The term for the person/group a political party aligns themselves with to appear concerned about the general publicA word for a person concerned with spellingCorrect term for a group of thirty-two things (or the general rule for anything over twenty) - duotrigectet?Is there a “-nym” word for the members of a political party?What is the word for : “A person who, in general, does not agree with the general/popular opinion”?A single word for a person who encourages terrible rumors about themselves to feel protectedWords for someone whose behavior is in question, and the person who is concernedgeneral term for a group of species whose members are similar to each other?What is a word for a person who is always concerned with what might have been?The term for a Person who is asked to state a negative about themselves, but actually says a positiveGeneric term for the other party to an aggressor's actions
Why would a home insurer offer a discount based on credit score?
Is tuition reimbursement a good idea if you have to stay with the job
Dedicated bike GPS computer over smartphone
Is fission/fusion to iron the most efficient way to convert mass to energy?
Why is linear regression results so much different from Poisson regression?
Tiffeneau–Demjanov rearrangement products
Manager wants to hire me, HR do not, how to proceed?
How do I properly use a function under a class?
Am I allowed to determine tenets of my contract as a warlock?
New Site Design!
Generate parentheses solution
Why didn't all the iron and heavier elements find their way to the center of the accretion disc in the early solar system?
How to remove the empty page that is placed after the ToC, List of figures and List of tables
Plot vectors as sums of vectors along the axes
Fully extended TQFT and lattice models
In The Incredibles 2, why does Screenslaver's name use a pun on something that doesn't exist in the 1950s pastiche?
Idiom for 'person who gets violent when drunk"
Changing the PK column of a data extension without completely recreating it
Do gold quality wild crops yield better seeds?
Why are backslashes included in this shell script?
Can an open source licence be revoked if it violates employer's IP?
How to represent jealousy in a cute way?
What is the theme of analysis?
Approach sick days in feedback meeting
The term for the person/group a political party aligns themselves with to appear concerned about the general public
A word for a person concerned with spellingCorrect term for a group of thirty-two things (or the general rule for anything over twenty) - duotrigectet?Is there a “-nym” word for the members of a political party?What is the word for : “A person who, in general, does not agree with the general/popular opinion”?A single word for a person who encourages terrible rumors about themselves to feel protectedWords for someone whose behavior is in question, and the person who is concernedgeneral term for a group of species whose members are similar to each other?What is a word for a person who is always concerned with what might have been?The term for a Person who is asked to state a negative about themselves, but actually says a positiveGeneric term for the other party to an aggressor's actions
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
A good example would be a president bringing iron workers onstage at a rally to show that he has the workingman's interests at heart.
Sentence: the workers were the president's ____ in attempt to win over public support.
Sentence: the president used the workers as a ____ to win over public support.
"Uncle tom" comes to mind, but it is too specific and implies fault on the group being used. I would prefer a term describing the appropriation going on.
single-word-requests
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
add a comment |
A good example would be a president bringing iron workers onstage at a rally to show that he has the workingman's interests at heart.
Sentence: the workers were the president's ____ in attempt to win over public support.
Sentence: the president used the workers as a ____ to win over public support.
"Uncle tom" comes to mind, but it is too specific and implies fault on the group being used. I would prefer a term describing the appropriation going on.
single-word-requests
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– tchrist♦
Jun 2 at 22:28
add a comment |
A good example would be a president bringing iron workers onstage at a rally to show that he has the workingman's interests at heart.
Sentence: the workers were the president's ____ in attempt to win over public support.
Sentence: the president used the workers as a ____ to win over public support.
"Uncle tom" comes to mind, but it is too specific and implies fault on the group being used. I would prefer a term describing the appropriation going on.
single-word-requests
A good example would be a president bringing iron workers onstage at a rally to show that he has the workingman's interests at heart.
Sentence: the workers were the president's ____ in attempt to win over public support.
Sentence: the president used the workers as a ____ to win over public support.
"Uncle tom" comes to mind, but it is too specific and implies fault on the group being used. I would prefer a term describing the appropriation going on.
single-word-requests
single-word-requests
asked May 28 at 20:01
awsunitawsunit
6615
6615
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– tchrist♦
Jun 2 at 22:28
add a comment |
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– tchrist♦
Jun 2 at 22:28
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– tchrist♦
Jun 2 at 22:28
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– tchrist♦
Jun 2 at 22:28
add a comment |
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.
You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.
"The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."
Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.
2
"Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.
– user888379
May 28 at 20:29
@user888379, props is a very good word!
– Steve
May 28 at 21:18
add a comment |
I like the word prop.
Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect
Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.
1
But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 29 at 18:53
Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.
– Cullub
May 30 at 18:01
add a comment |
Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.
Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support
token English Oxford Living Dictionaries
- a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..
This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.
1
Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.
– TaliesinMerlin
May 28 at 20:46
3
Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.
– user240918
May 28 at 20:54
Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com
– tchrist♦
Jun 2 at 22:26
add a comment |
I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.
someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:
-Cambridge Dictionary online
2
This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 29 at 18:56
2
@EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".
– Steve
May 31 at 8:27
add a comment |
The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:
1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank
2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another
Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.
1
While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.
– eyeballfrog
May 29 at 20:25
add a comment |
Two different words, for two difference sentences.
Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.
From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".
Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.
See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.
1
Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.
– Mazura
May 29 at 20:54
add a comment |
The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.
No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.
add a comment |
The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:
Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:
- The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.
(Cambridge Dictionary)
- the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.
add a comment |
A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:
something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly
So the second sentence would be
The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.
This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:
“Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.
"Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02
The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.
"Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04
add a comment |
The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.
This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.
– awsunit
Jun 1 at 18:35
"Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.
– Joel Croteau
Jun 2 at 22:34
add a comment |
protected by tchrist♦ Jun 2 at 22:25
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.
You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.
"The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."
Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.
2
"Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.
– user888379
May 28 at 20:29
@user888379, props is a very good word!
– Steve
May 28 at 21:18
add a comment |
A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.
You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.
"The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."
Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.
2
"Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.
– user888379
May 28 at 20:29
@user888379, props is a very good word!
– Steve
May 28 at 21:18
add a comment |
A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.
You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.
"The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."
Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.
A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.
You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.
"The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."
Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.
edited May 28 at 20:33
user240918
28.1k1376167
28.1k1376167
answered May 28 at 20:17
SteveSteve
51016
51016
2
"Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.
– user888379
May 28 at 20:29
@user888379, props is a very good word!
– Steve
May 28 at 21:18
add a comment |
2
"Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.
– user888379
May 28 at 20:29
@user888379, props is a very good word!
– Steve
May 28 at 21:18
2
2
"Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.
– user888379
May 28 at 20:29
"Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.
– user888379
May 28 at 20:29
@user888379, props is a very good word!
– Steve
May 28 at 21:18
@user888379, props is a very good word!
– Steve
May 28 at 21:18
add a comment |
I like the word prop.
Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect
Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.
1
But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 29 at 18:53
Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.
– Cullub
May 30 at 18:01
add a comment |
I like the word prop.
Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect
Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.
1
But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 29 at 18:53
Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.
– Cullub
May 30 at 18:01
add a comment |
I like the word prop.
Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect
Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.
I like the word prop.
Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect
Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.
answered May 29 at 13:04
UnhandledExcepSeanUnhandledExcepSean
61847
61847
1
But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 29 at 18:53
Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.
– Cullub
May 30 at 18:01
add a comment |
1
But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 29 at 18:53
Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.
– Cullub
May 30 at 18:01
1
1
But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 29 at 18:53
But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 29 at 18:53
Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.
– Cullub
May 30 at 18:01
Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.
– Cullub
May 30 at 18:01
add a comment |
Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.
Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support
token English Oxford Living Dictionaries
- a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..
This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.
1
Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.
– TaliesinMerlin
May 28 at 20:46
3
Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.
– user240918
May 28 at 20:54
Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com
– tchrist♦
Jun 2 at 22:26
add a comment |
Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.
Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support
token English Oxford Living Dictionaries
- a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..
This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.
1
Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.
– TaliesinMerlin
May 28 at 20:46
3
Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.
– user240918
May 28 at 20:54
Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com
– tchrist♦
Jun 2 at 22:26
add a comment |
Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.
Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support
token English Oxford Living Dictionaries
- a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..
This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.
Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.
Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support
token English Oxford Living Dictionaries
- a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..
This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.
edited Jun 3 at 14:27
answered May 28 at 20:41
David DDavid D
1,468111
1,468111
1
Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.
– TaliesinMerlin
May 28 at 20:46
3
Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.
– user240918
May 28 at 20:54
Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com
– tchrist♦
Jun 2 at 22:26
add a comment |
1
Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.
– TaliesinMerlin
May 28 at 20:46
3
Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.
– user240918
May 28 at 20:54
Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com
– tchrist♦
Jun 2 at 22:26
1
1
Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.
– TaliesinMerlin
May 28 at 20:46
Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.
– TaliesinMerlin
May 28 at 20:46
3
3
Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.
– user240918
May 28 at 20:54
Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.
– user240918
May 28 at 20:54
Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com
– tchrist♦
Jun 2 at 22:26
Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com
– tchrist♦
Jun 2 at 22:26
add a comment |
I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.
someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:
-Cambridge Dictionary online
2
This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 29 at 18:56
2
@EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".
– Steve
May 31 at 8:27
add a comment |
I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.
someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:
-Cambridge Dictionary online
2
This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 29 at 18:56
2
@EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".
– Steve
May 31 at 8:27
add a comment |
I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.
someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:
-Cambridge Dictionary online
I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.
someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:
-Cambridge Dictionary online
edited May 29 at 19:57
Cascabel
8,89863260
8,89863260
answered May 29 at 18:49
adamlaughlinadamlaughlin
912
912
2
This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 29 at 18:56
2
@EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".
– Steve
May 31 at 8:27
add a comment |
2
This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 29 at 18:56
2
@EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".
– Steve
May 31 at 8:27
2
2
This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 29 at 18:56
This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 29 at 18:56
2
2
@EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".
– Steve
May 31 at 8:27
@EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".
– Steve
May 31 at 8:27
add a comment |
The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:
1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank
2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another
Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.
1
While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.
– eyeballfrog
May 29 at 20:25
add a comment |
The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:
1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank
2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another
Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.
1
While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.
– eyeballfrog
May 29 at 20:25
add a comment |
The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:
1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank
2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another
Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.
The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:
1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank
2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another
Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.
edited May 29 at 12:56
answered May 29 at 12:12
cobaltduckcobaltduck
11.8k13475
11.8k13475
1
While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.
– eyeballfrog
May 29 at 20:25
add a comment |
1
While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.
– eyeballfrog
May 29 at 20:25
1
1
While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.
– eyeballfrog
May 29 at 20:25
While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.
– eyeballfrog
May 29 at 20:25
add a comment |
Two different words, for two difference sentences.
Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.
From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".
Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.
See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.
1
Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.
– Mazura
May 29 at 20:54
add a comment |
Two different words, for two difference sentences.
Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.
From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".
Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.
See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.
1
Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.
– Mazura
May 29 at 20:54
add a comment |
Two different words, for two difference sentences.
Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.
From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".
Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.
See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.
Two different words, for two difference sentences.
Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.
From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".
Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.
See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.
answered May 29 at 13:23
RonJohnRonJohn
21117
21117
1
Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.
– Mazura
May 29 at 20:54
add a comment |
1
Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.
– Mazura
May 29 at 20:54
1
1
Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.
– Mazura
May 29 at 20:54
Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.
– Mazura
May 29 at 20:54
add a comment |
The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.
No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.
add a comment |
The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.
No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.
add a comment |
The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.
No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.
The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.
No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.
answered May 30 at 14:45
barbecuebarbecue
4,9431230
4,9431230
add a comment |
add a comment |
The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:
Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:
- The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.
(Cambridge Dictionary)
- the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.
add a comment |
The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:
Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:
- The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.
(Cambridge Dictionary)
- the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.
add a comment |
The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:
Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:
- The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.
(Cambridge Dictionary)
- the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.
The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:
Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:
- The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.
(Cambridge Dictionary)
- the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.
answered May 28 at 20:06
user240918user240918
28.1k1376167
28.1k1376167
add a comment |
add a comment |
A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:
something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly
So the second sentence would be
The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.
This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:
“Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.
"Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02
The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.
"Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04
add a comment |
A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:
something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly
So the second sentence would be
The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.
This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:
“Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.
"Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02
The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.
"Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04
add a comment |
A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:
something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly
So the second sentence would be
The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.
This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:
“Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.
"Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02
The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.
"Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04
A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:
something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly
So the second sentence would be
The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.
This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:
“Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.
"Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02
The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.
"Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04
answered May 29 at 18:13
Michael SeifertMichael Seifert
2,965923
2,965923
add a comment |
add a comment |
The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.
This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.
– awsunit
Jun 1 at 18:35
"Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.
– Joel Croteau
Jun 2 at 22:34
add a comment |
The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.
This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.
– awsunit
Jun 1 at 18:35
"Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.
– Joel Croteau
Jun 2 at 22:34
add a comment |
The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.
The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.
answered May 31 at 16:05
Joel CroteauJoel Croteau
1011
1011
This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.
– awsunit
Jun 1 at 18:35
"Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.
– Joel Croteau
Jun 2 at 22:34
add a comment |
This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.
– awsunit
Jun 1 at 18:35
"Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.
– Joel Croteau
Jun 2 at 22:34
This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.
– awsunit
Jun 1 at 18:35
This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.
– awsunit
Jun 1 at 18:35
"Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.
– Joel Croteau
Jun 2 at 22:34
"Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.
– Joel Croteau
Jun 2 at 22:34
add a comment |
protected by tchrist♦ Jun 2 at 22:25
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– tchrist♦
Jun 2 at 22:28