Should I use n only, b only, bg, bgn, or gn?Windows 7 PC connected to 2.4 Ghz band does not recognize other computers on the networkWhat channel should I use for 2.4 GHz band?What are the key differences between 2.4 Ghz and 5 Ghz Wifi distribution?What is the maximum connections practically supported by a 2.4 GHz router?Unable to connect to 2.4 GHz WiFi band?Selecting wifi adapter on Windows 7Dual-band wifi router to dual-band extender: can/should I use a single SSID name?Can I set my wireless network card to connect only to 2.4 GHz wireless networks?Which WiFi channel to use?manually choosing best 802.11ac wifi channel in 5 GHz band

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

How do I avoid typing "git" at the begining of every Git command?

How to make a composition of functions prettier?

Does a single fopen introduce TOCTOU vulnerability?

Is it true that "only photographers care about noise"?

What's the difference between DHCP and NAT? Are they mutually exclusive?

Why is long-term living in Almost-Earth causing severe health problems?

A life of PhD: is it feasible?

Oil draining out shortly after turbo hose detached/broke

How can powerful telekinesis avoid violating Newton's 3rd Law?

Problem with pronounciation

Why are ambiguous grammars bad?

Why does there seem to be an extreme lack of public trashcans in Taiwan?

What does the homotopy coherent nerve do to spaces of enriched functors?

Enchiridion, 16: Does a stoic moan, or not?

What is this object?

Should I list a completely different profession in my technical resume?

Forgot passport for Alaska cruise (Anchorage to Vancouver)

Is it advisable to add a location heads-up when a scene changes in a novel?

How to generate list of *all* available commands and functions?

Mathematica 12 has gotten worse at solving simple equations?

If absolute velocity does not exist, how can we say a rocket accelerates in empty space?

What is the theme of analysis?

Makefile for a simple Debian Repo

What do you call the action of "describing events as they happen" like sports anchors do?



Should I use n only, b only, bg, bgn, or gn?


Windows 7 PC connected to 2.4 Ghz band does not recognize other computers on the networkWhat channel should I use for 2.4 GHz band?What are the key differences between 2.4 Ghz and 5 Ghz Wifi distribution?What is the maximum connections practically supported by a 2.4 GHz router?Unable to connect to 2.4 GHz WiFi band?Selecting wifi adapter on Windows 7Dual-band wifi router to dual-band extender: can/should I use a single SSID name?Can I set my wireless network card to connect only to 2.4 GHz wireless networks?Which WiFi channel to use?manually choosing best 802.11ac wifi channel in 5 GHz band






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








2















I have a choice between n only, b only, bg, bgn, and gn on my 2.4 GHz wifi and I would like to know which one would be the fastest for me.










share|improve this question




























    2















    I have a choice between n only, b only, bg, bgn, and gn on my 2.4 GHz wifi and I would like to know which one would be the fastest for me.










    share|improve this question
























      2












      2








      2








      I have a choice between n only, b only, bg, bgn, and gn on my 2.4 GHz wifi and I would like to know which one would be the fastest for me.










      share|improve this question














      I have a choice between n only, b only, bg, bgn, and gn on my 2.4 GHz wifi and I would like to know which one would be the fastest for me.







      wireless-networking performance






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked May 27 at 16:43









      NicoleNicole

      161




      161




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          BGN. You need N for speed, and B and G for range and compatibility with older devices.



          If you still have any devices that only use B or G and you use them a lot, you will probably want to replace them (or upgrade their wireless cards) to something more modern. Slow devices using the network heavily gobble up valuable airtime. Contrary to popular myth, leaving B and G enabled on your AP is not harmful, and in fact it helps even your most modern clients stay connected at long range. Having B and G devices on your network occasionally is not a big deal.






          share|improve this answer























          • do you have any evidence that G routers help moden clients stay connected at longer range then N routers? Googling has only revealed this assertion from you, with other assertions to the contrary - almost all most claiming 802.11n has at least twice the range - typically put down to MIMO, which makes sense to me.

            – davidgo
            May 28 at 1:48


















          2














          I partially disagree with @spiff's answer (were it N vs AC I would agree). Forcing n only connectivity can increase your available bandwidth and thus throughput significantly.



          There are 2 reasons for this - the one which seems to be overlooked is the addition of "wide channels" on 802.11n standard which greatly increases available bandwidth. By keeping backward compatibility with G (and B) devices you lose the substantial speed advantage of wide channels.



          Another, much lesser reason is that when G devices do connect they waste bandwidth for everyone by transmitting at a slower speed. This is not much if a disadvantage unless the 802.11g device is actively transmitting or receiving.



          I am also not convinced that 802.11B should be enabled - its an ancient standard and I struggle to believe that you can get better distance from it - I posit that - as a rule - devices designed around this standard are so old they can't have the sensitivity of newer devices. 802.11 N, with the addition of MIMI actively cancels echo/reflections and, by creating corridors must be able to reach further then 802.11B and G).



          Also see:



          • Ten Tips and Considerations on Upgrading to Wireless N


          • Can you mix 802.11ac Access Points with 802.11n Wireless? (although it seems to miss the point that 802.11ac is 5 Ghz only)


          • Four ways to get the most from your 802.11n Wi-Fi






          share|improve this answer

























          • Your main disagreement is based on a misunderstanding. You can leave 40MHz channels enabled concurrently with B and G. In fact, the IEEE 802.11n standard only specifies two channel width modes: 20MHz only, and 20/40 auto. A few vendors have a nonstandard 40MHz only mode that is not recommended (because in some RF conditions 40MHz-capable clients will choose to use 20MHz mode when it is more robust than 40MHz channels). Also, 40MHz channel mode in 2.4GHz is widely discouraged, because it does not leave enough room in the band for Bluetooth and other 2.4GHz-using technologies.

            – Spiff
            May 28 at 1:40











          • @spiff interesting, and possibly correct. I'll look into it some more.

            – davidgo
            May 28 at 2:11


















          0














          I would base this on your devices that you use on your network, if you know that all your devices use 802.11g or newer then it's safe to set it to g/n likewise, if you still have some 802.11b devices kicking around then keep it at BGN for compatibility. 802.11b has a maximum theoretical transfer speed of 11Mbps, 802.11g has a maximum theoretical speed of 54Mbps and 802.11n has a maximum theoretical speed of up to 300Mbps (When configured correctly).






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "3"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1441795%2fshould-i-use-n-only-b-only-bg-bgn-or-gn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5














            BGN. You need N for speed, and B and G for range and compatibility with older devices.



            If you still have any devices that only use B or G and you use them a lot, you will probably want to replace them (or upgrade their wireless cards) to something more modern. Slow devices using the network heavily gobble up valuable airtime. Contrary to popular myth, leaving B and G enabled on your AP is not harmful, and in fact it helps even your most modern clients stay connected at long range. Having B and G devices on your network occasionally is not a big deal.






            share|improve this answer























            • do you have any evidence that G routers help moden clients stay connected at longer range then N routers? Googling has only revealed this assertion from you, with other assertions to the contrary - almost all most claiming 802.11n has at least twice the range - typically put down to MIMO, which makes sense to me.

              – davidgo
              May 28 at 1:48















            5














            BGN. You need N for speed, and B and G for range and compatibility with older devices.



            If you still have any devices that only use B or G and you use them a lot, you will probably want to replace them (or upgrade their wireless cards) to something more modern. Slow devices using the network heavily gobble up valuable airtime. Contrary to popular myth, leaving B and G enabled on your AP is not harmful, and in fact it helps even your most modern clients stay connected at long range. Having B and G devices on your network occasionally is not a big deal.






            share|improve this answer























            • do you have any evidence that G routers help moden clients stay connected at longer range then N routers? Googling has only revealed this assertion from you, with other assertions to the contrary - almost all most claiming 802.11n has at least twice the range - typically put down to MIMO, which makes sense to me.

              – davidgo
              May 28 at 1:48













            5












            5








            5







            BGN. You need N for speed, and B and G for range and compatibility with older devices.



            If you still have any devices that only use B or G and you use them a lot, you will probably want to replace them (or upgrade their wireless cards) to something more modern. Slow devices using the network heavily gobble up valuable airtime. Contrary to popular myth, leaving B and G enabled on your AP is not harmful, and in fact it helps even your most modern clients stay connected at long range. Having B and G devices on your network occasionally is not a big deal.






            share|improve this answer













            BGN. You need N for speed, and B and G for range and compatibility with older devices.



            If you still have any devices that only use B or G and you use them a lot, you will probably want to replace them (or upgrade their wireless cards) to something more modern. Slow devices using the network heavily gobble up valuable airtime. Contrary to popular myth, leaving B and G enabled on your AP is not harmful, and in fact it helps even your most modern clients stay connected at long range. Having B and G devices on your network occasionally is not a big deal.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered May 27 at 16:52









            SpiffSpiff

            78.9k10121166




            78.9k10121166












            • do you have any evidence that G routers help moden clients stay connected at longer range then N routers? Googling has only revealed this assertion from you, with other assertions to the contrary - almost all most claiming 802.11n has at least twice the range - typically put down to MIMO, which makes sense to me.

              – davidgo
              May 28 at 1:48

















            • do you have any evidence that G routers help moden clients stay connected at longer range then N routers? Googling has only revealed this assertion from you, with other assertions to the contrary - almost all most claiming 802.11n has at least twice the range - typically put down to MIMO, which makes sense to me.

              – davidgo
              May 28 at 1:48
















            do you have any evidence that G routers help moden clients stay connected at longer range then N routers? Googling has only revealed this assertion from you, with other assertions to the contrary - almost all most claiming 802.11n has at least twice the range - typically put down to MIMO, which makes sense to me.

            – davidgo
            May 28 at 1:48





            do you have any evidence that G routers help moden clients stay connected at longer range then N routers? Googling has only revealed this assertion from you, with other assertions to the contrary - almost all most claiming 802.11n has at least twice the range - typically put down to MIMO, which makes sense to me.

            – davidgo
            May 28 at 1:48













            2














            I partially disagree with @spiff's answer (were it N vs AC I would agree). Forcing n only connectivity can increase your available bandwidth and thus throughput significantly.



            There are 2 reasons for this - the one which seems to be overlooked is the addition of "wide channels" on 802.11n standard which greatly increases available bandwidth. By keeping backward compatibility with G (and B) devices you lose the substantial speed advantage of wide channels.



            Another, much lesser reason is that when G devices do connect they waste bandwidth for everyone by transmitting at a slower speed. This is not much if a disadvantage unless the 802.11g device is actively transmitting or receiving.



            I am also not convinced that 802.11B should be enabled - its an ancient standard and I struggle to believe that you can get better distance from it - I posit that - as a rule - devices designed around this standard are so old they can't have the sensitivity of newer devices. 802.11 N, with the addition of MIMI actively cancels echo/reflections and, by creating corridors must be able to reach further then 802.11B and G).



            Also see:



            • Ten Tips and Considerations on Upgrading to Wireless N


            • Can you mix 802.11ac Access Points with 802.11n Wireless? (although it seems to miss the point that 802.11ac is 5 Ghz only)


            • Four ways to get the most from your 802.11n Wi-Fi






            share|improve this answer

























            • Your main disagreement is based on a misunderstanding. You can leave 40MHz channels enabled concurrently with B and G. In fact, the IEEE 802.11n standard only specifies two channel width modes: 20MHz only, and 20/40 auto. A few vendors have a nonstandard 40MHz only mode that is not recommended (because in some RF conditions 40MHz-capable clients will choose to use 20MHz mode when it is more robust than 40MHz channels). Also, 40MHz channel mode in 2.4GHz is widely discouraged, because it does not leave enough room in the band for Bluetooth and other 2.4GHz-using technologies.

              – Spiff
              May 28 at 1:40











            • @spiff interesting, and possibly correct. I'll look into it some more.

              – davidgo
              May 28 at 2:11















            2














            I partially disagree with @spiff's answer (were it N vs AC I would agree). Forcing n only connectivity can increase your available bandwidth and thus throughput significantly.



            There are 2 reasons for this - the one which seems to be overlooked is the addition of "wide channels" on 802.11n standard which greatly increases available bandwidth. By keeping backward compatibility with G (and B) devices you lose the substantial speed advantage of wide channels.



            Another, much lesser reason is that when G devices do connect they waste bandwidth for everyone by transmitting at a slower speed. This is not much if a disadvantage unless the 802.11g device is actively transmitting or receiving.



            I am also not convinced that 802.11B should be enabled - its an ancient standard and I struggle to believe that you can get better distance from it - I posit that - as a rule - devices designed around this standard are so old they can't have the sensitivity of newer devices. 802.11 N, with the addition of MIMI actively cancels echo/reflections and, by creating corridors must be able to reach further then 802.11B and G).



            Also see:



            • Ten Tips and Considerations on Upgrading to Wireless N


            • Can you mix 802.11ac Access Points with 802.11n Wireless? (although it seems to miss the point that 802.11ac is 5 Ghz only)


            • Four ways to get the most from your 802.11n Wi-Fi






            share|improve this answer

























            • Your main disagreement is based on a misunderstanding. You can leave 40MHz channels enabled concurrently with B and G. In fact, the IEEE 802.11n standard only specifies two channel width modes: 20MHz only, and 20/40 auto. A few vendors have a nonstandard 40MHz only mode that is not recommended (because in some RF conditions 40MHz-capable clients will choose to use 20MHz mode when it is more robust than 40MHz channels). Also, 40MHz channel mode in 2.4GHz is widely discouraged, because it does not leave enough room in the band for Bluetooth and other 2.4GHz-using technologies.

              – Spiff
              May 28 at 1:40











            • @spiff interesting, and possibly correct. I'll look into it some more.

              – davidgo
              May 28 at 2:11













            2












            2








            2







            I partially disagree with @spiff's answer (were it N vs AC I would agree). Forcing n only connectivity can increase your available bandwidth and thus throughput significantly.



            There are 2 reasons for this - the one which seems to be overlooked is the addition of "wide channels" on 802.11n standard which greatly increases available bandwidth. By keeping backward compatibility with G (and B) devices you lose the substantial speed advantage of wide channels.



            Another, much lesser reason is that when G devices do connect they waste bandwidth for everyone by transmitting at a slower speed. This is not much if a disadvantage unless the 802.11g device is actively transmitting or receiving.



            I am also not convinced that 802.11B should be enabled - its an ancient standard and I struggle to believe that you can get better distance from it - I posit that - as a rule - devices designed around this standard are so old they can't have the sensitivity of newer devices. 802.11 N, with the addition of MIMI actively cancels echo/reflections and, by creating corridors must be able to reach further then 802.11B and G).



            Also see:



            • Ten Tips and Considerations on Upgrading to Wireless N


            • Can you mix 802.11ac Access Points with 802.11n Wireless? (although it seems to miss the point that 802.11ac is 5 Ghz only)


            • Four ways to get the most from your 802.11n Wi-Fi






            share|improve this answer















            I partially disagree with @spiff's answer (were it N vs AC I would agree). Forcing n only connectivity can increase your available bandwidth and thus throughput significantly.



            There are 2 reasons for this - the one which seems to be overlooked is the addition of "wide channels" on 802.11n standard which greatly increases available bandwidth. By keeping backward compatibility with G (and B) devices you lose the substantial speed advantage of wide channels.



            Another, much lesser reason is that when G devices do connect they waste bandwidth for everyone by transmitting at a slower speed. This is not much if a disadvantage unless the 802.11g device is actively transmitting or receiving.



            I am also not convinced that 802.11B should be enabled - its an ancient standard and I struggle to believe that you can get better distance from it - I posit that - as a rule - devices designed around this standard are so old they can't have the sensitivity of newer devices. 802.11 N, with the addition of MIMI actively cancels echo/reflections and, by creating corridors must be able to reach further then 802.11B and G).



            Also see:



            • Ten Tips and Considerations on Upgrading to Wireless N


            • Can you mix 802.11ac Access Points with 802.11n Wireless? (although it seems to miss the point that 802.11ac is 5 Ghz only)


            • Four ways to get the most from your 802.11n Wi-Fi







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited May 28 at 1:33









            muru

            860524




            860524










            answered May 27 at 19:15









            davidgodavidgo

            46.4k75897




            46.4k75897












            • Your main disagreement is based on a misunderstanding. You can leave 40MHz channels enabled concurrently with B and G. In fact, the IEEE 802.11n standard only specifies two channel width modes: 20MHz only, and 20/40 auto. A few vendors have a nonstandard 40MHz only mode that is not recommended (because in some RF conditions 40MHz-capable clients will choose to use 20MHz mode when it is more robust than 40MHz channels). Also, 40MHz channel mode in 2.4GHz is widely discouraged, because it does not leave enough room in the band for Bluetooth and other 2.4GHz-using technologies.

              – Spiff
              May 28 at 1:40











            • @spiff interesting, and possibly correct. I'll look into it some more.

              – davidgo
              May 28 at 2:11

















            • Your main disagreement is based on a misunderstanding. You can leave 40MHz channels enabled concurrently with B and G. In fact, the IEEE 802.11n standard only specifies two channel width modes: 20MHz only, and 20/40 auto. A few vendors have a nonstandard 40MHz only mode that is not recommended (because in some RF conditions 40MHz-capable clients will choose to use 20MHz mode when it is more robust than 40MHz channels). Also, 40MHz channel mode in 2.4GHz is widely discouraged, because it does not leave enough room in the band for Bluetooth and other 2.4GHz-using technologies.

              – Spiff
              May 28 at 1:40











            • @spiff interesting, and possibly correct. I'll look into it some more.

              – davidgo
              May 28 at 2:11
















            Your main disagreement is based on a misunderstanding. You can leave 40MHz channels enabled concurrently with B and G. In fact, the IEEE 802.11n standard only specifies two channel width modes: 20MHz only, and 20/40 auto. A few vendors have a nonstandard 40MHz only mode that is not recommended (because in some RF conditions 40MHz-capable clients will choose to use 20MHz mode when it is more robust than 40MHz channels). Also, 40MHz channel mode in 2.4GHz is widely discouraged, because it does not leave enough room in the band for Bluetooth and other 2.4GHz-using technologies.

            – Spiff
            May 28 at 1:40





            Your main disagreement is based on a misunderstanding. You can leave 40MHz channels enabled concurrently with B and G. In fact, the IEEE 802.11n standard only specifies two channel width modes: 20MHz only, and 20/40 auto. A few vendors have a nonstandard 40MHz only mode that is not recommended (because in some RF conditions 40MHz-capable clients will choose to use 20MHz mode when it is more robust than 40MHz channels). Also, 40MHz channel mode in 2.4GHz is widely discouraged, because it does not leave enough room in the band for Bluetooth and other 2.4GHz-using technologies.

            – Spiff
            May 28 at 1:40













            @spiff interesting, and possibly correct. I'll look into it some more.

            – davidgo
            May 28 at 2:11





            @spiff interesting, and possibly correct. I'll look into it some more.

            – davidgo
            May 28 at 2:11











            0














            I would base this on your devices that you use on your network, if you know that all your devices use 802.11g or newer then it's safe to set it to g/n likewise, if you still have some 802.11b devices kicking around then keep it at BGN for compatibility. 802.11b has a maximum theoretical transfer speed of 11Mbps, 802.11g has a maximum theoretical speed of 54Mbps and 802.11n has a maximum theoretical speed of up to 300Mbps (When configured correctly).






            share|improve this answer



























              0














              I would base this on your devices that you use on your network, if you know that all your devices use 802.11g or newer then it's safe to set it to g/n likewise, if you still have some 802.11b devices kicking around then keep it at BGN for compatibility. 802.11b has a maximum theoretical transfer speed of 11Mbps, 802.11g has a maximum theoretical speed of 54Mbps and 802.11n has a maximum theoretical speed of up to 300Mbps (When configured correctly).






              share|improve this answer

























                0












                0








                0







                I would base this on your devices that you use on your network, if you know that all your devices use 802.11g or newer then it's safe to set it to g/n likewise, if you still have some 802.11b devices kicking around then keep it at BGN for compatibility. 802.11b has a maximum theoretical transfer speed of 11Mbps, 802.11g has a maximum theoretical speed of 54Mbps and 802.11n has a maximum theoretical speed of up to 300Mbps (When configured correctly).






                share|improve this answer













                I would base this on your devices that you use on your network, if you know that all your devices use 802.11g or newer then it's safe to set it to g/n likewise, if you still have some 802.11b devices kicking around then keep it at BGN for compatibility. 802.11b has a maximum theoretical transfer speed of 11Mbps, 802.11g has a maximum theoretical speed of 54Mbps and 802.11n has a maximum theoretical speed of up to 300Mbps (When configured correctly).







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Jun 2 at 13:44









                Hoi Kay LiHoi Kay Li

                61




                61



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1441795%2fshould-i-use-n-only-b-only-bg-bgn-or-gn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    kXoxEltk Vv6ISD,jVHbg6 lHYImp6s8 bvPvSBhv
                    wmNh6ifjXkcdmgFcsjPDsp,0j mqvR7olwrgX3CdtCScmkj8Nb7i5fJV6dGiDJkd3gEB,OFOK AMfckOM,Q

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

                    Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                    Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020