Points within polygons in different projectionsOverlaying layers with different projections on AndroidCorrect coordinate systems, but trustworthy distance between points?How do you clip a gnomonic or stereographic azimuthal projection?Overlay polygons on raster in different projectionsIssue rendering polygons at global scale when using the Robinson coordinate reference system in QGIS 2.10Change coordinate system to add buffer in metersHow to determine if lat/long is within SABS school boundary?Project raster tool stays white at iteration in ModelBuilder?Vizualise different projections of a vector using QGISConversion between unknown map projections?

Can an open source licence be revoked if it violates employer's IP?

Which are the methodologies for interpreting Vedas?

Can an escape pod land on Earth from orbit and not be immediately detected?

Can you open the door or die? v2

Am I being scammed by a sugar daddy?

Do Veracrypt encrypted volumes have any kind of brute force protection?

How to represent jealousy in a cute way?

Why would a car salesman tell me not to get my credit pulled again?

Why are backslashes included in this shell script?

Purpose of cylindrical attachments on Power Transmission towers

Does WiFi affect the quality of images downloaded from the internet?

What do I need to do, tax-wise, for a sudden windfall?

Tiffeneau–Demjanov rearrangement products

Idiom for 'person who gets violent when drunk"

Is it possible to have battery technology that can't be duplicated?

Are athlete's college degrees discounted by employers and graduate school admissions?

Is it good practice to create tables dynamically?

Why did the Death Eaters wait to reopen the Chamber of Secrets?

Someone who is granted access to information but not expected to read it

Why does there seem to be an extreme lack of public trashcans in Taiwan?

Am I allowed to determine tenets of my contract as a warlock?

In Pandemic, why take the extra step of eradicating a disease after you've cured it?

Print "N NE E SE S SW W NW"

Simple log rotation script



Points within polygons in different projections


Overlaying layers with different projections on AndroidCorrect coordinate systems, but trustworthy distance between points?How do you clip a gnomonic or stereographic azimuthal projection?Overlay polygons on raster in different projectionsIssue rendering polygons at global scale when using the Robinson coordinate reference system in QGIS 2.10Change coordinate system to add buffer in metersHow to determine if lat/long is within SABS school boundary?Project raster tool stays white at iteration in ModelBuilder?Vizualise different projections of a vector using QGISConversion between unknown map projections?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5















I have a polygon and a point feature class in some projection. The points are contained within the polygons



The points are always inside the polygons no matter the projection destination I'm projecting points and polygons to (including 'unprojecting' to geographic).




Putting visually JGH example I have a big polygon in WKID =4326 with a point outside of it...



WKID 4326



...when I project them (say in 3347 to follow JGH example) I get this...



enter image description here



where the point now is inside the polygon. I used the ArcGIS Pro 'project' function.



When I use project setting the optional parameter 'Preserve Shape' as in the following picture.



enter image description here



...I get something definitely better like...



enter image description here



where (hopefully) the point stays outside the polygon.
'Preserve shape' parameter did what outlined by J.R. Extra vertices that provide a better discretization of the polygon in the destination projection....otherwise everything is reduced to projecting 4 vertices and drawing straight lines in the destination space to connect them (producing the indesiderable output of the second picture above)



Am I getting this right ?










share|improve this question






























    5















    I have a polygon and a point feature class in some projection. The points are contained within the polygons



    The points are always inside the polygons no matter the projection destination I'm projecting points and polygons to (including 'unprojecting' to geographic).




    Putting visually JGH example I have a big polygon in WKID =4326 with a point outside of it...



    WKID 4326



    ...when I project them (say in 3347 to follow JGH example) I get this...



    enter image description here



    where the point now is inside the polygon. I used the ArcGIS Pro 'project' function.



    When I use project setting the optional parameter 'Preserve Shape' as in the following picture.



    enter image description here



    ...I get something definitely better like...



    enter image description here



    where (hopefully) the point stays outside the polygon.
    'Preserve shape' parameter did what outlined by J.R. Extra vertices that provide a better discretization of the polygon in the destination projection....otherwise everything is reduced to projecting 4 vertices and drawing straight lines in the destination space to connect them (producing the indesiderable output of the second picture above)



    Am I getting this right ?










    share|improve this question


























      5












      5








      5


      1






      I have a polygon and a point feature class in some projection. The points are contained within the polygons



      The points are always inside the polygons no matter the projection destination I'm projecting points and polygons to (including 'unprojecting' to geographic).




      Putting visually JGH example I have a big polygon in WKID =4326 with a point outside of it...



      WKID 4326



      ...when I project them (say in 3347 to follow JGH example) I get this...



      enter image description here



      where the point now is inside the polygon. I used the ArcGIS Pro 'project' function.



      When I use project setting the optional parameter 'Preserve Shape' as in the following picture.



      enter image description here



      ...I get something definitely better like...



      enter image description here



      where (hopefully) the point stays outside the polygon.
      'Preserve shape' parameter did what outlined by J.R. Extra vertices that provide a better discretization of the polygon in the destination projection....otherwise everything is reduced to projecting 4 vertices and drawing straight lines in the destination space to connect them (producing the indesiderable output of the second picture above)



      Am I getting this right ?










      share|improve this question
















      I have a polygon and a point feature class in some projection. The points are contained within the polygons



      The points are always inside the polygons no matter the projection destination I'm projecting points and polygons to (including 'unprojecting' to geographic).




      Putting visually JGH example I have a big polygon in WKID =4326 with a point outside of it...



      WKID 4326



      ...when I project them (say in 3347 to follow JGH example) I get this...



      enter image description here



      where the point now is inside the polygon. I used the ArcGIS Pro 'project' function.



      When I use project setting the optional parameter 'Preserve Shape' as in the following picture.



      enter image description here



      ...I get something definitely better like...



      enter image description here



      where (hopefully) the point stays outside the polygon.
      'Preserve shape' parameter did what outlined by J.R. Extra vertices that provide a better discretization of the polygon in the destination projection....otherwise everything is reduced to projecting 4 vertices and drawing straight lines in the destination space to connect them (producing the indesiderable output of the second picture above)



      Am I getting this right ?







      coordinate-system arcgis-pro reprojection-mathematics






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 30 at 10:03









      PolyGeo

      54.3k1784253




      54.3k1784253










      asked May 28 at 16:26









      SupereshekSupereshek

      262




      262




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8














          Some software will use great circle arcs to connect unprojected vertices (sometimes when using a special data type, like PostGIS geography), while projected (or unprojected using the geometry datatype) vertices are connected using straight lines.



          This can result in a point being inside a polygon expressed as geography but outside of it if expressed as geometry



          The following example uses PostGIS. The polygon goes up to latitude 50, the point is at latitude 51.



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((0 0, 50 0, 50 50, 0 50, 0 0))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(25 51)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom::geography,pnt.geom::geography) intersect_geography
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_geography
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t


          Edit



          Extending on @JR comment, here is an example when projecting a huge polygon to a Lambert Conformal Conic projection (3347) and checking the point intersection near the central meridian: we can see a difference of 4 degrees of latitude between the two!



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((-70 45, -130 45, -130 50, -70 50, -70 45))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(-100 54)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(st_transform(poly.geom,3347),st_transform(pnt.geom,3347)) intersect_reproject
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_reproject
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t





          share|improve this answer

























          • Same in SQL server...

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:55


















          2














          Yes. projections will never reproject a point that was inside a polygon in one projection to be outside it in another--unless there's some sort of precision error. I'm not sure what this property is called in geography, but I just realized it's essentially relativistic invariance, which basically says that as time dilates for us, and our coordinate systems are compressed or stretched, no observer in any given frame will disagree on causal ordering of events. Likewise, no matter in what projection an "observer lives", no one will disagree on what points are in what polygons, even if they disagree on exactly how far the points are from the edges of the polygons, and stuff like that.






          share|improve this answer























          • Well, except for horizon clipping, and discontinuous projections, which might throw a monkey wench in topology.

            – Vince
            May 28 at 16:53







          • 3





            Not sure but I think the question come from the way polygon may be incorrectly reprojected as in a big polygon defined by only corner vertex. When reprojecting you will project the corner then reconstruct the polygon by linking the corner with a straight line. In this case a point close to the border could be seen on the other side after reprojecting but that's because the projection is wrong along the length of the side (to prevent that you need to add vertex on the polygon side before reprojecting)

            – J.R
            May 28 at 16:54











          • I hadn't considered horizons or discontinous projections. I guess like in physics geography does have singularities where certain space-time coordinate systems break down; poles are another example.

            – 0mn1
            May 28 at 19:37











          • Yes...as J.R. is saying my question comes from the way a polygon may be incorrectly re-projected. I think ArcGIS 'Project' accounts for this if you use "preserve_shape" optional parameter. It adds extra vertices in order to get a better projected shape.

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:54











          • @J.R I see. Is it correct to say that this happens because the PostGIS geometry is a different projection than the geography? If I connect to points on unprojected data with a straight line, then do the same thing with correct geodesic calculations and add that (apparently) curved line to the map, then there will be points between them. But the straight line was never the correct line for unprojected lon-lat data--it's not like the line is shifting from one side of a point to the other between two projections, rather the geometry projection is wrong.

            – 0mn1
            May 29 at 14:00











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "79"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f324171%2fpoints-within-polygons-in-different-projections%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          8














          Some software will use great circle arcs to connect unprojected vertices (sometimes when using a special data type, like PostGIS geography), while projected (or unprojected using the geometry datatype) vertices are connected using straight lines.



          This can result in a point being inside a polygon expressed as geography but outside of it if expressed as geometry



          The following example uses PostGIS. The polygon goes up to latitude 50, the point is at latitude 51.



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((0 0, 50 0, 50 50, 0 50, 0 0))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(25 51)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom::geography,pnt.geom::geography) intersect_geography
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_geography
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t


          Edit



          Extending on @JR comment, here is an example when projecting a huge polygon to a Lambert Conformal Conic projection (3347) and checking the point intersection near the central meridian: we can see a difference of 4 degrees of latitude between the two!



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((-70 45, -130 45, -130 50, -70 50, -70 45))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(-100 54)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(st_transform(poly.geom,3347),st_transform(pnt.geom,3347)) intersect_reproject
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_reproject
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t





          share|improve this answer

























          • Same in SQL server...

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:55















          8














          Some software will use great circle arcs to connect unprojected vertices (sometimes when using a special data type, like PostGIS geography), while projected (or unprojected using the geometry datatype) vertices are connected using straight lines.



          This can result in a point being inside a polygon expressed as geography but outside of it if expressed as geometry



          The following example uses PostGIS. The polygon goes up to latitude 50, the point is at latitude 51.



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((0 0, 50 0, 50 50, 0 50, 0 0))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(25 51)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom::geography,pnt.geom::geography) intersect_geography
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_geography
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t


          Edit



          Extending on @JR comment, here is an example when projecting a huge polygon to a Lambert Conformal Conic projection (3347) and checking the point intersection near the central meridian: we can see a difference of 4 degrees of latitude between the two!



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((-70 45, -130 45, -130 50, -70 50, -70 45))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(-100 54)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(st_transform(poly.geom,3347),st_transform(pnt.geom,3347)) intersect_reproject
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_reproject
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t





          share|improve this answer

























          • Same in SQL server...

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:55













          8












          8








          8







          Some software will use great circle arcs to connect unprojected vertices (sometimes when using a special data type, like PostGIS geography), while projected (or unprojected using the geometry datatype) vertices are connected using straight lines.



          This can result in a point being inside a polygon expressed as geography but outside of it if expressed as geometry



          The following example uses PostGIS. The polygon goes up to latitude 50, the point is at latitude 51.



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((0 0, 50 0, 50 50, 0 50, 0 0))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(25 51)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom::geography,pnt.geom::geography) intersect_geography
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_geography
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t


          Edit



          Extending on @JR comment, here is an example when projecting a huge polygon to a Lambert Conformal Conic projection (3347) and checking the point intersection near the central meridian: we can see a difference of 4 degrees of latitude between the two!



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((-70 45, -130 45, -130 50, -70 50, -70 45))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(-100 54)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(st_transform(poly.geom,3347),st_transform(pnt.geom,3347)) intersect_reproject
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_reproject
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t





          share|improve this answer















          Some software will use great circle arcs to connect unprojected vertices (sometimes when using a special data type, like PostGIS geography), while projected (or unprojected using the geometry datatype) vertices are connected using straight lines.



          This can result in a point being inside a polygon expressed as geography but outside of it if expressed as geometry



          The following example uses PostGIS. The polygon goes up to latitude 50, the point is at latitude 51.



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((0 0, 50 0, 50 50, 0 50, 0 0))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(25 51)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom::geography,pnt.geom::geography) intersect_geography
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_geography
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t


          Edit



          Extending on @JR comment, here is an example when projecting a huge polygon to a Lambert Conformal Conic projection (3347) and checking the point intersection near the central meridian: we can see a difference of 4 degrees of latitude between the two!



          WITH poly AS (select ST_GeomFromText('polygon((-70 45, -130 45, -130 50, -70 50, -70 45))',4326) as geom),
          pnt AS (select ST_GeomFromText('point(-100 54)',4326) as geom)
          SELECT ST_INTERSECTS(poly.geom,pnt.geom) intersect_geometry,
          ST_INTERSECTS(st_transform(poly.geom,3347),st_transform(pnt.geom,3347)) intersect_reproject
          FROM poly, pnt;

          intersect_geometry | intersect_reproject
          --------------------+---------------------
          f | t






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 29 at 11:21

























          answered May 28 at 17:33









          JGHJGH

          14.4k21439




          14.4k21439












          • Same in SQL server...

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:55

















          • Same in SQL server...

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:55
















          Same in SQL server...

          – Supereshek
          May 29 at 9:55





          Same in SQL server...

          – Supereshek
          May 29 at 9:55













          2














          Yes. projections will never reproject a point that was inside a polygon in one projection to be outside it in another--unless there's some sort of precision error. I'm not sure what this property is called in geography, but I just realized it's essentially relativistic invariance, which basically says that as time dilates for us, and our coordinate systems are compressed or stretched, no observer in any given frame will disagree on causal ordering of events. Likewise, no matter in what projection an "observer lives", no one will disagree on what points are in what polygons, even if they disagree on exactly how far the points are from the edges of the polygons, and stuff like that.






          share|improve this answer























          • Well, except for horizon clipping, and discontinuous projections, which might throw a monkey wench in topology.

            – Vince
            May 28 at 16:53







          • 3





            Not sure but I think the question come from the way polygon may be incorrectly reprojected as in a big polygon defined by only corner vertex. When reprojecting you will project the corner then reconstruct the polygon by linking the corner with a straight line. In this case a point close to the border could be seen on the other side after reprojecting but that's because the projection is wrong along the length of the side (to prevent that you need to add vertex on the polygon side before reprojecting)

            – J.R
            May 28 at 16:54











          • I hadn't considered horizons or discontinous projections. I guess like in physics geography does have singularities where certain space-time coordinate systems break down; poles are another example.

            – 0mn1
            May 28 at 19:37











          • Yes...as J.R. is saying my question comes from the way a polygon may be incorrectly re-projected. I think ArcGIS 'Project' accounts for this if you use "preserve_shape" optional parameter. It adds extra vertices in order to get a better projected shape.

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:54











          • @J.R I see. Is it correct to say that this happens because the PostGIS geometry is a different projection than the geography? If I connect to points on unprojected data with a straight line, then do the same thing with correct geodesic calculations and add that (apparently) curved line to the map, then there will be points between them. But the straight line was never the correct line for unprojected lon-lat data--it's not like the line is shifting from one side of a point to the other between two projections, rather the geometry projection is wrong.

            – 0mn1
            May 29 at 14:00















          2














          Yes. projections will never reproject a point that was inside a polygon in one projection to be outside it in another--unless there's some sort of precision error. I'm not sure what this property is called in geography, but I just realized it's essentially relativistic invariance, which basically says that as time dilates for us, and our coordinate systems are compressed or stretched, no observer in any given frame will disagree on causal ordering of events. Likewise, no matter in what projection an "observer lives", no one will disagree on what points are in what polygons, even if they disagree on exactly how far the points are from the edges of the polygons, and stuff like that.






          share|improve this answer























          • Well, except for horizon clipping, and discontinuous projections, which might throw a monkey wench in topology.

            – Vince
            May 28 at 16:53







          • 3





            Not sure but I think the question come from the way polygon may be incorrectly reprojected as in a big polygon defined by only corner vertex. When reprojecting you will project the corner then reconstruct the polygon by linking the corner with a straight line. In this case a point close to the border could be seen on the other side after reprojecting but that's because the projection is wrong along the length of the side (to prevent that you need to add vertex on the polygon side before reprojecting)

            – J.R
            May 28 at 16:54











          • I hadn't considered horizons or discontinous projections. I guess like in physics geography does have singularities where certain space-time coordinate systems break down; poles are another example.

            – 0mn1
            May 28 at 19:37











          • Yes...as J.R. is saying my question comes from the way a polygon may be incorrectly re-projected. I think ArcGIS 'Project' accounts for this if you use "preserve_shape" optional parameter. It adds extra vertices in order to get a better projected shape.

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:54











          • @J.R I see. Is it correct to say that this happens because the PostGIS geometry is a different projection than the geography? If I connect to points on unprojected data with a straight line, then do the same thing with correct geodesic calculations and add that (apparently) curved line to the map, then there will be points between them. But the straight line was never the correct line for unprojected lon-lat data--it's not like the line is shifting from one side of a point to the other between two projections, rather the geometry projection is wrong.

            – 0mn1
            May 29 at 14:00













          2












          2








          2







          Yes. projections will never reproject a point that was inside a polygon in one projection to be outside it in another--unless there's some sort of precision error. I'm not sure what this property is called in geography, but I just realized it's essentially relativistic invariance, which basically says that as time dilates for us, and our coordinate systems are compressed or stretched, no observer in any given frame will disagree on causal ordering of events. Likewise, no matter in what projection an "observer lives", no one will disagree on what points are in what polygons, even if they disagree on exactly how far the points are from the edges of the polygons, and stuff like that.






          share|improve this answer













          Yes. projections will never reproject a point that was inside a polygon in one projection to be outside it in another--unless there's some sort of precision error. I'm not sure what this property is called in geography, but I just realized it's essentially relativistic invariance, which basically says that as time dilates for us, and our coordinate systems are compressed or stretched, no observer in any given frame will disagree on causal ordering of events. Likewise, no matter in what projection an "observer lives", no one will disagree on what points are in what polygons, even if they disagree on exactly how far the points are from the edges of the polygons, and stuff like that.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered May 28 at 16:37









          0mn10mn1

          784




          784












          • Well, except for horizon clipping, and discontinuous projections, which might throw a monkey wench in topology.

            – Vince
            May 28 at 16:53







          • 3





            Not sure but I think the question come from the way polygon may be incorrectly reprojected as in a big polygon defined by only corner vertex. When reprojecting you will project the corner then reconstruct the polygon by linking the corner with a straight line. In this case a point close to the border could be seen on the other side after reprojecting but that's because the projection is wrong along the length of the side (to prevent that you need to add vertex on the polygon side before reprojecting)

            – J.R
            May 28 at 16:54











          • I hadn't considered horizons or discontinous projections. I guess like in physics geography does have singularities where certain space-time coordinate systems break down; poles are another example.

            – 0mn1
            May 28 at 19:37











          • Yes...as J.R. is saying my question comes from the way a polygon may be incorrectly re-projected. I think ArcGIS 'Project' accounts for this if you use "preserve_shape" optional parameter. It adds extra vertices in order to get a better projected shape.

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:54











          • @J.R I see. Is it correct to say that this happens because the PostGIS geometry is a different projection than the geography? If I connect to points on unprojected data with a straight line, then do the same thing with correct geodesic calculations and add that (apparently) curved line to the map, then there will be points between them. But the straight line was never the correct line for unprojected lon-lat data--it's not like the line is shifting from one side of a point to the other between two projections, rather the geometry projection is wrong.

            – 0mn1
            May 29 at 14:00

















          • Well, except for horizon clipping, and discontinuous projections, which might throw a monkey wench in topology.

            – Vince
            May 28 at 16:53







          • 3





            Not sure but I think the question come from the way polygon may be incorrectly reprojected as in a big polygon defined by only corner vertex. When reprojecting you will project the corner then reconstruct the polygon by linking the corner with a straight line. In this case a point close to the border could be seen on the other side after reprojecting but that's because the projection is wrong along the length of the side (to prevent that you need to add vertex on the polygon side before reprojecting)

            – J.R
            May 28 at 16:54











          • I hadn't considered horizons or discontinous projections. I guess like in physics geography does have singularities where certain space-time coordinate systems break down; poles are another example.

            – 0mn1
            May 28 at 19:37











          • Yes...as J.R. is saying my question comes from the way a polygon may be incorrectly re-projected. I think ArcGIS 'Project' accounts for this if you use "preserve_shape" optional parameter. It adds extra vertices in order to get a better projected shape.

            – Supereshek
            May 29 at 9:54











          • @J.R I see. Is it correct to say that this happens because the PostGIS geometry is a different projection than the geography? If I connect to points on unprojected data with a straight line, then do the same thing with correct geodesic calculations and add that (apparently) curved line to the map, then there will be points between them. But the straight line was never the correct line for unprojected lon-lat data--it's not like the line is shifting from one side of a point to the other between two projections, rather the geometry projection is wrong.

            – 0mn1
            May 29 at 14:00
















          Well, except for horizon clipping, and discontinuous projections, which might throw a monkey wench in topology.

          – Vince
          May 28 at 16:53






          Well, except for horizon clipping, and discontinuous projections, which might throw a monkey wench in topology.

          – Vince
          May 28 at 16:53





          3




          3





          Not sure but I think the question come from the way polygon may be incorrectly reprojected as in a big polygon defined by only corner vertex. When reprojecting you will project the corner then reconstruct the polygon by linking the corner with a straight line. In this case a point close to the border could be seen on the other side after reprojecting but that's because the projection is wrong along the length of the side (to prevent that you need to add vertex on the polygon side before reprojecting)

          – J.R
          May 28 at 16:54





          Not sure but I think the question come from the way polygon may be incorrectly reprojected as in a big polygon defined by only corner vertex. When reprojecting you will project the corner then reconstruct the polygon by linking the corner with a straight line. In this case a point close to the border could be seen on the other side after reprojecting but that's because the projection is wrong along the length of the side (to prevent that you need to add vertex on the polygon side before reprojecting)

          – J.R
          May 28 at 16:54













          I hadn't considered horizons or discontinous projections. I guess like in physics geography does have singularities where certain space-time coordinate systems break down; poles are another example.

          – 0mn1
          May 28 at 19:37





          I hadn't considered horizons or discontinous projections. I guess like in physics geography does have singularities where certain space-time coordinate systems break down; poles are another example.

          – 0mn1
          May 28 at 19:37













          Yes...as J.R. is saying my question comes from the way a polygon may be incorrectly re-projected. I think ArcGIS 'Project' accounts for this if you use "preserve_shape" optional parameter. It adds extra vertices in order to get a better projected shape.

          – Supereshek
          May 29 at 9:54





          Yes...as J.R. is saying my question comes from the way a polygon may be incorrectly re-projected. I think ArcGIS 'Project' accounts for this if you use "preserve_shape" optional parameter. It adds extra vertices in order to get a better projected shape.

          – Supereshek
          May 29 at 9:54













          @J.R I see. Is it correct to say that this happens because the PostGIS geometry is a different projection than the geography? If I connect to points on unprojected data with a straight line, then do the same thing with correct geodesic calculations and add that (apparently) curved line to the map, then there will be points between them. But the straight line was never the correct line for unprojected lon-lat data--it's not like the line is shifting from one side of a point to the other between two projections, rather the geometry projection is wrong.

          – 0mn1
          May 29 at 14:00





          @J.R I see. Is it correct to say that this happens because the PostGIS geometry is a different projection than the geography? If I connect to points on unprojected data with a straight line, then do the same thing with correct geodesic calculations and add that (apparently) curved line to the map, then there will be points between them. But the straight line was never the correct line for unprojected lon-lat data--it's not like the line is shifting from one side of a point to the other between two projections, rather the geometry projection is wrong.

          – 0mn1
          May 29 at 14:00

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f324171%2fpoints-within-polygons-in-different-projections%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

          Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

          Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020