How Are Humans Special? [closed]How would human society develop if humans had gills?How would early Homo sapiens and a humanoid marsupial interact?Modern neanderthalsHumans specifically adapted to be ambush predatorsHuman evolution on ExoplanetHumans born in a world without humans?How would a new species of homo replace humans in my world?5 million years in the future and Humans are still the same: how is that possible?Why would a tribe of humans come to be consistently taller?How would humans look after living many generations on a terraformed Mars?

How did they achieve the Gunslinger's shining eye effect in Westworld?

Inconsistent behavior of compiler optimization of unused string

Why only the fundamental frequency component is said to give useful power?

How do I write "Show, Don't Tell" as a person with Asperger Syndrome?

Facebook Marketing API asset access suddenly denied

Winning Strategy for the Magician and his Apprentice

What makes Ada the language of choice for the ISS's safety-critical systems?

What makes an item an artifact?

Do simulator games use a realistic trajectory to get into orbit?

Using a found spellbook as a Sorcerer-Wizard multiclass

How is water heavier than petrol, even though its molecular weight is less than petrol?

How does an ordinary object become radioactive?

Should an arbiter claim draw at a K+R vs K+R endgame?

Are there downsides to using std::string as a buffer?

When conversion from Integer to Single may lose precision

Can anyone identify this tank?

The eyes have it

What could have caused a rear derailleur to end up in the back wheel suddenly?

What is the actual quality of machine translations?

Does an ice chest packed full of frozen food need ice?

What language is the software written in on the ISS?

What is the `some` keyword in SwiftUI

Were Alexander the Great and Hephaestion lovers?

How to project 3d image in the planes xy, xz, yz?



How Are Humans Special? [closed]


How would human society develop if humans had gills?How would early Homo sapiens and a humanoid marsupial interact?Modern neanderthalsHumans specifically adapted to be ambush predatorsHuman evolution on ExoplanetHumans born in a world without humans?How would a new species of homo replace humans in my world?5 million years in the future and Humans are still the same: how is that possible?Why would a tribe of humans come to be consistently taller?How would humans look after living many generations on a terraformed Mars?













6












$begingroup$


Setting: Far future space based science fiction. Think Star Trek: Enterprise levels of tech with more consistency and more resources if that helps.



There are 4 sentient species in my setting:



  • Homo Sapiens Sapiens

  • Homo Martiensis (Martians)

  • Dar

  • Awrx

The Martians are the descendants of the first colonists. They are generally better adapted to low gravity and high radiation. They are tall, not lanky but generally lacking in musculature (by comparison to humans) due to extra "water weight" that helps with radiation. Culturally they are known for a strong appreciation for knowledge and are generally more naturally intelligent than most humans but also generally weaker and lighter.



The Dar are not a hive mind but they are very collectivist and have a chromataphore based language that allows incredibly dense transfers of information in parallel. Essentially its like having multiple conversations at once with different people that don't get confused with each other but they do amalgamate into a whole. Allowing for astounding levels of teamwork in the species because they can group together and make plans very efficiently. Especially because in their family structure parents are always estranged. It is your siblings that you stay with for life in a family unit who's name roughly translates to "circle" or "ring" as they tend to stand in circles when communicating at high bandwidths. They are also, not silicon based, but more like mobile coral or other rock like forms of life and thus are structurally strong but brittle. They are the only species that does not ban and distrust Artificial Intelligence.



The Awrx are large muscly green creatures from a super-earth with lots of sunshine. They are relatively radiation resistant because they can "eat" a lot of it. Culturally they are very direct but diplomatic. Their emotional centres are more developed than ours and their history is full of cold wars but almost no hot ones. I tend to think of them as being strong like a cow rather than strong like a jaguar. Neither of which are creatures I'd like to mess with. They are also herbivorous meaning their relationship with the animals on their planet went down a very different route. Generally less naturally intelligent than humans but they are by no means stupid and "the cream" is historically better at rising to the top in most of their cultures compared with most of ours. They are the only species with a strong dislike of cybernetics and genetic enhancements.



Which just leaves the humans.



There are several things my research has led me to such as "Sweat" suggesting we are more enduring over long distance than most land species and superior balance.



A friend of mine has also suggested that as a species we are far more enduring when injured than most species. He cited as example things like deer just dying from shock at a minor injury whereas there are stories of humans that have had just horrific things happened to them and they've stayed awake the whole way through but I don't know how true this is and any more professional sources would be appreciated.



I want the humans to be in charge and not in an entirely nice way. The Solar Aegis is an stratocratic empire that is pretty nice to live in for most people but rising through the ranks is tough and not necessarily based on merit.



What do humans have going for them that makes this possible?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as primarily opinion-based by Joe Bloggs, Ash, workerjoe, Don Qualm, Mathaddict May 21 at 20:11


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Isn't it quite racist to call them "humans" while Homo Martinesis are their descendants? Being a martian, I'd certainly demand the ancestral species be called "earthlings".
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    May 21 at 12:39











  • $begingroup$
    Believe me there's plenty of tension there in the story. Just trying to keep things easy and concise for the post/
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas
    May 21 at 12:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just use the Star Trek Mirror Universe traits: Humans are more aggressive, cunning, politically astute, exploitative, self-interested, and luckier than the others.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    May 21 at 13:37







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    H. martianus, maybe H. martialis, possibly H. marticola, even H. martius in a pinch, but definitely not H. martiensis -- *martiensis is simply not a word in Latin.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    May 21 at 13:56







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Seems like this obviously depends on your story. Literature should have some kind of a point to it. If you want to emphasize humans as greedy and wasteful, you make them like the humans in Avatar. If you want to emphasize humans as courageous and principled, you make them like the humans in Star Trek. Etc.
    $endgroup$
    – workerjoe
    May 21 at 17:27
















6












$begingroup$


Setting: Far future space based science fiction. Think Star Trek: Enterprise levels of tech with more consistency and more resources if that helps.



There are 4 sentient species in my setting:



  • Homo Sapiens Sapiens

  • Homo Martiensis (Martians)

  • Dar

  • Awrx

The Martians are the descendants of the first colonists. They are generally better adapted to low gravity and high radiation. They are tall, not lanky but generally lacking in musculature (by comparison to humans) due to extra "water weight" that helps with radiation. Culturally they are known for a strong appreciation for knowledge and are generally more naturally intelligent than most humans but also generally weaker and lighter.



The Dar are not a hive mind but they are very collectivist and have a chromataphore based language that allows incredibly dense transfers of information in parallel. Essentially its like having multiple conversations at once with different people that don't get confused with each other but they do amalgamate into a whole. Allowing for astounding levels of teamwork in the species because they can group together and make plans very efficiently. Especially because in their family structure parents are always estranged. It is your siblings that you stay with for life in a family unit who's name roughly translates to "circle" or "ring" as they tend to stand in circles when communicating at high bandwidths. They are also, not silicon based, but more like mobile coral or other rock like forms of life and thus are structurally strong but brittle. They are the only species that does not ban and distrust Artificial Intelligence.



The Awrx are large muscly green creatures from a super-earth with lots of sunshine. They are relatively radiation resistant because they can "eat" a lot of it. Culturally they are very direct but diplomatic. Their emotional centres are more developed than ours and their history is full of cold wars but almost no hot ones. I tend to think of them as being strong like a cow rather than strong like a jaguar. Neither of which are creatures I'd like to mess with. They are also herbivorous meaning their relationship with the animals on their planet went down a very different route. Generally less naturally intelligent than humans but they are by no means stupid and "the cream" is historically better at rising to the top in most of their cultures compared with most of ours. They are the only species with a strong dislike of cybernetics and genetic enhancements.



Which just leaves the humans.



There are several things my research has led me to such as "Sweat" suggesting we are more enduring over long distance than most land species and superior balance.



A friend of mine has also suggested that as a species we are far more enduring when injured than most species. He cited as example things like deer just dying from shock at a minor injury whereas there are stories of humans that have had just horrific things happened to them and they've stayed awake the whole way through but I don't know how true this is and any more professional sources would be appreciated.



I want the humans to be in charge and not in an entirely nice way. The Solar Aegis is an stratocratic empire that is pretty nice to live in for most people but rising through the ranks is tough and not necessarily based on merit.



What do humans have going for them that makes this possible?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as primarily opinion-based by Joe Bloggs, Ash, workerjoe, Don Qualm, Mathaddict May 21 at 20:11


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Isn't it quite racist to call them "humans" while Homo Martinesis are their descendants? Being a martian, I'd certainly demand the ancestral species be called "earthlings".
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    May 21 at 12:39











  • $begingroup$
    Believe me there's plenty of tension there in the story. Just trying to keep things easy and concise for the post/
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas
    May 21 at 12:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just use the Star Trek Mirror Universe traits: Humans are more aggressive, cunning, politically astute, exploitative, self-interested, and luckier than the others.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    May 21 at 13:37







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    H. martianus, maybe H. martialis, possibly H. marticola, even H. martius in a pinch, but definitely not H. martiensis -- *martiensis is simply not a word in Latin.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    May 21 at 13:56







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Seems like this obviously depends on your story. Literature should have some kind of a point to it. If you want to emphasize humans as greedy and wasteful, you make them like the humans in Avatar. If you want to emphasize humans as courageous and principled, you make them like the humans in Star Trek. Etc.
    $endgroup$
    – workerjoe
    May 21 at 17:27














6












6








6


2



$begingroup$


Setting: Far future space based science fiction. Think Star Trek: Enterprise levels of tech with more consistency and more resources if that helps.



There are 4 sentient species in my setting:



  • Homo Sapiens Sapiens

  • Homo Martiensis (Martians)

  • Dar

  • Awrx

The Martians are the descendants of the first colonists. They are generally better adapted to low gravity and high radiation. They are tall, not lanky but generally lacking in musculature (by comparison to humans) due to extra "water weight" that helps with radiation. Culturally they are known for a strong appreciation for knowledge and are generally more naturally intelligent than most humans but also generally weaker and lighter.



The Dar are not a hive mind but they are very collectivist and have a chromataphore based language that allows incredibly dense transfers of information in parallel. Essentially its like having multiple conversations at once with different people that don't get confused with each other but they do amalgamate into a whole. Allowing for astounding levels of teamwork in the species because they can group together and make plans very efficiently. Especially because in their family structure parents are always estranged. It is your siblings that you stay with for life in a family unit who's name roughly translates to "circle" or "ring" as they tend to stand in circles when communicating at high bandwidths. They are also, not silicon based, but more like mobile coral or other rock like forms of life and thus are structurally strong but brittle. They are the only species that does not ban and distrust Artificial Intelligence.



The Awrx are large muscly green creatures from a super-earth with lots of sunshine. They are relatively radiation resistant because they can "eat" a lot of it. Culturally they are very direct but diplomatic. Their emotional centres are more developed than ours and their history is full of cold wars but almost no hot ones. I tend to think of them as being strong like a cow rather than strong like a jaguar. Neither of which are creatures I'd like to mess with. They are also herbivorous meaning their relationship with the animals on their planet went down a very different route. Generally less naturally intelligent than humans but they are by no means stupid and "the cream" is historically better at rising to the top in most of their cultures compared with most of ours. They are the only species with a strong dislike of cybernetics and genetic enhancements.



Which just leaves the humans.



There are several things my research has led me to such as "Sweat" suggesting we are more enduring over long distance than most land species and superior balance.



A friend of mine has also suggested that as a species we are far more enduring when injured than most species. He cited as example things like deer just dying from shock at a minor injury whereas there are stories of humans that have had just horrific things happened to them and they've stayed awake the whole way through but I don't know how true this is and any more professional sources would be appreciated.



I want the humans to be in charge and not in an entirely nice way. The Solar Aegis is an stratocratic empire that is pretty nice to live in for most people but rising through the ranks is tough and not necessarily based on merit.



What do humans have going for them that makes this possible?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Setting: Far future space based science fiction. Think Star Trek: Enterprise levels of tech with more consistency and more resources if that helps.



There are 4 sentient species in my setting:



  • Homo Sapiens Sapiens

  • Homo Martiensis (Martians)

  • Dar

  • Awrx

The Martians are the descendants of the first colonists. They are generally better adapted to low gravity and high radiation. They are tall, not lanky but generally lacking in musculature (by comparison to humans) due to extra "water weight" that helps with radiation. Culturally they are known for a strong appreciation for knowledge and are generally more naturally intelligent than most humans but also generally weaker and lighter.



The Dar are not a hive mind but they are very collectivist and have a chromataphore based language that allows incredibly dense transfers of information in parallel. Essentially its like having multiple conversations at once with different people that don't get confused with each other but they do amalgamate into a whole. Allowing for astounding levels of teamwork in the species because they can group together and make plans very efficiently. Especially because in their family structure parents are always estranged. It is your siblings that you stay with for life in a family unit who's name roughly translates to "circle" or "ring" as they tend to stand in circles when communicating at high bandwidths. They are also, not silicon based, but more like mobile coral or other rock like forms of life and thus are structurally strong but brittle. They are the only species that does not ban and distrust Artificial Intelligence.



The Awrx are large muscly green creatures from a super-earth with lots of sunshine. They are relatively radiation resistant because they can "eat" a lot of it. Culturally they are very direct but diplomatic. Their emotional centres are more developed than ours and their history is full of cold wars but almost no hot ones. I tend to think of them as being strong like a cow rather than strong like a jaguar. Neither of which are creatures I'd like to mess with. They are also herbivorous meaning their relationship with the animals on their planet went down a very different route. Generally less naturally intelligent than humans but they are by no means stupid and "the cream" is historically better at rising to the top in most of their cultures compared with most of ours. They are the only species with a strong dislike of cybernetics and genetic enhancements.



Which just leaves the humans.



There are several things my research has led me to such as "Sweat" suggesting we are more enduring over long distance than most land species and superior balance.



A friend of mine has also suggested that as a species we are far more enduring when injured than most species. He cited as example things like deer just dying from shock at a minor injury whereas there are stories of humans that have had just horrific things happened to them and they've stayed awake the whole way through but I don't know how true this is and any more professional sources would be appreciated.



I want the humans to be in charge and not in an entirely nice way. The Solar Aegis is an stratocratic empire that is pretty nice to live in for most people but rising through the ranks is tough and not necessarily based on merit.



What do humans have going for them that makes this possible?







science-fiction humans






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 21 at 12:30









DouglasDouglas

1,263423




1,263423




closed as primarily opinion-based by Joe Bloggs, Ash, workerjoe, Don Qualm, Mathaddict May 21 at 20:11


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as primarily opinion-based by Joe Bloggs, Ash, workerjoe, Don Qualm, Mathaddict May 21 at 20:11


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Isn't it quite racist to call them "humans" while Homo Martinesis are their descendants? Being a martian, I'd certainly demand the ancestral species be called "earthlings".
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    May 21 at 12:39











  • $begingroup$
    Believe me there's plenty of tension there in the story. Just trying to keep things easy and concise for the post/
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas
    May 21 at 12:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just use the Star Trek Mirror Universe traits: Humans are more aggressive, cunning, politically astute, exploitative, self-interested, and luckier than the others.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    May 21 at 13:37







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    H. martianus, maybe H. martialis, possibly H. marticola, even H. martius in a pinch, but definitely not H. martiensis -- *martiensis is simply not a word in Latin.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    May 21 at 13:56







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Seems like this obviously depends on your story. Literature should have some kind of a point to it. If you want to emphasize humans as greedy and wasteful, you make them like the humans in Avatar. If you want to emphasize humans as courageous and principled, you make them like the humans in Star Trek. Etc.
    $endgroup$
    – workerjoe
    May 21 at 17:27













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Isn't it quite racist to call them "humans" while Homo Martinesis are their descendants? Being a martian, I'd certainly demand the ancestral species be called "earthlings".
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    May 21 at 12:39











  • $begingroup$
    Believe me there's plenty of tension there in the story. Just trying to keep things easy and concise for the post/
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas
    May 21 at 12:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just use the Star Trek Mirror Universe traits: Humans are more aggressive, cunning, politically astute, exploitative, self-interested, and luckier than the others.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    May 21 at 13:37







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    H. martianus, maybe H. martialis, possibly H. marticola, even H. martius in a pinch, but definitely not H. martiensis -- *martiensis is simply not a word in Latin.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    May 21 at 13:56







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Seems like this obviously depends on your story. Literature should have some kind of a point to it. If you want to emphasize humans as greedy and wasteful, you make them like the humans in Avatar. If you want to emphasize humans as courageous and principled, you make them like the humans in Star Trek. Etc.
    $endgroup$
    – workerjoe
    May 21 at 17:27








3




3




$begingroup$
Isn't it quite racist to call them "humans" while Homo Martinesis are their descendants? Being a martian, I'd certainly demand the ancestral species be called "earthlings".
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
May 21 at 12:39





$begingroup$
Isn't it quite racist to call them "humans" while Homo Martinesis are their descendants? Being a martian, I'd certainly demand the ancestral species be called "earthlings".
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
May 21 at 12:39













$begingroup$
Believe me there's plenty of tension there in the story. Just trying to keep things easy and concise for the post/
$endgroup$
– Douglas
May 21 at 12:56




$begingroup$
Believe me there's plenty of tension there in the story. Just trying to keep things easy and concise for the post/
$endgroup$
– Douglas
May 21 at 12:56




1




1




$begingroup$
Just use the Star Trek Mirror Universe traits: Humans are more aggressive, cunning, politically astute, exploitative, self-interested, and luckier than the others.
$endgroup$
– user535733
May 21 at 13:37





$begingroup$
Just use the Star Trek Mirror Universe traits: Humans are more aggressive, cunning, politically astute, exploitative, self-interested, and luckier than the others.
$endgroup$
– user535733
May 21 at 13:37





2




2




$begingroup$
H. martianus, maybe H. martialis, possibly H. marticola, even H. martius in a pinch, but definitely not H. martiensis -- *martiensis is simply not a word in Latin.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
May 21 at 13:56





$begingroup$
H. martianus, maybe H. martialis, possibly H. marticola, even H. martius in a pinch, but definitely not H. martiensis -- *martiensis is simply not a word in Latin.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
May 21 at 13:56





1




1




$begingroup$
Seems like this obviously depends on your story. Literature should have some kind of a point to it. If you want to emphasize humans as greedy and wasteful, you make them like the humans in Avatar. If you want to emphasize humans as courageous and principled, you make them like the humans in Star Trek. Etc.
$endgroup$
– workerjoe
May 21 at 17:27





$begingroup$
Seems like this obviously depends on your story. Literature should have some kind of a point to it. If you want to emphasize humans as greedy and wasteful, you make them like the humans in Avatar. If you want to emphasize humans as courageous and principled, you make them like the humans in Star Trek. Etc.
$endgroup$
– workerjoe
May 21 at 17:27











5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

Earth has a technological advantage over everyone else. That is why they are in charge.



The martians are living on a dead world, so most of their resources go into just staying alive.



The Dar circles are naturally cooperative, so their history is peaceful and mostly conflict free. Their technology is amazing, but it is non-aggressive and often shares power among all of its users rather than reinforces a hierarchical command structure.



The Awrx aren't as smart as us and have a physical strength advantage so they aren't as motivated as us to develop a technological advantage.



As with most of human history, the side with the most guns and the best guns get to be in charge. The Earth human advantage is that we have always known this, so we came to the party armed.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The Dar DO trust AI
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas
    May 21 at 12:57










  • $begingroup$
    But I do like the last paragraph there/
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas
    May 21 at 12:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    oops. I misread that. I will edit
    $endgroup$
    – Henry Taylor
    May 21 at 12:59










  • $begingroup$
    It makes a lot of sense considering the Dar had a pretty lifeless moon to grow up on. Not much biodiversity.
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas
    May 21 at 12:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So, we're the ones that bring the gun to the knife-fight?
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    May 21 at 14:38


















9












$begingroup$

Compared to the other races humans are psychotic. The other races (with the possible exception of the martians) would - literally - die before taking another life, humans can have lots of coping mechanisms for squaring away murder (self defense, first strike, the greater good).



The martians are few in number, and see life as very precious given the harsh environment they inhabit.



The other races hope they can steer our maturity as a species, and take the view that it's better to have us on the inside pissing out, than on the outside pissing in.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "coping mechanisms" is an excellent point. As an intelligent, social, predatory species, warlike species, that generally values morality our minds have a lot of ways of compartmentalizing hostility to keep our egos intact.
    $endgroup$
    – Nosajimiki
    May 21 at 14:09


















4












$begingroup$

One thing that you failed to mention as cultural traits is creativity. And this is what makes humanity special... most of the other races are sort of mono-cultures with little varience. Humans are fractured into nations and divided over religions and which fictional universes are the best. We've gone to war over the silliest of reasons... and that was before we met an alien life forms! But those same negative sides have lead to some amazing achievements in arts, and culture, and having the insane notion to combine a pizza with a bagel! Humanity thinks outside of the box and can provide solutions to problems no one would think of.



In my own fiction, aliens who know of humans have a saying: You can not kill a human. The reason for this is that they realize humans are organized in loose and inter-related clans... in order to kill a human, you must kill his family... and their families... and then his tribe (nations) and eventually, his entire species. Humans are perfectly willing to work with you for a common peace, but they will fight until either you back off or you kill every last one of them. And the problem with that is humans understand the concept of a fair fight... but they choose to ignore that. They will make you fight a fierce battle for every inch of territory.



Other series saw some unique options that may or may not be true. For example, in Animorphs, the two warring alien races (The Andelites and the Yeerks) both come to the conclusions about humans that terrify them. The Andelites recognize that that humans technology advanced much more swiftly than their own, having achieved orbital space flight mere decades after the first flight (their own interval between their two achievements is measured in centuries) and they fear that humans might achieve FTL in a few more decades... and are wide-eyed with horror when they realize the basic understanding of the concepts are developed in the course of the series. The Yeerks, a race of parasitic Brain Slugs, realized they had to switch tactics from an all out invasion to a secret invasion when the initial scout who found humans reported back to her superiors that humans were a Class 5 species (Ideal class to infest) numbering about 5 Billion (this was made in the 90s)... and they responded "Surely you mean 5 million" which was more comparable to most species population numbers.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$

    Looking at this kinda from the hugely negative side...



    • You describe the Awrx as cowards, always getting mad at one another but never actually throwing a punch.


    • You describe the Dar as cooperative to a fault, socially incapable of making individual decisions. Cohesive as a group they're wet noodles caught alone in a dark alley.


    • Your martians are natural isolationists. Settlers. People who want to be left alone and build fences to protect what's theirs.


    And the Terrans...



    Your Earthers are pioneers, they can't stand the idea that there's someplace they don't know about, haven't visited, cannot overcome, and consequently, cannot claim as their own. But this expansionist, "that's mine, too!" behavior isn't enough....



    Let me tell you about a co-worker I once had. He was aggressive, perfectly willing to step on the people around him to stand a little taller in the company. He manipulated every situation to make him the savior, the obvious decision maker, and the only one who could be trusted to protect the company. He isolated labor from management, ensuring that management only ever saw that he was the perfect person to control the masses. (Management literally couldn't believe and wouldn't believe our complaints.) He enjoyed playing the intracorporate political games and the pain he caused others. He turned a company that was family into a group of strangers that couldn't trust one another. After a year, everybody was walking on eggshells. It took me years to understand what he was in a single word — and your Earthers are the same thing.



    Your Terrans are sociopaths



    From Psychology Today, "How to Spot a Sociopath":




    • Superficial charm and good intelligence

    • Absence of delusions and other signs of irrational thinking

    • Absence of nervousness or neurotic manifestations

    • Unreliability

    • Untruthfulness and insincerity

    • Lack of remorse and shame

    • Inadequately motivated antisocial behavior

    • Poor judgment and failure to learn by experience

    • Pathologic egocentricity and incapacity for love

    • General poverty in major affective reactions

    • Specific loss of insight

    • Unresponsiveness in general interpersonal relations

    • Fantastic and uninviting behavior with alcohol and sometimes without

    • Suicide threats rarely carried out

    • Sex life impersonal, trivial, and poorly integrated

    • Failure to follow any life plan



    From a social standpoint, nearly all of these would define a naturally aggressive and controlling species that's a pain in everyone else's collective behind, but you'd be unable to easily move them out of the halls of government. They'd be too good at making every other species look like the villain.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "You choose to cause suffering in others purely to see how people react? Is your entire species like this?" - "Nah mate, just the fun ones"
      $endgroup$
      – Joe Bloggs
      May 21 at 16:08


















    3












    $begingroup$

    I like both these other answers, but in addition to humans are crazy and like guns, I’d like to add a few more options here.



    Humans are adaptable



    Out of all the creatures on planet earth, nothing can match humans at their ability to adapt to new environments or situations, or even better, change said environments and situations to suit their needs. Name another creature, (besides maybe tardigrades), that can exist in the desert, the tundra, in mountains, on plains, on the ocean, in the ocean, in the sky, in space, and apparently other planets. Even crazier, humans often times explore or even settle in wildly hostile terrain for no other reason than because they can, or because another human said that it was impossible. Humans are always trying to improve and push the limits of what is possible.



    Humans are predators



    Although we don’t normally think of ourselves this way, humans are the alpha predator on planet earth. Which, I might add, we manage to accomplish by throwing pointy sticks at things and walking behind them until they die. Due to our body plan, intelligence, and again, adaptability, humans always win a war of attrition.



    Humans are determined



    Because of our persistence predator nature, humans are nearly impossible to subjugate. In fact, if history has taught us anything, it is impossible to keep humans from eventually dominating everything around them, be it their environment, animals, or even other humans. This is because humans are stubborn and determined, once their minds are set on something they are pretty much unstoppable in pursuit of that goal, and are willing to use any tactic necessary to achieve it.



    So to put it all together, humans are an adaptable, determined, super predator with a powerful drive to dominate everything around them. So it’s not going to remotely strain the suspension of disbelief for you to have them be the dominant party in this scenario.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The intelligence of these other species is essentially on par with humans which poses an issue with your first point. Just statistical distributions and the expression of that intelligence that change really. However the determined predator stuff is very relevant.
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 13:52










    • $begingroup$
      That’s true, they would have the intelligence necessary to modify their environment. However, psychologically we put ourselves in extreme situations and sometimes even decide to live there, basically just because we can. So even if the other races’ abilities are the same, they might not have the same will to act on it as humans. +1 for pointing that out though, thanks!
      $endgroup$
      – Nick
      May 21 at 13:56











    • $begingroup$
      The lack of necessity would certainly stunt the Awrx growth in that department, but once shown new tech they'd be able to work it out.
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 14:06










    • $begingroup$
      The Dar however might be better suited to hostile environments because they lived underground for a good portion of their existence. The first "surface" vehicles would have been technologically equivalent to our submarines.
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 14:07






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I mean it did put us on the moon. Haha! Also side note, using that line at some point in the future.
      $endgroup$
      – Nick
      May 21 at 14:09


















    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8












    $begingroup$

    Earth has a technological advantage over everyone else. That is why they are in charge.



    The martians are living on a dead world, so most of their resources go into just staying alive.



    The Dar circles are naturally cooperative, so their history is peaceful and mostly conflict free. Their technology is amazing, but it is non-aggressive and often shares power among all of its users rather than reinforces a hierarchical command structure.



    The Awrx aren't as smart as us and have a physical strength advantage so they aren't as motivated as us to develop a technological advantage.



    As with most of human history, the side with the most guns and the best guns get to be in charge. The Earth human advantage is that we have always known this, so we came to the party armed.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      The Dar DO trust AI
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 12:57










    • $begingroup$
      But I do like the last paragraph there/
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 12:58






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      oops. I misread that. I will edit
      $endgroup$
      – Henry Taylor
      May 21 at 12:59










    • $begingroup$
      It makes a lot of sense considering the Dar had a pretty lifeless moon to grow up on. Not much biodiversity.
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 12:59






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      So, we're the ones that bring the gun to the knife-fight?
      $endgroup$
      – Baldrickk
      May 21 at 14:38















    8












    $begingroup$

    Earth has a technological advantage over everyone else. That is why they are in charge.



    The martians are living on a dead world, so most of their resources go into just staying alive.



    The Dar circles are naturally cooperative, so their history is peaceful and mostly conflict free. Their technology is amazing, but it is non-aggressive and often shares power among all of its users rather than reinforces a hierarchical command structure.



    The Awrx aren't as smart as us and have a physical strength advantage so they aren't as motivated as us to develop a technological advantage.



    As with most of human history, the side with the most guns and the best guns get to be in charge. The Earth human advantage is that we have always known this, so we came to the party armed.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      The Dar DO trust AI
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 12:57










    • $begingroup$
      But I do like the last paragraph there/
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 12:58






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      oops. I misread that. I will edit
      $endgroup$
      – Henry Taylor
      May 21 at 12:59










    • $begingroup$
      It makes a lot of sense considering the Dar had a pretty lifeless moon to grow up on. Not much biodiversity.
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 12:59






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      So, we're the ones that bring the gun to the knife-fight?
      $endgroup$
      – Baldrickk
      May 21 at 14:38













    8












    8








    8





    $begingroup$

    Earth has a technological advantage over everyone else. That is why they are in charge.



    The martians are living on a dead world, so most of their resources go into just staying alive.



    The Dar circles are naturally cooperative, so their history is peaceful and mostly conflict free. Their technology is amazing, but it is non-aggressive and often shares power among all of its users rather than reinforces a hierarchical command structure.



    The Awrx aren't as smart as us and have a physical strength advantage so they aren't as motivated as us to develop a technological advantage.



    As with most of human history, the side with the most guns and the best guns get to be in charge. The Earth human advantage is that we have always known this, so we came to the party armed.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Earth has a technological advantage over everyone else. That is why they are in charge.



    The martians are living on a dead world, so most of their resources go into just staying alive.



    The Dar circles are naturally cooperative, so their history is peaceful and mostly conflict free. Their technology is amazing, but it is non-aggressive and often shares power among all of its users rather than reinforces a hierarchical command structure.



    The Awrx aren't as smart as us and have a physical strength advantage so they aren't as motivated as us to develop a technological advantage.



    As with most of human history, the side with the most guns and the best guns get to be in charge. The Earth human advantage is that we have always known this, so we came to the party armed.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 21 at 13:05

























    answered May 21 at 12:56









    Henry TaylorHenry Taylor

    47.4k872170




    47.4k872170











    • $begingroup$
      The Dar DO trust AI
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 12:57










    • $begingroup$
      But I do like the last paragraph there/
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 12:58






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      oops. I misread that. I will edit
      $endgroup$
      – Henry Taylor
      May 21 at 12:59










    • $begingroup$
      It makes a lot of sense considering the Dar had a pretty lifeless moon to grow up on. Not much biodiversity.
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 12:59






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      So, we're the ones that bring the gun to the knife-fight?
      $endgroup$
      – Baldrickk
      May 21 at 14:38
















    • $begingroup$
      The Dar DO trust AI
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 12:57










    • $begingroup$
      But I do like the last paragraph there/
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 12:58






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      oops. I misread that. I will edit
      $endgroup$
      – Henry Taylor
      May 21 at 12:59










    • $begingroup$
      It makes a lot of sense considering the Dar had a pretty lifeless moon to grow up on. Not much biodiversity.
      $endgroup$
      – Douglas
      May 21 at 12:59






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      So, we're the ones that bring the gun to the knife-fight?
      $endgroup$
      – Baldrickk
      May 21 at 14:38















    $begingroup$
    The Dar DO trust AI
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas
    May 21 at 12:57




    $begingroup$
    The Dar DO trust AI
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas
    May 21 at 12:57












    $begingroup$
    But I do like the last paragraph there/
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas
    May 21 at 12:58




    $begingroup$
    But I do like the last paragraph there/
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas
    May 21 at 12:58




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    oops. I misread that. I will edit
    $endgroup$
    – Henry Taylor
    May 21 at 12:59




    $begingroup$
    oops. I misread that. I will edit
    $endgroup$
    – Henry Taylor
    May 21 at 12:59












    $begingroup$
    It makes a lot of sense considering the Dar had a pretty lifeless moon to grow up on. Not much biodiversity.
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas
    May 21 at 12:59




    $begingroup$
    It makes a lot of sense considering the Dar had a pretty lifeless moon to grow up on. Not much biodiversity.
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas
    May 21 at 12:59




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    So, we're the ones that bring the gun to the knife-fight?
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    May 21 at 14:38




    $begingroup$
    So, we're the ones that bring the gun to the knife-fight?
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    May 21 at 14:38











    9












    $begingroup$

    Compared to the other races humans are psychotic. The other races (with the possible exception of the martians) would - literally - die before taking another life, humans can have lots of coping mechanisms for squaring away murder (self defense, first strike, the greater good).



    The martians are few in number, and see life as very precious given the harsh environment they inhabit.



    The other races hope they can steer our maturity as a species, and take the view that it's better to have us on the inside pissing out, than on the outside pissing in.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "coping mechanisms" is an excellent point. As an intelligent, social, predatory species, warlike species, that generally values morality our minds have a lot of ways of compartmentalizing hostility to keep our egos intact.
      $endgroup$
      – Nosajimiki
      May 21 at 14:09















    9












    $begingroup$

    Compared to the other races humans are psychotic. The other races (with the possible exception of the martians) would - literally - die before taking another life, humans can have lots of coping mechanisms for squaring away murder (self defense, first strike, the greater good).



    The martians are few in number, and see life as very precious given the harsh environment they inhabit.



    The other races hope they can steer our maturity as a species, and take the view that it's better to have us on the inside pissing out, than on the outside pissing in.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "coping mechanisms" is an excellent point. As an intelligent, social, predatory species, warlike species, that generally values morality our minds have a lot of ways of compartmentalizing hostility to keep our egos intact.
      $endgroup$
      – Nosajimiki
      May 21 at 14:09













    9












    9








    9





    $begingroup$

    Compared to the other races humans are psychotic. The other races (with the possible exception of the martians) would - literally - die before taking another life, humans can have lots of coping mechanisms for squaring away murder (self defense, first strike, the greater good).



    The martians are few in number, and see life as very precious given the harsh environment they inhabit.



    The other races hope they can steer our maturity as a species, and take the view that it's better to have us on the inside pissing out, than on the outside pissing in.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Compared to the other races humans are psychotic. The other races (with the possible exception of the martians) would - literally - die before taking another life, humans can have lots of coping mechanisms for squaring away murder (self defense, first strike, the greater good).



    The martians are few in number, and see life as very precious given the harsh environment they inhabit.



    The other races hope they can steer our maturity as a species, and take the view that it's better to have us on the inside pissing out, than on the outside pissing in.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered May 21 at 12:40









    Binary WorrierBinary Worrier

    2,200915




    2,200915







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "coping mechanisms" is an excellent point. As an intelligent, social, predatory species, warlike species, that generally values morality our minds have a lot of ways of compartmentalizing hostility to keep our egos intact.
      $endgroup$
      – Nosajimiki
      May 21 at 14:09












    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "coping mechanisms" is an excellent point. As an intelligent, social, predatory species, warlike species, that generally values morality our minds have a lot of ways of compartmentalizing hostility to keep our egos intact.
      $endgroup$
      – Nosajimiki
      May 21 at 14:09







    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    "coping mechanisms" is an excellent point. As an intelligent, social, predatory species, warlike species, that generally values morality our minds have a lot of ways of compartmentalizing hostility to keep our egos intact.
    $endgroup$
    – Nosajimiki
    May 21 at 14:09




    $begingroup$
    "coping mechanisms" is an excellent point. As an intelligent, social, predatory species, warlike species, that generally values morality our minds have a lot of ways of compartmentalizing hostility to keep our egos intact.
    $endgroup$
    – Nosajimiki
    May 21 at 14:09











    4












    $begingroup$

    One thing that you failed to mention as cultural traits is creativity. And this is what makes humanity special... most of the other races are sort of mono-cultures with little varience. Humans are fractured into nations and divided over religions and which fictional universes are the best. We've gone to war over the silliest of reasons... and that was before we met an alien life forms! But those same negative sides have lead to some amazing achievements in arts, and culture, and having the insane notion to combine a pizza with a bagel! Humanity thinks outside of the box and can provide solutions to problems no one would think of.



    In my own fiction, aliens who know of humans have a saying: You can not kill a human. The reason for this is that they realize humans are organized in loose and inter-related clans... in order to kill a human, you must kill his family... and their families... and then his tribe (nations) and eventually, his entire species. Humans are perfectly willing to work with you for a common peace, but they will fight until either you back off or you kill every last one of them. And the problem with that is humans understand the concept of a fair fight... but they choose to ignore that. They will make you fight a fierce battle for every inch of territory.



    Other series saw some unique options that may or may not be true. For example, in Animorphs, the two warring alien races (The Andelites and the Yeerks) both come to the conclusions about humans that terrify them. The Andelites recognize that that humans technology advanced much more swiftly than their own, having achieved orbital space flight mere decades after the first flight (their own interval between their two achievements is measured in centuries) and they fear that humans might achieve FTL in a few more decades... and are wide-eyed with horror when they realize the basic understanding of the concepts are developed in the course of the series. The Yeerks, a race of parasitic Brain Slugs, realized they had to switch tactics from an all out invasion to a secret invasion when the initial scout who found humans reported back to her superiors that humans were a Class 5 species (Ideal class to infest) numbering about 5 Billion (this was made in the 90s)... and they responded "Surely you mean 5 million" which was more comparable to most species population numbers.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      One thing that you failed to mention as cultural traits is creativity. And this is what makes humanity special... most of the other races are sort of mono-cultures with little varience. Humans are fractured into nations and divided over religions and which fictional universes are the best. We've gone to war over the silliest of reasons... and that was before we met an alien life forms! But those same negative sides have lead to some amazing achievements in arts, and culture, and having the insane notion to combine a pizza with a bagel! Humanity thinks outside of the box and can provide solutions to problems no one would think of.



      In my own fiction, aliens who know of humans have a saying: You can not kill a human. The reason for this is that they realize humans are organized in loose and inter-related clans... in order to kill a human, you must kill his family... and their families... and then his tribe (nations) and eventually, his entire species. Humans are perfectly willing to work with you for a common peace, but they will fight until either you back off or you kill every last one of them. And the problem with that is humans understand the concept of a fair fight... but they choose to ignore that. They will make you fight a fierce battle for every inch of territory.



      Other series saw some unique options that may or may not be true. For example, in Animorphs, the two warring alien races (The Andelites and the Yeerks) both come to the conclusions about humans that terrify them. The Andelites recognize that that humans technology advanced much more swiftly than their own, having achieved orbital space flight mere decades after the first flight (their own interval between their two achievements is measured in centuries) and they fear that humans might achieve FTL in a few more decades... and are wide-eyed with horror when they realize the basic understanding of the concepts are developed in the course of the series. The Yeerks, a race of parasitic Brain Slugs, realized they had to switch tactics from an all out invasion to a secret invasion when the initial scout who found humans reported back to her superiors that humans were a Class 5 species (Ideal class to infest) numbering about 5 Billion (this was made in the 90s)... and they responded "Surely you mean 5 million" which was more comparable to most species population numbers.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        One thing that you failed to mention as cultural traits is creativity. And this is what makes humanity special... most of the other races are sort of mono-cultures with little varience. Humans are fractured into nations and divided over religions and which fictional universes are the best. We've gone to war over the silliest of reasons... and that was before we met an alien life forms! But those same negative sides have lead to some amazing achievements in arts, and culture, and having the insane notion to combine a pizza with a bagel! Humanity thinks outside of the box and can provide solutions to problems no one would think of.



        In my own fiction, aliens who know of humans have a saying: You can not kill a human. The reason for this is that they realize humans are organized in loose and inter-related clans... in order to kill a human, you must kill his family... and their families... and then his tribe (nations) and eventually, his entire species. Humans are perfectly willing to work with you for a common peace, but they will fight until either you back off or you kill every last one of them. And the problem with that is humans understand the concept of a fair fight... but they choose to ignore that. They will make you fight a fierce battle for every inch of territory.



        Other series saw some unique options that may or may not be true. For example, in Animorphs, the two warring alien races (The Andelites and the Yeerks) both come to the conclusions about humans that terrify them. The Andelites recognize that that humans technology advanced much more swiftly than their own, having achieved orbital space flight mere decades after the first flight (their own interval between their two achievements is measured in centuries) and they fear that humans might achieve FTL in a few more decades... and are wide-eyed with horror when they realize the basic understanding of the concepts are developed in the course of the series. The Yeerks, a race of parasitic Brain Slugs, realized they had to switch tactics from an all out invasion to a secret invasion when the initial scout who found humans reported back to her superiors that humans were a Class 5 species (Ideal class to infest) numbering about 5 Billion (this was made in the 90s)... and they responded "Surely you mean 5 million" which was more comparable to most species population numbers.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        One thing that you failed to mention as cultural traits is creativity. And this is what makes humanity special... most of the other races are sort of mono-cultures with little varience. Humans are fractured into nations and divided over religions and which fictional universes are the best. We've gone to war over the silliest of reasons... and that was before we met an alien life forms! But those same negative sides have lead to some amazing achievements in arts, and culture, and having the insane notion to combine a pizza with a bagel! Humanity thinks outside of the box and can provide solutions to problems no one would think of.



        In my own fiction, aliens who know of humans have a saying: You can not kill a human. The reason for this is that they realize humans are organized in loose and inter-related clans... in order to kill a human, you must kill his family... and their families... and then his tribe (nations) and eventually, his entire species. Humans are perfectly willing to work with you for a common peace, but they will fight until either you back off or you kill every last one of them. And the problem with that is humans understand the concept of a fair fight... but they choose to ignore that. They will make you fight a fierce battle for every inch of territory.



        Other series saw some unique options that may or may not be true. For example, in Animorphs, the two warring alien races (The Andelites and the Yeerks) both come to the conclusions about humans that terrify them. The Andelites recognize that that humans technology advanced much more swiftly than their own, having achieved orbital space flight mere decades after the first flight (their own interval between their two achievements is measured in centuries) and they fear that humans might achieve FTL in a few more decades... and are wide-eyed with horror when they realize the basic understanding of the concepts are developed in the course of the series. The Yeerks, a race of parasitic Brain Slugs, realized they had to switch tactics from an all out invasion to a secret invasion when the initial scout who found humans reported back to her superiors that humans were a Class 5 species (Ideal class to infest) numbering about 5 Billion (this was made in the 90s)... and they responded "Surely you mean 5 million" which was more comparable to most species population numbers.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 21 at 14:26









        hszmvhszmv

        5,400517




        5,400517





















            4












            $begingroup$

            Looking at this kinda from the hugely negative side...



            • You describe the Awrx as cowards, always getting mad at one another but never actually throwing a punch.


            • You describe the Dar as cooperative to a fault, socially incapable of making individual decisions. Cohesive as a group they're wet noodles caught alone in a dark alley.


            • Your martians are natural isolationists. Settlers. People who want to be left alone and build fences to protect what's theirs.


            And the Terrans...



            Your Earthers are pioneers, they can't stand the idea that there's someplace they don't know about, haven't visited, cannot overcome, and consequently, cannot claim as their own. But this expansionist, "that's mine, too!" behavior isn't enough....



            Let me tell you about a co-worker I once had. He was aggressive, perfectly willing to step on the people around him to stand a little taller in the company. He manipulated every situation to make him the savior, the obvious decision maker, and the only one who could be trusted to protect the company. He isolated labor from management, ensuring that management only ever saw that he was the perfect person to control the masses. (Management literally couldn't believe and wouldn't believe our complaints.) He enjoyed playing the intracorporate political games and the pain he caused others. He turned a company that was family into a group of strangers that couldn't trust one another. After a year, everybody was walking on eggshells. It took me years to understand what he was in a single word — and your Earthers are the same thing.



            Your Terrans are sociopaths



            From Psychology Today, "How to Spot a Sociopath":




            • Superficial charm and good intelligence

            • Absence of delusions and other signs of irrational thinking

            • Absence of nervousness or neurotic manifestations

            • Unreliability

            • Untruthfulness and insincerity

            • Lack of remorse and shame

            • Inadequately motivated antisocial behavior

            • Poor judgment and failure to learn by experience

            • Pathologic egocentricity and incapacity for love

            • General poverty in major affective reactions

            • Specific loss of insight

            • Unresponsiveness in general interpersonal relations

            • Fantastic and uninviting behavior with alcohol and sometimes without

            • Suicide threats rarely carried out

            • Sex life impersonal, trivial, and poorly integrated

            • Failure to follow any life plan



            From a social standpoint, nearly all of these would define a naturally aggressive and controlling species that's a pain in everyone else's collective behind, but you'd be unable to easily move them out of the halls of government. They'd be too good at making every other species look like the villain.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "You choose to cause suffering in others purely to see how people react? Is your entire species like this?" - "Nah mate, just the fun ones"
              $endgroup$
              – Joe Bloggs
              May 21 at 16:08















            4












            $begingroup$

            Looking at this kinda from the hugely negative side...



            • You describe the Awrx as cowards, always getting mad at one another but never actually throwing a punch.


            • You describe the Dar as cooperative to a fault, socially incapable of making individual decisions. Cohesive as a group they're wet noodles caught alone in a dark alley.


            • Your martians are natural isolationists. Settlers. People who want to be left alone and build fences to protect what's theirs.


            And the Terrans...



            Your Earthers are pioneers, they can't stand the idea that there's someplace they don't know about, haven't visited, cannot overcome, and consequently, cannot claim as their own. But this expansionist, "that's mine, too!" behavior isn't enough....



            Let me tell you about a co-worker I once had. He was aggressive, perfectly willing to step on the people around him to stand a little taller in the company. He manipulated every situation to make him the savior, the obvious decision maker, and the only one who could be trusted to protect the company. He isolated labor from management, ensuring that management only ever saw that he was the perfect person to control the masses. (Management literally couldn't believe and wouldn't believe our complaints.) He enjoyed playing the intracorporate political games and the pain he caused others. He turned a company that was family into a group of strangers that couldn't trust one another. After a year, everybody was walking on eggshells. It took me years to understand what he was in a single word — and your Earthers are the same thing.



            Your Terrans are sociopaths



            From Psychology Today, "How to Spot a Sociopath":




            • Superficial charm and good intelligence

            • Absence of delusions and other signs of irrational thinking

            • Absence of nervousness or neurotic manifestations

            • Unreliability

            • Untruthfulness and insincerity

            • Lack of remorse and shame

            • Inadequately motivated antisocial behavior

            • Poor judgment and failure to learn by experience

            • Pathologic egocentricity and incapacity for love

            • General poverty in major affective reactions

            • Specific loss of insight

            • Unresponsiveness in general interpersonal relations

            • Fantastic and uninviting behavior with alcohol and sometimes without

            • Suicide threats rarely carried out

            • Sex life impersonal, trivial, and poorly integrated

            • Failure to follow any life plan



            From a social standpoint, nearly all of these would define a naturally aggressive and controlling species that's a pain in everyone else's collective behind, but you'd be unable to easily move them out of the halls of government. They'd be too good at making every other species look like the villain.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "You choose to cause suffering in others purely to see how people react? Is your entire species like this?" - "Nah mate, just the fun ones"
              $endgroup$
              – Joe Bloggs
              May 21 at 16:08













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Looking at this kinda from the hugely negative side...



            • You describe the Awrx as cowards, always getting mad at one another but never actually throwing a punch.


            • You describe the Dar as cooperative to a fault, socially incapable of making individual decisions. Cohesive as a group they're wet noodles caught alone in a dark alley.


            • Your martians are natural isolationists. Settlers. People who want to be left alone and build fences to protect what's theirs.


            And the Terrans...



            Your Earthers are pioneers, they can't stand the idea that there's someplace they don't know about, haven't visited, cannot overcome, and consequently, cannot claim as their own. But this expansionist, "that's mine, too!" behavior isn't enough....



            Let me tell you about a co-worker I once had. He was aggressive, perfectly willing to step on the people around him to stand a little taller in the company. He manipulated every situation to make him the savior, the obvious decision maker, and the only one who could be trusted to protect the company. He isolated labor from management, ensuring that management only ever saw that he was the perfect person to control the masses. (Management literally couldn't believe and wouldn't believe our complaints.) He enjoyed playing the intracorporate political games and the pain he caused others. He turned a company that was family into a group of strangers that couldn't trust one another. After a year, everybody was walking on eggshells. It took me years to understand what he was in a single word — and your Earthers are the same thing.



            Your Terrans are sociopaths



            From Psychology Today, "How to Spot a Sociopath":




            • Superficial charm and good intelligence

            • Absence of delusions and other signs of irrational thinking

            • Absence of nervousness or neurotic manifestations

            • Unreliability

            • Untruthfulness and insincerity

            • Lack of remorse and shame

            • Inadequately motivated antisocial behavior

            • Poor judgment and failure to learn by experience

            • Pathologic egocentricity and incapacity for love

            • General poverty in major affective reactions

            • Specific loss of insight

            • Unresponsiveness in general interpersonal relations

            • Fantastic and uninviting behavior with alcohol and sometimes without

            • Suicide threats rarely carried out

            • Sex life impersonal, trivial, and poorly integrated

            • Failure to follow any life plan



            From a social standpoint, nearly all of these would define a naturally aggressive and controlling species that's a pain in everyone else's collective behind, but you'd be unable to easily move them out of the halls of government. They'd be too good at making every other species look like the villain.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Looking at this kinda from the hugely negative side...



            • You describe the Awrx as cowards, always getting mad at one another but never actually throwing a punch.


            • You describe the Dar as cooperative to a fault, socially incapable of making individual decisions. Cohesive as a group they're wet noodles caught alone in a dark alley.


            • Your martians are natural isolationists. Settlers. People who want to be left alone and build fences to protect what's theirs.


            And the Terrans...



            Your Earthers are pioneers, they can't stand the idea that there's someplace they don't know about, haven't visited, cannot overcome, and consequently, cannot claim as their own. But this expansionist, "that's mine, too!" behavior isn't enough....



            Let me tell you about a co-worker I once had. He was aggressive, perfectly willing to step on the people around him to stand a little taller in the company. He manipulated every situation to make him the savior, the obvious decision maker, and the only one who could be trusted to protect the company. He isolated labor from management, ensuring that management only ever saw that he was the perfect person to control the masses. (Management literally couldn't believe and wouldn't believe our complaints.) He enjoyed playing the intracorporate political games and the pain he caused others. He turned a company that was family into a group of strangers that couldn't trust one another. After a year, everybody was walking on eggshells. It took me years to understand what he was in a single word — and your Earthers are the same thing.



            Your Terrans are sociopaths



            From Psychology Today, "How to Spot a Sociopath":




            • Superficial charm and good intelligence

            • Absence of delusions and other signs of irrational thinking

            • Absence of nervousness or neurotic manifestations

            • Unreliability

            • Untruthfulness and insincerity

            • Lack of remorse and shame

            • Inadequately motivated antisocial behavior

            • Poor judgment and failure to learn by experience

            • Pathologic egocentricity and incapacity for love

            • General poverty in major affective reactions

            • Specific loss of insight

            • Unresponsiveness in general interpersonal relations

            • Fantastic and uninviting behavior with alcohol and sometimes without

            • Suicide threats rarely carried out

            • Sex life impersonal, trivial, and poorly integrated

            • Failure to follow any life plan



            From a social standpoint, nearly all of these would define a naturally aggressive and controlling species that's a pain in everyone else's collective behind, but you'd be unable to easily move them out of the halls of government. They'd be too good at making every other species look like the villain.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered May 21 at 15:48









            JBHJBH

            53.1k8117258




            53.1k8117258







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "You choose to cause suffering in others purely to see how people react? Is your entire species like this?" - "Nah mate, just the fun ones"
              $endgroup$
              – Joe Bloggs
              May 21 at 16:08












            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "You choose to cause suffering in others purely to see how people react? Is your entire species like this?" - "Nah mate, just the fun ones"
              $endgroup$
              – Joe Bloggs
              May 21 at 16:08







            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            "You choose to cause suffering in others purely to see how people react? Is your entire species like this?" - "Nah mate, just the fun ones"
            $endgroup$
            – Joe Bloggs
            May 21 at 16:08




            $begingroup$
            "You choose to cause suffering in others purely to see how people react? Is your entire species like this?" - "Nah mate, just the fun ones"
            $endgroup$
            – Joe Bloggs
            May 21 at 16:08











            3












            $begingroup$

            I like both these other answers, but in addition to humans are crazy and like guns, I’d like to add a few more options here.



            Humans are adaptable



            Out of all the creatures on planet earth, nothing can match humans at their ability to adapt to new environments or situations, or even better, change said environments and situations to suit their needs. Name another creature, (besides maybe tardigrades), that can exist in the desert, the tundra, in mountains, on plains, on the ocean, in the ocean, in the sky, in space, and apparently other planets. Even crazier, humans often times explore or even settle in wildly hostile terrain for no other reason than because they can, or because another human said that it was impossible. Humans are always trying to improve and push the limits of what is possible.



            Humans are predators



            Although we don’t normally think of ourselves this way, humans are the alpha predator on planet earth. Which, I might add, we manage to accomplish by throwing pointy sticks at things and walking behind them until they die. Due to our body plan, intelligence, and again, adaptability, humans always win a war of attrition.



            Humans are determined



            Because of our persistence predator nature, humans are nearly impossible to subjugate. In fact, if history has taught us anything, it is impossible to keep humans from eventually dominating everything around them, be it their environment, animals, or even other humans. This is because humans are stubborn and determined, once their minds are set on something they are pretty much unstoppable in pursuit of that goal, and are willing to use any tactic necessary to achieve it.



            So to put it all together, humans are an adaptable, determined, super predator with a powerful drive to dominate everything around them. So it’s not going to remotely strain the suspension of disbelief for you to have them be the dominant party in this scenario.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              The intelligence of these other species is essentially on par with humans which poses an issue with your first point. Just statistical distributions and the expression of that intelligence that change really. However the determined predator stuff is very relevant.
              $endgroup$
              – Douglas
              May 21 at 13:52










            • $begingroup$
              That’s true, they would have the intelligence necessary to modify their environment. However, psychologically we put ourselves in extreme situations and sometimes even decide to live there, basically just because we can. So even if the other races’ abilities are the same, they might not have the same will to act on it as humans. +1 for pointing that out though, thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              May 21 at 13:56











            • $begingroup$
              The lack of necessity would certainly stunt the Awrx growth in that department, but once shown new tech they'd be able to work it out.
              $endgroup$
              – Douglas
              May 21 at 14:06










            • $begingroup$
              The Dar however might be better suited to hostile environments because they lived underground for a good portion of their existence. The first "surface" vehicles would have been technologically equivalent to our submarines.
              $endgroup$
              – Douglas
              May 21 at 14:07






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I mean it did put us on the moon. Haha! Also side note, using that line at some point in the future.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              May 21 at 14:09
















            3












            $begingroup$

            I like both these other answers, but in addition to humans are crazy and like guns, I’d like to add a few more options here.



            Humans are adaptable



            Out of all the creatures on planet earth, nothing can match humans at their ability to adapt to new environments or situations, or even better, change said environments and situations to suit their needs. Name another creature, (besides maybe tardigrades), that can exist in the desert, the tundra, in mountains, on plains, on the ocean, in the ocean, in the sky, in space, and apparently other planets. Even crazier, humans often times explore or even settle in wildly hostile terrain for no other reason than because they can, or because another human said that it was impossible. Humans are always trying to improve and push the limits of what is possible.



            Humans are predators



            Although we don’t normally think of ourselves this way, humans are the alpha predator on planet earth. Which, I might add, we manage to accomplish by throwing pointy sticks at things and walking behind them until they die. Due to our body plan, intelligence, and again, adaptability, humans always win a war of attrition.



            Humans are determined



            Because of our persistence predator nature, humans are nearly impossible to subjugate. In fact, if history has taught us anything, it is impossible to keep humans from eventually dominating everything around them, be it their environment, animals, or even other humans. This is because humans are stubborn and determined, once their minds are set on something they are pretty much unstoppable in pursuit of that goal, and are willing to use any tactic necessary to achieve it.



            So to put it all together, humans are an adaptable, determined, super predator with a powerful drive to dominate everything around them. So it’s not going to remotely strain the suspension of disbelief for you to have them be the dominant party in this scenario.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              The intelligence of these other species is essentially on par with humans which poses an issue with your first point. Just statistical distributions and the expression of that intelligence that change really. However the determined predator stuff is very relevant.
              $endgroup$
              – Douglas
              May 21 at 13:52










            • $begingroup$
              That’s true, they would have the intelligence necessary to modify their environment. However, psychologically we put ourselves in extreme situations and sometimes even decide to live there, basically just because we can. So even if the other races’ abilities are the same, they might not have the same will to act on it as humans. +1 for pointing that out though, thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              May 21 at 13:56











            • $begingroup$
              The lack of necessity would certainly stunt the Awrx growth in that department, but once shown new tech they'd be able to work it out.
              $endgroup$
              – Douglas
              May 21 at 14:06










            • $begingroup$
              The Dar however might be better suited to hostile environments because they lived underground for a good portion of their existence. The first "surface" vehicles would have been technologically equivalent to our submarines.
              $endgroup$
              – Douglas
              May 21 at 14:07






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I mean it did put us on the moon. Haha! Also side note, using that line at some point in the future.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              May 21 at 14:09














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            I like both these other answers, but in addition to humans are crazy and like guns, I’d like to add a few more options here.



            Humans are adaptable



            Out of all the creatures on planet earth, nothing can match humans at their ability to adapt to new environments or situations, or even better, change said environments and situations to suit their needs. Name another creature, (besides maybe tardigrades), that can exist in the desert, the tundra, in mountains, on plains, on the ocean, in the ocean, in the sky, in space, and apparently other planets. Even crazier, humans often times explore or even settle in wildly hostile terrain for no other reason than because they can, or because another human said that it was impossible. Humans are always trying to improve and push the limits of what is possible.



            Humans are predators



            Although we don’t normally think of ourselves this way, humans are the alpha predator on planet earth. Which, I might add, we manage to accomplish by throwing pointy sticks at things and walking behind them until they die. Due to our body plan, intelligence, and again, adaptability, humans always win a war of attrition.



            Humans are determined



            Because of our persistence predator nature, humans are nearly impossible to subjugate. In fact, if history has taught us anything, it is impossible to keep humans from eventually dominating everything around them, be it their environment, animals, or even other humans. This is because humans are stubborn and determined, once their minds are set on something they are pretty much unstoppable in pursuit of that goal, and are willing to use any tactic necessary to achieve it.



            So to put it all together, humans are an adaptable, determined, super predator with a powerful drive to dominate everything around them. So it’s not going to remotely strain the suspension of disbelief for you to have them be the dominant party in this scenario.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            I like both these other answers, but in addition to humans are crazy and like guns, I’d like to add a few more options here.



            Humans are adaptable



            Out of all the creatures on planet earth, nothing can match humans at their ability to adapt to new environments or situations, or even better, change said environments and situations to suit their needs. Name another creature, (besides maybe tardigrades), that can exist in the desert, the tundra, in mountains, on plains, on the ocean, in the ocean, in the sky, in space, and apparently other planets. Even crazier, humans often times explore or even settle in wildly hostile terrain for no other reason than because they can, or because another human said that it was impossible. Humans are always trying to improve and push the limits of what is possible.



            Humans are predators



            Although we don’t normally think of ourselves this way, humans are the alpha predator on planet earth. Which, I might add, we manage to accomplish by throwing pointy sticks at things and walking behind them until they die. Due to our body plan, intelligence, and again, adaptability, humans always win a war of attrition.



            Humans are determined



            Because of our persistence predator nature, humans are nearly impossible to subjugate. In fact, if history has taught us anything, it is impossible to keep humans from eventually dominating everything around them, be it their environment, animals, or even other humans. This is because humans are stubborn and determined, once their minds are set on something they are pretty much unstoppable in pursuit of that goal, and are willing to use any tactic necessary to achieve it.



            So to put it all together, humans are an adaptable, determined, super predator with a powerful drive to dominate everything around them. So it’s not going to remotely strain the suspension of disbelief for you to have them be the dominant party in this scenario.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited May 21 at 14:01

























            answered May 21 at 13:48









            NickNick

            2,4571031




            2,4571031







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              The intelligence of these other species is essentially on par with humans which poses an issue with your first point. Just statistical distributions and the expression of that intelligence that change really. However the determined predator stuff is very relevant.
              $endgroup$
              – Douglas
              May 21 at 13:52










            • $begingroup$
              That’s true, they would have the intelligence necessary to modify their environment. However, psychologically we put ourselves in extreme situations and sometimes even decide to live there, basically just because we can. So even if the other races’ abilities are the same, they might not have the same will to act on it as humans. +1 for pointing that out though, thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              May 21 at 13:56











            • $begingroup$
              The lack of necessity would certainly stunt the Awrx growth in that department, but once shown new tech they'd be able to work it out.
              $endgroup$
              – Douglas
              May 21 at 14:06










            • $begingroup$
              The Dar however might be better suited to hostile environments because they lived underground for a good portion of their existence. The first "surface" vehicles would have been technologically equivalent to our submarines.
              $endgroup$
              – Douglas
              May 21 at 14:07






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I mean it did put us on the moon. Haha! Also side note, using that line at some point in the future.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              May 21 at 14:09













            • 1




              $begingroup$
              The intelligence of these other species is essentially on par with humans which poses an issue with your first point. Just statistical distributions and the expression of that intelligence that change really. However the determined predator stuff is very relevant.
              $endgroup$
              – Douglas
              May 21 at 13:52










            • $begingroup$
              That’s true, they would have the intelligence necessary to modify their environment. However, psychologically we put ourselves in extreme situations and sometimes even decide to live there, basically just because we can. So even if the other races’ abilities are the same, they might not have the same will to act on it as humans. +1 for pointing that out though, thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              May 21 at 13:56











            • $begingroup$
              The lack of necessity would certainly stunt the Awrx growth in that department, but once shown new tech they'd be able to work it out.
              $endgroup$
              – Douglas
              May 21 at 14:06










            • $begingroup$
              The Dar however might be better suited to hostile environments because they lived underground for a good portion of their existence. The first "surface" vehicles would have been technologically equivalent to our submarines.
              $endgroup$
              – Douglas
              May 21 at 14:07






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I mean it did put us on the moon. Haha! Also side note, using that line at some point in the future.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              May 21 at 14:09








            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            The intelligence of these other species is essentially on par with humans which poses an issue with your first point. Just statistical distributions and the expression of that intelligence that change really. However the determined predator stuff is very relevant.
            $endgroup$
            – Douglas
            May 21 at 13:52




            $begingroup$
            The intelligence of these other species is essentially on par with humans which poses an issue with your first point. Just statistical distributions and the expression of that intelligence that change really. However the determined predator stuff is very relevant.
            $endgroup$
            – Douglas
            May 21 at 13:52












            $begingroup$
            That’s true, they would have the intelligence necessary to modify their environment. However, psychologically we put ourselves in extreme situations and sometimes even decide to live there, basically just because we can. So even if the other races’ abilities are the same, they might not have the same will to act on it as humans. +1 for pointing that out though, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            May 21 at 13:56





            $begingroup$
            That’s true, they would have the intelligence necessary to modify their environment. However, psychologically we put ourselves in extreme situations and sometimes even decide to live there, basically just because we can. So even if the other races’ abilities are the same, they might not have the same will to act on it as humans. +1 for pointing that out though, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            May 21 at 13:56













            $begingroup$
            The lack of necessity would certainly stunt the Awrx growth in that department, but once shown new tech they'd be able to work it out.
            $endgroup$
            – Douglas
            May 21 at 14:06




            $begingroup$
            The lack of necessity would certainly stunt the Awrx growth in that department, but once shown new tech they'd be able to work it out.
            $endgroup$
            – Douglas
            May 21 at 14:06












            $begingroup$
            The Dar however might be better suited to hostile environments because they lived underground for a good portion of their existence. The first "surface" vehicles would have been technologically equivalent to our submarines.
            $endgroup$
            – Douglas
            May 21 at 14:07




            $begingroup$
            The Dar however might be better suited to hostile environments because they lived underground for a good portion of their existence. The first "surface" vehicles would have been technologically equivalent to our submarines.
            $endgroup$
            – Douglas
            May 21 at 14:07




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            I mean it did put us on the moon. Haha! Also side note, using that line at some point in the future.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            May 21 at 14:09





            $begingroup$
            I mean it did put us on the moon. Haha! Also side note, using that line at some point in the future.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            May 21 at 14:09




            Popular posts from this blog

            Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020