Where is the encrypted mask value?How are outPk, mask and amount fields created when spending RignCT coinbase transactions?Error with transaction on the blockchainIs it possible to reset the blockchain with a new genesis block for efficiency?How does having a negative number in a Pedersen commitment, create money out of thin air?How would I exploit the fact that I knew the scalar used for H in the Pedersons Commitment w.r.t G?Why do we use different H values in a vector Pedersen Commitment?How is the used Pedersen commitment kept secret?How does the mixing work?What is the significance of monero switching the G and H points in a Pedersen commitment?Trying to understand how RCTTypeSimple works

As easy as Three, Two, One... How fast can you go from Five to Four?

The significance of kelvin as a unit of absolute temperature

Transfer custom ringtones to iPhone using a computer running Linux

Does a (nice) centerless group always have a centerless profinite completion?

Can there be absolute velocity?

So a part of my house disappeared... But not because of a chunk resetting

Does the new finding on "reversing a quantum jump mid-flight" rule out any interpretations of QM?

How to destroy a galactic level civilization and still leave behind primitive survivors?

Why is long-term living in Almost-Earth causing severe health problems?

Is it safe to remove python 2.7.15rc1 from Ubuntu 18.04?

How can I write the maximally mixed state on m qubits as a linear combination of basis vectors

Make Gimbap cutter

Is Lambda Calculus purely syntactic?

Print "N NE E SE S SW W NW"

What STL algorithm can determine if exactly one item in a container satisfies a predicate?

Why is the length of the Kelvin unit of temperature equal to that of the Celsius unit?

Ability To Change Root User Password (Vulnerability?)

Is it okay to have a sequel start immediately after the end of the first book?

What plausible reason could I give for my FTL drive only working in space

Diatonic chords of a pentatonic vs blues scale?

Who is "He that flies" in Lord of the Rings?

Why do radiation hardened IC packages often have long leads?

empApi with Lightning Web Components?

Should I put programming books I wrote a few years ago on my resume?



Where is the encrypted mask value?


How are outPk, mask and amount fields created when spending RignCT coinbase transactions?Error with transaction on the blockchainIs it possible to reset the blockchain with a new genesis block for efficiency?How does having a negative number in a Pedersen commitment, create money out of thin air?How would I exploit the fact that I knew the scalar used for H in the Pedersons Commitment w.r.t G?Why do we use different H values in a vector Pedersen Commitment?How is the used Pedersen commitment kept secret?How does the mixing work?What is the significance of monero switching the G and H points in a Pedersen commitment?Trying to understand how RCTTypeSimple works













4















Checked this link: https://moneroblocks.info/api/get_transaction_data/4adb55cde1ffcc0ea639b6718355c48c0e574000306d95ef857e55d91ddabcf2



I could not find the encrypted mask value.



I believe the encrypted amount is in the ecdh part:



 "ecdhInfo": [

"amount": "f350bbedb3a4a93b"
,

"amount": "c2005984b560da47"
,

"amount": "6a2a649c8322d6e1"
,

"amount": "0e0c6e72d16779c7"

],









share|improve this question


























    4















    Checked this link: https://moneroblocks.info/api/get_transaction_data/4adb55cde1ffcc0ea639b6718355c48c0e574000306d95ef857e55d91ddabcf2



    I could not find the encrypted mask value.



    I believe the encrypted amount is in the ecdh part:



     "ecdhInfo": [

    "amount": "f350bbedb3a4a93b"
    ,

    "amount": "c2005984b560da47"
    ,

    "amount": "6a2a649c8322d6e1"
    ,

    "amount": "0e0c6e72d16779c7"

    ],









    share|improve this question
























      4












      4








      4








      Checked this link: https://moneroblocks.info/api/get_transaction_data/4adb55cde1ffcc0ea639b6718355c48c0e574000306d95ef857e55d91ddabcf2



      I could not find the encrypted mask value.



      I believe the encrypted amount is in the ecdh part:



       "ecdhInfo": [

      "amount": "f350bbedb3a4a93b"
      ,

      "amount": "c2005984b560da47"
      ,

      "amount": "6a2a649c8322d6e1"
      ,

      "amount": "0e0c6e72d16779c7"

      ],









      share|improve this question














      Checked this link: https://moneroblocks.info/api/get_transaction_data/4adb55cde1ffcc0ea639b6718355c48c0e574000306d95ef857e55d91ddabcf2



      I could not find the encrypted mask value.



      I believe the encrypted amount is in the ecdh part:



       "ecdhInfo": [

      "amount": "f350bbedb3a4a93b"
      ,

      "amount": "c2005984b560da47"
      ,

      "amount": "6a2a649c8322d6e1"
      ,

      "amount": "0e0c6e72d16779c7"

      ],






      ringct






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked May 26 at 18:50









      WeCanBeFriendsWeCanBeFriends

      33617




      33617




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          As of the March 2019 hard fork, commitment masks are deterministically derived from the per-output shared secret. This means the ECDHinfo part of the transaction will no longer store the encrypted mask.



          See the commit here: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/commit/7d375981584e5ddac4ea6ad8879e2211d465b79d



          Therefore, to determine the commitment mask, calculate:



          commitment mask = Hs("commitment_mask" || Hs(8aR||i))



          To reduce the storage requirement for the amount from 32 bytes to 8 bytes, the 8 byte amount is now XOR encrypted using an 8 byte key deterministically derived from the shared secret.



          To encrypt the amount, calculate:



          encrypted amount = 8 byte amount XOR first 8 bytes of keccak("amount" || Hs(8rA||i))



          To decrypt the amount, calculate:



          amount = 8 byte encrypted amount XOR first 8 bytes of keccak("amount" || Hs(8aR||i))






          share|improve this answer

























          • TBC: a is the public view key, i is the index of the output in the transaction

            – WeCanBeFriends
            May 26 at 21:11












          • a is the private view key, not public.

            – jtgrassie
            May 26 at 22:10











          • Oh right, 8aR is the public view key

            – WeCanBeFriends
            May 26 at 22:24











          • 8aR is not "the public view key" either. R is the tx public key (the shared part of the shared secret), a is the receivers private view key and i is the output index.

            – jtgrassie
            May 27 at 0:24






          • 1





            @WeCanBeFriends You're right, I've fixed the error in my answer. The shared secret is Hs(8aR||i) and not Hs(8aR||i)G. From a cryptographic point of view, it would also have worked to have chosen to directly use (8aR||i) instead of Hs(8aR||i) (inside these hashed constructions only), but since the code already calculates Hs(8aR||i) for use elsewhere, we just re-use it for simplicity.

            – knaccc
            May 27 at 4:23












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "656"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmonero.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11272%2fwhere-is-the-encrypted-mask-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          As of the March 2019 hard fork, commitment masks are deterministically derived from the per-output shared secret. This means the ECDHinfo part of the transaction will no longer store the encrypted mask.



          See the commit here: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/commit/7d375981584e5ddac4ea6ad8879e2211d465b79d



          Therefore, to determine the commitment mask, calculate:



          commitment mask = Hs("commitment_mask" || Hs(8aR||i))



          To reduce the storage requirement for the amount from 32 bytes to 8 bytes, the 8 byte amount is now XOR encrypted using an 8 byte key deterministically derived from the shared secret.



          To encrypt the amount, calculate:



          encrypted amount = 8 byte amount XOR first 8 bytes of keccak("amount" || Hs(8rA||i))



          To decrypt the amount, calculate:



          amount = 8 byte encrypted amount XOR first 8 bytes of keccak("amount" || Hs(8aR||i))






          share|improve this answer

























          • TBC: a is the public view key, i is the index of the output in the transaction

            – WeCanBeFriends
            May 26 at 21:11












          • a is the private view key, not public.

            – jtgrassie
            May 26 at 22:10











          • Oh right, 8aR is the public view key

            – WeCanBeFriends
            May 26 at 22:24











          • 8aR is not "the public view key" either. R is the tx public key (the shared part of the shared secret), a is the receivers private view key and i is the output index.

            – jtgrassie
            May 27 at 0:24






          • 1





            @WeCanBeFriends You're right, I've fixed the error in my answer. The shared secret is Hs(8aR||i) and not Hs(8aR||i)G. From a cryptographic point of view, it would also have worked to have chosen to directly use (8aR||i) instead of Hs(8aR||i) (inside these hashed constructions only), but since the code already calculates Hs(8aR||i) for use elsewhere, we just re-use it for simplicity.

            – knaccc
            May 27 at 4:23
















          4














          As of the March 2019 hard fork, commitment masks are deterministically derived from the per-output shared secret. This means the ECDHinfo part of the transaction will no longer store the encrypted mask.



          See the commit here: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/commit/7d375981584e5ddac4ea6ad8879e2211d465b79d



          Therefore, to determine the commitment mask, calculate:



          commitment mask = Hs("commitment_mask" || Hs(8aR||i))



          To reduce the storage requirement for the amount from 32 bytes to 8 bytes, the 8 byte amount is now XOR encrypted using an 8 byte key deterministically derived from the shared secret.



          To encrypt the amount, calculate:



          encrypted amount = 8 byte amount XOR first 8 bytes of keccak("amount" || Hs(8rA||i))



          To decrypt the amount, calculate:



          amount = 8 byte encrypted amount XOR first 8 bytes of keccak("amount" || Hs(8aR||i))






          share|improve this answer

























          • TBC: a is the public view key, i is the index of the output in the transaction

            – WeCanBeFriends
            May 26 at 21:11












          • a is the private view key, not public.

            – jtgrassie
            May 26 at 22:10











          • Oh right, 8aR is the public view key

            – WeCanBeFriends
            May 26 at 22:24











          • 8aR is not "the public view key" either. R is the tx public key (the shared part of the shared secret), a is the receivers private view key and i is the output index.

            – jtgrassie
            May 27 at 0:24






          • 1





            @WeCanBeFriends You're right, I've fixed the error in my answer. The shared secret is Hs(8aR||i) and not Hs(8aR||i)G. From a cryptographic point of view, it would also have worked to have chosen to directly use (8aR||i) instead of Hs(8aR||i) (inside these hashed constructions only), but since the code already calculates Hs(8aR||i) for use elsewhere, we just re-use it for simplicity.

            – knaccc
            May 27 at 4:23














          4












          4








          4







          As of the March 2019 hard fork, commitment masks are deterministically derived from the per-output shared secret. This means the ECDHinfo part of the transaction will no longer store the encrypted mask.



          See the commit here: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/commit/7d375981584e5ddac4ea6ad8879e2211d465b79d



          Therefore, to determine the commitment mask, calculate:



          commitment mask = Hs("commitment_mask" || Hs(8aR||i))



          To reduce the storage requirement for the amount from 32 bytes to 8 bytes, the 8 byte amount is now XOR encrypted using an 8 byte key deterministically derived from the shared secret.



          To encrypt the amount, calculate:



          encrypted amount = 8 byte amount XOR first 8 bytes of keccak("amount" || Hs(8rA||i))



          To decrypt the amount, calculate:



          amount = 8 byte encrypted amount XOR first 8 bytes of keccak("amount" || Hs(8aR||i))






          share|improve this answer















          As of the March 2019 hard fork, commitment masks are deterministically derived from the per-output shared secret. This means the ECDHinfo part of the transaction will no longer store the encrypted mask.



          See the commit here: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/commit/7d375981584e5ddac4ea6ad8879e2211d465b79d



          Therefore, to determine the commitment mask, calculate:



          commitment mask = Hs("commitment_mask" || Hs(8aR||i))



          To reduce the storage requirement for the amount from 32 bytes to 8 bytes, the 8 byte amount is now XOR encrypted using an 8 byte key deterministically derived from the shared secret.



          To encrypt the amount, calculate:



          encrypted amount = 8 byte amount XOR first 8 bytes of keccak("amount" || Hs(8rA||i))



          To decrypt the amount, calculate:



          amount = 8 byte encrypted amount XOR first 8 bytes of keccak("amount" || Hs(8aR||i))







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 30 at 20:29

























          answered May 26 at 19:27









          knacccknaccc

          7,018820




          7,018820












          • TBC: a is the public view key, i is the index of the output in the transaction

            – WeCanBeFriends
            May 26 at 21:11












          • a is the private view key, not public.

            – jtgrassie
            May 26 at 22:10











          • Oh right, 8aR is the public view key

            – WeCanBeFriends
            May 26 at 22:24











          • 8aR is not "the public view key" either. R is the tx public key (the shared part of the shared secret), a is the receivers private view key and i is the output index.

            – jtgrassie
            May 27 at 0:24






          • 1





            @WeCanBeFriends You're right, I've fixed the error in my answer. The shared secret is Hs(8aR||i) and not Hs(8aR||i)G. From a cryptographic point of view, it would also have worked to have chosen to directly use (8aR||i) instead of Hs(8aR||i) (inside these hashed constructions only), but since the code already calculates Hs(8aR||i) for use elsewhere, we just re-use it for simplicity.

            – knaccc
            May 27 at 4:23


















          • TBC: a is the public view key, i is the index of the output in the transaction

            – WeCanBeFriends
            May 26 at 21:11












          • a is the private view key, not public.

            – jtgrassie
            May 26 at 22:10











          • Oh right, 8aR is the public view key

            – WeCanBeFriends
            May 26 at 22:24











          • 8aR is not "the public view key" either. R is the tx public key (the shared part of the shared secret), a is the receivers private view key and i is the output index.

            – jtgrassie
            May 27 at 0:24






          • 1





            @WeCanBeFriends You're right, I've fixed the error in my answer. The shared secret is Hs(8aR||i) and not Hs(8aR||i)G. From a cryptographic point of view, it would also have worked to have chosen to directly use (8aR||i) instead of Hs(8aR||i) (inside these hashed constructions only), but since the code already calculates Hs(8aR||i) for use elsewhere, we just re-use it for simplicity.

            – knaccc
            May 27 at 4:23

















          TBC: a is the public view key, i is the index of the output in the transaction

          – WeCanBeFriends
          May 26 at 21:11






          TBC: a is the public view key, i is the index of the output in the transaction

          – WeCanBeFriends
          May 26 at 21:11














          a is the private view key, not public.

          – jtgrassie
          May 26 at 22:10





          a is the private view key, not public.

          – jtgrassie
          May 26 at 22:10













          Oh right, 8aR is the public view key

          – WeCanBeFriends
          May 26 at 22:24





          Oh right, 8aR is the public view key

          – WeCanBeFriends
          May 26 at 22:24













          8aR is not "the public view key" either. R is the tx public key (the shared part of the shared secret), a is the receivers private view key and i is the output index.

          – jtgrassie
          May 27 at 0:24





          8aR is not "the public view key" either. R is the tx public key (the shared part of the shared secret), a is the receivers private view key and i is the output index.

          – jtgrassie
          May 27 at 0:24




          1




          1





          @WeCanBeFriends You're right, I've fixed the error in my answer. The shared secret is Hs(8aR||i) and not Hs(8aR||i)G. From a cryptographic point of view, it would also have worked to have chosen to directly use (8aR||i) instead of Hs(8aR||i) (inside these hashed constructions only), but since the code already calculates Hs(8aR||i) for use elsewhere, we just re-use it for simplicity.

          – knaccc
          May 27 at 4:23






          @WeCanBeFriends You're right, I've fixed the error in my answer. The shared secret is Hs(8aR||i) and not Hs(8aR||i)G. From a cryptographic point of view, it would also have worked to have chosen to directly use (8aR||i) instead of Hs(8aR||i) (inside these hashed constructions only), but since the code already calculates Hs(8aR||i) for use elsewhere, we just re-use it for simplicity.

          – knaccc
          May 27 at 4:23


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Monero Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmonero.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11272%2fwhere-is-the-encrypted-mask-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to write a 12-bar blues melodyI-IV-V blues progressionHow to play the bridges in a standard blues progressionHow does Gdim7 fit in C# minor?question on a certain chord progressionMusicology of Melody12 bar blues, spread rhythm: alternative to 6th chord to avoid finger stretchChord progressions/ Root key/ MelodiesHow to put chords (POP-EDM) under a given lead vocal melody (starting from a good knowledge in music theory)Are there “rules” for improvising with the minor pentatonic scale over 12-bar shuffle?Confusion about blues scale and chords

          What if the end-user didn't have the required library?What is setup.py?What is a clean, pythonic way to have multiple constructors in Python?What does Ruby have that Python doesn't, and vice versa?What is the reason for having '//' in Python?How do I create a namespace package in Python?How to package shared objects that python modules depend on?setuptools vs. distutils: why is distutils still a thing?Navigation in Windows 10 vs code not going to virtualenv library when the same library is installed at user levelPython create package for local usePackaging a project that uses multiple python versionsWhy is permission denied on pip install except for when “--user” is included at end of command?

          Esgonzo ibérico Índice Descrición Distribución Hábitat Ameazas Notas Véxase tamén "Acerca dos nomes dos anfibios e réptiles galegos""Chalcides bedriagai"Chalcides bedriagai en Carrascal, L. M. Salvador, A. (Eds). Enciclopedia virtual de los vertebrados españoles. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid. España.Fotos