'chmod -644' would set file permission to 000Permisions set to unknown after chmod 777What are the standard file permissions for the /etc directory(file)Cannot use sudo command, changed permission of /usr folderFile permissions won't changeHaving trouble with chmod“No such file or directory” after chmodPermission to my .sh file?What are the consequences of running chmod 755 -R on home directory?rsync + chmod multiple fileschmod 400 will not change the permissions of a file

How can I find out about the game world without meta-influencing it?

Is it possible to have battery technology that can't be duplicated?

What is the language spoken in Babylon?

A team managed by my peer is close to melting down

Simple log rotation script

Was the Lonely Mountain, where Smaug lived, a volcano?

What's the relation between у.е. to USD?

I am caught when I was about to steal some candies

Changing the PK column of a data extension without completely recreating it

Am I allowed to determine tenets of my contract as a warlock?

Did I need a visa in 2004 and 2006?

In American Politics, why is the Justice Department under the President?

A life of PhD: is it feasible?

Do Veracrypt encrypted volumes have any kind of brute force protection?

LWC: detect last element in for:each iteration

Must a CPU have a GPU if the motherboard provides a display port (when there isn't any separate video card)?

What is Gilligan's full name?

How do I properly use a function under a class?

My mom's return ticket is 3 days after I-94 expires

Boss making me feel guilty for leaving the company at the end of my internship

David slept with Bathsheba because she was pure?? What does that mean?

Can I get a photo of an Ancient Arrow?

Part of my house is inexplicably gone

Can I use 220 V outlets on a 15 ampere breaker and wire it up as 110 V?



'chmod -644' would set file permission to 000


Permisions set to unknown after chmod 777What are the standard file permissions for the /etc directory(file)Cannot use sudo command, changed permission of /usr folderFile permissions won't changeHaving trouble with chmod“No such file or directory” after chmodPermission to my .sh file?What are the consequences of running chmod 755 -R on home directory?rsync + chmod multiple fileschmod 400 will not change the permissions of a file






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








12















I had a file with 644(-rw-r--r--) and wanted to change it to 664(-rw-rw-r--), after running:



sudo chmod -664 my_file


file permissions were set to 000(----------).



Trying to change the permissions to anything different than 000 seems to be not working. What am I missing here?










share|improve this question



















  • 11





    Why do you have a - in front of 644 ? Try sudo chmod 644 my_file. -644 will remove the rights.

    – Soren A
    May 28 at 12:46

















12















I had a file with 644(-rw-r--r--) and wanted to change it to 664(-rw-rw-r--), after running:



sudo chmod -664 my_file


file permissions were set to 000(----------).



Trying to change the permissions to anything different than 000 seems to be not working. What am I missing here?










share|improve this question



















  • 11





    Why do you have a - in front of 644 ? Try sudo chmod 644 my_file. -644 will remove the rights.

    – Soren A
    May 28 at 12:46













12












12








12


1






I had a file with 644(-rw-r--r--) and wanted to change it to 664(-rw-rw-r--), after running:



sudo chmod -664 my_file


file permissions were set to 000(----------).



Trying to change the permissions to anything different than 000 seems to be not working. What am I missing here?










share|improve this question
















I had a file with 644(-rw-r--r--) and wanted to change it to 664(-rw-rw-r--), after running:



sudo chmod -664 my_file


file permissions were set to 000(----------).



Trying to change the permissions to anything different than 000 seems to be not working. What am I missing here?







command-line permissions chmod






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 30 at 5:15









Monty Harder

29616




29616










asked May 28 at 12:44









illgoforitillgoforit

636




636







  • 11





    Why do you have a - in front of 644 ? Try sudo chmod 644 my_file. -644 will remove the rights.

    – Soren A
    May 28 at 12:46












  • 11





    Why do you have a - in front of 644 ? Try sudo chmod 644 my_file. -644 will remove the rights.

    – Soren A
    May 28 at 12:46







11




11





Why do you have a - in front of 644 ? Try sudo chmod 644 my_file. -644 will remove the rights.

– Soren A
May 28 at 12:46





Why do you have a - in front of 644 ? Try sudo chmod 644 my_file. -644 will remove the rights.

– Soren A
May 28 at 12:46










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















33














You are using -664, just use 664 instead. And never use sudo when you dont need to. If that's your file, you don't need sudo:



chmod 644 my_file


When you run chmod with a - before the mode, you will remove that mode. See man chmod (emphasis mine):




The operator + causes the selected file mode bits to be added to
the existing file mode bits of each file; - causes them to be
removed
; and = causes them to be added and causes unmentioned bits
to be removed except that a directory's unmentioned set user and
group ID bits are not affected.




The numbers are:



  • 1: execute

  • 2: write

  • 4: read

So a file with 777 permissions means everyone has the right to do all three, since 1 + 2 + 4 = 7, and therefore setting the permissions to 7 means allowing read, write and execute.



If you start with a file whose mode is 777:



$ ls -l my_file 
-rwxrwxrwx 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file


And now run chmod -644, you will remove the bits 644, and end up with a file whose mode is 133:



$ chmod -644 my_file; ls -l my_file 
---x-wx-wx 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file


That's because you removed 6 (read (4) + write (2)) from the owner's permissions, leaving only 1 (execute) set, and 4 (read) from the group and other permissions. The result is a file with only execute (1) permissions for the owner, and write and execute (you unset 4, leaving 1 and 3) permissions for the rest.



Because your file presumably had the default permissions for new files, so 644, when you ran chmod -644 my_file, you removed all of the set permission bits and got a file with no permissions for anybody.



$ ls -l my_file 
-rw-r--r-- 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file
$ chmod -644 my_file
$ ls -l my_file
---------- 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file





share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "89"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1146834%2fchmod-644-would-set-file-permission-to-000%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    33














    You are using -664, just use 664 instead. And never use sudo when you dont need to. If that's your file, you don't need sudo:



    chmod 644 my_file


    When you run chmod with a - before the mode, you will remove that mode. See man chmod (emphasis mine):




    The operator + causes the selected file mode bits to be added to
    the existing file mode bits of each file; - causes them to be
    removed
    ; and = causes them to be added and causes unmentioned bits
    to be removed except that a directory's unmentioned set user and
    group ID bits are not affected.




    The numbers are:



    • 1: execute

    • 2: write

    • 4: read

    So a file with 777 permissions means everyone has the right to do all three, since 1 + 2 + 4 = 7, and therefore setting the permissions to 7 means allowing read, write and execute.



    If you start with a file whose mode is 777:



    $ ls -l my_file 
    -rwxrwxrwx 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file


    And now run chmod -644, you will remove the bits 644, and end up with a file whose mode is 133:



    $ chmod -644 my_file; ls -l my_file 
    ---x-wx-wx 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file


    That's because you removed 6 (read (4) + write (2)) from the owner's permissions, leaving only 1 (execute) set, and 4 (read) from the group and other permissions. The result is a file with only execute (1) permissions for the owner, and write and execute (you unset 4, leaving 1 and 3) permissions for the rest.



    Because your file presumably had the default permissions for new files, so 644, when you ran chmod -644 my_file, you removed all of the set permission bits and got a file with no permissions for anybody.



    $ ls -l my_file 
    -rw-r--r-- 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file
    $ chmod -644 my_file
    $ ls -l my_file
    ---------- 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file





    share|improve this answer





























      33














      You are using -664, just use 664 instead. And never use sudo when you dont need to. If that's your file, you don't need sudo:



      chmod 644 my_file


      When you run chmod with a - before the mode, you will remove that mode. See man chmod (emphasis mine):




      The operator + causes the selected file mode bits to be added to
      the existing file mode bits of each file; - causes them to be
      removed
      ; and = causes them to be added and causes unmentioned bits
      to be removed except that a directory's unmentioned set user and
      group ID bits are not affected.




      The numbers are:



      • 1: execute

      • 2: write

      • 4: read

      So a file with 777 permissions means everyone has the right to do all three, since 1 + 2 + 4 = 7, and therefore setting the permissions to 7 means allowing read, write and execute.



      If you start with a file whose mode is 777:



      $ ls -l my_file 
      -rwxrwxrwx 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file


      And now run chmod -644, you will remove the bits 644, and end up with a file whose mode is 133:



      $ chmod -644 my_file; ls -l my_file 
      ---x-wx-wx 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file


      That's because you removed 6 (read (4) + write (2)) from the owner's permissions, leaving only 1 (execute) set, and 4 (read) from the group and other permissions. The result is a file with only execute (1) permissions for the owner, and write and execute (you unset 4, leaving 1 and 3) permissions for the rest.



      Because your file presumably had the default permissions for new files, so 644, when you ran chmod -644 my_file, you removed all of the set permission bits and got a file with no permissions for anybody.



      $ ls -l my_file 
      -rw-r--r-- 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file
      $ chmod -644 my_file
      $ ls -l my_file
      ---------- 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file





      share|improve this answer



























        33












        33








        33







        You are using -664, just use 664 instead. And never use sudo when you dont need to. If that's your file, you don't need sudo:



        chmod 644 my_file


        When you run chmod with a - before the mode, you will remove that mode. See man chmod (emphasis mine):




        The operator + causes the selected file mode bits to be added to
        the existing file mode bits of each file; - causes them to be
        removed
        ; and = causes them to be added and causes unmentioned bits
        to be removed except that a directory's unmentioned set user and
        group ID bits are not affected.




        The numbers are:



        • 1: execute

        • 2: write

        • 4: read

        So a file with 777 permissions means everyone has the right to do all three, since 1 + 2 + 4 = 7, and therefore setting the permissions to 7 means allowing read, write and execute.



        If you start with a file whose mode is 777:



        $ ls -l my_file 
        -rwxrwxrwx 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file


        And now run chmod -644, you will remove the bits 644, and end up with a file whose mode is 133:



        $ chmod -644 my_file; ls -l my_file 
        ---x-wx-wx 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file


        That's because you removed 6 (read (4) + write (2)) from the owner's permissions, leaving only 1 (execute) set, and 4 (read) from the group and other permissions. The result is a file with only execute (1) permissions for the owner, and write and execute (you unset 4, leaving 1 and 3) permissions for the rest.



        Because your file presumably had the default permissions for new files, so 644, when you ran chmod -644 my_file, you removed all of the set permission bits and got a file with no permissions for anybody.



        $ ls -l my_file 
        -rw-r--r-- 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file
        $ chmod -644 my_file
        $ ls -l my_file
        ---------- 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file





        share|improve this answer















        You are using -664, just use 664 instead. And never use sudo when you dont need to. If that's your file, you don't need sudo:



        chmod 644 my_file


        When you run chmod with a - before the mode, you will remove that mode. See man chmod (emphasis mine):




        The operator + causes the selected file mode bits to be added to
        the existing file mode bits of each file; - causes them to be
        removed
        ; and = causes them to be added and causes unmentioned bits
        to be removed except that a directory's unmentioned set user and
        group ID bits are not affected.




        The numbers are:



        • 1: execute

        • 2: write

        • 4: read

        So a file with 777 permissions means everyone has the right to do all three, since 1 + 2 + 4 = 7, and therefore setting the permissions to 7 means allowing read, write and execute.



        If you start with a file whose mode is 777:



        $ ls -l my_file 
        -rwxrwxrwx 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file


        And now run chmod -644, you will remove the bits 644, and end up with a file whose mode is 133:



        $ chmod -644 my_file; ls -l my_file 
        ---x-wx-wx 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file


        That's because you removed 6 (read (4) + write (2)) from the owner's permissions, leaving only 1 (execute) set, and 4 (read) from the group and other permissions. The result is a file with only execute (1) permissions for the owner, and write and execute (you unset 4, leaving 1 and 3) permissions for the rest.



        Because your file presumably had the default permissions for new files, so 644, when you ran chmod -644 my_file, you removed all of the set permission bits and got a file with no permissions for anybody.



        $ ls -l my_file 
        -rw-r--r-- 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file
        $ chmod -644 my_file
        $ ls -l my_file
        ---------- 1 terdon terdon 0 May 28 13:45 my_file






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 30 at 10:40

























        answered May 28 at 12:46









        terdonterdon

        70.4k13147231




        70.4k13147231



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1146834%2fchmod-644-would-set-file-permission-to-000%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

            Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

            What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company