Probability of a fraction $a/b$ that cannot be simplified [closed]On the probability that two positive integers are relatively primeprobability of at least a fraction of bins contain a fixed number of ballsProbability that two random integers have only one prime factor in commonProbability with Discrete Random VariableAbsolute difference and probabilityFinding the probability of a fraction being in lowest terms.Finding out probability that the last digit of a product is 5Can't compute the integral in this probabilityOut of $50$ consecutive numbers, what is the probability that the absolute difference between the two numbers is $10$ or less?What is the probability to pick a fraction that cannot be reduced?

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

How can I list the different hex characters between two files?

Professor Roman loves to teach unorthodox Chemistry

Are the guests in Westworld forbidden to tell the hosts that they are robots?

Why is it bad to use your whole foot in rock climbing

What plausible reason could I give for my FTL drive only working in space

In The Incredibles 2, why does Screenslaver's name use a pun on something that doesn't exist in the 1950s pastiche?

In Pandemic, why take the extra step of eradicating a disease after you've cured it?

What exactly "triggers an additional time" in the interaction between Afterlife and Teysa Karlov?

How many sets of dice do I need for D&D?

How to Handle Many Times Series Simultaneously?

How can I find out about the game world without meta-influencing it?

Part of my house is inexplicably gone

Dedicated bike GPS computer over smartphone

Was planting UN flag on Moon ever discussed?

What is the "books received" section in journals?

ASCII Meme Arrow Generator

Is Jesus the last Prophet?

How can powerful telekinesis avoid violating Newton's 3rd Law?

Labels still showing when no Label Features turned on in ArcMap?

Was self-modifying code possible using BASIC?

Is all-caps blackletter no longer taboo?

Why did Robert pick unworthy men for the White Cloaks?

Make Gimbap cutter

How to make a composition of functions prettier?



Probability of a fraction $a/b$ that cannot be simplified [closed]


On the probability that two positive integers are relatively primeprobability of at least a fraction of bins contain a fixed number of ballsProbability that two random integers have only one prime factor in commonProbability with Discrete Random VariableAbsolute difference and probabilityFinding the probability of a fraction being in lowest terms.Finding out probability that the last digit of a product is 5Can't compute the integral in this probabilityOut of $50$ consecutive numbers, what is the probability that the absolute difference between the two numbers is $10$ or less?What is the probability to pick a fraction that cannot be reduced?













11












$begingroup$


Let a and b be random independent positive integers. What is the probability that the fraction:



$fracab$



cannot be simplified?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by TheSimpliFire, Jendrik Stelzner, Adrian Keister, Aweygan, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 May 28 at 23:32


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – TheSimpliFire, Jendrik Stelzner, Adrian Keister, Aweygan, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • $begingroup$
    That's equal to the probability that $gcd(a,b)=1$. Since prime numbers follow a $log$ distribution, I think that the probability must be zero in the end.
    $endgroup$
    – RMWGNE96
    May 27 at 20:22






  • 13




    $begingroup$
    There is no uniform distribution on positive integers. What is true is that if $a$ and $b$ are chosen independently from the uniform distribution on $1,2,ldots, N$, then asymptotically as $N to infty$ the probability approaches $6/pi^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    May 27 at 20:27






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is a video of a mathematician doing this very problem with dice and explaining the maths: youtube.com/watch?v=RZBhSi_PwHU
    $endgroup$
    – Jon Rose
    May 28 at 8:13















11












$begingroup$


Let a and b be random independent positive integers. What is the probability that the fraction:



$fracab$



cannot be simplified?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by TheSimpliFire, Jendrik Stelzner, Adrian Keister, Aweygan, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 May 28 at 23:32


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – TheSimpliFire, Jendrik Stelzner, Adrian Keister, Aweygan, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • $begingroup$
    That's equal to the probability that $gcd(a,b)=1$. Since prime numbers follow a $log$ distribution, I think that the probability must be zero in the end.
    $endgroup$
    – RMWGNE96
    May 27 at 20:22






  • 13




    $begingroup$
    There is no uniform distribution on positive integers. What is true is that if $a$ and $b$ are chosen independently from the uniform distribution on $1,2,ldots, N$, then asymptotically as $N to infty$ the probability approaches $6/pi^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    May 27 at 20:27






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is a video of a mathematician doing this very problem with dice and explaining the maths: youtube.com/watch?v=RZBhSi_PwHU
    $endgroup$
    – Jon Rose
    May 28 at 8:13













11












11








11


5



$begingroup$


Let a and b be random independent positive integers. What is the probability that the fraction:



$fracab$



cannot be simplified?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let a and b be random independent positive integers. What is the probability that the fraction:



$fracab$



cannot be simplified?







probability number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jun 5 at 15:21







michail vazaios

















asked May 27 at 20:20









michail vazaiosmichail vazaios

1809




1809




closed as off-topic by TheSimpliFire, Jendrik Stelzner, Adrian Keister, Aweygan, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 May 28 at 23:32


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – TheSimpliFire, Jendrik Stelzner, Adrian Keister, Aweygan, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by TheSimpliFire, Jendrik Stelzner, Adrian Keister, Aweygan, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 May 28 at 23:32


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – TheSimpliFire, Jendrik Stelzner, Adrian Keister, Aweygan, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • $begingroup$
    That's equal to the probability that $gcd(a,b)=1$. Since prime numbers follow a $log$ distribution, I think that the probability must be zero in the end.
    $endgroup$
    – RMWGNE96
    May 27 at 20:22






  • 13




    $begingroup$
    There is no uniform distribution on positive integers. What is true is that if $a$ and $b$ are chosen independently from the uniform distribution on $1,2,ldots, N$, then asymptotically as $N to infty$ the probability approaches $6/pi^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    May 27 at 20:27






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is a video of a mathematician doing this very problem with dice and explaining the maths: youtube.com/watch?v=RZBhSi_PwHU
    $endgroup$
    – Jon Rose
    May 28 at 8:13
















  • $begingroup$
    That's equal to the probability that $gcd(a,b)=1$. Since prime numbers follow a $log$ distribution, I think that the probability must be zero in the end.
    $endgroup$
    – RMWGNE96
    May 27 at 20:22






  • 13




    $begingroup$
    There is no uniform distribution on positive integers. What is true is that if $a$ and $b$ are chosen independently from the uniform distribution on $1,2,ldots, N$, then asymptotically as $N to infty$ the probability approaches $6/pi^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    May 27 at 20:27






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is a video of a mathematician doing this very problem with dice and explaining the maths: youtube.com/watch?v=RZBhSi_PwHU
    $endgroup$
    – Jon Rose
    May 28 at 8:13















$begingroup$
That's equal to the probability that $gcd(a,b)=1$. Since prime numbers follow a $log$ distribution, I think that the probability must be zero in the end.
$endgroup$
– RMWGNE96
May 27 at 20:22




$begingroup$
That's equal to the probability that $gcd(a,b)=1$. Since prime numbers follow a $log$ distribution, I think that the probability must be zero in the end.
$endgroup$
– RMWGNE96
May 27 at 20:22




13




13




$begingroup$
There is no uniform distribution on positive integers. What is true is that if $a$ and $b$ are chosen independently from the uniform distribution on $1,2,ldots, N$, then asymptotically as $N to infty$ the probability approaches $6/pi^2$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
May 27 at 20:27




$begingroup$
There is no uniform distribution on positive integers. What is true is that if $a$ and $b$ are chosen independently from the uniform distribution on $1,2,ldots, N$, then asymptotically as $N to infty$ the probability approaches $6/pi^2$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
May 27 at 20:27




1




1




$begingroup$
Here is a video of a mathematician doing this very problem with dice and explaining the maths: youtube.com/watch?v=RZBhSi_PwHU
$endgroup$
– Jon Rose
May 28 at 8:13




$begingroup$
Here is a video of a mathematician doing this very problem with dice and explaining the maths: youtube.com/watch?v=RZBhSi_PwHU
$endgroup$
– Jon Rose
May 28 at 8:13










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















19












$begingroup$

Peter's answer gets to the heart of the matter relatively quickly, but I feel it would also be best to demonstrate where the $6/pi^2$ comes from, seemingly out of nowhere to the uninitiated.



So, it should be obvious that $a/b$ is in simplest form if and only if $a,b$ are coprime, i.e. $gcd(a,b) = 1$. Well, what does that mean? It means that $a,b$ share no common prime number factors.



In particular, it means $a,b$ do not share a factor of $2$. For (uniformly randomly chosen) nonzero integers $a,b$ (less than some other number $x$), there is a $1/2$ chance (in the limit $x to infty$) each will have a factor of $2$. Thus,



$$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of 2) = 1 - left(frac 1 2 right)^2$$



Similarly, it means that they do not share a factor of $3$. There's a $1/3$ chance each will have a factor of three, and thus,



$$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of 3) = 1 - left(frac 1 3 right)^2$$



This clearly generalizes. Consider a prime number $p$. There is a $1/p$ chance that $a,b$ each will have it, and in turn



$$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of p) = 1 - left(frac 1 p right)^2$$



For $a,b$ to be coprime this needs to be true of all primes $p$. The events are independent, and we accordingly can multiply the respective probabilities for each prime $p$, obtaining



$$P(texta,b are coprime) = prod_textp prime 1 - left(frac 1 p right)^2 = prod_textp prime 1 - frac 1 p^2$$



This now ties into something known as the Riemann zeta function. There are two formulas typically associated with it: a summation and a product formula. We often focus on the summation formula but can derive the latter; a proof of said derivation can be found here. In any event, we focus on the prime product formula below:



$$zeta(s) = prod_textp prime frac11-p^-s$$



Bearing in mind this is a product, we can do a manipulation:



$$frac1zeta(s) = prod_textp prime 1-frac 1 p^s$$



This looks precisely like the formula for our probability of $a,b$ being coprime but with $s$ in lieu of $2$. Indeed, letting $s=2$,



$$P(texta,b are coprime) = prod_textp prime 1 - frac1p^2 = frac1zeta(2)$$



$zeta(2)$ is a known value which Euler calculated to be $pi^2/6$; finding this value is often referred to as the Basel problem. Accordingly,



$$P(texta,b are coprime) = frac1pi^2/6 = frac6pi^2$$



The idea also generalizes further. Say you have some group of $n$ integers ($n$ a positive integer). Then the probability that all $n$ are coprime is given by



$$P(textall n numbers are coprime) = frac1zeta(n)$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This same heuristic can be applied to finding the probability that an integer is "$k$-free" (that is, an integer having no perfect $k$th power factor > 1), which also happens to be $frac1zetaleft(kright).$ In fact, the probability that greatest common divisor of $n$ integers has no perfect $k$th power factor > 1 (that is, the probability of $n$ integers being relatively $k$-prime) is $frac1zetaleft(nkright).$
    $endgroup$
    – Brian
    May 27 at 21:14


















6












$begingroup$

This question is equivalent to ask for the probability that $a$ and $b$ are coprime. If $a$ and $b$ are random integers below $x$, then the probability $P(x)$ that $a$ and $b$ are coprime , satisfies $$lim_xrightarrowinfty P(x)=frac6pi^2approx0.6079$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    19












    $begingroup$

    Peter's answer gets to the heart of the matter relatively quickly, but I feel it would also be best to demonstrate where the $6/pi^2$ comes from, seemingly out of nowhere to the uninitiated.



    So, it should be obvious that $a/b$ is in simplest form if and only if $a,b$ are coprime, i.e. $gcd(a,b) = 1$. Well, what does that mean? It means that $a,b$ share no common prime number factors.



    In particular, it means $a,b$ do not share a factor of $2$. For (uniformly randomly chosen) nonzero integers $a,b$ (less than some other number $x$), there is a $1/2$ chance (in the limit $x to infty$) each will have a factor of $2$. Thus,



    $$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of 2) = 1 - left(frac 1 2 right)^2$$



    Similarly, it means that they do not share a factor of $3$. There's a $1/3$ chance each will have a factor of three, and thus,



    $$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of 3) = 1 - left(frac 1 3 right)^2$$



    This clearly generalizes. Consider a prime number $p$. There is a $1/p$ chance that $a,b$ each will have it, and in turn



    $$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of p) = 1 - left(frac 1 p right)^2$$



    For $a,b$ to be coprime this needs to be true of all primes $p$. The events are independent, and we accordingly can multiply the respective probabilities for each prime $p$, obtaining



    $$P(texta,b are coprime) = prod_textp prime 1 - left(frac 1 p right)^2 = prod_textp prime 1 - frac 1 p^2$$



    This now ties into something known as the Riemann zeta function. There are two formulas typically associated with it: a summation and a product formula. We often focus on the summation formula but can derive the latter; a proof of said derivation can be found here. In any event, we focus on the prime product formula below:



    $$zeta(s) = prod_textp prime frac11-p^-s$$



    Bearing in mind this is a product, we can do a manipulation:



    $$frac1zeta(s) = prod_textp prime 1-frac 1 p^s$$



    This looks precisely like the formula for our probability of $a,b$ being coprime but with $s$ in lieu of $2$. Indeed, letting $s=2$,



    $$P(texta,b are coprime) = prod_textp prime 1 - frac1p^2 = frac1zeta(2)$$



    $zeta(2)$ is a known value which Euler calculated to be $pi^2/6$; finding this value is often referred to as the Basel problem. Accordingly,



    $$P(texta,b are coprime) = frac1pi^2/6 = frac6pi^2$$



    The idea also generalizes further. Say you have some group of $n$ integers ($n$ a positive integer). Then the probability that all $n$ are coprime is given by



    $$P(textall n numbers are coprime) = frac1zeta(n)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This same heuristic can be applied to finding the probability that an integer is "$k$-free" (that is, an integer having no perfect $k$th power factor > 1), which also happens to be $frac1zetaleft(kright).$ In fact, the probability that greatest common divisor of $n$ integers has no perfect $k$th power factor > 1 (that is, the probability of $n$ integers being relatively $k$-prime) is $frac1zetaleft(nkright).$
      $endgroup$
      – Brian
      May 27 at 21:14















    19












    $begingroup$

    Peter's answer gets to the heart of the matter relatively quickly, but I feel it would also be best to demonstrate where the $6/pi^2$ comes from, seemingly out of nowhere to the uninitiated.



    So, it should be obvious that $a/b$ is in simplest form if and only if $a,b$ are coprime, i.e. $gcd(a,b) = 1$. Well, what does that mean? It means that $a,b$ share no common prime number factors.



    In particular, it means $a,b$ do not share a factor of $2$. For (uniformly randomly chosen) nonzero integers $a,b$ (less than some other number $x$), there is a $1/2$ chance (in the limit $x to infty$) each will have a factor of $2$. Thus,



    $$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of 2) = 1 - left(frac 1 2 right)^2$$



    Similarly, it means that they do not share a factor of $3$. There's a $1/3$ chance each will have a factor of three, and thus,



    $$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of 3) = 1 - left(frac 1 3 right)^2$$



    This clearly generalizes. Consider a prime number $p$. There is a $1/p$ chance that $a,b$ each will have it, and in turn



    $$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of p) = 1 - left(frac 1 p right)^2$$



    For $a,b$ to be coprime this needs to be true of all primes $p$. The events are independent, and we accordingly can multiply the respective probabilities for each prime $p$, obtaining



    $$P(texta,b are coprime) = prod_textp prime 1 - left(frac 1 p right)^2 = prod_textp prime 1 - frac 1 p^2$$



    This now ties into something known as the Riemann zeta function. There are two formulas typically associated with it: a summation and a product formula. We often focus on the summation formula but can derive the latter; a proof of said derivation can be found here. In any event, we focus on the prime product formula below:



    $$zeta(s) = prod_textp prime frac11-p^-s$$



    Bearing in mind this is a product, we can do a manipulation:



    $$frac1zeta(s) = prod_textp prime 1-frac 1 p^s$$



    This looks precisely like the formula for our probability of $a,b$ being coprime but with $s$ in lieu of $2$. Indeed, letting $s=2$,



    $$P(texta,b are coprime) = prod_textp prime 1 - frac1p^2 = frac1zeta(2)$$



    $zeta(2)$ is a known value which Euler calculated to be $pi^2/6$; finding this value is often referred to as the Basel problem. Accordingly,



    $$P(texta,b are coprime) = frac1pi^2/6 = frac6pi^2$$



    The idea also generalizes further. Say you have some group of $n$ integers ($n$ a positive integer). Then the probability that all $n$ are coprime is given by



    $$P(textall n numbers are coprime) = frac1zeta(n)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This same heuristic can be applied to finding the probability that an integer is "$k$-free" (that is, an integer having no perfect $k$th power factor > 1), which also happens to be $frac1zetaleft(kright).$ In fact, the probability that greatest common divisor of $n$ integers has no perfect $k$th power factor > 1 (that is, the probability of $n$ integers being relatively $k$-prime) is $frac1zetaleft(nkright).$
      $endgroup$
      – Brian
      May 27 at 21:14













    19












    19








    19





    $begingroup$

    Peter's answer gets to the heart of the matter relatively quickly, but I feel it would also be best to demonstrate where the $6/pi^2$ comes from, seemingly out of nowhere to the uninitiated.



    So, it should be obvious that $a/b$ is in simplest form if and only if $a,b$ are coprime, i.e. $gcd(a,b) = 1$. Well, what does that mean? It means that $a,b$ share no common prime number factors.



    In particular, it means $a,b$ do not share a factor of $2$. For (uniformly randomly chosen) nonzero integers $a,b$ (less than some other number $x$), there is a $1/2$ chance (in the limit $x to infty$) each will have a factor of $2$. Thus,



    $$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of 2) = 1 - left(frac 1 2 right)^2$$



    Similarly, it means that they do not share a factor of $3$. There's a $1/3$ chance each will have a factor of three, and thus,



    $$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of 3) = 1 - left(frac 1 3 right)^2$$



    This clearly generalizes. Consider a prime number $p$. There is a $1/p$ chance that $a,b$ each will have it, and in turn



    $$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of p) = 1 - left(frac 1 p right)^2$$



    For $a,b$ to be coprime this needs to be true of all primes $p$. The events are independent, and we accordingly can multiply the respective probabilities for each prime $p$, obtaining



    $$P(texta,b are coprime) = prod_textp prime 1 - left(frac 1 p right)^2 = prod_textp prime 1 - frac 1 p^2$$



    This now ties into something known as the Riemann zeta function. There are two formulas typically associated with it: a summation and a product formula. We often focus on the summation formula but can derive the latter; a proof of said derivation can be found here. In any event, we focus on the prime product formula below:



    $$zeta(s) = prod_textp prime frac11-p^-s$$



    Bearing in mind this is a product, we can do a manipulation:



    $$frac1zeta(s) = prod_textp prime 1-frac 1 p^s$$



    This looks precisely like the formula for our probability of $a,b$ being coprime but with $s$ in lieu of $2$. Indeed, letting $s=2$,



    $$P(texta,b are coprime) = prod_textp prime 1 - frac1p^2 = frac1zeta(2)$$



    $zeta(2)$ is a known value which Euler calculated to be $pi^2/6$; finding this value is often referred to as the Basel problem. Accordingly,



    $$P(texta,b are coprime) = frac1pi^2/6 = frac6pi^2$$



    The idea also generalizes further. Say you have some group of $n$ integers ($n$ a positive integer). Then the probability that all $n$ are coprime is given by



    $$P(textall n numbers are coprime) = frac1zeta(n)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Peter's answer gets to the heart of the matter relatively quickly, but I feel it would also be best to demonstrate where the $6/pi^2$ comes from, seemingly out of nowhere to the uninitiated.



    So, it should be obvious that $a/b$ is in simplest form if and only if $a,b$ are coprime, i.e. $gcd(a,b) = 1$. Well, what does that mean? It means that $a,b$ share no common prime number factors.



    In particular, it means $a,b$ do not share a factor of $2$. For (uniformly randomly chosen) nonzero integers $a,b$ (less than some other number $x$), there is a $1/2$ chance (in the limit $x to infty$) each will have a factor of $2$. Thus,



    $$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of 2) = 1 - left(frac 1 2 right)^2$$



    Similarly, it means that they do not share a factor of $3$. There's a $1/3$ chance each will have a factor of three, and thus,



    $$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of 3) = 1 - left(frac 1 3 right)^2$$



    This clearly generalizes. Consider a prime number $p$. There is a $1/p$ chance that $a,b$ each will have it, and in turn



    $$P(texta,b do not have a mutual factor of p) = 1 - left(frac 1 p right)^2$$



    For $a,b$ to be coprime this needs to be true of all primes $p$. The events are independent, and we accordingly can multiply the respective probabilities for each prime $p$, obtaining



    $$P(texta,b are coprime) = prod_textp prime 1 - left(frac 1 p right)^2 = prod_textp prime 1 - frac 1 p^2$$



    This now ties into something known as the Riemann zeta function. There are two formulas typically associated with it: a summation and a product formula. We often focus on the summation formula but can derive the latter; a proof of said derivation can be found here. In any event, we focus on the prime product formula below:



    $$zeta(s) = prod_textp prime frac11-p^-s$$



    Bearing in mind this is a product, we can do a manipulation:



    $$frac1zeta(s) = prod_textp prime 1-frac 1 p^s$$



    This looks precisely like the formula for our probability of $a,b$ being coprime but with $s$ in lieu of $2$. Indeed, letting $s=2$,



    $$P(texta,b are coprime) = prod_textp prime 1 - frac1p^2 = frac1zeta(2)$$



    $zeta(2)$ is a known value which Euler calculated to be $pi^2/6$; finding this value is often referred to as the Basel problem. Accordingly,



    $$P(texta,b are coprime) = frac1pi^2/6 = frac6pi^2$$



    The idea also generalizes further. Say you have some group of $n$ integers ($n$ a positive integer). Then the probability that all $n$ are coprime is given by



    $$P(textall n numbers are coprime) = frac1zeta(n)$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered May 27 at 20:46









    Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

    13k32046




    13k32046







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This same heuristic can be applied to finding the probability that an integer is "$k$-free" (that is, an integer having no perfect $k$th power factor > 1), which also happens to be $frac1zetaleft(kright).$ In fact, the probability that greatest common divisor of $n$ integers has no perfect $k$th power factor > 1 (that is, the probability of $n$ integers being relatively $k$-prime) is $frac1zetaleft(nkright).$
      $endgroup$
      – Brian
      May 27 at 21:14












    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This same heuristic can be applied to finding the probability that an integer is "$k$-free" (that is, an integer having no perfect $k$th power factor > 1), which also happens to be $frac1zetaleft(kright).$ In fact, the probability that greatest common divisor of $n$ integers has no perfect $k$th power factor > 1 (that is, the probability of $n$ integers being relatively $k$-prime) is $frac1zetaleft(nkright).$
      $endgroup$
      – Brian
      May 27 at 21:14







    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    This same heuristic can be applied to finding the probability that an integer is "$k$-free" (that is, an integer having no perfect $k$th power factor > 1), which also happens to be $frac1zetaleft(kright).$ In fact, the probability that greatest common divisor of $n$ integers has no perfect $k$th power factor > 1 (that is, the probability of $n$ integers being relatively $k$-prime) is $frac1zetaleft(nkright).$
    $endgroup$
    – Brian
    May 27 at 21:14




    $begingroup$
    This same heuristic can be applied to finding the probability that an integer is "$k$-free" (that is, an integer having no perfect $k$th power factor > 1), which also happens to be $frac1zetaleft(kright).$ In fact, the probability that greatest common divisor of $n$ integers has no perfect $k$th power factor > 1 (that is, the probability of $n$ integers being relatively $k$-prime) is $frac1zetaleft(nkright).$
    $endgroup$
    – Brian
    May 27 at 21:14











    6












    $begingroup$

    This question is equivalent to ask for the probability that $a$ and $b$ are coprime. If $a$ and $b$ are random integers below $x$, then the probability $P(x)$ that $a$ and $b$ are coprime , satisfies $$lim_xrightarrowinfty P(x)=frac6pi^2approx0.6079$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      6












      $begingroup$

      This question is equivalent to ask for the probability that $a$ and $b$ are coprime. If $a$ and $b$ are random integers below $x$, then the probability $P(x)$ that $a$ and $b$ are coprime , satisfies $$lim_xrightarrowinfty P(x)=frac6pi^2approx0.6079$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        This question is equivalent to ask for the probability that $a$ and $b$ are coprime. If $a$ and $b$ are random integers below $x$, then the probability $P(x)$ that $a$ and $b$ are coprime , satisfies $$lim_xrightarrowinfty P(x)=frac6pi^2approx0.6079$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        This question is equivalent to ask for the probability that $a$ and $b$ are coprime. If $a$ and $b$ are random integers below $x$, then the probability $P(x)$ that $a$ and $b$ are coprime , satisfies $$lim_xrightarrowinfty P(x)=frac6pi^2approx0.6079$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered May 27 at 20:24









        PeterPeter

        50.6k1240141




        50.6k1240141













            C1o s5SKBDtQPqyycy7sS,Qo5JJWNTQhhBgTax41s,CMROkVq7T7btSI6voqr,kw6JZ3ouyWF5rr5Li
            nre CAHW2,SAcX,N68kNw1Q8 3KceCYdS8B92s7Qbc90GD 9FUl,dkmKzgc,JboRdMT8FlWs,Jv

            Popular posts from this blog

            RemoteApp sporadic failureWindows 2008 RemoteAPP client disconnects within a matter of minutesWhat is the minimum version of RDP supported by Server 2012 RDS?How to configure a Remoteapp server to increase stabilityMicrosoft RemoteApp Active SessionRDWeb TS connection broken for some users post RemoteApp certificate changeRemote Desktop Licensing, RemoteAPPRDS 2012 R2 some users are not able to logon after changed date and time on Connection BrokersWhat happens during Remote Desktop logon, and is there any logging?After installing RDS on WinServer 2016 I still can only connect with two users?RD Connection via RDGW to Session host is not connecting

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020