Should I run RG8x / mini8 zip tied to a cat 5e ethernet cable?How to detect common-mode currents or “RF in the shack”?What should I consider when choosing a coaxial cable?How to choose a coaxial cableUsing cable coax rg 11Will coaxial cable degrade over time?Could I run a Zepp antenna from a telegraph pole underneath a mains cable?How should I measure RFI on the headset cable from a hand-talkie?Current flow in a coaxial cableSuspected Damage in Coax CableIs this the Correct Ferrite Core to Reduce RFI as a Common Mode Choke?RG-213 Cable with electric strained wire as metallic shield of Coaxial cable

Is it true that "only photographers care about noise"?

Can you open the door or die? v2

Purpose of cylindrical attachments on Power Transmission towers

Is Jesus the last Prophet?

Someone who is granted access to information but not expected to read it

David slept with Bathsheba because she was pure?? What does that mean?

Placement of positioning lights on A320 winglets

Undocumented incompatibility between changes and siunitx?

Does WiFi affect the quality of images downloaded from the internet?

Can we decompose every group element to elements of order 2? (using Cayley's theorem to identificate the group with permutations)

Must I use my personal social media account for work?

What's the relation between у.е. to USD?

Remove the small black rectangle that appears at the end of environment

Is there a radar system monitoring the UK mainland border?

What is the theme of analysis?

Why did the AvroCar fail to fly above 3 feet?

Why does there seem to be an extreme lack of public trashcans in Taiwan?

Keeping track of theme when improvising

Jam with honey & without pectin has a saucy consistency always

Is fission/fusion to iron the most efficient way to convert mass to energy?

Can I use 220 V outlets on a 15 ampere breaker and wire it up as 110 V?

Why would a home insurer offer a discount based on credit score?

Was the Lonely Mountain, where Smaug lived, a volcano?

Is it possible to have battery technology that can't be duplicated?



Should I run RG8x / mini8 zip tied to a cat 5e ethernet cable?


How to detect common-mode currents or “RF in the shack”?What should I consider when choosing a coaxial cable?How to choose a coaxial cableUsing cable coax rg 11Will coaxial cable degrade over time?Could I run a Zepp antenna from a telegraph pole underneath a mains cable?How should I measure RFI on the headset cable from a hand-talkie?Current flow in a coaxial cableSuspected Damage in Coax CableIs this the Correct Ferrite Core to Reduce RFI as a Common Mode Choke?RG-213 Cable with electric strained wire as metallic shield of Coaxial cable













2












$begingroup$


I'm running a feed line from the end of my amplifier to the antenna for HF transmissions. I'm using RG8x / mini 8. There's an existing pathway through my house I'd like to use that has a cat 5e ethernet cable.



I'd like to just push the coax through the same conduit as the ethernet, they'll be laying on top of each other for maybe 10 feet, outer jackets touching. In a couple of areas they'll end up zip tied next to each other. Does this create any interference that would be detectable? I'll be running up to max legal power (US / FCC).










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What is the maximum power that your amplifier is capable of? And what is the highest band? A correct answer depends on knowing that information.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    May 28 at 18:28







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    BTW, welcome to this site! Check your email.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    May 28 at 20:21















2












$begingroup$


I'm running a feed line from the end of my amplifier to the antenna for HF transmissions. I'm using RG8x / mini 8. There's an existing pathway through my house I'd like to use that has a cat 5e ethernet cable.



I'd like to just push the coax through the same conduit as the ethernet, they'll be laying on top of each other for maybe 10 feet, outer jackets touching. In a couple of areas they'll end up zip tied next to each other. Does this create any interference that would be detectable? I'll be running up to max legal power (US / FCC).










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What is the maximum power that your amplifier is capable of? And what is the highest band? A correct answer depends on knowing that information.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    May 28 at 18:28







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    BTW, welcome to this site! Check your email.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    May 28 at 20:21













2












2








2





$begingroup$


I'm running a feed line from the end of my amplifier to the antenna for HF transmissions. I'm using RG8x / mini 8. There's an existing pathway through my house I'd like to use that has a cat 5e ethernet cable.



I'd like to just push the coax through the same conduit as the ethernet, they'll be laying on top of each other for maybe 10 feet, outer jackets touching. In a couple of areas they'll end up zip tied next to each other. Does this create any interference that would be detectable? I'll be running up to max legal power (US / FCC).










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm running a feed line from the end of my amplifier to the antenna for HF transmissions. I'm using RG8x / mini 8. There's an existing pathway through my house I'd like to use that has a cat 5e ethernet cable.



I'd like to just push the coax through the same conduit as the ethernet, they'll be laying on top of each other for maybe 10 feet, outer jackets touching. In a couple of areas they'll end up zip tied next to each other. Does this create any interference that would be detectable? I'll be running up to max legal power (US / FCC).







antenna rfi coaxial-cable






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 28 at 15:15









EricEric

1163




1163











  • $begingroup$
    What is the maximum power that your amplifier is capable of? And what is the highest band? A correct answer depends on knowing that information.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    May 28 at 18:28







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    BTW, welcome to this site! Check your email.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    May 28 at 20:21
















  • $begingroup$
    What is the maximum power that your amplifier is capable of? And what is the highest band? A correct answer depends on knowing that information.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    May 28 at 18:28







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    BTW, welcome to this site! Check your email.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    May 28 at 20:21















$begingroup$
What is the maximum power that your amplifier is capable of? And what is the highest band? A correct answer depends on knowing that information.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
May 28 at 18:28





$begingroup$
What is the maximum power that your amplifier is capable of? And what is the highest band? A correct answer depends on knowing that information.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
May 28 at 18:28





1




1




$begingroup$
BTW, welcome to this site! Check your email.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
May 28 at 20:21




$begingroup$
BTW, welcome to this site! Check your email.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
May 28 at 20:21










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

No.



In fact, you shouldn't use RG-8X at all. Belden's specifications put the maximum power at 1000 W at 10 MHz, and 370 W at 50 MHz. The maximum power on most HF bands is 1500 W, so you'll be significantly exceeding the ratings of the cable.



Also keep in mind a cable in an enclosed space will run hotter than one with natural convection, so some derating may be appropriate.



Provided however you operate within the cable's specifications, use a high quality cable, and the cat 5 isn't connected to something extremely sensitive to RF, running other cables bundled with the coax is probably fine. See the datasheet for the isolation the shield provides: if there's not a datasheet then it's not a high quality cable. Do be sure to check for common-mode current, and mitigate as necessary, as this is likely the more significant coupling mechanism compared to leakage through the shield.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If the cable is hidden behind a wall or similar this would be even worse, as there would be nowhere for excess heat to dissipate. This could lead to a lot of heat in an enclosed space, and the consequences of that don’t bear thinking about
    $endgroup$
    – Scott Earle
    May 28 at 15:43










  • $begingroup$
    I submit those consequences "do bear thinking about"!
    $endgroup$
    – K7PEH
    May 28 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Phil if I keep it to 100 watts (I can run without the amp at home) that would take care of the cable rating, but what about the interference side?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric
    May 28 at 16:09










  • $begingroup$
    There could also be an issue with the zip ties if you tighten them enough to pinch either of the cables.
    $endgroup$
    – mrog
    May 28 at 18:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Phil's answer and the comments here so far are most likely correct. However, until we know what power and the maximum frequency the OP with be using ... For all we know, he's only on 160 thru 40 and running 500 watts. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    May 28 at 19:01











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "520"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14605%2fshould-i-run-rg8x-mini8-zip-tied-to-a-cat-5e-ethernet-cable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

No.



In fact, you shouldn't use RG-8X at all. Belden's specifications put the maximum power at 1000 W at 10 MHz, and 370 W at 50 MHz. The maximum power on most HF bands is 1500 W, so you'll be significantly exceeding the ratings of the cable.



Also keep in mind a cable in an enclosed space will run hotter than one with natural convection, so some derating may be appropriate.



Provided however you operate within the cable's specifications, use a high quality cable, and the cat 5 isn't connected to something extremely sensitive to RF, running other cables bundled with the coax is probably fine. See the datasheet for the isolation the shield provides: if there's not a datasheet then it's not a high quality cable. Do be sure to check for common-mode current, and mitigate as necessary, as this is likely the more significant coupling mechanism compared to leakage through the shield.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If the cable is hidden behind a wall or similar this would be even worse, as there would be nowhere for excess heat to dissipate. This could lead to a lot of heat in an enclosed space, and the consequences of that don’t bear thinking about
    $endgroup$
    – Scott Earle
    May 28 at 15:43










  • $begingroup$
    I submit those consequences "do bear thinking about"!
    $endgroup$
    – K7PEH
    May 28 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Phil if I keep it to 100 watts (I can run without the amp at home) that would take care of the cable rating, but what about the interference side?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric
    May 28 at 16:09










  • $begingroup$
    There could also be an issue with the zip ties if you tighten them enough to pinch either of the cables.
    $endgroup$
    – mrog
    May 28 at 18:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Phil's answer and the comments here so far are most likely correct. However, until we know what power and the maximum frequency the OP with be using ... For all we know, he's only on 160 thru 40 and running 500 watts. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    May 28 at 19:01















3












$begingroup$

No.



In fact, you shouldn't use RG-8X at all. Belden's specifications put the maximum power at 1000 W at 10 MHz, and 370 W at 50 MHz. The maximum power on most HF bands is 1500 W, so you'll be significantly exceeding the ratings of the cable.



Also keep in mind a cable in an enclosed space will run hotter than one with natural convection, so some derating may be appropriate.



Provided however you operate within the cable's specifications, use a high quality cable, and the cat 5 isn't connected to something extremely sensitive to RF, running other cables bundled with the coax is probably fine. See the datasheet for the isolation the shield provides: if there's not a datasheet then it's not a high quality cable. Do be sure to check for common-mode current, and mitigate as necessary, as this is likely the more significant coupling mechanism compared to leakage through the shield.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If the cable is hidden behind a wall or similar this would be even worse, as there would be nowhere for excess heat to dissipate. This could lead to a lot of heat in an enclosed space, and the consequences of that don’t bear thinking about
    $endgroup$
    – Scott Earle
    May 28 at 15:43










  • $begingroup$
    I submit those consequences "do bear thinking about"!
    $endgroup$
    – K7PEH
    May 28 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Phil if I keep it to 100 watts (I can run without the amp at home) that would take care of the cable rating, but what about the interference side?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric
    May 28 at 16:09










  • $begingroup$
    There could also be an issue with the zip ties if you tighten them enough to pinch either of the cables.
    $endgroup$
    – mrog
    May 28 at 18:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Phil's answer and the comments here so far are most likely correct. However, until we know what power and the maximum frequency the OP with be using ... For all we know, he's only on 160 thru 40 and running 500 watts. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    May 28 at 19:01













3












3








3





$begingroup$

No.



In fact, you shouldn't use RG-8X at all. Belden's specifications put the maximum power at 1000 W at 10 MHz, and 370 W at 50 MHz. The maximum power on most HF bands is 1500 W, so you'll be significantly exceeding the ratings of the cable.



Also keep in mind a cable in an enclosed space will run hotter than one with natural convection, so some derating may be appropriate.



Provided however you operate within the cable's specifications, use a high quality cable, and the cat 5 isn't connected to something extremely sensitive to RF, running other cables bundled with the coax is probably fine. See the datasheet for the isolation the shield provides: if there's not a datasheet then it's not a high quality cable. Do be sure to check for common-mode current, and mitigate as necessary, as this is likely the more significant coupling mechanism compared to leakage through the shield.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



No.



In fact, you shouldn't use RG-8X at all. Belden's specifications put the maximum power at 1000 W at 10 MHz, and 370 W at 50 MHz. The maximum power on most HF bands is 1500 W, so you'll be significantly exceeding the ratings of the cable.



Also keep in mind a cable in an enclosed space will run hotter than one with natural convection, so some derating may be appropriate.



Provided however you operate within the cable's specifications, use a high quality cable, and the cat 5 isn't connected to something extremely sensitive to RF, running other cables bundled with the coax is probably fine. See the datasheet for the isolation the shield provides: if there's not a datasheet then it's not a high quality cable. Do be sure to check for common-mode current, and mitigate as necessary, as this is likely the more significant coupling mechanism compared to leakage through the shield.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 28 at 17:33

























answered May 28 at 15:39









Phil Frost - W8IIPhil Frost - W8II

30.2k148118




30.2k148118







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If the cable is hidden behind a wall or similar this would be even worse, as there would be nowhere for excess heat to dissipate. This could lead to a lot of heat in an enclosed space, and the consequences of that don’t bear thinking about
    $endgroup$
    – Scott Earle
    May 28 at 15:43










  • $begingroup$
    I submit those consequences "do bear thinking about"!
    $endgroup$
    – K7PEH
    May 28 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Phil if I keep it to 100 watts (I can run without the amp at home) that would take care of the cable rating, but what about the interference side?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric
    May 28 at 16:09










  • $begingroup$
    There could also be an issue with the zip ties if you tighten them enough to pinch either of the cables.
    $endgroup$
    – mrog
    May 28 at 18:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Phil's answer and the comments here so far are most likely correct. However, until we know what power and the maximum frequency the OP with be using ... For all we know, he's only on 160 thru 40 and running 500 watts. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    May 28 at 19:01












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If the cable is hidden behind a wall or similar this would be even worse, as there would be nowhere for excess heat to dissipate. This could lead to a lot of heat in an enclosed space, and the consequences of that don’t bear thinking about
    $endgroup$
    – Scott Earle
    May 28 at 15:43










  • $begingroup$
    I submit those consequences "do bear thinking about"!
    $endgroup$
    – K7PEH
    May 28 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Phil if I keep it to 100 watts (I can run without the amp at home) that would take care of the cable rating, but what about the interference side?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric
    May 28 at 16:09










  • $begingroup$
    There could also be an issue with the zip ties if you tighten them enough to pinch either of the cables.
    $endgroup$
    – mrog
    May 28 at 18:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Phil's answer and the comments here so far are most likely correct. However, until we know what power and the maximum frequency the OP with be using ... For all we know, he's only on 160 thru 40 and running 500 watts. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    May 28 at 19:01







1




1




$begingroup$
If the cable is hidden behind a wall or similar this would be even worse, as there would be nowhere for excess heat to dissipate. This could lead to a lot of heat in an enclosed space, and the consequences of that don’t bear thinking about
$endgroup$
– Scott Earle
May 28 at 15:43




$begingroup$
If the cable is hidden behind a wall or similar this would be even worse, as there would be nowhere for excess heat to dissipate. This could lead to a lot of heat in an enclosed space, and the consequences of that don’t bear thinking about
$endgroup$
– Scott Earle
May 28 at 15:43












$begingroup$
I submit those consequences "do bear thinking about"!
$endgroup$
– K7PEH
May 28 at 15:50




$begingroup$
I submit those consequences "do bear thinking about"!
$endgroup$
– K7PEH
May 28 at 15:50












$begingroup$
@Phil if I keep it to 100 watts (I can run without the amp at home) that would take care of the cable rating, but what about the interference side?
$endgroup$
– Eric
May 28 at 16:09




$begingroup$
@Phil if I keep it to 100 watts (I can run without the amp at home) that would take care of the cable rating, but what about the interference side?
$endgroup$
– Eric
May 28 at 16:09












$begingroup$
There could also be an issue with the zip ties if you tighten them enough to pinch either of the cables.
$endgroup$
– mrog
May 28 at 18:13




$begingroup$
There could also be an issue with the zip ties if you tighten them enough to pinch either of the cables.
$endgroup$
– mrog
May 28 at 18:13




1




1




$begingroup$
Phil's answer and the comments here so far are most likely correct. However, until we know what power and the maximum frequency the OP with be using ... For all we know, he's only on 160 thru 40 and running 500 watts. :-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
May 28 at 19:01




$begingroup$
Phil's answer and the comments here so far are most likely correct. However, until we know what power and the maximum frequency the OP with be using ... For all we know, he's only on 160 thru 40 and running 500 watts. :-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
May 28 at 19:01

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Amateur Radio Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14605%2fshould-i-run-rg8x-mini8-zip-tied-to-a-cat-5e-ethernet-cable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020