Troubleshooting kerberos problems with SambaProvide Samba access based on LDAP info?Authenticating Windows 7 against MIT Kerberos 5Issues with Kerberos trying to log on Samba 4 Active Directory Domain Controller from WindowsKerberos Authenticator Encryption Type NULLPossible to authenticate Samba via Kerberos but without domain-join?Auth fail on Samba server with LDAP backend‏Powerbroker Open : Cannot automount CIFS share, where is the kerberos ticket?Windows 7 : Application cannot write to shared folder - Access deniedSet up Samba with Active Directory and local user authenticationSamba ADS: Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

C++ logging library

Why do radiation hardened IC packages often have long leads?

What is the Leave No Trace way to dispose of coffee grounds?

Find all letter Combinations of a Phone Number

Why do the Tie-fighter pilot helmets have similar ridges as the rebels?

Was Self-modifying-code possible just using BASIC?

Is Dumbledore a human lie detector?

Why would a home insurer offer a discount based on credit score?

If absolute velocity does not exist, how can we say a rocket accelerates in empty space?

Housemarks (superimposed & combined letters, heraldry)

Do you need to let the DM know when you are multiclassing?

Use 1 9 6 2 in this order to make 75

Can you make an identity from this product?

How many sets of dice do I need for D&D?

How was the airlock installed on the Space Shuttle mid deck?

Why isn't Bash trap working if output is redirected to stdout?

Grep Match and extract

What is the reason for setting flaps 1 on the ground at high temperatures?

Rail-to-rail op-amp only reaches 90% of VCC, works sometimes, not everytime

A Salute to Poetry

If the pressure inside and outside a balloon balance, then why does air leave when it pops?

Remove border lines of SRTM tiles rendered as hillshade

Suppose leased car is totalled: what are financial implications?

What would be the way to say "just saying" in German? (Not the literal translation)



Troubleshooting kerberos problems with Samba


Provide Samba access based on LDAP info?Authenticating Windows 7 against MIT Kerberos 5Issues with Kerberos trying to log on Samba 4 Active Directory Domain Controller from WindowsKerberos Authenticator Encryption Type NULLPossible to authenticate Samba via Kerberos but without domain-join?Auth fail on Samba server with LDAP backend‏Powerbroker Open : Cannot automount CIFS share, where is the kerberos ticket?Windows 7 : Application cannot write to shared folder - Access deniedSet up Samba with Active Directory and local user authenticationSamba ADS: Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








0















I've run into an odd problem with Samba 3.6.23. Right now I have a Windows 2008 R2 machine that has trouble accessing shares on a domained Samba box.




  • \example_servmy_share : Fails with LOGIN FAILURE


  • \172.16.102.19my_share : Works just fine.

When I set smbd to debug logging, I get this:



[2015/03/23 17:33:03.306499, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:662(reply_spnego_negotiate)
reply_spnego_negotiate: Got secblob of size 1840
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.306939, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:386(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:386: found previous password
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.315587, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [18] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.319930, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [17] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.320027, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [23] failed to decrypt with error Decrypt integrity check failed
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.320101, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [1] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.320162, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [3] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.328693, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [18] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.332985, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [17] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333065, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [23] failed to decrypt with error Decrypt integrity check failed
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333128, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [1] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333192, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [3] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333234, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:638(ads_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:638: krb5_rd_req with auth failed (Bad encryption type)
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333264, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:648(ads_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:648: returning error NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE


Which was enough to point me at something kerberos-y. So I did a bit of tcpdumping, and learned that different login methods are negotiated for machine-name and ip-only styles. When accessing via machine-name, it attempts a kerberos login and fails. When accessing via IP-address, it attempts NTLMv2, which works just fine.



Of interest, the Win 2008 R2 machine is in a child-domain of the one the Samba server is in. However, I have lots of examples of machines in the child domain correctly accessing the Samba machine.



Confoundingly, I have an identically configured samba system (testparm shows identical [global] settings) in another AD Site that is working just fine for this machine.



I'm at a loss over where to poke next.



  • Something weird on the AD DC's in those two sites?

  • Obscure Samba settings I'm not seeing?

I'm not sure where to go from here.










share|improve this question
























  • 1.) Kerberos is DNS dependent. Are all servers in this scenario using same DNS, and are DNS entries there 100% accurate? 2.) How are you specifying login credentials? Sometimes SMB shares require full domain to be specified, i.e. "mydomain.localmyuser"

    – jlehtinen
    Mar 23 '15 at 18:57











  • @jlehtinen FQDN does work, though a bit less reliably than IP does. That's new data.

    – Blue Warrior NFB
    Mar 23 '15 at 19:16











  • Have you compared the encryptions (search for enctypes in krb5.conf and kdc..conf) being used in a working and a non-working samba environment? (klist -k -e -K -F FILE), also this link might be of interest.

    – dawud
    Mar 23 '15 at 23:36











  • It took lots of time to understand the issue. AS you mentioned, it could be netbios issue. Please check you have correct host name in /etc/hosts on samba server. The FQDN of the samba should match with windows AD domain i.e domain part of hostname should be AD domain name. As windows admin to set correct hostname for your samba or correct your hostname(samba)

    – user330194
    Jan 5 '16 at 18:14

















0















I've run into an odd problem with Samba 3.6.23. Right now I have a Windows 2008 R2 machine that has trouble accessing shares on a domained Samba box.




  • \example_servmy_share : Fails with LOGIN FAILURE


  • \172.16.102.19my_share : Works just fine.

When I set smbd to debug logging, I get this:



[2015/03/23 17:33:03.306499, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:662(reply_spnego_negotiate)
reply_spnego_negotiate: Got secblob of size 1840
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.306939, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:386(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:386: found previous password
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.315587, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [18] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.319930, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [17] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.320027, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [23] failed to decrypt with error Decrypt integrity check failed
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.320101, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [1] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.320162, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [3] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.328693, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [18] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.332985, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [17] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333065, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [23] failed to decrypt with error Decrypt integrity check failed
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333128, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [1] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333192, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [3] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333234, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:638(ads_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:638: krb5_rd_req with auth failed (Bad encryption type)
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333264, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:648(ads_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:648: returning error NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE


Which was enough to point me at something kerberos-y. So I did a bit of tcpdumping, and learned that different login methods are negotiated for machine-name and ip-only styles. When accessing via machine-name, it attempts a kerberos login and fails. When accessing via IP-address, it attempts NTLMv2, which works just fine.



Of interest, the Win 2008 R2 machine is in a child-domain of the one the Samba server is in. However, I have lots of examples of machines in the child domain correctly accessing the Samba machine.



Confoundingly, I have an identically configured samba system (testparm shows identical [global] settings) in another AD Site that is working just fine for this machine.



I'm at a loss over where to poke next.



  • Something weird on the AD DC's in those two sites?

  • Obscure Samba settings I'm not seeing?

I'm not sure where to go from here.










share|improve this question
























  • 1.) Kerberos is DNS dependent. Are all servers in this scenario using same DNS, and are DNS entries there 100% accurate? 2.) How are you specifying login credentials? Sometimes SMB shares require full domain to be specified, i.e. "mydomain.localmyuser"

    – jlehtinen
    Mar 23 '15 at 18:57











  • @jlehtinen FQDN does work, though a bit less reliably than IP does. That's new data.

    – Blue Warrior NFB
    Mar 23 '15 at 19:16











  • Have you compared the encryptions (search for enctypes in krb5.conf and kdc..conf) being used in a working and a non-working samba environment? (klist -k -e -K -F FILE), also this link might be of interest.

    – dawud
    Mar 23 '15 at 23:36











  • It took lots of time to understand the issue. AS you mentioned, it could be netbios issue. Please check you have correct host name in /etc/hosts on samba server. The FQDN of the samba should match with windows AD domain i.e domain part of hostname should be AD domain name. As windows admin to set correct hostname for your samba or correct your hostname(samba)

    – user330194
    Jan 5 '16 at 18:14













0












0








0








I've run into an odd problem with Samba 3.6.23. Right now I have a Windows 2008 R2 machine that has trouble accessing shares on a domained Samba box.




  • \example_servmy_share : Fails with LOGIN FAILURE


  • \172.16.102.19my_share : Works just fine.

When I set smbd to debug logging, I get this:



[2015/03/23 17:33:03.306499, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:662(reply_spnego_negotiate)
reply_spnego_negotiate: Got secblob of size 1840
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.306939, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:386(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:386: found previous password
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.315587, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [18] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.319930, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [17] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.320027, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [23] failed to decrypt with error Decrypt integrity check failed
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.320101, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [1] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.320162, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [3] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.328693, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [18] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.332985, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [17] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333065, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [23] failed to decrypt with error Decrypt integrity check failed
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333128, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [1] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333192, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [3] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333234, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:638(ads_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:638: krb5_rd_req with auth failed (Bad encryption type)
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333264, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:648(ads_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:648: returning error NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE


Which was enough to point me at something kerberos-y. So I did a bit of tcpdumping, and learned that different login methods are negotiated for machine-name and ip-only styles. When accessing via machine-name, it attempts a kerberos login and fails. When accessing via IP-address, it attempts NTLMv2, which works just fine.



Of interest, the Win 2008 R2 machine is in a child-domain of the one the Samba server is in. However, I have lots of examples of machines in the child domain correctly accessing the Samba machine.



Confoundingly, I have an identically configured samba system (testparm shows identical [global] settings) in another AD Site that is working just fine for this machine.



I'm at a loss over where to poke next.



  • Something weird on the AD DC's in those two sites?

  • Obscure Samba settings I'm not seeing?

I'm not sure where to go from here.










share|improve this question
















I've run into an odd problem with Samba 3.6.23. Right now I have a Windows 2008 R2 machine that has trouble accessing shares on a domained Samba box.




  • \example_servmy_share : Fails with LOGIN FAILURE


  • \172.16.102.19my_share : Works just fine.

When I set smbd to debug logging, I get this:



[2015/03/23 17:33:03.306499, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:662(reply_spnego_negotiate)
reply_spnego_negotiate: Got secblob of size 1840
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.306939, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:386(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:386: found previous password
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.315587, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [18] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.319930, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [17] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.320027, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [23] failed to decrypt with error Decrypt integrity check failed
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.320101, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [1] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.320162, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [3] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.328693, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [18] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.332985, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [17] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333065, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [23] failed to decrypt with error Decrypt integrity check failed
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333128, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [1] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333192, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:435(ads_secrets_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:435: enc type [3] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333234, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:638(ads_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:638: krb5_rd_req with auth failed (Bad encryption type)
[2015/03/23 17:33:03.333264, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:648(ads_verify_ticket)
libads/kerberos_verify.c:648: returning error NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE


Which was enough to point me at something kerberos-y. So I did a bit of tcpdumping, and learned that different login methods are negotiated for machine-name and ip-only styles. When accessing via machine-name, it attempts a kerberos login and fails. When accessing via IP-address, it attempts NTLMv2, which works just fine.



Of interest, the Win 2008 R2 machine is in a child-domain of the one the Samba server is in. However, I have lots of examples of machines in the child domain correctly accessing the Samba machine.



Confoundingly, I have an identically configured samba system (testparm shows identical [global] settings) in another AD Site that is working just fine for this machine.



I'm at a loss over where to poke next.



  • Something weird on the AD DC's in those two sites?

  • Obscure Samba settings I'm not seeing?

I'm not sure where to go from here.







windows-server-2008-r2 samba kerberos






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 5 '16 at 23:41









chicks

3,09072033




3,09072033










asked Mar 23 '15 at 18:21









Blue Warrior NFBBlue Warrior NFB

431317




431317












  • 1.) Kerberos is DNS dependent. Are all servers in this scenario using same DNS, and are DNS entries there 100% accurate? 2.) How are you specifying login credentials? Sometimes SMB shares require full domain to be specified, i.e. "mydomain.localmyuser"

    – jlehtinen
    Mar 23 '15 at 18:57











  • @jlehtinen FQDN does work, though a bit less reliably than IP does. That's new data.

    – Blue Warrior NFB
    Mar 23 '15 at 19:16











  • Have you compared the encryptions (search for enctypes in krb5.conf and kdc..conf) being used in a working and a non-working samba environment? (klist -k -e -K -F FILE), also this link might be of interest.

    – dawud
    Mar 23 '15 at 23:36











  • It took lots of time to understand the issue. AS you mentioned, it could be netbios issue. Please check you have correct host name in /etc/hosts on samba server. The FQDN of the samba should match with windows AD domain i.e domain part of hostname should be AD domain name. As windows admin to set correct hostname for your samba or correct your hostname(samba)

    – user330194
    Jan 5 '16 at 18:14

















  • 1.) Kerberos is DNS dependent. Are all servers in this scenario using same DNS, and are DNS entries there 100% accurate? 2.) How are you specifying login credentials? Sometimes SMB shares require full domain to be specified, i.e. "mydomain.localmyuser"

    – jlehtinen
    Mar 23 '15 at 18:57











  • @jlehtinen FQDN does work, though a bit less reliably than IP does. That's new data.

    – Blue Warrior NFB
    Mar 23 '15 at 19:16











  • Have you compared the encryptions (search for enctypes in krb5.conf and kdc..conf) being used in a working and a non-working samba environment? (klist -k -e -K -F FILE), also this link might be of interest.

    – dawud
    Mar 23 '15 at 23:36











  • It took lots of time to understand the issue. AS you mentioned, it could be netbios issue. Please check you have correct host name in /etc/hosts on samba server. The FQDN of the samba should match with windows AD domain i.e domain part of hostname should be AD domain name. As windows admin to set correct hostname for your samba or correct your hostname(samba)

    – user330194
    Jan 5 '16 at 18:14
















1.) Kerberos is DNS dependent. Are all servers in this scenario using same DNS, and are DNS entries there 100% accurate? 2.) How are you specifying login credentials? Sometimes SMB shares require full domain to be specified, i.e. "mydomain.localmyuser"

– jlehtinen
Mar 23 '15 at 18:57





1.) Kerberos is DNS dependent. Are all servers in this scenario using same DNS, and are DNS entries there 100% accurate? 2.) How are you specifying login credentials? Sometimes SMB shares require full domain to be specified, i.e. "mydomain.localmyuser"

– jlehtinen
Mar 23 '15 at 18:57













@jlehtinen FQDN does work, though a bit less reliably than IP does. That's new data.

– Blue Warrior NFB
Mar 23 '15 at 19:16





@jlehtinen FQDN does work, though a bit less reliably than IP does. That's new data.

– Blue Warrior NFB
Mar 23 '15 at 19:16













Have you compared the encryptions (search for enctypes in krb5.conf and kdc..conf) being used in a working and a non-working samba environment? (klist -k -e -K -F FILE), also this link might be of interest.

– dawud
Mar 23 '15 at 23:36





Have you compared the encryptions (search for enctypes in krb5.conf and kdc..conf) being used in a working and a non-working samba environment? (klist -k -e -K -F FILE), also this link might be of interest.

– dawud
Mar 23 '15 at 23:36













It took lots of time to understand the issue. AS you mentioned, it could be netbios issue. Please check you have correct host name in /etc/hosts on samba server. The FQDN of the samba should match with windows AD domain i.e domain part of hostname should be AD domain name. As windows admin to set correct hostname for your samba or correct your hostname(samba)

– user330194
Jan 5 '16 at 18:14





It took lots of time to understand the issue. AS you mentioned, it could be netbios issue. Please check you have correct host name in /etc/hosts on samba server. The FQDN of the samba should match with windows AD domain i.e domain part of hostname should be AD domain name. As windows admin to set correct hostname for your samba or correct your hostname(samba)

– user330194
Jan 5 '16 at 18:14










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I witnessed same behavior which was caused by un-synchronized AD's (Active Directory) after the server running samba was re-joined to domain.



After reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerberos_(protocol) I concluded the error means that samba (the service) cannot decrypt the "client-to-service" Kerberos ticket received from client, because in my case it was encoded by service's old secret key. According to wikipedia, the service secret key is a hash of service password stored in AD. The re-joining to domain generated new password. Until this change was propagated to other AD's, clients were receiving from their TGS (running on unsynchronized ADs) tickets encoded with old service secret.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "2"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f677665%2ftroubleshooting-kerberos-problems-with-samba%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    I witnessed same behavior which was caused by un-synchronized AD's (Active Directory) after the server running samba was re-joined to domain.



    After reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerberos_(protocol) I concluded the error means that samba (the service) cannot decrypt the "client-to-service" Kerberos ticket received from client, because in my case it was encoded by service's old secret key. According to wikipedia, the service secret key is a hash of service password stored in AD. The re-joining to domain generated new password. Until this change was propagated to other AD's, clients were receiving from their TGS (running on unsynchronized ADs) tickets encoded with old service secret.






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      I witnessed same behavior which was caused by un-synchronized AD's (Active Directory) after the server running samba was re-joined to domain.



      After reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerberos_(protocol) I concluded the error means that samba (the service) cannot decrypt the "client-to-service" Kerberos ticket received from client, because in my case it was encoded by service's old secret key. According to wikipedia, the service secret key is a hash of service password stored in AD. The re-joining to domain generated new password. Until this change was propagated to other AD's, clients were receiving from their TGS (running on unsynchronized ADs) tickets encoded with old service secret.






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        I witnessed same behavior which was caused by un-synchronized AD's (Active Directory) after the server running samba was re-joined to domain.



        After reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerberos_(protocol) I concluded the error means that samba (the service) cannot decrypt the "client-to-service" Kerberos ticket received from client, because in my case it was encoded by service's old secret key. According to wikipedia, the service secret key is a hash of service password stored in AD. The re-joining to domain generated new password. Until this change was propagated to other AD's, clients were receiving from their TGS (running on unsynchronized ADs) tickets encoded with old service secret.






        share|improve this answer













        I witnessed same behavior which was caused by un-synchronized AD's (Active Directory) after the server running samba was re-joined to domain.



        After reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerberos_(protocol) I concluded the error means that samba (the service) cannot decrypt the "client-to-service" Kerberos ticket received from client, because in my case it was encoded by service's old secret key. According to wikipedia, the service secret key is a hash of service password stored in AD. The re-joining to domain generated new password. Until this change was propagated to other AD's, clients were receiving from their TGS (running on unsynchronized ADs) tickets encoded with old service secret.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 7 '15 at 7:09









        Petr GajdůšekPetr Gajdůšek

        11




        11



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f677665%2ftroubleshooting-kerberos-problems-with-samba%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            3fw9w,vdt0
            6RLBngs7,WSRc,atkxEK8 trw08,R4o1kZy ew7Co3pfnk0 5E9 giK7GJP,mna

            Popular posts from this blog

            RemoteApp sporadic failureWindows 2008 RemoteAPP client disconnects within a matter of minutesWhat is the minimum version of RDP supported by Server 2012 RDS?How to configure a Remoteapp server to increase stabilityMicrosoft RemoteApp Active SessionRDWeb TS connection broken for some users post RemoteApp certificate changeRemote Desktop Licensing, RemoteAPPRDS 2012 R2 some users are not able to logon after changed date and time on Connection BrokersWhat happens during Remote Desktop logon, and is there any logging?After installing RDS on WinServer 2016 I still can only connect with two users?RD Connection via RDGW to Session host is not connecting

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020