Points within polygons in different projectionsOverlaying layers with different projections on AndroidCorrect coordinate systems, but trustworthy distance between points?How do you clip a gnomonic or stereographic azimuthal projection?Overlay polygons on raster in different projectionsIssue rendering polygons at global scale when using the Robinson coordinate reference system in QGIS 2.10Change coordinate system to add buffer in metersHow to determine if lat/long is within SABS school boundary?Project raster tool stays white at iteration in ModelBuilder?Vizualise different projections of a vector using QGISConversion between unknown map projections?

Can an open source licence be revoked if it violates employer's IP?

Which are the methodologies for interpreting Vedas?

Can an escape pod land on Earth from orbit and not be immediately detected?

Can you open the door or die? v2

Am I being scammed by a sugar daddy?

Do Veracrypt encrypted volumes have any kind of brute force protection?

How to represent jealousy in a cute way?

Why would a car salesman tell me not to get my credit pulled again?

Why are backslashes included in this shell script?

Purpose of cylindrical attachments on Power Transmission towers

Does WiFi affect the quality of images downloaded from the internet?

What do I need to do, tax-wise, for a sudden windfall?

Tiffeneau–Demjanov rearrangement products

Idiom for 'person who gets violent when drunk"

Is it possible to have battery technology that can't be duplicated?

Are athlete's college degrees discounted by employers and graduate school admissions?

Is it good practice to create tables dynamically?

Why did the Death Eaters wait to reopen the Chamber of Secrets?

Someone who is granted access to information but not expected to read it

Why does there seem to be an extreme lack of public trashcans in Taiwan?

Am I allowed to determine tenets of my contract as a warlock?

In Pandemic, why take the extra step of eradicating a disease after you've cured it?

Print "N NE E SE S SW W NW"

Simple log rotation script



Points within polygons in different projections


Overlaying layers with different projections on AndroidCorrect coordinate systems, but trustworthy distance between points?How do you clip a gnomonic or stereographic azimuthal projection?Overlay polygons on raster in different projectionsIssue rendering polygons at global scale when using the Robinson coordinate reference system in QGIS 2.10Change coordinate system to add buffer in metersHow to determine if lat/long is within SABS school boundary?Project raster tool stays white at iteration in ModelBuilder?Vizualise different projections of a vector using QGISConversion between unknown map projections?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5















I have a polygon and a point feature class in some projection. The points are contained within the polygons



The points are always inside the polygons no matter the projection destination I'm projecting points and polygons to (including 'unprojecting' to geographic).




Putting visually JGH example I have a big polygon in WKID =4326 with a point outside of it...



WKID 4326



...when I project them (say in 3347 to follow JGH example) I get this...



enter image description here



where the point now is inside the polygon. I used the ArcGIS Pro 'project' function.



When I use project setting the optional parameter 'Preserve Shape' as in the following picture.



enter image description here



...I get something definitely better like...



enter image description here



where (hopefully) the point stays outside the polygon.
'Preserve shape' parameter did what outlined by J.R. Extra vertices that provide a better discretization of the polygon in the destination projection....otherwise everything is reduced to projecting 4 vertices and drawing straight lines in the destination space to connect them (producing the indesiderable output of the second picture above)



Am I getting this right ?










share|improve this question






























    5















    I have a polygon and a point feature class in some projection. The points are contained within the polygons



    The points are always inside the polygons no matter the projection destination I'm projecting points and polygons to (including 'unprojecting' to geographic).




    Putting visually JGH example I have a big polygon in WKID =4326 with a point outside of it...



    WKID 4326



    ...when I project them (say in 3347 to follow JGH example) I get this...



    enter image description here



    where the point now is inside the polygon. I used the ArcGIS Pro 'project' function.



    When I use project setting the optional parameter 'Preserve Shape' as in the following picture.



    enter image description here



    ...I get something definitely better like...



    enter image description here



    where (hopefully) the point stays outside the polygon.
    'Preserve shape' parameter did what outlined by J.R. Extra vertices that provide a better discretization of the polygon in the destination projection....otherwise everything is reduced to projecting 4 vertices and drawing straight lines in the destination space to connect them (producing the indesiderable output of the second picture above)



    Am I getting this right ?










    share|improve this question


























      5












      5








      5


      1






      I have a polygon and a point feature class in some projection. The points are contained within the polygons



      The points are always inside the polygons no matter the projection destination I'm projecting points and polygons to (including 'unprojecting' to geographic).




      Putting visually JGH example I have a big polygon in WKID =4326 with a point outside of it...



      WKID 4326



      ...when I project them (say in 3347 to follow JGH example) I get this...



      enter image description here



      where the point now is inside the polygon. I used the ArcGIS Pro 'project' function.



      When I use project setting the optional parameter 'Preserve Shape' as in the following picture.



      enter image description here



      ...I get something definitely better like...



      enter image description here



      where (hopefully) the point stays outside the polygon.
      'Preserve shape' parameter did what outlined by J.R. Extra vertices that provide a better discretization of the polygon in the destination projection....otherwise everything is reduced to projecting 4 vertices and drawing straight lines in the destination space to connect them (producing the indesiderable output of the second picture above)



      Am I getting this right ?










      share|improve this question
















      I have a polygon and a point feature class in some projection. The points are contained within the polygons



      The points are always inside the polygons no matter the projection destination I'm projecting points and polygons to (including 'unprojecting' to geographic).




      Putting visually JGH example I have a big polygon in WKID =4326 with a point outside of it...



      WKID 4326



      ...when I project them (say in 3347 to follow JGH example) I get this...



      enter image description here



      where the point now is inside the polygon. I used the ArcGIS Pro 'project' function.



      When I use project setting the optional parameter 'Preserve Shape' as in the following picture.



      enter image description here



      ...I get something definitely better like...



      enter image description here



      where (hopefully) the point stays outside the polygon.
      'Preserve shape' parameter did what outlined by J.R. Extra vertices that provide a better discretization of the polygon in the destination projection....otherwise everything is reduced to projecting 4 vertices and drawing straight lines in the destination space to connect them (producing the indesiderable output of the second picture above)



      Am I getting this right ?







      coordinate-system arcgis-pro reprojection-mathematics






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 30 at 10:03









      PolyGeo

      54.3k1784253




      54.3k1784253










      asked May 28 at 16:26









      SupereshekSupereshek

      262




      262




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8














          Some software will use great circle arcs to connect unprojected vertices (sometimes when using a special data type, like PostGIS geography), while projected (or unprojected using the geometry datatype) vertices are connected using straight lines.



          This can result in a point being inside a polygon expressed as geography but outside of it if expressed as geometry



          The following example uses PostGIS. The polygon goes up to latitude 50, the point is at latitude 51.



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((0 0, 50 0, 50 50, 0 50, 0 0))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(25 51)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom::geography,pnt.geom::geography) intersect_geography
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_geography
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t


          Edit



          Extending on @JR comment, here is an example when projecting a huge polygon to a Lambert Conformal Conic projection (3347) and checking the point intersection near the central meridian: we can see a difference of 4 degrees of latitude between the two!



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((-70 45, -130 45, -130 50, -70 50, -70 45))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(-100 54)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(st_transform(poly.geom,3347),st_transform(pnt.geom,3347)) intersect_reproject
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_reproject
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t





          share|improve this answer

























          • Same in SQL server...

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:55


















          2














          Yes. projections will never reproject a point that was inside a polygon in one projection to be outside it in another--unless there's some sort of precision error. I'm not sure what this property is called in geography, but I just realized it's essentially relativistic invariance, which basically says that as time dilates for us, and our coordinate systems are compressed or stretched, no observer in any given frame will disagree on causal ordering of events. Likewise, no matter in what projection an "observer lives", no one will disagree on what points are in what polygons, even if they disagree on exactly how far the points are from the edges of the polygons, and stuff like that.






          share|improve this answer























          • Well, except for horizon clipping, and discontinuous projections, which might throw a monkey wench in topology.

            – Vince
            May 28 at 16:53







          • 3





            Not sure but I think the question come from the way polygon may be incorrectly reprojected as in a big polygon defined by only corner vertex. When reprojecting you will project the corner then reconstruct the polygon by linking the corner with a straight line. In this case a point close to the border could be seen on the other side after reprojecting but that's because the projection is wrong along the length of the side (to prevent that you need to add vertex on the polygon side before reprojecting)

            – J.R
            May 28 at 16:54











          • I hadn't considered horizons or discontinous projections. I guess like in physics geography does have singularities where certain space-time coordinate systems break down; poles are another example.

            – 0mn1
            May 28 at 19:37











          • Yes...as J.R. is saying my question comes from the way a polygon may be incorrectly re-projected. I think ArcGIS 'Project' accounts for this if you use "preserve_shape" optional parameter. It adds extra vertices in order to get a better projected shape.

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:54











          • @J.R I see. Is it correct to say that this happens because the PostGIS geometry is a different projection than the geography? If I connect to points on unprojected data with a straight line, then do the same thing with correct geodesic calculations and add that (apparently) curved line to the map, then there will be points between them. But the straight line was never the correct line for unprojected lon-lat data--it's not like the line is shifting from one side of a point to the other between two projections, rather the geometry projection is wrong.

            – 0mn1
            May 29 at 14:00











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "79"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f324171%2fpoints-within-polygons-in-different-projections%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          8














          Some software will use great circle arcs to connect unprojected vertices (sometimes when using a special data type, like PostGIS geography), while projected (or unprojected using the geometry datatype) vertices are connected using straight lines.



          This can result in a point being inside a polygon expressed as geography but outside of it if expressed as geometry



          The following example uses PostGIS. The polygon goes up to latitude 50, the point is at latitude 51.



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((0 0, 50 0, 50 50, 0 50, 0 0))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(25 51)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom::geography,pnt.geom::geography) intersect_geography
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_geography
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t


          Edit



          Extending on @JR comment, here is an example when projecting a huge polygon to a Lambert Conformal Conic projection (3347) and checking the point intersection near the central meridian: we can see a difference of 4 degrees of latitude between the two!



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((-70 45, -130 45, -130 50, -70 50, -70 45))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(-100 54)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(st_transform(poly.geom,3347),st_transform(pnt.geom,3347)) intersect_reproject
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_reproject
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t





          share|improve this answer

























          • Same in SQL server...

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:55















          8














          Some software will use great circle arcs to connect unprojected vertices (sometimes when using a special data type, like PostGIS geography), while projected (or unprojected using the geometry datatype) vertices are connected using straight lines.



          This can result in a point being inside a polygon expressed as geography but outside of it if expressed as geometry



          The following example uses PostGIS. The polygon goes up to latitude 50, the point is at latitude 51.



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((0 0, 50 0, 50 50, 0 50, 0 0))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(25 51)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom::geography,pnt.geom::geography) intersect_geography
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_geography
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t


          Edit



          Extending on @JR comment, here is an example when projecting a huge polygon to a Lambert Conformal Conic projection (3347) and checking the point intersection near the central meridian: we can see a difference of 4 degrees of latitude between the two!



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((-70 45, -130 45, -130 50, -70 50, -70 45))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(-100 54)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(st_transform(poly.geom,3347),st_transform(pnt.geom,3347)) intersect_reproject
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_reproject
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t





          share|improve this answer

























          • Same in SQL server...

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:55













          8












          8








          8







          Some software will use great circle arcs to connect unprojected vertices (sometimes when using a special data type, like PostGIS geography), while projected (or unprojected using the geometry datatype) vertices are connected using straight lines.



          This can result in a point being inside a polygon expressed as geography but outside of it if expressed as geometry



          The following example uses PostGIS. The polygon goes up to latitude 50, the point is at latitude 51.



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((0 0, 50 0, 50 50, 0 50, 0 0))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(25 51)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom::geography,pnt.geom::geography) intersect_geography
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_geography
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t


          Edit



          Extending on @JR comment, here is an example when projecting a huge polygon to a Lambert Conformal Conic projection (3347) and checking the point intersection near the central meridian: we can see a difference of 4 degrees of latitude between the two!



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((-70 45, -130 45, -130 50, -70 50, -70 45))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(-100 54)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(st_transform(poly.geom,3347),st_transform(pnt.geom,3347)) intersect_reproject
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_reproject
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t





          share|improve this answer















          Some software will use great circle arcs to connect unprojected vertices (sometimes when using a special data type, like PostGIS geography), while projected (or unprojected using the geometry datatype) vertices are connected using straight lines.



          This can result in a point being inside a polygon expressed as geography but outside of it if expressed as geometry



          The following example uses PostGIS. The polygon goes up to latitude 50, the point is at latitude 51.



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((0 0, 50 0, 50 50, 0 50, 0 0))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(25 51)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom::geography,pnt.geom::geography) intersect_geography
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_geography
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t


          Edit



          Extending on @JR comment, here is an example when projecting a huge polygon to a Lambert Conformal Conic projection (3347) and checking the point intersection near the central meridian: we can see a difference of 4 degrees of latitude between the two!



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((-70 45, -130 45, -130 50, -70 50, -70 45))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(-100 54)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(st_transform(poly.geom,3347),st_transform(pnt.geom,3347)) intersect_reproject
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_reproject
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 29 at 11:21

























          answered May 28 at 17:33









          JGHJGH

          14.4k21439




          14.4k21439












          • Same in SQL server...

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:55

















          • Same in SQL server...

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:55
















          Same in SQL server...

          – Supereshek
          May 29 at 9:55





          Same in SQL server...

          – Supereshek
          May 29 at 9:55













          2














          Yes. projections will never reproject a point that was inside a polygon in one projection to be outside it in another--unless there's some sort of precision error. I'm not sure what this property is called in geography, but I just realized it's essentially relativistic invariance, which basically says that as time dilates for us, and our coordinate systems are compressed or stretched, no observer in any given frame will disagree on causal ordering of events. Likewise, no matter in what projection an "observer lives", no one will disagree on what points are in what polygons, even if they disagree on exactly how far the points are from the edges of the polygons, and stuff like that.






          share|improve this answer























          • Well, except for horizon clipping, and discontinuous projections, which might throw a monkey wench in topology.

            – Vince
            May 28 at 16:53







          • 3





            Not sure but I think the question come from the way polygon may be incorrectly reprojected as in a big polygon defined by only corner vertex. When reprojecting you will project the corner then reconstruct the polygon by linking the corner with a straight line. In this case a point close to the border could be seen on the other side after reprojecting but that's because the projection is wrong along the length of the side (to prevent that you need to add vertex on the polygon side before reprojecting)

            – J.R
            May 28 at 16:54











          • I hadn't considered horizons or discontinous projections. I guess like in physics geography does have singularities where certain space-time coordinate systems break down; poles are another example.

            – 0mn1
            May 28 at 19:37











          • Yes...as J.R. is saying my question comes from the way a polygon may be incorrectly re-projected. I think ArcGIS 'Project' accounts for this if you use "preserve_shape" optional parameter. It adds extra vertices in order to get a better projected shape.

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:54











          • @J.R I see. Is it correct to say that this happens because the PostGIS geometry is a different projection than the geography? If I connect to points on unprojected data with a straight line, then do the same thing with correct geodesic calculations and add that (apparently) curved line to the map, then there will be points between them. But the straight line was never the correct line for unprojected lon-lat data--it's not like the line is shifting from one side of a point to the other between two projections, rather the geometry projection is wrong.

            – 0mn1
            May 29 at 14:00















          2














          Yes. projections will never reproject a point that was inside a polygon in one projection to be outside it in another--unless there's some sort of precision error. I'm not sure what this property is called in geography, but I just realized it's essentially relativistic invariance, which basically says that as time dilates for us, and our coordinate systems are compressed or stretched, no observer in any given frame will disagree on causal ordering of events. Likewise, no matter in what projection an "observer lives", no one will disagree on what points are in what polygons, even if they disagree on exactly how far the points are from the edges of the polygons, and stuff like that.






          share|improve this answer























          • Well, except for horizon clipping, and discontinuous projections, which might throw a monkey wench in topology.

            – Vince
            May 28 at 16:53







          • 3





            Not sure but I think the question come from the way polygon may be incorrectly reprojected as in a big polygon defined by only corner vertex. When reprojecting you will project the corner then reconstruct the polygon by linking the corner with a straight line. In this case a point close to the border could be seen on the other side after reprojecting but that's because the projection is wrong along the length of the side (to prevent that you need to add vertex on the polygon side before reprojecting)

            – J.R
            May 28 at 16:54











          • I hadn't considered horizons or discontinous projections. I guess like in physics geography does have singularities where certain space-time coordinate systems break down; poles are another example.

            – 0mn1
            May 28 at 19:37











          • Yes...as J.R. is saying my question comes from the way a polygon may be incorrectly re-projected. I think ArcGIS 'Project' accounts for this if you use "preserve_shape" optional parameter. It adds extra vertices in order to get a better projected shape.

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:54











          • @J.R I see. Is it correct to say that this happens because the PostGIS geometry is a different projection than the geography? If I connect to points on unprojected data with a straight line, then do the same thing with correct geodesic calculations and add that (apparently) curved line to the map, then there will be points between them. But the straight line was never the correct line for unprojected lon-lat data--it's not like the line is shifting from one side of a point to the other between two projections, rather the geometry projection is wrong.

            – 0mn1
            May 29 at 14:00













          2












          2








          2







          Yes. projections will never reproject a point that was inside a polygon in one projection to be outside it in another--unless there's some sort of precision error. I'm not sure what this property is called in geography, but I just realized it's essentially relativistic invariance, which basically says that as time dilates for us, and our coordinate systems are compressed or stretched, no observer in any given frame will disagree on causal ordering of events. Likewise, no matter in what projection an "observer lives", no one will disagree on what points are in what polygons, even if they disagree on exactly how far the points are from the edges of the polygons, and stuff like that.






          share|improve this answer













          Yes. projections will never reproject a point that was inside a polygon in one projection to be outside it in another--unless there's some sort of precision error. I'm not sure what this property is called in geography, but I just realized it's essentially relativistic invariance, which basically says that as time dilates for us, and our coordinate systems are compressed or stretched, no observer in any given frame will disagree on causal ordering of events. Likewise, no matter in what projection an "observer lives", no one will disagree on what points are in what polygons, even if they disagree on exactly how far the points are from the edges of the polygons, and stuff like that.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered May 28 at 16:37









          0mn10mn1

          784




          784












          • Well, except for horizon clipping, and discontinuous projections, which might throw a monkey wench in topology.

            – Vince
            May 28 at 16:53







          • 3





            Not sure but I think the question come from the way polygon may be incorrectly reprojected as in a big polygon defined by only corner vertex. When reprojecting you will project the corner then reconstruct the polygon by linking the corner with a straight line. In this case a point close to the border could be seen on the other side after reprojecting but that's because the projection is wrong along the length of the side (to prevent that you need to add vertex on the polygon side before reprojecting)

            – J.R
            May 28 at 16:54











          • I hadn't considered horizons or discontinous projections. I guess like in physics geography does have singularities where certain space-time coordinate systems break down; poles are another example.

            – 0mn1
            May 28 at 19:37











          • Yes...as J.R. is saying my question comes from the way a polygon may be incorrectly re-projected. I think ArcGIS 'Project' accounts for this if you use "preserve_shape" optional parameter. It adds extra vertices in order to get a better projected shape.

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:54











          • @J.R I see. Is it correct to say that this happens because the PostGIS geometry is a different projection than the geography? If I connect to points on unprojected data with a straight line, then do the same thing with correct geodesic calculations and add that (apparently) curved line to the map, then there will be points between them. But the straight line was never the correct line for unprojected lon-lat data--it's not like the line is shifting from one side of a point to the other between two projections, rather the geometry projection is wrong.

            – 0mn1
            May 29 at 14:00

















          • Well, except for horizon clipping, and discontinuous projections, which might throw a monkey wench in topology.

            – Vince
            May 28 at 16:53







          • 3





            Not sure but I think the question come from the way polygon may be incorrectly reprojected as in a big polygon defined by only corner vertex. When reprojecting you will project the corner then reconstruct the polygon by linking the corner with a straight line. In this case a point close to the border could be seen on the other side after reprojecting but that's because the projection is wrong along the length of the side (to prevent that you need to add vertex on the polygon side before reprojecting)

            – J.R
            May 28 at 16:54











          • I hadn't considered horizons or discontinous projections. I guess like in physics geography does have singularities where certain space-time coordinate systems break down; poles are another example.

            – 0mn1
            May 28 at 19:37











          • Yes...as J.R. is saying my question comes from the way a polygon may be incorrectly re-projected. I think ArcGIS 'Project' accounts for this if you use "preserve_shape" optional parameter. It adds extra vertices in order to get a better projected shape.

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:54











          • @J.R I see. Is it correct to say that this happens because the PostGIS geometry is a different projection than the geography? If I connect to points on unprojected data with a straight line, then do the same thing with correct geodesic calculations and add that (apparently) curved line to the map, then there will be points between them. But the straight line was never the correct line for unprojected lon-lat data--it's not like the line is shifting from one side of a point to the other between two projections, rather the geometry projection is wrong.

            – 0mn1
            May 29 at 14:00
















          Well, except for horizon clipping, and discontinuous projections, which might throw a monkey wench in topology.

          – Vince
          May 28 at 16:53






          Well, except for horizon clipping, and discontinuous projections, which might throw a monkey wench in topology.

          – Vince
          May 28 at 16:53





          3




          3





          Not sure but I think the question come from the way polygon may be incorrectly reprojected as in a big polygon defined by only corner vertex. When reprojecting you will project the corner then reconstruct the polygon by linking the corner with a straight line. In this case a point close to the border could be seen on the other side after reprojecting but that's because the projection is wrong along the length of the side (to prevent that you need to add vertex on the polygon side before reprojecting)

          – J.R
          May 28 at 16:54





          Not sure but I think the question come from the way polygon may be incorrectly reprojected as in a big polygon defined by only corner vertex. When reprojecting you will project the corner then reconstruct the polygon by linking the corner with a straight line. In this case a point close to the border could be seen on the other side after reprojecting but that's because the projection is wrong along the length of the side (to prevent that you need to add vertex on the polygon side before reprojecting)

          – J.R
          May 28 at 16:54













          I hadn't considered horizons or discontinous projections. I guess like in physics geography does have singularities where certain space-time coordinate systems break down; poles are another example.

          – 0mn1
          May 28 at 19:37





          I hadn't considered horizons or discontinous projections. I guess like in physics geography does have singularities where certain space-time coordinate systems break down; poles are another example.

          – 0mn1
          May 28 at 19:37













          Yes...as J.R. is saying my question comes from the way a polygon may be incorrectly re-projected. I think ArcGIS 'Project' accounts for this if you use "preserve_shape" optional parameter. It adds extra vertices in order to get a better projected shape.

          – Supereshek
          May 29 at 9:54





          Yes...as J.R. is saying my question comes from the way a polygon may be incorrectly re-projected. I think ArcGIS 'Project' accounts for this if you use "preserve_shape" optional parameter. It adds extra vertices in order to get a better projected shape.

          – Supereshek
          May 29 at 9:54













          @J.R I see. Is it correct to say that this happens because the PostGIS geometry is a different projection than the geography? If I connect to points on unprojected data with a straight line, then do the same thing with correct geodesic calculations and add that (apparently) curved line to the map, then there will be points between them. But the straight line was never the correct line for unprojected lon-lat data--it's not like the line is shifting from one side of a point to the other between two projections, rather the geometry projection is wrong.

          – 0mn1
          May 29 at 14:00





          @J.R I see. Is it correct to say that this happens because the PostGIS geometry is a different projection than the geography? If I connect to points on unprojected data with a straight line, then do the same thing with correct geodesic calculations and add that (apparently) curved line to the map, then there will be points between them. But the straight line was never the correct line for unprojected lon-lat data--it's not like the line is shifting from one side of a point to the other between two projections, rather the geometry projection is wrong.

          – 0mn1
          May 29 at 14:00

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f324171%2fpoints-within-polygons-in-different-projections%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

          Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

          What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company