How was Apollo supposed to rendezvous in the case of a lunar abort?Why did Apollo 11 need someone to stay behind in lunar orbit?How did Gemini/ Agena rendezvous?Could the Apollo lunar ascent stage have separated from the descent stage before touchdown in an emergency?Was an elliptical orbit considered for the CSM when planning the Apollo moon landing missions?What was the purpose of an Apollo 10 test?Could the Apollo LM abort mode be engaged after touchdown? What would have happened if it was?How important is plume impingement in rendezvous operations?How long is the Apollo Lunar Module extraction window?Launch window for the Apollo Lunar Module?Rendezvouses in halo or lissajous orbits

In Pandemic, why take the extra step of eradicating a disease after you've cured it?

How to import .txt file with missing data?

Can I use 220 V outlets on a 15 ampere breaker and wire it up as 110 V?

Is it possible to have battery technology that can't be duplicated?

What is the theme of analysis?

Is all-caps blackletter no longer taboo?

Which game is this?

Are skill challenges an official option or homebrewed?

Is there a frequency comparator device?

How to soundproof the Wood Shop?

What did the 8086 (and 8088) do upon encountering an illegal instruction?

How do I properly use a function under a class?

How (un)safe is it to ride barefoot?

Nth term of Van Eck Sequence

Boss making me feel guilty for leaving the company at the end of my internship

Idiom for 'person who gets violent when drunk"

What do you call the action of "describing events as they happen" like sports anchors do?

As easy as Three, Two, One... How fast can you go from Five to Four?

Why does there seem to be an extreme lack of public trashcans in Taiwan?

Can you open the door or die? v2

In The Incredibles 2, why does Screenslaver's name use a pun on something that doesn't exist in the 1950s pastiche?

Can a 40amp breaker be used safely and without issue with a 40amp device on 6AWG wire?

Does the UK delegate some immigration control to the Republic of Ireland?

How can powerful telekinesis avoid violating Newton's 3rd Law?



How was Apollo supposed to rendezvous in the case of a lunar abort?


Why did Apollo 11 need someone to stay behind in lunar orbit?How did Gemini/ Agena rendezvous?Could the Apollo lunar ascent stage have separated from the descent stage before touchdown in an emergency?Was an elliptical orbit considered for the CSM when planning the Apollo moon landing missions?What was the purpose of an Apollo 10 test?Could the Apollo LM abort mode be engaged after touchdown? What would have happened if it was?How important is plume impingement in rendezvous operations?How long is the Apollo Lunar Module extraction window?Launch window for the Apollo Lunar Module?Rendezvouses in halo or lissajous orbits













10












$begingroup$


If the LEM had to abort at the point of landing on the moon, the CM/SM would be about 1000 miles ahead of it when the LEM reached the same orbit. How could the 2 craft achieve rendezvous ?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 28 at 13:11










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    May 29 at 0:18















10












$begingroup$


If the LEM had to abort at the point of landing on the moon, the CM/SM would be about 1000 miles ahead of it when the LEM reached the same orbit. How could the 2 craft achieve rendezvous ?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 28 at 13:11










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    May 29 at 0:18













10












10








10





$begingroup$


If the LEM had to abort at the point of landing on the moon, the CM/SM would be about 1000 miles ahead of it when the LEM reached the same orbit. How could the 2 craft achieve rendezvous ?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




If the LEM had to abort at the point of landing on the moon, the CM/SM would be about 1000 miles ahead of it when the LEM reached the same orbit. How could the 2 craft achieve rendezvous ?







apollo-program abort rendezvous






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 29 at 0:20









DrSheldon

8,55423277




8,55423277










asked May 28 at 12:56









Alan BorrowmanAlan Borrowman

5113




5113







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 28 at 13:11










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    May 29 at 0:18












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 28 at 13:11










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    May 29 at 0:18







1




1




$begingroup$
The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 28 at 13:11




$begingroup$
The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 28 at 13:11












$begingroup$
Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
May 29 at 0:18




$begingroup$
Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
May 29 at 0:18










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















19












$begingroup$

Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.



The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
    $endgroup$
    – Russell McMahon
    May 29 at 13:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Jour
    May 30 at 0:52


















16












$begingroup$

There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:



enter image description here



It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.



So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "508"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36443%2fhow-was-apollo-supposed-to-rendezvous-in-the-case-of-a-lunar-abort%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    19












    $begingroup$

    Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.



    The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
      $endgroup$
      – Russell McMahon
      May 29 at 13:54






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Jour
      May 30 at 0:52















    19












    $begingroup$

    Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.



    The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
      $endgroup$
      – Russell McMahon
      May 29 at 13:54






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Jour
      May 30 at 0:52













    19












    19








    19





    $begingroup$

    Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.



    The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.



    The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 28 at 13:43

























    answered May 28 at 13:28









    GremlinWrangerGremlinWranger

    3,349319




    3,349319







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
      $endgroup$
      – Russell McMahon
      May 29 at 13:54






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Jour
      May 30 at 0:52












    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
      $endgroup$
      – Russell McMahon
      May 29 at 13:54






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Jour
      May 30 at 0:52







    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    "East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
    $endgroup$
    – Russell McMahon
    May 29 at 13:54




    $begingroup$
    "East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
    $endgroup$
    – Russell McMahon
    May 29 at 13:54




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Jour
    May 30 at 0:52




    $begingroup$
    Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Jour
    May 30 at 0:52











    16












    $begingroup$

    There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:



    enter image description here



    It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.



    So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      16












      $begingroup$

      There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:



      enter image description here



      It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.



      So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        16












        16








        16





        $begingroup$

        There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:



        enter image description here



        It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.



        So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:



        enter image description here



        It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.



        So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 28 at 16:43









        indy91indy91

        1,01668




        1,01668



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36443%2fhow-was-apollo-supposed-to-rendezvous-in-the-case-of-a-lunar-abort%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020