't. So Gen. 1:14-16 has to be re-interpreted accordingly.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 25 at 18:42







  • 2





    Lesley - I agree with your comments above. The record of Gen 1 is inconsistent with both evolution and theistic evolution. However, this is not the place (within comments) to resolve such questions.

    – Mac's Musings
    May 25 at 21:15






  • 1





    Agreed. The genealogy in Luke states seventy generations from Jesus of Nazareth back to Adam, every single named individual being identifiable in recorded, historical documentation.

    – Nigel J
    May 26 at 7:13












  • Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp, Origen, Augustine, Ambrose, most of the Patristics did not hold to a solely literal interpretation of Scripture. The idea that if the events depicted did not literally happen as history then scripture is a lie, is itself an invention of 1850s theology. I'm not saying it's wrong, but we need to realize that there are other paradigms, that go back to the very foundation of the Church. Ignoring them blinds us to the rich tradition of the Church Fathers, who provide a way to deal with Historical Criticism, which a literal method cannot overcome.

    – Rob
    May 27 at 3:58

















Lesley, consider that Genesis 1 is only one of numerous creation-related texts in scripture -- and some of those other texts call its APPARENT chronology into question. In Job 38:4-7 for example, God states that while He was creating the very earth itself (Gen. 1:1), "the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy." Yet if you go to Gen. 1:14-16, it SEEMS to say the stars did not exist until Day 4. Now God may use poetic language but He wouldn't flat-out lie by telling Job that stars existed when they didn't. So Gen. 1:14-16 has to be re-interpreted accordingly.

– JDM-GBG
May 25 at 18:42






Lesley, consider that Genesis 1 is only one of numerous creation-related texts in scripture -- and some of those other texts call its APPARENT chronology into question. In Job 38:4-7 for example, God states that while He was creating the very earth itself (Gen. 1:1), "the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy." Yet if you go to Gen. 1:14-16, it SEEMS to say the stars did not exist until Day 4. Now God may use poetic language but He wouldn't flat-out lie by telling Job that stars existed when they didn't. So Gen. 1:14-16 has to be re-interpreted accordingly.

– JDM-GBG
May 25 at 18:42





2




2





Lesley - I agree with your comments above. The record of Gen 1 is inconsistent with both evolution and theistic evolution. However, this is not the place (within comments) to resolve such questions.

– Mac's Musings
May 25 at 21:15





Lesley - I agree with your comments above. The record of Gen 1 is inconsistent with both evolution and theistic evolution. However, this is not the place (within comments) to resolve such questions.

– Mac's Musings
May 25 at 21:15




1




1





Agreed. The genealogy in Luke states seventy generations from Jesus of Nazareth back to Adam, every single named individual being identifiable in recorded, historical documentation.

– Nigel J
May 26 at 7:13






Agreed. The genealogy in Luke states seventy generations from Jesus of Nazareth back to Adam, every single named individual being identifiable in recorded, historical documentation.

– Nigel J
May 26 at 7:13














Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp, Origen, Augustine, Ambrose, most of the Patristics did not hold to a solely literal interpretation of Scripture. The idea that if the events depicted did not literally happen as history then scripture is a lie, is itself an invention of 1850s theology. I'm not saying it's wrong, but we need to realize that there are other paradigms, that go back to the very foundation of the Church. Ignoring them blinds us to the rich tradition of the Church Fathers, who provide a way to deal with Historical Criticism, which a literal method cannot overcome.

– Rob
May 27 at 3:58






Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp, Origen, Augustine, Ambrose, most of the Patristics did not hold to a solely literal interpretation of Scripture. The idea that if the events depicted did not literally happen as history then scripture is a lie, is itself an invention of 1850s theology. I'm not saying it's wrong, but we need to realize that there are other paradigms, that go back to the very foundation of the Church. Ignoring them blinds us to the rich tradition of the Church Fathers, who provide a way to deal with Historical Criticism, which a literal method cannot overcome.

– Rob
May 27 at 3:58












1














First a couple of disclaimers: (1) Personally I'm skeptical of motives & specifics of "theistic evolution" as it's called, and (2) though I'm a great admirer of C. S. Lewis I don't agree with or endorse 100% of everything he said or wrote.



That said -- and considering that this site is not about "truth" per se but rather the views of different Christian denominations and traditions -- I offer this quote from C. S. Lewis' book "The Problem of Pain."



In it, he describes his own hypothetical interpretation of creation, which apparently sought to harmonize the evolutionary beliefs as they stood in his time (mid-20th century) with Christian doctrine.



In doing so, he offered an answer (valid or not) to the question you're asking here.




For long centuries, God perfected the animal form which was to become
the vehicle of humanity and the image of Himself. he gave it hands
whose thumb could be applied to each of the fingers, and jaws and
teeth and throat capable of articulation, and a brain sufficiently
complex to execute all of the material motions whereby rational
thought is incarnated. The creature may have existed in this state for
ages before it became man: it may even have been clever enough to make
things which a modern archaeologist would accept as proof of its
humanity. But it was only an animal because all its physical and
psychical processes were directed to purely material and natural ends.
Then, in the fullness of time, God caused to descend upon this
organism, both on its psychology and physiology, a new kind of
consciousness which could say “I” and “me,” which could look upon
itself as an object, which knew God, which could make judgments of
truth, beauty and goodness, and which was so far above time that it
could perceive time flowing past…. We do not know how many of these
creatures God made, nor how long they continued in the Paradisal
state. But sooner or later they fell. Someone or something whispered
that they could become as gods…. They wanted some corner in this
universe of which they could say to God, “This is our business, not
yours.” But there is no such corner.







share|improve this answer























  • Interesting, then who was Adam according to him?

    – Beestocks
    May 25 at 20:21











  • Keeping in mind that Lewis described this interpretation only as a possibility (and not something he genuinely believed in) -- Adam would have been the chosen pre-human creature that God transformed into the first true Man.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 25 at 23:49















1














First a couple of disclaimers: (1) Personally I'm skeptical of motives & specifics of "theistic evolution" as it's called, and (2) though I'm a great admirer of C. S. Lewis I don't agree with or endorse 100% of everything he said or wrote.



That said -- and considering that this site is not about "truth" per se but rather the views of different Christian denominations and traditions -- I offer this quote from C. S. Lewis' book "The Problem of Pain."



In it, he describes his own hypothetical interpretation of creation, which apparently sought to harmonize the evolutionary beliefs as they stood in his time (mid-20th century) with Christian doctrine.



In doing so, he offered an answer (valid or not) to the question you're asking here.




For long centuries, God perfected the animal form which was to become
the vehicle of humanity and the image of Himself. he gave it hands
whose thumb could be applied to each of the fingers, and jaws and
teeth and throat capable of articulation, and a brain sufficiently
complex to execute all of the material motions whereby rational
thought is incarnated. The creature may have existed in this state for
ages before it became man: it may even have been clever enough to make
things which a modern archaeologist would accept as proof of its
humanity. But it was only an animal because all its physical and
psychical processes were directed to purely material and natural ends.
Then, in the fullness of time, God caused to descend upon this
organism, both on its psychology and physiology, a new kind of
consciousness which could say “I” and “me,” which could look upon
itself as an object, which knew God, which could make judgments of
truth, beauty and goodness, and which was so far above time that it
could perceive time flowing past…. We do not know how many of these
creatures God made, nor how long they continued in the Paradisal
state. But sooner or later they fell. Someone or something whispered
that they could become as gods…. They wanted some corner in this
universe of which they could say to God, “This is our business, not
yours.” But there is no such corner.







share|improve this answer























  • Interesting, then who was Adam according to him?

    – Beestocks
    May 25 at 20:21











  • Keeping in mind that Lewis described this interpretation only as a possibility (and not something he genuinely believed in) -- Adam would have been the chosen pre-human creature that God transformed into the first true Man.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 25 at 23:49













1












1








1







First a couple of disclaimers: (1) Personally I'm skeptical of motives & specifics of "theistic evolution" as it's called, and (2) though I'm a great admirer of C. S. Lewis I don't agree with or endorse 100% of everything he said or wrote.



That said -- and considering that this site is not about "truth" per se but rather the views of different Christian denominations and traditions -- I offer this quote from C. S. Lewis' book "The Problem of Pain."



In it, he describes his own hypothetical interpretation of creation, which apparently sought to harmonize the evolutionary beliefs as they stood in his time (mid-20th century) with Christian doctrine.



In doing so, he offered an answer (valid or not) to the question you're asking here.




For long centuries, God perfected the animal form which was to become
the vehicle of humanity and the image of Himself. he gave it hands
whose thumb could be applied to each of the fingers, and jaws and
teeth and throat capable of articulation, and a brain sufficiently
complex to execute all of the material motions whereby rational
thought is incarnated. The creature may have existed in this state for
ages before it became man: it may even have been clever enough to make
things which a modern archaeologist would accept as proof of its
humanity. But it was only an animal because all its physical and
psychical processes were directed to purely material and natural ends.
Then, in the fullness of time, God caused to descend upon this
organism, both on its psychology and physiology, a new kind of
consciousness which could say “I” and “me,” which could look upon
itself as an object, which knew God, which could make judgments of
truth, beauty and goodness, and which was so far above time that it
could perceive time flowing past…. We do not know how many of these
creatures God made, nor how long they continued in the Paradisal
state. But sooner or later they fell. Someone or something whispered
that they could become as gods…. They wanted some corner in this
universe of which they could say to God, “This is our business, not
yours.” But there is no such corner.







share|improve this answer













First a couple of disclaimers: (1) Personally I'm skeptical of motives & specifics of "theistic evolution" as it's called, and (2) though I'm a great admirer of C. S. Lewis I don't agree with or endorse 100% of everything he said or wrote.



That said -- and considering that this site is not about "truth" per se but rather the views of different Christian denominations and traditions -- I offer this quote from C. S. Lewis' book "The Problem of Pain."



In it, he describes his own hypothetical interpretation of creation, which apparently sought to harmonize the evolutionary beliefs as they stood in his time (mid-20th century) with Christian doctrine.



In doing so, he offered an answer (valid or not) to the question you're asking here.




For long centuries, God perfected the animal form which was to become
the vehicle of humanity and the image of Himself. he gave it hands
whose thumb could be applied to each of the fingers, and jaws and
teeth and throat capable of articulation, and a brain sufficiently
complex to execute all of the material motions whereby rational
thought is incarnated. The creature may have existed in this state for
ages before it became man: it may even have been clever enough to make
things which a modern archaeologist would accept as proof of its
humanity. But it was only an animal because all its physical and
psychical processes were directed to purely material and natural ends.
Then, in the fullness of time, God caused to descend upon this
organism, both on its psychology and physiology, a new kind of
consciousness which could say “I” and “me,” which could look upon
itself as an object, which knew God, which could make judgments of
truth, beauty and goodness, and which was so far above time that it
could perceive time flowing past…. We do not know how many of these
creatures God made, nor how long they continued in the Paradisal
state. But sooner or later they fell. Someone or something whispered
that they could become as gods…. They wanted some corner in this
universe of which they could say to God, “This is our business, not
yours.” But there is no such corner.








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 25 at 18:54









JDM-GBGJDM-GBG

56218




56218












  • Interesting, then who was Adam according to him?

    – Beestocks
    May 25 at 20:21











  • Keeping in mind that Lewis described this interpretation only as a possibility (and not something he genuinely believed in) -- Adam would have been the chosen pre-human creature that God transformed into the first true Man.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 25 at 23:49

















  • Interesting, then who was Adam according to him?

    – Beestocks
    May 25 at 20:21











  • Keeping in mind that Lewis described this interpretation only as a possibility (and not something he genuinely believed in) -- Adam would have been the chosen pre-human creature that God transformed into the first true Man.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 25 at 23:49
















Interesting, then who was Adam according to him?

– Beestocks
May 25 at 20:21





Interesting, then who was Adam according to him?

– Beestocks
May 25 at 20:21













Keeping in mind that Lewis described this interpretation only as a possibility (and not something he genuinely believed in) -- Adam would have been the chosen pre-human creature that God transformed into the first true Man.

– JDM-GBG
May 25 at 23:49





Keeping in mind that Lewis described this interpretation only as a possibility (and not something he genuinely believed in) -- Adam would have been the chosen pre-human creature that God transformed into the first true Man.

– JDM-GBG
May 25 at 23:49











1














I hope I understand your question correctly, in that you find confusion in the part about Adam introducing sin into the World; and the part about death reigning over all people until Moses introduced the LAW.
First of all we need understand Adam's disobedience. Adam's sin of disobedience was Intentional.




Genesis 3:6 KJV  And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.



Gen 3:17 KJV  And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;




God did not tell Adam that he hearkened to Satan as had Eve; but instead had Harkened to Eve. Therefore, Adam was not deceived by Satan and was fully aware that he was disobeying God's word. That fact will be of importance when we get to the part about being like Jesus. So now let's take a long look at the part about sin not being levied until the law. Until the arrival of Jesus, God had only given his rules to only two men Adam and Moses. Without rules one cannot be charged with disobeying. So when Paul says that death reigned from Adam to Moseseven unto those who had not sinned as Adam had; All of those people who had not intentionally disobeyed God also suffered death; though they were sinless, as there was no prohibition other than not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.



That all changed after God gave Moses the ten Commandments. Now God had decreed eleven rules to follow. Therefore, when one of those rules was broken the person was now committing the same sin as Adam that of intentionally disobeying God. Those who had not intentionally sinned had not lived faultless lives, indeed many had committed acts such as Cain killing Abel, but until the ten Commandments were given there was no rule about killing.



If I have misinterpreted your question please let me know. As far as your last paragraph it is the belief in Salvation that is the basis of Christianity, and the hope of eternal life. Otherwise After death there is nothing, and The soul does not exist, we simply die and are gone.






share|improve this answer























  • Could you clarify the statement, "...death reigned from Adam to Moses even unto those who had not sinned as Adam had; All of those people who had not intentionally disobeyed God also suffered death; though they were sinless..." I'm having trouble understanding how this could be accurate in light of Gen. 4:7 when God warns Cain that "sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it." It seems clear that murder was a sin, Cain had been warned of this, and was punished later in Gen. 4 when he committed it.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 26 at 0:01











  • Be glad to: If there is no Law you cannot break the law. God made no laws after telling Adam not to eat from the tree; until he gave Moses the ten commandments. If God had only decreed that eating from the tree, was prohibited then anyone who had not eaten from the tree had not disobeyed him as had Adam; that is to say that they had not done anything knowing that it was wrong, or intentionally disobeyed God's command. After giving the ten Commandments, God gave many other don'ts as in the other books by Moses. Those were strictly for Israelites.

    – BYE
    May 26 at 17:42











  • @JDN-GBG Sin is disobedience of God. God warned Cain that his nature was to do as he wished, just as we today have that same sin nature. We are constantly confronted by our own desires rather than do as God would have us do. God has warned us all that that is sinful; yet how many people do not give 10% to God. How many people talk about others wrong doings (gossip). You must also remember that Cain then had the knowledge of good and evil, and was punished for choosing evil. That is also true of those who died before Moses gave the ten commandments.

    – BYE
    May 26 at 18:04











  • OK, so then Cain was not sinless -- correct?

    – JDM-GBG
    May 28 at 23:10











  • @JDM-GBG Killing Abel was actually a sin, but it was not imputed to him. David Guzik explains it: Until the law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law: We know that at the root of it all we are made sinners because of Adam and not because we break the law ourselves. We know this because sin and death were in the world before the Law was ever given.

    – BYE
    May 29 at 12:56
















1














I hope I understand your question correctly, in that you find confusion in the part about Adam introducing sin into the World; and the part about death reigning over all people until Moses introduced the LAW.
First of all we need understand Adam's disobedience. Adam's sin of disobedience was Intentional.




Genesis 3:6 KJV  And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.



Gen 3:17 KJV  And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;




God did not tell Adam that he hearkened to Satan as had Eve; but instead had Harkened to Eve. Therefore, Adam was not deceived by Satan and was fully aware that he was disobeying God's word. That fact will be of importance when we get to the part about being like Jesus. So now let's take a long look at the part about sin not being levied until the law. Until the arrival of Jesus, God had only given his rules to only two men Adam and Moses. Without rules one cannot be charged with disobeying. So when Paul says that death reigned from Adam to Moseseven unto those who had not sinned as Adam had; All of those people who had not intentionally disobeyed God also suffered death; though they were sinless, as there was no prohibition other than not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.



That all changed after God gave Moses the ten Commandments. Now God had decreed eleven rules to follow. Therefore, when one of those rules was broken the person was now committing the same sin as Adam that of intentionally disobeying God. Those who had not intentionally sinned had not lived faultless lives, indeed many had committed acts such as Cain killing Abel, but until the ten Commandments were given there was no rule about killing.



If I have misinterpreted your question please let me know. As far as your last paragraph it is the belief in Salvation that is the basis of Christianity, and the hope of eternal life. Otherwise After death there is nothing, and The soul does not exist, we simply die and are gone.






share|improve this answer























  • Could you clarify the statement, "...death reigned from Adam to Moses even unto those who had not sinned as Adam had; All of those people who had not intentionally disobeyed God also suffered death; though they were sinless..." I'm having trouble understanding how this could be accurate in light of Gen. 4:7 when God warns Cain that "sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it." It seems clear that murder was a sin, Cain had been warned of this, and was punished later in Gen. 4 when he committed it.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 26 at 0:01











  • Be glad to: If there is no Law you cannot break the law. God made no laws after telling Adam not to eat from the tree; until he gave Moses the ten commandments. If God had only decreed that eating from the tree, was prohibited then anyone who had not eaten from the tree had not disobeyed him as had Adam; that is to say that they had not done anything knowing that it was wrong, or intentionally disobeyed God's command. After giving the ten Commandments, God gave many other don'ts as in the other books by Moses. Those were strictly for Israelites.

    – BYE
    May 26 at 17:42











  • @JDN-GBG Sin is disobedience of God. God warned Cain that his nature was to do as he wished, just as we today have that same sin nature. We are constantly confronted by our own desires rather than do as God would have us do. God has warned us all that that is sinful; yet how many people do not give 10% to God. How many people talk about others wrong doings (gossip). You must also remember that Cain then had the knowledge of good and evil, and was punished for choosing evil. That is also true of those who died before Moses gave the ten commandments.

    – BYE
    May 26 at 18:04











  • OK, so then Cain was not sinless -- correct?

    – JDM-GBG
    May 28 at 23:10











  • @JDM-GBG Killing Abel was actually a sin, but it was not imputed to him. David Guzik explains it: Until the law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law: We know that at the root of it all we are made sinners because of Adam and not because we break the law ourselves. We know this because sin and death were in the world before the Law was ever given.

    – BYE
    May 29 at 12:56














1












1








1







I hope I understand your question correctly, in that you find confusion in the part about Adam introducing sin into the World; and the part about death reigning over all people until Moses introduced the LAW.
First of all we need understand Adam's disobedience. Adam's sin of disobedience was Intentional.




Genesis 3:6 KJV  And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.



Gen 3:17 KJV  And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;




God did not tell Adam that he hearkened to Satan as had Eve; but instead had Harkened to Eve. Therefore, Adam was not deceived by Satan and was fully aware that he was disobeying God's word. That fact will be of importance when we get to the part about being like Jesus. So now let's take a long look at the part about sin not being levied until the law. Until the arrival of Jesus, God had only given his rules to only two men Adam and Moses. Without rules one cannot be charged with disobeying. So when Paul says that death reigned from Adam to Moseseven unto those who had not sinned as Adam had; All of those people who had not intentionally disobeyed God also suffered death; though they were sinless, as there was no prohibition other than not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.



That all changed after God gave Moses the ten Commandments. Now God had decreed eleven rules to follow. Therefore, when one of those rules was broken the person was now committing the same sin as Adam that of intentionally disobeying God. Those who had not intentionally sinned had not lived faultless lives, indeed many had committed acts such as Cain killing Abel, but until the ten Commandments were given there was no rule about killing.



If I have misinterpreted your question please let me know. As far as your last paragraph it is the belief in Salvation that is the basis of Christianity, and the hope of eternal life. Otherwise After death there is nothing, and The soul does not exist, we simply die and are gone.






share|improve this answer













I hope I understand your question correctly, in that you find confusion in the part about Adam introducing sin into the World; and the part about death reigning over all people until Moses introduced the LAW.
First of all we need understand Adam's disobedience. Adam's sin of disobedience was Intentional.




Genesis 3:6 KJV  And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.



Gen 3:17 KJV  And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;




God did not tell Adam that he hearkened to Satan as had Eve; but instead had Harkened to Eve. Therefore, Adam was not deceived by Satan and was fully aware that he was disobeying God's word. That fact will be of importance when we get to the part about being like Jesus. So now let's take a long look at the part about sin not being levied until the law. Until the arrival of Jesus, God had only given his rules to only two men Adam and Moses. Without rules one cannot be charged with disobeying. So when Paul says that death reigned from Adam to Moseseven unto those who had not sinned as Adam had; All of those people who had not intentionally disobeyed God also suffered death; though they were sinless, as there was no prohibition other than not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.



That all changed after God gave Moses the ten Commandments. Now God had decreed eleven rules to follow. Therefore, when one of those rules was broken the person was now committing the same sin as Adam that of intentionally disobeying God. Those who had not intentionally sinned had not lived faultless lives, indeed many had committed acts such as Cain killing Abel, but until the ten Commandments were given there was no rule about killing.



If I have misinterpreted your question please let me know. As far as your last paragraph it is the belief in Salvation that is the basis of Christianity, and the hope of eternal life. Otherwise After death there is nothing, and The soul does not exist, we simply die and are gone.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 25 at 20:10









BYEBYE

10.4k124588




10.4k124588












  • Could you clarify the statement, "...death reigned from Adam to Moses even unto those who had not sinned as Adam had; All of those people who had not intentionally disobeyed God also suffered death; though they were sinless..." I'm having trouble understanding how this could be accurate in light of Gen. 4:7 when God warns Cain that "sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it." It seems clear that murder was a sin, Cain had been warned of this, and was punished later in Gen. 4 when he committed it.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 26 at 0:01











  • Be glad to: If there is no Law you cannot break the law. God made no laws after telling Adam not to eat from the tree; until he gave Moses the ten commandments. If God had only decreed that eating from the tree, was prohibited then anyone who had not eaten from the tree had not disobeyed him as had Adam; that is to say that they had not done anything knowing that it was wrong, or intentionally disobeyed God's command. After giving the ten Commandments, God gave many other don'ts as in the other books by Moses. Those were strictly for Israelites.

    – BYE
    May 26 at 17:42











  • @JDN-GBG Sin is disobedience of God. God warned Cain that his nature was to do as he wished, just as we today have that same sin nature. We are constantly confronted by our own desires rather than do as God would have us do. God has warned us all that that is sinful; yet how many people do not give 10% to God. How many people talk about others wrong doings (gossip). You must also remember that Cain then had the knowledge of good and evil, and was punished for choosing evil. That is also true of those who died before Moses gave the ten commandments.

    – BYE
    May 26 at 18:04











  • OK, so then Cain was not sinless -- correct?

    – JDM-GBG
    May 28 at 23:10











  • @JDM-GBG Killing Abel was actually a sin, but it was not imputed to him. David Guzik explains it: Until the law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law: We know that at the root of it all we are made sinners because of Adam and not because we break the law ourselves. We know this because sin and death were in the world before the Law was ever given.

    – BYE
    May 29 at 12:56


















  • Could you clarify the statement, "...death reigned from Adam to Moses even unto those who had not sinned as Adam had; All of those people who had not intentionally disobeyed God also suffered death; though they were sinless..." I'm having trouble understanding how this could be accurate in light of Gen. 4:7 when God warns Cain that "sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it." It seems clear that murder was a sin, Cain had been warned of this, and was punished later in Gen. 4 when he committed it.

    – JDM-GBG
    May 26 at 0:01











  • Be glad to: If there is no Law you cannot break the law. God made no laws after telling Adam not to eat from the tree; until he gave Moses the ten commandments. If God had only decreed that eating from the tree, was prohibited then anyone who had not eaten from the tree had not disobeyed him as had Adam; that is to say that they had not done anything knowing that it was wrong, or intentionally disobeyed God's command. After giving the ten Commandments, God gave many other don'ts as in the other books by Moses. Those were strictly for Israelites.

    – BYE
    May 26 at 17:42











  • @JDN-GBG Sin is disobedience of God. God warned Cain that his nature was to do as he wished, just as we today have that same sin nature. We are constantly confronted by our own desires rather than do as God would have us do. God has warned us all that that is sinful; yet how many people do not give 10% to God. How many people talk about others wrong doings (gossip). You must also remember that Cain then had the knowledge of good and evil, and was punished for choosing evil. That is also true of those who died before Moses gave the ten commandments.

    – BYE
    May 26 at 18:04











  • OK, so then Cain was not sinless -- correct?

    – JDM-GBG
    May 28 at 23:10











  • @JDM-GBG Killing Abel was actually a sin, but it was not imputed to him. David Guzik explains it: Until the law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law: We know that at the root of it all we are made sinners because of Adam and not because we break the law ourselves. We know this because sin and death were in the world before the Law was ever given.

    – BYE
    May 29 at 12:56

















Could you clarify the statement, "...death reigned from Adam to Moses even unto those who had not sinned as Adam had; All of those people who had not intentionally disobeyed God also suffered death; though they were sinless..." I'm having trouble understanding how this could be accurate in light of Gen. 4:7 when God warns Cain that "sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it." It seems clear that murder was a sin, Cain had been warned of this, and was punished later in Gen. 4 when he committed it.

– JDM-GBG
May 26 at 0:01





Could you clarify the statement, "...death reigned from Adam to Moses even unto those who had not sinned as Adam had; All of those people who had not intentionally disobeyed God also suffered death; though they were sinless..." I'm having trouble understanding how this could be accurate in light of Gen. 4:7 when God warns Cain that "sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it." It seems clear that murder was a sin, Cain had been warned of this, and was punished later in Gen. 4 when he committed it.

– JDM-GBG
May 26 at 0:01













Be glad to: If there is no Law you cannot break the law. God made no laws after telling Adam not to eat from the tree; until he gave Moses the ten commandments. If God had only decreed that eating from the tree, was prohibited then anyone who had not eaten from the tree had not disobeyed him as had Adam; that is to say that they had not done anything knowing that it was wrong, or intentionally disobeyed God's command. After giving the ten Commandments, God gave many other don'ts as in the other books by Moses. Those were strictly for Israelites.

– BYE
May 26 at 17:42





Be glad to: If there is no Law you cannot break the law. God made no laws after telling Adam not to eat from the tree; until he gave Moses the ten commandments. If God had only decreed that eating from the tree, was prohibited then anyone who had not eaten from the tree had not disobeyed him as had Adam; that is to say that they had not done anything knowing that it was wrong, or intentionally disobeyed God's command. After giving the ten Commandments, God gave many other don'ts as in the other books by Moses. Those were strictly for Israelites.

– BYE
May 26 at 17:42













@JDN-GBG Sin is disobedience of God. God warned Cain that his nature was to do as he wished, just as we today have that same sin nature. We are constantly confronted by our own desires rather than do as God would have us do. God has warned us all that that is sinful; yet how many people do not give 10% to God. How many people talk about others wrong doings (gossip). You must also remember that Cain then had the knowledge of good and evil, and was punished for choosing evil. That is also true of those who died before Moses gave the ten commandments.

– BYE
May 26 at 18:04





@JDN-GBG Sin is disobedience of God. God warned Cain that his nature was to do as he wished, just as we today have that same sin nature. We are constantly confronted by our own desires rather than do as God would have us do. God has warned us all that that is sinful; yet how many people do not give 10% to God. How many people talk about others wrong doings (gossip). You must also remember that Cain then had the knowledge of good and evil, and was punished for choosing evil. That is also true of those who died before Moses gave the ten commandments.

– BYE
May 26 at 18:04













OK, so then Cain was not sinless -- correct?

– JDM-GBG
May 28 at 23:10





OK, so then Cain was not sinless -- correct?

– JDM-GBG
May 28 at 23:10













@JDM-GBG Killing Abel was actually a sin, but it was not imputed to him. David Guzik explains it: Until the law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law: We know that at the root of it all we are made sinners because of Adam and not because we break the law ourselves. We know this because sin and death were in the world before the Law was ever given.

– BYE
May 29 at 12:56






@JDM-GBG Killing Abel was actually a sin, but it was not imputed to him. David Guzik explains it: Until the law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law: We know that at the root of it all we are made sinners because of Adam and not because we break the law ourselves. We know this because sin and death were in the world before the Law was ever given.

– BYE
May 29 at 12:56


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Christianity Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchristianity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f71111%2fwhat-is-adam-if-he-isnt-literally-the-first-human%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company