The term for the person/group a political party aligns themselves with to appear concerned about the general publicA word for a person concerned with spellingCorrect term for a group of thirty-two things (or the general rule for anything over twenty) - duotrigectet?Is there a “-nym” word for the members of a political party?What is the word for : “A person who, in general, does not agree with the general/popular opinion”?A single word for a person who encourages terrible rumors about themselves to feel protectedWords for someone whose behavior is in question, and the person who is concernedgeneral term for a group of species whose members are similar to each other?What is a word for a person who is always concerned with what might have been?The term for a Person who is asked to state a negative about themselves, but actually says a positiveGeneric term for the other party to an aggressor's actions

Why would a home insurer offer a discount based on credit score?

Is tuition reimbursement a good idea if you have to stay with the job

Dedicated bike GPS computer over smartphone

Is fission/fusion to iron the most efficient way to convert mass to energy?

Why is linear regression results so much different from Poisson regression?

Tiffeneau–Demjanov rearrangement products

Manager wants to hire me, HR do not, how to proceed?

How do I properly use a function under a class?

Am I allowed to determine tenets of my contract as a warlock?

New Site Design!

Generate parentheses solution

Why didn't all the iron and heavier elements find their way to the center of the accretion disc in the early solar system?

How to remove the empty page that is placed after the ToC, List of figures and List of tables

Plot vectors as sums of vectors along the axes

Fully extended TQFT and lattice models

In The Incredibles 2, why does Screenslaver's name use a pun on something that doesn't exist in the 1950s pastiche?

Idiom for 'person who gets violent when drunk"

Changing the PK column of a data extension without completely recreating it

Do gold quality wild crops yield better seeds?

Why are backslashes included in this shell script?

Can an open source licence be revoked if it violates employer's IP?

How to represent jealousy in a cute way?

What is the theme of analysis?

Approach sick days in feedback meeting



The term for the person/group a political party aligns themselves with to appear concerned about the general public


A word for a person concerned with spellingCorrect term for a group of thirty-two things (or the general rule for anything over twenty) - duotrigectet?Is there a “-nym” word for the members of a political party?What is the word for : “A person who, in general, does not agree with the general/popular opinion”?A single word for a person who encourages terrible rumors about themselves to feel protectedWords for someone whose behavior is in question, and the person who is concernedgeneral term for a group of species whose members are similar to each other?What is a word for a person who is always concerned with what might have been?The term for a Person who is asked to state a negative about themselves, but actually says a positiveGeneric term for the other party to an aggressor's actions






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








12















A good example would be a president bringing iron workers onstage at a rally to show that he has the workingman's interests at heart.



Sentence: the workers were the president's ____ in attempt to win over public support.



Sentence: the president used the workers as a ____ to win over public support.



"Uncle tom" comes to mind, but it is too specific and implies fault on the group being used. I would prefer a term describing the appropriation going on.










share|improve this question












We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.














  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – tchrist
    Jun 2 at 22:28

















12















A good example would be a president bringing iron workers onstage at a rally to show that he has the workingman's interests at heart.



Sentence: the workers were the president's ____ in attempt to win over public support.



Sentence: the president used the workers as a ____ to win over public support.



"Uncle tom" comes to mind, but it is too specific and implies fault on the group being used. I would prefer a term describing the appropriation going on.










share|improve this question












We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.














  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – tchrist
    Jun 2 at 22:28













12












12








12


3






A good example would be a president bringing iron workers onstage at a rally to show that he has the workingman's interests at heart.



Sentence: the workers were the president's ____ in attempt to win over public support.



Sentence: the president used the workers as a ____ to win over public support.



"Uncle tom" comes to mind, but it is too specific and implies fault on the group being used. I would prefer a term describing the appropriation going on.










share|improve this question














A good example would be a president bringing iron workers onstage at a rally to show that he has the workingman's interests at heart.



Sentence: the workers were the president's ____ in attempt to win over public support.



Sentence: the president used the workers as a ____ to win over public support.



"Uncle tom" comes to mind, but it is too specific and implies fault on the group being used. I would prefer a term describing the appropriation going on.







single-word-requests






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 28 at 20:01









awsunitawsunit

6615




6615



We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.




We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.













  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – tchrist
    Jun 2 at 22:28

















  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – tchrist
    Jun 2 at 22:28
















Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

– tchrist
Jun 2 at 22:28





Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

– tchrist
Jun 2 at 22:28










10 Answers
10






active

oldest

votes


















8














A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.



You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.



"The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."



Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    "Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.

    – user888379
    May 28 at 20:29











  • @user888379, props is a very good word!

    – Steve
    May 28 at 21:18


















35














I like the word prop.




Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect




Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 29 at 18:53











  • Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.

    – Cullub
    May 30 at 18:01


















14















Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.



Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support




token English Oxford Living Dictionaries




  1. a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..



This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    May 28 at 20:46







  • 3





    Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.

    – user240918
    May 28 at 20:54











  • Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com

    – tchrist
    Jun 2 at 22:26


















9














I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.




someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:




-Cambridge Dictionary online






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 29 at 18:56







  • 2





    @EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".

    – Steve
    May 31 at 8:27


















7














The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:




1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank



2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another




Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.

    – eyeballfrog
    May 29 at 20:25


















3














Two different words, for two difference sentences.




Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.




From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".




Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.




See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.

    – Mazura
    May 29 at 20:54


















3














The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.




No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.







share|improve this answer






























    1














    The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:




    Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:



    • The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.



    (Cambridge Dictionary)



    • the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.





    share|improve this answer






























      1














      A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:




      something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly




      So the second sentence would be




      The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.




      This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:




      “Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.




      "Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02




      The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.




      "Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04






      share|improve this answer






























        0














        The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.






        share|improve this answer























        • This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.

          – awsunit
          Jun 1 at 18:35











        • "Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.

          – Joel Croteau
          Jun 2 at 22:34









        protected by tchrist Jun 2 at 22:25



        Thank you for your interest in this question.
        Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



        Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














        10 Answers
        10






        active

        oldest

        votes








        10 Answers
        10






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        8














        A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.



        You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.



        "The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."



        Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.






        share|improve this answer




















        • 2





          "Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.

          – user888379
          May 28 at 20:29











        • @user888379, props is a very good word!

          – Steve
          May 28 at 21:18















        8














        A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.



        You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.



        "The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."



        Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.






        share|improve this answer




















        • 2





          "Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.

          – user888379
          May 28 at 20:29











        • @user888379, props is a very good word!

          – Steve
          May 28 at 21:18













        8












        8








        8







        A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.



        You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.



        "The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."



        Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.






        share|improve this answer















        A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.



        You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.



        "The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."



        Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 28 at 20:33









        user240918

        28.1k1376167




        28.1k1376167










        answered May 28 at 20:17









        SteveSteve

        51016




        51016







        • 2





          "Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.

          – user888379
          May 28 at 20:29











        • @user888379, props is a very good word!

          – Steve
          May 28 at 21:18












        • 2





          "Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.

          – user888379
          May 28 at 20:29











        • @user888379, props is a very good word!

          – Steve
          May 28 at 21:18







        2




        2





        "Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.

        – user888379
        May 28 at 20:29





        "Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.

        – user888379
        May 28 at 20:29













        @user888379, props is a very good word!

        – Steve
        May 28 at 21:18





        @user888379, props is a very good word!

        – Steve
        May 28 at 21:18













        35














        I like the word prop.




        Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect




        Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.






        share|improve this answer


















        • 1





          But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:53











        • Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.

          – Cullub
          May 30 at 18:01















        35














        I like the word prop.




        Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect




        Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.






        share|improve this answer


















        • 1





          But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:53











        • Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.

          – Cullub
          May 30 at 18:01













        35












        35








        35







        I like the word prop.




        Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect




        Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.






        share|improve this answer













        I like the word prop.




        Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect




        Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 29 at 13:04









        UnhandledExcepSeanUnhandledExcepSean

        61847




        61847







        • 1





          But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:53











        • Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.

          – Cullub
          May 30 at 18:01












        • 1





          But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:53











        • Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.

          – Cullub
          May 30 at 18:01







        1




        1





        But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.

        – Edwin Ashworth
        May 29 at 18:53





        But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.

        – Edwin Ashworth
        May 29 at 18:53













        Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.

        – Cullub
        May 30 at 18:01





        Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.

        – Cullub
        May 30 at 18:01











        14















        Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.



        Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support




        token English Oxford Living Dictionaries




        1. a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..



        This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.






        share|improve this answer




















        • 1





          Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.

          – TaliesinMerlin
          May 28 at 20:46







        • 3





          Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.

          – user240918
          May 28 at 20:54











        • Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com

          – tchrist
          Jun 2 at 22:26















        14















        Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.



        Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support




        token English Oxford Living Dictionaries




        1. a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..



        This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.






        share|improve this answer




















        • 1





          Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.

          – TaliesinMerlin
          May 28 at 20:46







        • 3





          Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.

          – user240918
          May 28 at 20:54











        • Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com

          – tchrist
          Jun 2 at 22:26













        14












        14








        14








        Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.



        Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support




        token English Oxford Living Dictionaries




        1. a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..



        This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.






        share|improve this answer
















        Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.



        Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support




        token English Oxford Living Dictionaries




        1. a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..



        This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Jun 3 at 14:27

























        answered May 28 at 20:41









        David DDavid D

        1,468111




        1,468111







        • 1





          Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.

          – TaliesinMerlin
          May 28 at 20:46







        • 3





          Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.

          – user240918
          May 28 at 20:54











        • Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com

          – tchrist
          Jun 2 at 22:26












        • 1





          Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.

          – TaliesinMerlin
          May 28 at 20:46







        • 3





          Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.

          – user240918
          May 28 at 20:54











        • Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com

          – tchrist
          Jun 2 at 22:26







        1




        1





        Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.

        – TaliesinMerlin
        May 28 at 20:46






        Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.

        – TaliesinMerlin
        May 28 at 20:46





        3




        3





        Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.

        – user240918
        May 28 at 20:54





        Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.

        – user240918
        May 28 at 20:54













        Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com

        – tchrist
        Jun 2 at 22:26





        Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com

        – tchrist
        Jun 2 at 22:26











        9














        I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.




        someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:




        -Cambridge Dictionary online






        share|improve this answer




















        • 2





          This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:56







        • 2





          @EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".

          – Steve
          May 31 at 8:27















        9














        I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.




        someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:




        -Cambridge Dictionary online






        share|improve this answer




















        • 2





          This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:56







        • 2





          @EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".

          – Steve
          May 31 at 8:27













        9












        9








        9







        I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.




        someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:




        -Cambridge Dictionary online






        share|improve this answer















        I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.




        someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:




        -Cambridge Dictionary online







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 29 at 19:57









        Cascabel

        8,89863260




        8,89863260










        answered May 29 at 18:49









        adamlaughlinadamlaughlin

        912




        912







        • 2





          This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:56







        • 2





          @EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".

          – Steve
          May 31 at 8:27












        • 2





          This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:56







        • 2





          @EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".

          – Steve
          May 31 at 8:27







        2




        2





        This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.

        – Edwin Ashworth
        May 29 at 18:56






        This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.

        – Edwin Ashworth
        May 29 at 18:56





        2




        2





        @EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".

        – Steve
        May 31 at 8:27





        @EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".

        – Steve
        May 31 at 8:27











        7














        The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:




        1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank



        2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another




        Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.






        share|improve this answer




















        • 1





          While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.

          – eyeballfrog
          May 29 at 20:25















        7














        The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:




        1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank



        2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another




        Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.






        share|improve this answer




















        • 1





          While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.

          – eyeballfrog
          May 29 at 20:25













        7












        7








        7







        The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:




        1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank



        2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another




        Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.






        share|improve this answer















        The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:




        1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank



        2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another




        Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 29 at 12:56

























        answered May 29 at 12:12









        cobaltduckcobaltduck

        11.8k13475




        11.8k13475







        • 1





          While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.

          – eyeballfrog
          May 29 at 20:25












        • 1





          While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.

          – eyeballfrog
          May 29 at 20:25







        1




        1





        While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.

        – eyeballfrog
        May 29 at 20:25





        While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.

        – eyeballfrog
        May 29 at 20:25











        3














        Two different words, for two difference sentences.




        Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.




        From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".




        Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.




        See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.






        share|improve this answer


















        • 1





          Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.

          – Mazura
          May 29 at 20:54















        3














        Two different words, for two difference sentences.




        Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.




        From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".




        Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.




        See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.






        share|improve this answer


















        • 1





          Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.

          – Mazura
          May 29 at 20:54













        3












        3








        3







        Two different words, for two difference sentences.




        Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.




        From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".




        Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.




        See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.






        share|improve this answer













        Two different words, for two difference sentences.




        Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.




        From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".




        Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.




        See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 29 at 13:23









        RonJohnRonJohn

        21117




        21117







        • 1





          Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.

          – Mazura
          May 29 at 20:54












        • 1





          Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.

          – Mazura
          May 29 at 20:54







        1




        1





        Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.

        – Mazura
        May 29 at 20:54





        Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.

        – Mazura
        May 29 at 20:54











        3














        The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.




        No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.







        share|improve this answer



























          3














          The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.




          No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.







          share|improve this answer

























            3












            3








            3







            The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.




            No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.







            share|improve this answer













            The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.




            No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered May 30 at 14:45









            barbecuebarbecue

            4,9431230




            4,9431230





















                1














                The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:




                Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:



                • The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.



                (Cambridge Dictionary)



                • the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.





                share|improve this answer



























                  1














                  The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:




                  Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:



                  • The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.



                  (Cambridge Dictionary)



                  • the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.





                  share|improve this answer

























                    1












                    1








                    1







                    The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:




                    Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:



                    • The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.



                    (Cambridge Dictionary)



                    • the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.





                    share|improve this answer













                    The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:




                    Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:



                    • The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.



                    (Cambridge Dictionary)



                    • the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.






                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered May 28 at 20:06









                    user240918user240918

                    28.1k1376167




                    28.1k1376167





















                        1














                        A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:




                        something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly




                        So the second sentence would be




                        The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.




                        This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:




                        “Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.




                        "Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02




                        The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.




                        "Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04






                        share|improve this answer



























                          1














                          A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:




                          something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly




                          So the second sentence would be




                          The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.




                          This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:




                          “Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.




                          "Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02




                          The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.




                          "Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04






                          share|improve this answer

























                            1












                            1








                            1







                            A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:




                            something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly




                            So the second sentence would be




                            The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.




                            This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:




                            “Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.




                            "Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02




                            The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.




                            "Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04






                            share|improve this answer













                            A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:




                            something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly




                            So the second sentence would be




                            The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.




                            This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:




                            “Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.




                            "Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02




                            The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.




                            "Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered May 29 at 18:13









                            Michael SeifertMichael Seifert

                            2,965923




                            2,965923





















                                0














                                The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.






                                share|improve this answer























                                • This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.

                                  – awsunit
                                  Jun 1 at 18:35











                                • "Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.

                                  – Joel Croteau
                                  Jun 2 at 22:34















                                0














                                The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.






                                share|improve this answer























                                • This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.

                                  – awsunit
                                  Jun 1 at 18:35











                                • "Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.

                                  – Joel Croteau
                                  Jun 2 at 22:34













                                0












                                0








                                0







                                The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.






                                share|improve this answer













                                The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.







                                share|improve this answer












                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer










                                answered May 31 at 16:05









                                Joel CroteauJoel Croteau

                                1011




                                1011












                                • This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.

                                  – awsunit
                                  Jun 1 at 18:35











                                • "Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.

                                  – Joel Croteau
                                  Jun 2 at 22:34

















                                • This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.

                                  – awsunit
                                  Jun 1 at 18:35











                                • "Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.

                                  – Joel Croteau
                                  Jun 2 at 22:34
















                                This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.

                                – awsunit
                                Jun 1 at 18:35





                                This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.

                                – awsunit
                                Jun 1 at 18:35













                                "Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.

                                – Joel Croteau
                                Jun 2 at 22:34





                                "Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.

                                – Joel Croteau
                                Jun 2 at 22:34





                                protected by tchrist Jun 2 at 22:25



                                Thank you for your interest in this question.
                                Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                                Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

                                Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

                                What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company