Would an object launched by the Catapult spell do full damage against a Scarecrow?Are spells that do piercing, bludgeoning, or slashing damage considered magical damage?How can one obtain an adamantine weapon?Damage reduction and damage resistance: how to calculate?How does the Lich's Tether Lair Action interact with damage resistance?What happens when a creature with vulnerability to a damage type has resistance to the same type imposed on it, or vice versa?Is there a cantrip or spell that grants resistance to damage from natural attacks in the way Blade Ward does for weapon damage?Do attacks from Conjure Animals creatures count as magical?Does the Ancestral Guardian barbarian's Ancestral Protectors feature grant resistance against spells such as fireball and toll the dead?Is the war cleric's divine strike considered non-magical damage?Are Flameskulls resistant to magical piercing damage?
Why is my power MOSFET heating up when on?
What is the logic behind charging tax _in the form of money_ for owning property when the property does not produce money?
That's not my X, its Y is too Z
In Pandemic, why take the extra step of eradicating a disease after you've cured it?
When to use и or а as “and”?
What do I need to do, tax-wise, for a sudden windfall?
Does a single fopen introduce TOCTOU vulnerability?
What does the homotopy coherent nerve do to spaces of enriched functors?
Create a cube from identical 3D objects
Make Gimbap cutter
Problem with pronounciation
Playing a trill with grace note ending
What would the consequences be of a high number of solar systems being within close proximity to one another?
How to change the headfont of newtheorem environments to match komascript font?
Is Jesus the last Prophet?
Oil draining out shortly after turbo hose detached/broke
How to represent jealousy in a cute way?
Why does there seem to be an extreme lack of public trashcans in Taiwan?
What is this object?
Why are ambiguous grammars bad?
How to befriend someone who doesn't like to talk?
What does this line mean in Zelazny's "The Courts of Chaos"?
Suppose leased car is totalled: what are financial implications?
Forgot passport for Alaska cruise (Anchorage to Vancouver)
Would an object launched by the Catapult spell do full damage against a Scarecrow?
Are spells that do piercing, bludgeoning, or slashing damage considered magical damage?How can one obtain an adamantine weapon?Damage reduction and damage resistance: how to calculate?How does the Lich's Tether Lair Action interact with damage resistance?What happens when a creature with vulnerability to a damage type has resistance to the same type imposed on it, or vice versa?Is there a cantrip or spell that grants resistance to damage from natural attacks in the way Blade Ward does for weapon damage?Do attacks from Conjure Animals creatures count as magical?Does the Ancestral Guardian barbarian's Ancestral Protectors feature grant resistance against spells such as fireball and toll the dead?Is the war cleric's divine strike considered non-magical damage?Are Flameskulls resistant to magical piercing damage?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
A Wizard uses the spell Catapult (EEPC, p. 15-16; XGtE, p. 150) against a Scarecrow (MM, pg. 268).
Catapult flings an object that is not worn or carried toward a scarecrow and hits.
The scarecrow has damage resistance to bludgeoning, piercing, and slashing from nonmagical attacks.
Does Catapult do full damage, or reduced damage in this scenario?
dnd-5e spells monsters damage-resistance
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A Wizard uses the spell Catapult (EEPC, p. 15-16; XGtE, p. 150) against a Scarecrow (MM, pg. 268).
Catapult flings an object that is not worn or carried toward a scarecrow and hits.
The scarecrow has damage resistance to bludgeoning, piercing, and slashing from nonmagical attacks.
Does Catapult do full damage, or reduced damage in this scenario?
dnd-5e spells monsters damage-resistance
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A Wizard uses the spell Catapult (EEPC, p. 15-16; XGtE, p. 150) against a Scarecrow (MM, pg. 268).
Catapult flings an object that is not worn or carried toward a scarecrow and hits.
The scarecrow has damage resistance to bludgeoning, piercing, and slashing from nonmagical attacks.
Does Catapult do full damage, or reduced damage in this scenario?
dnd-5e spells monsters damage-resistance
$endgroup$
A Wizard uses the spell Catapult (EEPC, p. 15-16; XGtE, p. 150) against a Scarecrow (MM, pg. 268).
Catapult flings an object that is not worn or carried toward a scarecrow and hits.
The scarecrow has damage resistance to bludgeoning, piercing, and slashing from nonmagical attacks.
Does Catapult do full damage, or reduced damage in this scenario?
dnd-5e spells monsters damage-resistance
dnd-5e spells monsters damage-resistance
edited May 28 at 19:59
V2Blast
30.6k5112185
30.6k5112185
asked May 27 at 19:28
GuyGuy
2,69511330
2,69511330
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The catapult does full damage
The catapult deals bludgeoning damage. Scarecrow, in its most recent version, has a resistance towards Bludgeoning, Piercing, and Slashing damage from Nonmagical Attacks (emphasis mine; see the monster's stat block on DnDBeyond). Catapult, however, is not an attack as the damage comes from a failed saving throw and not an attack roll, so the resistance does not apply.
You can find the change to the wording of the resistance in the Global section of the errata document here.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
So if you used Bigby's hand to push them off a cliff they would take full damage from the fall? This seems to imply that any time you save vs. damage you would not get to apply your resistance.Is this a loophole that is only detrimental to monsters?
$endgroup$
– Guy
May 27 at 20:34
$begingroup$
@Guy Only when the resistance says it's specifically against attacks. If it's a general damage type resistance without such stipulation, the resistance applies against any source of that type of damage.
$endgroup$
– kviiri
May 27 at 20:39
$begingroup$
Hmm. Well, I don't think I would personally rule this way in my game but the answer looks RAW backed so it shall be accepted!
$endgroup$
– Guy
May 28 at 16:29
$begingroup$
@Guy Out of curiosity, would you personally rule otherwise for any spell dealing piercing/bludgeoning/slashing damage? Or elemental damage? What's your criteria for what's sourced from magic vs not?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
May 28 at 20:00
$begingroup$
@Guy That's a separate damage situation that deserves its own question, and I think already has one. I am pretty sure that the example question had to do with a werewolf falling off of a cliff. Page 17, right hand column, Sage Advice Compendium
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
May 28 at 20:31
|
show 6 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148779%2fwould-an-object-launched-by-the-catapult-spell-do-full-damage-against-a-scarecro%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The catapult does full damage
The catapult deals bludgeoning damage. Scarecrow, in its most recent version, has a resistance towards Bludgeoning, Piercing, and Slashing damage from Nonmagical Attacks (emphasis mine; see the monster's stat block on DnDBeyond). Catapult, however, is not an attack as the damage comes from a failed saving throw and not an attack roll, so the resistance does not apply.
You can find the change to the wording of the resistance in the Global section of the errata document here.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
So if you used Bigby's hand to push them off a cliff they would take full damage from the fall? This seems to imply that any time you save vs. damage you would not get to apply your resistance.Is this a loophole that is only detrimental to monsters?
$endgroup$
– Guy
May 27 at 20:34
$begingroup$
@Guy Only when the resistance says it's specifically against attacks. If it's a general damage type resistance without such stipulation, the resistance applies against any source of that type of damage.
$endgroup$
– kviiri
May 27 at 20:39
$begingroup$
Hmm. Well, I don't think I would personally rule this way in my game but the answer looks RAW backed so it shall be accepted!
$endgroup$
– Guy
May 28 at 16:29
$begingroup$
@Guy Out of curiosity, would you personally rule otherwise for any spell dealing piercing/bludgeoning/slashing damage? Or elemental damage? What's your criteria for what's sourced from magic vs not?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
May 28 at 20:00
$begingroup$
@Guy That's a separate damage situation that deserves its own question, and I think already has one. I am pretty sure that the example question had to do with a werewolf falling off of a cliff. Page 17, right hand column, Sage Advice Compendium
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
May 28 at 20:31
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
The catapult does full damage
The catapult deals bludgeoning damage. Scarecrow, in its most recent version, has a resistance towards Bludgeoning, Piercing, and Slashing damage from Nonmagical Attacks (emphasis mine; see the monster's stat block on DnDBeyond). Catapult, however, is not an attack as the damage comes from a failed saving throw and not an attack roll, so the resistance does not apply.
You can find the change to the wording of the resistance in the Global section of the errata document here.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
So if you used Bigby's hand to push them off a cliff they would take full damage from the fall? This seems to imply that any time you save vs. damage you would not get to apply your resistance.Is this a loophole that is only detrimental to monsters?
$endgroup$
– Guy
May 27 at 20:34
$begingroup$
@Guy Only when the resistance says it's specifically against attacks. If it's a general damage type resistance without such stipulation, the resistance applies against any source of that type of damage.
$endgroup$
– kviiri
May 27 at 20:39
$begingroup$
Hmm. Well, I don't think I would personally rule this way in my game but the answer looks RAW backed so it shall be accepted!
$endgroup$
– Guy
May 28 at 16:29
$begingroup$
@Guy Out of curiosity, would you personally rule otherwise for any spell dealing piercing/bludgeoning/slashing damage? Or elemental damage? What's your criteria for what's sourced from magic vs not?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
May 28 at 20:00
$begingroup$
@Guy That's a separate damage situation that deserves its own question, and I think already has one. I am pretty sure that the example question had to do with a werewolf falling off of a cliff. Page 17, right hand column, Sage Advice Compendium
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
May 28 at 20:31
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
The catapult does full damage
The catapult deals bludgeoning damage. Scarecrow, in its most recent version, has a resistance towards Bludgeoning, Piercing, and Slashing damage from Nonmagical Attacks (emphasis mine; see the monster's stat block on DnDBeyond). Catapult, however, is not an attack as the damage comes from a failed saving throw and not an attack roll, so the resistance does not apply.
You can find the change to the wording of the resistance in the Global section of the errata document here.
$endgroup$
The catapult does full damage
The catapult deals bludgeoning damage. Scarecrow, in its most recent version, has a resistance towards Bludgeoning, Piercing, and Slashing damage from Nonmagical Attacks (emphasis mine; see the monster's stat block on DnDBeyond). Catapult, however, is not an attack as the damage comes from a failed saving throw and not an attack roll, so the resistance does not apply.
You can find the change to the wording of the resistance in the Global section of the errata document here.
answered May 27 at 19:33
kviirikviiri
39.2k13151220
39.2k13151220
1
$begingroup$
So if you used Bigby's hand to push them off a cliff they would take full damage from the fall? This seems to imply that any time you save vs. damage you would not get to apply your resistance.Is this a loophole that is only detrimental to monsters?
$endgroup$
– Guy
May 27 at 20:34
$begingroup$
@Guy Only when the resistance says it's specifically against attacks. If it's a general damage type resistance without such stipulation, the resistance applies against any source of that type of damage.
$endgroup$
– kviiri
May 27 at 20:39
$begingroup$
Hmm. Well, I don't think I would personally rule this way in my game but the answer looks RAW backed so it shall be accepted!
$endgroup$
– Guy
May 28 at 16:29
$begingroup$
@Guy Out of curiosity, would you personally rule otherwise for any spell dealing piercing/bludgeoning/slashing damage? Or elemental damage? What's your criteria for what's sourced from magic vs not?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
May 28 at 20:00
$begingroup$
@Guy That's a separate damage situation that deserves its own question, and I think already has one. I am pretty sure that the example question had to do with a werewolf falling off of a cliff. Page 17, right hand column, Sage Advice Compendium
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
May 28 at 20:31
|
show 6 more comments
1
$begingroup$
So if you used Bigby's hand to push them off a cliff they would take full damage from the fall? This seems to imply that any time you save vs. damage you would not get to apply your resistance.Is this a loophole that is only detrimental to monsters?
$endgroup$
– Guy
May 27 at 20:34
$begingroup$
@Guy Only when the resistance says it's specifically against attacks. If it's a general damage type resistance without such stipulation, the resistance applies against any source of that type of damage.
$endgroup$
– kviiri
May 27 at 20:39
$begingroup$
Hmm. Well, I don't think I would personally rule this way in my game but the answer looks RAW backed so it shall be accepted!
$endgroup$
– Guy
May 28 at 16:29
$begingroup$
@Guy Out of curiosity, would you personally rule otherwise for any spell dealing piercing/bludgeoning/slashing damage? Or elemental damage? What's your criteria for what's sourced from magic vs not?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
May 28 at 20:00
$begingroup$
@Guy That's a separate damage situation that deserves its own question, and I think already has one. I am pretty sure that the example question had to do with a werewolf falling off of a cliff. Page 17, right hand column, Sage Advice Compendium
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
May 28 at 20:31
1
1
$begingroup$
So if you used Bigby's hand to push them off a cliff they would take full damage from the fall? This seems to imply that any time you save vs. damage you would not get to apply your resistance.Is this a loophole that is only detrimental to monsters?
$endgroup$
– Guy
May 27 at 20:34
$begingroup$
So if you used Bigby's hand to push them off a cliff they would take full damage from the fall? This seems to imply that any time you save vs. damage you would not get to apply your resistance.Is this a loophole that is only detrimental to monsters?
$endgroup$
– Guy
May 27 at 20:34
$begingroup$
@Guy Only when the resistance says it's specifically against attacks. If it's a general damage type resistance without such stipulation, the resistance applies against any source of that type of damage.
$endgroup$
– kviiri
May 27 at 20:39
$begingroup$
@Guy Only when the resistance says it's specifically against attacks. If it's a general damage type resistance without such stipulation, the resistance applies against any source of that type of damage.
$endgroup$
– kviiri
May 27 at 20:39
$begingroup$
Hmm. Well, I don't think I would personally rule this way in my game but the answer looks RAW backed so it shall be accepted!
$endgroup$
– Guy
May 28 at 16:29
$begingroup$
Hmm. Well, I don't think I would personally rule this way in my game but the answer looks RAW backed so it shall be accepted!
$endgroup$
– Guy
May 28 at 16:29
$begingroup$
@Guy Out of curiosity, would you personally rule otherwise for any spell dealing piercing/bludgeoning/slashing damage? Or elemental damage? What's your criteria for what's sourced from magic vs not?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
May 28 at 20:00
$begingroup$
@Guy Out of curiosity, would you personally rule otherwise for any spell dealing piercing/bludgeoning/slashing damage? Or elemental damage? What's your criteria for what's sourced from magic vs not?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
May 28 at 20:00
$begingroup$
@Guy That's a separate damage situation that deserves its own question, and I think already has one. I am pretty sure that the example question had to do with a werewolf falling off of a cliff. Page 17, right hand column, Sage Advice Compendium
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
May 28 at 20:31
$begingroup$
@Guy That's a separate damage situation that deserves its own question, and I think already has one. I am pretty sure that the example question had to do with a werewolf falling off of a cliff. Page 17, right hand column, Sage Advice Compendium
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
May 28 at 20:31
|
show 6 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148779%2fwould-an-object-launched-by-the-catapult-spell-do-full-damage-against-a-scarecro%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown