Send out-of-office reply for every SMTP recordSuggestion required for Mailbox migration from Mailenable 7.5 POP/SMTP to Exchange ServerExchange 2016 - Unable to Send As for Mail Public FolderCredential pop-ups after moving mailbox from 2010 to 2016Exchange 2016 is ignoring a single host for SMTP/EWSWhat's using my Exchange server to send email via SMTP?
Genetic limitations to learn certain instruments
Are "living" organ banks practical?
Is this a mistake? (regarding maximum likelihood estimator)
Understanding the TeXlive release cycle: What is the meaning of a TeXlive release and is it ever 'finished'?
Inconsistent behavior of compiler optimization of unused string
What's the name of this light airplane?
No array bounds check when using auto
How do I write "Show, Don't Tell" as a person with Asperger Syndrome?
Find duplicated column value in CSV
My coworkers think I had a long honeymoon. Actually I was diagnosed with cancer. How do I talk about it?
Can an Aarakocra use a shield while flying?
How can drunken, homicidal elves successfully conduct a wild hunt?
How to tell your grandparent to not come to fetch you with their car?
Preventing Employees from either switching to Competitors or Opening Their Own Business
Do the English have an ancient (obsolete) verb for the action of the book opening?
Does a 3rd-level Wolf Totem barbarian get advantage against enemies when an ally is within 5 feet of the enemy?
Average spam confidence
Is open-sourcing the code of a webapp not recommended?
What makes Ada the language of choice for the ISS's safety-critical systems?
"You've got another thing coming" - translation into French
Taxi Services at Didcot
Why only the fundamental frequency component is said to give useful power?
Argon vs nitrogen for preserving wine
Last survivors from different time periods living together
Send out-of-office reply for every SMTP record
Suggestion required for Mailbox migration from Mailenable 7.5 POP/SMTP to Exchange ServerExchange 2016 - Unable to Send As for Mail Public FolderCredential pop-ups after moving mailbox from 2010 to 2016Exchange 2016 is ignoring a single host for SMTP/EWSWhat's using my Exchange server to send email via SMTP?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
When someone leaves the company their mailbox is deleted and the SMTP record is added to a noreply@company.com
mailbox.
On the mailbox we added an out-of-office notifying the sender that person they are trying to reach is no longer with the company. After a couple of months the record is removed from the mailbox.
(thank God this is all automated...)
However, if Alice is sending an email to Bob who has left the company, she will receive an OoO from the mailbox. If after an hour she sends an email to Carl who left the company too, she no longer will receive the OoO because the is hitting the same mailbox.
Is there a way to get around this issue? Or is there a better way to handle disabled mailboxes?
exchange-2016 outlook-2013
add a comment |
When someone leaves the company their mailbox is deleted and the SMTP record is added to a noreply@company.com
mailbox.
On the mailbox we added an out-of-office notifying the sender that person they are trying to reach is no longer with the company. After a couple of months the record is removed from the mailbox.
(thank God this is all automated...)
However, if Alice is sending an email to Bob who has left the company, she will receive an OoO from the mailbox. If after an hour she sends an email to Carl who left the company too, she no longer will receive the OoO because the is hitting the same mailbox.
Is there a way to get around this issue? Or is there a better way to handle disabled mailboxes?
exchange-2016 outlook-2013
1
Just delete the mailbox. The bounce message is notification enough that the person is no longer there.
– Gerald Schneider
May 21 at 11:44
Management finds this rather unprofessional. Also some less 'savvy' employees might start calling IT because "they can send mail to xxx".
– MeMario
May 21 at 11:54
You can refer to this: support.microsoft.com/en-sg/help/157961/…
– joyceshen
May 22 at 1:51
add a comment |
When someone leaves the company their mailbox is deleted and the SMTP record is added to a noreply@company.com
mailbox.
On the mailbox we added an out-of-office notifying the sender that person they are trying to reach is no longer with the company. After a couple of months the record is removed from the mailbox.
(thank God this is all automated...)
However, if Alice is sending an email to Bob who has left the company, she will receive an OoO from the mailbox. If after an hour she sends an email to Carl who left the company too, she no longer will receive the OoO because the is hitting the same mailbox.
Is there a way to get around this issue? Or is there a better way to handle disabled mailboxes?
exchange-2016 outlook-2013
When someone leaves the company their mailbox is deleted and the SMTP record is added to a noreply@company.com
mailbox.
On the mailbox we added an out-of-office notifying the sender that person they are trying to reach is no longer with the company. After a couple of months the record is removed from the mailbox.
(thank God this is all automated...)
However, if Alice is sending an email to Bob who has left the company, she will receive an OoO from the mailbox. If after an hour she sends an email to Carl who left the company too, she no longer will receive the OoO because the is hitting the same mailbox.
Is there a way to get around this issue? Or is there a better way to handle disabled mailboxes?
exchange-2016 outlook-2013
exchange-2016 outlook-2013
asked May 21 at 11:34
MeMarioMeMario
1
1
1
Just delete the mailbox. The bounce message is notification enough that the person is no longer there.
– Gerald Schneider
May 21 at 11:44
Management finds this rather unprofessional. Also some less 'savvy' employees might start calling IT because "they can send mail to xxx".
– MeMario
May 21 at 11:54
You can refer to this: support.microsoft.com/en-sg/help/157961/…
– joyceshen
May 22 at 1:51
add a comment |
1
Just delete the mailbox. The bounce message is notification enough that the person is no longer there.
– Gerald Schneider
May 21 at 11:44
Management finds this rather unprofessional. Also some less 'savvy' employees might start calling IT because "they can send mail to xxx".
– MeMario
May 21 at 11:54
You can refer to this: support.microsoft.com/en-sg/help/157961/…
– joyceshen
May 22 at 1:51
1
1
Just delete the mailbox. The bounce message is notification enough that the person is no longer there.
– Gerald Schneider
May 21 at 11:44
Just delete the mailbox. The bounce message is notification enough that the person is no longer there.
– Gerald Schneider
May 21 at 11:44
Management finds this rather unprofessional. Also some less 'savvy' employees might start calling IT because "they can send mail to xxx".
– MeMario
May 21 at 11:54
Management finds this rather unprofessional. Also some less 'savvy' employees might start calling IT because "they can send mail to xxx".
– MeMario
May 21 at 11:54
You can refer to this: support.microsoft.com/en-sg/help/157961/…
– joyceshen
May 22 at 1:51
You can refer to this: support.microsoft.com/en-sg/help/157961/…
– joyceshen
May 22 at 1:51
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
An out-of-office message on an Exchange mailbox is only replied to once during the lifetime of that specific out-of-office message.
To reply to every incoming mail you should delete the out-of-office message but instead add the reply via a rule.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f968214%2fsend-out-of-office-reply-for-every-smtp-record%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
An out-of-office message on an Exchange mailbox is only replied to once during the lifetime of that specific out-of-office message.
To reply to every incoming mail you should delete the out-of-office message but instead add the reply via a rule.
add a comment |
An out-of-office message on an Exchange mailbox is only replied to once during the lifetime of that specific out-of-office message.
To reply to every incoming mail you should delete the out-of-office message but instead add the reply via a rule.
add a comment |
An out-of-office message on an Exchange mailbox is only replied to once during the lifetime of that specific out-of-office message.
To reply to every incoming mail you should delete the out-of-office message but instead add the reply via a rule.
An out-of-office message on an Exchange mailbox is only replied to once during the lifetime of that specific out-of-office message.
To reply to every incoming mail you should delete the out-of-office message but instead add the reply via a rule.
answered May 21 at 12:16
eKKiMeKKiM
809320
809320
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f968214%2fsend-out-of-office-reply-for-every-smtp-record%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Just delete the mailbox. The bounce message is notification enough that the person is no longer there.
– Gerald Schneider
May 21 at 11:44
Management finds this rather unprofessional. Also some less 'savvy' employees might start calling IT because "they can send mail to xxx".
– MeMario
May 21 at 11:54
You can refer to this: support.microsoft.com/en-sg/help/157961/…
– joyceshen
May 22 at 1:51